Gleevec, Use in GIST and Beyond - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Gleevec, Use in GIST and Beyond

Description:

Patient agreed to participate in trial of Gleevec ... Clinical Trials. Dagher et.al. (2002) Clin Can Res FDA Approval Summary ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:470
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: digestive
Category:
Tags: gist | beyond | gleevec | trials | use

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gleevec, Use in GIST and Beyond


1
Gleevec, Use in GIST and Beyond
  • Avlin Imaeda 1/19/07
  • Advisor Fred Gorelick

2
Outline of Talk
  • Tumorigenesis
  • General
  • Tyrosine kinases
  • GIST
  • Gleevec development
  • Case Report in GIST
  • Clinical Trials
  • Complications/ side-effects
  • Resistance
  • Other Applications

3
Tumorigenesis 6 Must-Have Attributes/Alterations
for a Really Bad Cancer
  • Self-sufficient growth signals (Oncogenes)
  • In-sensitivity to growth inhibitor signals (Tumor
    suppressor genes)
  • Evasion of programmed cell death
  • Limitless replication potential (Telomerase)
  • Sustained angiogenesis
  • Tissue invasion (I-CAMs, Integrins, proteases)
  • Metastasis (I-CAMs, Integrins, proteases)

4
Tumorigenesis- Mechanisms
  • Traditional Pathway accumulation of genomic
    mutations- 4-7 stochastic events (Kinzler and
    Vogelstein et.al. studies of HNPCC and FAP)
  • Epigenetic Alterations Cell differentiation
    pathways
  • DNA hyper or hypo-methylation
  • Small regulatory RNAs

5
Tumorigenesis- other points
  • One gene alteration may affect more than one of
    the attributes listed on the prior slide
  • Most functions are encoded redundantly
  • Cancer stem cells
  • ? Relationship to stem cells
  • ? Defined by ability to renew tumor and
    resistance to therapy as well as stem cell markers

6
Tyrosine Kinases (TK)
  • Catalyze transfer of ?-phosphate from ATP to
    polypeptides
  • Human genome 90 TK and 43 TK-like genes
  • Function regulate proliferation, survival,
    differentiation, function and motility
  • Forms receptor TKs, non-receptor TKs

7
Mechanisms of Activation of Normal TKs
Krause D and Van Etten R. N Engl J Med
2005353172-187
8
Dysregulation of TKs in Cancer
  • Constitutive activation fusion protein
  • BCR-ABL tetramerization domain in BCR causes
    constitutive oligomerization thus
    autophosphorylation in CML
  • Absence of juxtamembrane inhibitory domain due to
    fusion protein
  • Point Mutations disrupting autoregulation
  • FLT3R in AML mutations allow activity without
    ligand
  • EGFR in NSCLC mutations in kinase domain increase
    sensitivity to ligand
  • Aberrant expression of TK receptor or ligand
  • Her-2/neu overexpression in breast CA
  • PDGF (TK ligand) overexpression in
    dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
  • Decrease in factors that limit TK activity
  • Impaired tyrosine phosphatase activity
  • Decrease expression of TK inhibitor proteins

9
Tyrosine Kinase Targets in Malignant Hematologic
Disorders
Krause D and Van Etten R. N Engl J Med
2005353172-187
10
Tyrosine Kinase Targets in Solid Tumors
Krause D and Van Etten R. N Engl J Med
2005353172-187
11
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors-GISTs
  • Soft tissue sarcomas
  • Origin mesenchymal stem cells in the GI tract
  • 10-30 or more are malignant
  • Rare before age 40
  • Most in stomach (60-70) or small intestine
    (10-30) rectum and esophagus (more likely to be
    malignant) rare in colon
  • Presentation often incidental, dependent on
    location
  • Median survival when complete resection not
    possible10-23m
  • Median survival from diagnosis of metastatic or
    recurrent disease 12-19 months
  • Response of GISTs to traditional
    anthracycline-based chemotherapy only 0-5

12
Genesis of a GIST
  • Cell of origin precursor of Interstitial cells
    of Cahal and smooth muscle cells
  • Mutations C-KIT (92) or PDGF -RA (5)
  • In families with germ-line c-KIT mutations, most
    if not all develop GIST tumors (also systemic
    mastocytosis)

13
GIST factors associated with lower malignancy
risks
  • Gastric location
  • Size lt 5cm
  • Low mitotic count 1 or less per 50 HPF
  • Low Ki-67 (proliferation index)
  • Lack of infiltration to adjacent organs
  • DNA- diploidy (G2 peak)
  • /- young patient age and histologic grade

14
Gleevec
  • Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor
  • Bcr-Abl
  • C-Kit
  • PDGFR a and b

15
Gleevec Development
  • 1992 Okabe et.al. Blood 801330 Herbimycin A
    an antagonist of tyrosine kinase blocked growth
    of Ph cell lines in vitro
  • 1993 Anafi et.al. Blood 823524 2 synthetic
    tyrosine kinase competitive inhibitors block
    proliferation of Bcr-Abl cell line in vitro
  • 1996 Drucker et.al. Oregon Health Sciences and
    Ciba Pharmaceuticals Nat Med 2561 Develop CGP
    57148 designed to bind the ATP binding site of
    protein kinases. The molecule blocked tumor
    formation in mice by Bcr-Abl cells and blocked
    colony formation by cells from CML patients

16
Gleevec Development Cont.
  • 8/2000 Heinrich et.al. Blood 96925 STI 571
    (formerly CGP 57148) shown to inhibit c-kit
    tyrosine kinase activity in vitro
  • 4/2001 Druker et.al. NEJM 3441031 Phase I
    clinical trial of STI 571 in chronic phase CML
    shows complete hematologic response in 53/54,
    cytogenetic response in 29/54 and complete
    cytogenetic response in 7/54, no maximum
    tolerated dose identified, adjacent article
    showed less response or rapid relapse in blast
    crisis CML or PH ALL
  • 4/2001 Joensuu et.al. NEJM 3441052 Case report
    showing activity of STI 571 (soon to be Imatinib
    Mesylate or Glivec or Gleevec) against GIST in a
    patient

17
First Case ReportJoensuu et.al. (2001) NEJM
3441052
  • 50 y/o previously healthy woman presented 10/96
    with abdominal pain and was found to have 2
    tumors 6.5 cm and 10 cm in size which were
    resected from the stomach along with greater
    omentum and mesocolic peritoneum which contained
    multiple mets
  • 2/98 and 9/98 8 liver mets, mult intra-abdominal
    mets and ovarian mets were excised
  • 11/98-3/99 given 7 cycles mesna, doxorubicin,
    ifosfamide, dacarbazine for liver mets without
    clinical response
  • 3/99 removal of large obstructing met and 45
    smaller mets
  • 4/99-2/00 treated with thalidomide and sc
    interferon-alpha tid

18
First Case ReportJoensuu et.al. (2001) NEJM
3441052
  • 2/00 liver metastases progressing with several
    new intra-abdominal and mesenteric mets on MRI
  • Patient agreed to participate in trial of Gleevec
  • Tumor was CD117 (c-KIT) positive and analysis
    revealed 15 bp deletion from exon 11 of c-KIT
  • She was treated with 400 mg qd Gleevec (Imatinib
    Mesylate)

19
Transaxial Gadolinium-Enhanced T1-Weighted MRI
Studies of the Upper Abdomen
T 0 112.5 cm2 2 wks 67 cm2 2 mos 54 cm2 4 mos
36 cm2 5.5 mos 33 cm2 8 mos 28 cm2 No new
lesions 6/28 liver mets disappeared
4 weeks treatment Less peripheral
enhancement Consistent with more cystic
appearance
8 months treatment
Joensuu H et al. N Engl J Med 20013441052-1056
20
PET Studies with 18FFluorodeoxyglucose as the
Tracer
Before Treatment
After 4 weeks Treatment
Joensuu H et al. N Engl J Med 20013441052-1056
21
Histologic Appearance of the Primary
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (Hematoxylin and
Eosin Panels A, B, and C and Immunostaining for
Ki-67 Panels D and E and CD117 Panels F and G)
Joensuu H et al. N Engl J Med 20013441052-1056
22
Clinical TrialsDagher et.al. (2002) Clin Can Res
FDA Approval Summary
  • 1 European Center, 3 U.S. Centers
  • 73 Pts randomized to 400 mg imatinib
  • 74 Pts randomized to 600 mg imatinib
  • No control group
  • Eligibility metastatic and/or unresectable
    CD117 GIST
  • Exclusion for performance status, chemo within 4
    weeks or significant radiotherapy
  • Endpoint objective tumor response (partial
    response, PR by SWOG )
  • Duration of exposure at termination, 76 lt or
    6mos, 24 6 mos to 12 mos

23
Clinical TrialsDagher et.al. (2002) Clin Can Res
FDA Approval Summary
Table 1 Tumor response by dose
24
Clinical TrialsDagher et.al. (2002) Clin Can Res
FDA Approval Summary
  • 1/56 Pts with documented disease progression by
    the cutoff date, despite protocol, the Pt
    remained on treatment and had subsequent PR

25
Clinical TrialsVerweij et.al. (2003) Eur J of
Cancer 392006
  • 27 GIST and 24 other soft tissue sarcomas (STS)
    entered, phase II trial
  • Eligibility advanced and/or metastatic CD117
    GIST any other subtype of STS incurable by
    surgery or radiotherapy (excluding mesothelioma,
    chondrosarcoma, neuroblastoma, osteossarcoma,
    Ewings sarcoma and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma)
  • Measurable lesion with evidence of progression
    within 6 weeks prior to entry
  • Some prior chemo restrictions
  • Other performance status and lab criteria

26
Clinical TrialsVerweij et.al. (2003) Eur J of
Cancer 392006
                                             
Fig. 2. Time to progression, by histology GIST
versus other soft-tissue sarcomas (STS).
27
Determining Response GIST characteristics
  • PET scan response observed in as little as 24 hrs
    (generally only used in clinical trials,
    predicted 1 yr survival in 1 trial)
  • GISTs may increase in size early in treatment due
    to intratumoral hemorrhage or myxoid degeneration
  • CT shows decrease density with hemorrhage or
    degeneration prior to decrease size
  • Survival in stable disease equivalent to that in
    patients with objective response

28
Determining Response
  • RECIST criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in
    Solid Tumors)
  • Partial response 30 decrease in longest
    dimension each measurable deposit
  • Minor response 10-30 reduction
  • Stable disease 10 reduction to 20 increase
  • Progressive gt20 increase or new lesions
  • Choi criteria 10 decrease in unidimensional
    tumor size or 15 decrease in tumor density on
    contrast CT
  • Comparison 98 patients (5 yrs) 48 good
    responders by RECIST, 84 good responders by Choi
    at 8 wks. Choi criteria and PET correlated with
    survival (DSS) (p0.04) whereas RECIST did not
    (p0.45) .

29
Complications/ Side-effects
  • Phase I trials, no maximum tolerated dose

30
Report to the FDA Dagher et.al. (2002) Clin Can
Res 83034
31
Complications/ Side-EffectsSummary
  • Bleeding generally grade 1 to 2, not related to
    tumor burden
  • Nausea/ vomiting improved by taking with meals
  • Flatulence, abdominal discomfort, diarrhea
    diarrhea usually grade 1-2 occasionally more
    severe, often responds to immodium
  • Muscle cramps bothersome long-term symptom
  • Skin rash usually mild and usually resolves
  • Cytopenias rarely significant with GIST
  • Edema periph edema common, esp peri-orbital,
    grade 3 to 4 about 1.3
  • Cardiac toxicity severe heart failure reported
    in 10 patients, monitoring for signs and symptoms
    recommended

32
Side-Effects Mechanisms
  • Bleeding ?PDGF, ? Relationship to tumor bulk
  • Cardiac Toxicity
  • Kerkela et.al. (2006) Nature Med 12908
  • Abnormalities in mitochondria and ER in 6 humans
    and treated mice
  • Gleevec activates ER stress response
  • Gene transfer of Gleevec resistant c-Abl or
    inhibition of JNK rescues cells

33
Resistance
  • What Determines Susceptibility
  • Site of Mutation
  • Dependence of tumor on the TK (dependent- BCR-ABL
    CML, GIST, Hypereosinophilic syndrome,
    dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans)
  • Late resistance
  • Secondary mutations
  • Stem cells

34
Table 1. KIT and PDGFRA Genotype Versus Clinical
Response in the CSTI571B 2222 Phase II Trial
Henrich et.al. (2003) J of Clin Oncol 214342
Nonassessable
Progressive Disease

35
Mechanisms of Resistance to TK-Inhibitor Therapy
Krause D and Van Etten R. N Engl J Med
2005353172-187
36
Resistance Stem CellsCML BCR/ABL CD34
CD38-Copland et.al. (2006) Blood 1074532
  • Stem Cell Specific (BCR/ABL Independent
    Resistance)
  • Insufficient drug levels (altered influx/efflux)
  • Gene amplification, high transcript, kinase
    activity
  • Altered switch between active and inactive
    BCR/ABL conformation (Gleevec only binds inactive
    form)
  • Enrichment in stem cells of mutations in kinase
    domains that prevent binding

37
Limitations
  • No complete responses in GIST
  • Resistance/ Stem Cells
  • Cardiac Toxicity
  • ?Duration of Treatment

38
Future many drugs in development eg. Sunitinib
  • Sunitinib KIT, PDFGRs, VEGFRs, RET, FLT3
  • Efficacy against Gleevec resistant GIST
  • Heinrich et.al. (2006) J Clin Onc 2418S9502-
    evaluated tumor mutations and Sunitinib response
    in Gleevec resistant patients exon 9 gt exon 11
    mutations
  • secondary KIT mutations in GISTS with exon 11gt
    exon 9, no secondary mutations in patients
    lacking primary KIT/PDGFRA mutation

39
Future Dasatinib
  • Binds both active and inactive BCR-ABL
  • Binds many Imatinib resistant mutations including
    D816Y seen in AML and some systemic mastocytosis,
    and seminoma
  • Appears to irradicate an earlier progenitor than
    Imatinib
  • CML stem cells still resistant

40
Other Applications Gleevec
  • Diabetes
  • Letter to the Ed, improved DM 6/7 CML Pts Breccia
    et.al. (2007) J. Clin Oncol 224653
  • In vitro data showing Bcr-Abl affects glucose
    metabolism (multiple articles, also usage in PET)
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Gleevec reduces atherosclerosis in mouse models
    where PDGFR or PDGF is upregulated ie DM or LRP1
    k/o Lassila et.al. (2004) Arterioscler Thromb
    Vasc Biol 24935 Boucher et.al. (2003) Science
    300 329

41
Other Applications of Gleevec
  • Fibrosis PDGF in Lung, Liver, Kidney
  • Gleevec blocks bleomycin induced lung fibrosis
    in mice, proliferation of mesenchyme not early
    inflammation, role of PDGF and Abl suggested Aono
    et.al.(2005) Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1711279,
    Daniels et.al. (2004) J. Clin. Invest. 1141308
  • Gleevec blocks irradiation induced pulmonary
    fibrosis in mice Abdollahi et.al. (2005) JEM
    201925
  • Letter/case report Gleevec improved NYHA
    function in man with familial IPF failing
    bosentan, inh iloprost and sildenafil Ghofrani
    et.al. (2005) NEJM 3531412
  • Gleevec block liver fibrosis in 3 rat models of
    liver fibrosis, CCL4, BDL and pig serum-induced
    Yoshiji et.al. (2006) Int J Mol Med 17899 Neef
    et.al. (2006) J. Hepat 44167 Yoshiji et.al.
    (2004) Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
    2886907
  • Innate Immunity Gleevec may stimulate NK cells
    independent of its action on GIST cells Borg
    et.al. (2004) 114379

42
Thank You!
  • Dr. Gorelick

43
Anti-Helpers
I Want Special Treats, She Demanded!
NO, NO, NO!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com