Bladder Cancer: What - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Bladder Cancer: What

Description:

Smits et al. Urology, 52: 1009, 1998. Using 1.5mm depth of invasion as cutoff ... Dalbagni et al, Urology, 10: 19-24, 2003. Dutta et al. J Urol, 166: 490-3. 2001 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:762
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: DSS9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bladder Cancer: What


1
Bladder Cancer Whats New?
  • Douglas S. Scherr, M.D.
  • Assistant Professor of Urology
  • Clinical Director, Urologic Oncology
  • Weill Medical College-Cornell University

2
Epidemiology
  • 5th most common cancer in menwith 55,000 new
    cases in 2002
  • 12,000 cancer related deaths/year
  • Approximately 11,000 are T1
  • MengtWomen

3
Estimated new cancer cases.10 leading sites by
gender, US, 2000
38 300
14 900
4
Estimated cancer deaths.10 leading sites by
gender, US, 2000
8 100
4 100
5
Pathology of Superficial Bladder Cancer
  • 90 Transitional Cell Carcinoma (TCC)
  • 5 squamous cell - more common in middle east
    schistosomiasis -also seen in chronic
    catheterization
  • 0.5-2 Adenocarcinoma - urachal

6
Epidemiology
  • 2.8 lifetime risk in caucasian men0.9 lifetime
    risk in African American men
  • 1 risk in caucasian women0.6 African American
    women
  • Carcinogens implicated in bladder cancer could
    have 40 year latency period

7
Risk Factors for Superficial TCC
  • Cigarette smoking 2-4 fold increase
    risk 4-Aminobiphenyl O-toluidine
  • Arylamine exposure 2-Naphthylamine Benzidine 4-
    Aminobiphenyl
  • Chemotherapy cyclophosphamide
  • Pelvic radiation therapy

8
Bladder Cancer
WHO, International Society of Urological
Pathology Consensus Classification of Urothelial
Neoplasms
9
Urinary Cytology
  • Voided or urine washing
  • 40-60 sensitivity(as high as 90 in G3
    Lesions)
  • Dependent on grade of tumor

Incidence of urine cytology according to grade
Heney et al. J Urol, 130 1083, 1983
10
Natural HistoryTa Tumor
  • Recurrence and Progression
  • Overall 60-70 recurrence rate
  • Progression based on Grade Low grade 4-5
    progression High grade 39 progression (26
    died of TCC)

Bostwick, DG J Cell Biochem, 16131, 1992 Herr
et al. J Urol, 163 60, 2000
11
Natural HistoryTis
  • 54 progress to muscle invasive disease
  • If diffuse and associated with symptoms
    progression rate higher
  • Worse prognosis if associated with papillary tumor

Lamm et al, Urol Clin NA, 19499, 1992 Herr et
al, J Urol, 147 1020, 1992
12
Long term survival of patients with CIS
Cheng L., et al. Cancer 1999
13
Natural HistoryT1 Tumor
  • Most often high grade
  • 30-50 progression rate
  • Depth of lamina propria prognostic
  • 70 associated with Cis
  • Size of tumor predictive of recurrence

14
Natural HistoryT1, GIII TCC
  • Natural history of T1, G3 -69-80 recurrence
    rate -53 progression rate -21 develop upper
    tract TCC
  • Rule of 30 a.) 30 never recur b.) 30
    die of metastatic TCC
  • c.) 30 require deferred cystectomy

Cookson et al. J Urol, 158(1) 62-7, 1997
15
Diagnosis and Stagingof T1 Disease
  • Aggressive TURB important
  • Adequacy of Biopsy must contain muscularis
    propria
  • Pathological Re-review 11 of T1 recategorized
    as T2 (Van der Miejden et al. J Urol, 1641533,
    2000)
  • Random Biopsies 50-70 of T1 tumors have
    coexisting CiS - pan-urothelial defect
  • Prostatic urethral biopsy

16
Diagnosis and StagingUtility of
Micro-classification
  • T1a up to muscularis mucosa (6 progression)
    T1b into muscularis mucosa (33 progression)
    T1c beyond muscularis mucosa (55
    prog.) Smits et al. Urology, 52 1009,
    1998
  • Using 1.5mm depth of invasion as cutoff
  • Good correlation of depth on TURB and final P
    stage 95 of pts with gt1.5mm had gtT2 83 of pts
    with gt4mm had extravesical extension
  • Cheng et al. Cancer, 86(6) 1035, 1999

17
Diagnosis and StagingThe Re-Staging TURB
  • 78 of T1 tumors have residual tumor at the time
    of re-staging TURB
  • 25-40 are upstaged to T2
  • If no muscle in first biopsy, approximately 50
    of pts are upstaged to T2
  • If T1 is restaged and remains T1, only 13 are
    upstaged at time of cystectomy

Herr et al. J Urol, 162 74-76, 1999 Brauer et
al. J Urol, 165 808-10, 2001 Dalbagni et al,
Urology, 10 19-24, 2003 Dutta et al. J Urol,
166 490-3. 2001
18
Treatment of High Grade T1
  • TUR alone
  • TUR Intravesical Therapy
  • TUR Radical Cystectomy
  • TUR chemo/XRT

19
TUR Alone
  • Survival Rates at 10 years for High Grade T1
    tumors are 55
  • These improve to 75 at 10 years with BCG

Herr et al. J Clin Oncol, 13 1404-8, 1995
20
TUR vs. TUR BCGT1, GIII
  • 153 patients (92 TURBCG, 61 TUR alone)
  • 5.3 year median follow up
  • Recurrence rate a.) BCG 70 b.) TUR alone
    75
  • Time to recurrence a.) BCG 38 months b.)
    TUR alone 22 months
  • Progression Rate a.) BCG 33 b.) TUR alone
    36
  • Cystectomy Requirement a.) BCG 29 b.) TUR
    alone 31
  • Overall Survival No significant difference

Shahin et al. J Urol 169 96-100, 2003
21
Overall Survival
Time to cystectomy
Recurrence Free Survival
Progression Free Survival
Shahin et al. J Urol 169 96-100, 2003
22
TUR BCG
  • BCG given as an induction course
  • Must define BCG failure adequately
  • 20-30 of pts with cytology at 3 mos will
    convert spontaneously by 6 mos

Shahin et al. J Urol 169 96-100, 2003
23
2nd Course of BCG
  • Salvage up to 50 on non-responders
  • Risk of progression and Mets increases as the
    courses of BCG increases

Catalona et al., J Urol, 137 220-4, 1987
24
Maintenance BCG
  • SWOG Lamm et al. J Urol, 163 1124-9, 2000
  • Compared induction vs. induction 3 weekly BCG
    at 3,6,12,18,24, 30,36 mos
  • No difference in overall survival (5 years)
  • Improvement in Recurrence free survival (60
    vs. 41) Progression free survival (76 vs 70)
  • Only 16 completed the maintenance protocol

25
BCG Interferon
  • ODonnel et al. - effect in BCG-refractory
    patients
  • 5/99-1/01 1100 patients460 failed BCG 2 or
    more times50Ta, 22T1, 21CIS, 7 mixed
  • 1/3 dose BCG50 million U Interferon-alpha2B
    (Intron A)

26
BCG Interferon
  • Single agent Interferon ineffectivewith
    recurrence rates of 21-60 Belldegrun et al. J
    Urol, 159 1793-1801, 1998
  • Using 1/3 does BCG Interferon alpha2B at 50MU
    for 6-8 weeks At 30 mos. Recurrence free
    survival55

ODonnell et al., J Urol, 166 1300-04, 2001
27
BCG and Interferon
  • 45 NED at 24 months
  • 28 NED if re-induction necessary

28
BCG InterferonFactors that Influence Outcome
  • Papillary vs. Flat CIS - -no difference
  • Ta and T1 had same results (even if G3)
  • BCG failures not significant
  • Low grade tumors did worse
  • Small tumors (lt2.5cm) do better
  • gt5 TURB do worse
  • Residual disease do worse
  • Multifocal tumors do worse
  • Longer duration of cancer do worse
  • Failure of 3 or more courses of chemo do worse
  • Those who fail initial BCGlt6 mos do worse

29
BCG vs. Mitomycin
  • Meta analysis 11 trials (1421 patients-BCG and
    1328 Mitomycin)
  • 26 mos median follow-up
  • BCG 38.6 recurrenceMitomycin 46.4
    recurrence
  • BCG superior to Mitomycin in preventing
    recurrence
  • Superiority of BCG over Mitomycin in preventing
    recurrence mostly seen in maintenance BCG trials

Bock et al. J Urol 169 90-95, 2003
30
BCG
  • Large studies by Lamm and Herr have demonstrated
    decrease in recurrence and delay in progression
  • Does not prevent progression
  • Theracys live attenuated Mycobacterium Bovis
    from Connaught strain of Bacillus Calmette and
    Guerin

31
High grade, cT1 treated with BCG
  • At 15 years
  • 52 progression (35 within 5 years)
  • 31 DOD (25 within 5 years)
  • 35 alive with intact bladder

Herr et al. J. Urol 1992, JCO 1995, BJU 1997
32
BCGTwo Methods for Therapy
  • Second induction course
  • Maintenance Therapy

33
BCGSecond Induction Course
  • Second course of BCG warranted in patients with
    initial prolonged response to induction therapy
  • Also indicated in a select group of patients who
    fail a single course of BCG
  • BCG Failure cytology or biopsy after 6 months
  • 32 of patients with a biopsy at 3 months were
    NED at 6 months Herr et al. J Urol, 141 22-29,
    1989.

Dalbagni and Herr Urol Clin NA, Feb. 2000
34
Maintenance BCG
35
Maintenance BCG
SWOG 8507 BCG given weekly for 3
Weeks at 3,6,12,18,24,30,36 months
Worsening free Survival
Survival
Recurrence free survival
P0.04
Plt0.0001
P0.08
Lamm et al. J Urol, 163 1124-29, 2000
36
Radical Cystectomy for T1 TCC
  • USC Experience 208 pts with T1 disease

Recurrence Free Survival Overall
Survival 5 Year 10 Year
5 Year 10 Year 80 75
74 51
Stein et al., J Clin Oncol, 19(3) 666-75, 2001
37
Muscle Invasive TCC
  • Timing of Cystectomy
  • Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

38
Early Vs. Late Cystectomy
  • 90 pts who had TUR BCG ultimately underwent
    cystectomy
  • 41/90 had T1 disease
  • Median Follow up of 96 mos Early cystectomy (lt2
    years) 92 survival Late cystectomy (gt2 years)
    56 survival

Herr and Sogani, J Urol, 166 1296-9, 2001
39
(No Transcript)
40
N Engl J Med 3499 859-66 August 28, 2003
41
Patient Characteristics
N Engl J Med 3499 859-66 August 28, 2003
42
MVAC Toxicities ? Grade 3 (n 150)
N Engl J Med 3499 859-66 August 28, 2003
43
N Engl J Med 3499 859-66 August 28, 2003
44
Survival among Patients Randomly Assigned to
Receive Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin,
and Cisplatin (M-VAC) Followed by Cystectomy or
Cystectomy Alone, According to an
Intention-to-Treat Analysis
Grossman, H. B. et. al. N Engl J Med
2003349859-866
45
Survival According to Treatment Group and Whether
Patients Were Pathologically Free of Cancer (pT0)
or Had Residual Disease (RD) at the Time of
Cystectomy
Grossman, H. B. et. al. N Engl J Med
2003349859-866
46
Survival According to Treatment Group and Whether
Patients Had Superficial Muscle Involvement
(Stage T2 Disease) or More Advanced Disease
(Stage T3 or T4a)
Grossman, H. B. et. al. N Engl J Med
2003349859-866
47
Conclusions
  • Median survival of cystectomy alone was 46 mo c/w
    77 mo for combination therapy (p0.06 by
    two-sided stratified log rank test)
  • In both groups, improved survival associated with
    the absence of residual cancer in the cystectomy
    specimen
  • Significantly more patients in the combination
    group had no residual disease than patients in
    the cystectomy group (38 vs. 15, plt0.001)

N Engl J Med 3499 859-66 August 28, 2003
48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
Potential Diagnostic Markers
  • S phase (Ki67)
  • P53
  • P21 downstream of p53 if favorable outcome
  • Rb

52
Androgen Receptor Expression in Bladder Cancer
53
Conclusion
  • 92 of all bladder cancer is Ta/T1 15 deaths
  • 8 of all TCC is T2 85 deaths
  • BCG effect in delaying progression
  • BCG Interferon may have role
  • Timing of Cystectomy is critical
  • Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy has a clear role
  • Molecular biology will further define bladder
    cancer

54
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com