State and Local Tax Topics

About This Presentation
Title:

State and Local Tax Topics

Description:

State and Local Tax Topics Sales and use taxes Income taxes Internet taxation Other state and local taxes (property taxes, franchise taxes, employment taxes) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: State and Local Tax Topics


1
State and Local Tax Topics
  • Sales and use taxes
  • Income taxes
  • Internet taxation
  • Other state and local taxes (property taxes,
    franchise taxes, employment taxes)
  • State tax incentive programs

2
Sales Tax
  • Assessed on purchases of tangible personal
    property (and services in some jurisdictions)
  • Owed by purchaser, collected by seller and
    remitted to government
  • Jurisdiction to assess sales tax exists only if
    seller has nexus within the taxing jurisdiction
  • Traditionally requires a physical presence by the
    seller
  • Sales via mail or independent shipper do not
    create nexus

3
Use Tax
  • Complementary to sales tax systems
  • Assessed on purchaser of goods brought into a
    state without paying sales tax
  • Would apply to Internet and mail-order purchases
  • Self-compliance system
  • Out-of-state venders cannot be required to
    collect use tax from purchasers, so many
    transactions escape taxation

4
State Income Taxation
  • Issues for multi-state business operations
  • State-level definition of taxable income
  • States in which business has nexus
  • Apportionment of total taxable income to each
    state
  • 46 states and the district of Columbia currently
    impose the equivalent of an income tax on
    corporate business operations

5
State-Level Taxation of Multi-State Businesses
  • Each state has jurisdiction to tax
  • corporations incorporated within the state
  • corporations incorporated outside the state with
    sufficient activity in the state to establish
    nexus
  • definition of nexus varies by state and may
    differ from sales tax nexus
  • generally requires a physical presence
  • a manufacturing or sales facility
  • company personnel working within the state

6
State-Level Taxation continued
  • Some income tax nexus issues
  • PL 86-272 solicitation of orders for tangible
    personal property shipped from outside the state
    does not create nexus for income taxation
  • Does not apply to income from services
  • Economic nexus
  • Some states have taken the position that use of
    intangible assets (such as licenses or
    trademarks) within a state creates nexus

7
State-Level Taxable Income
  • Common approach
  • Federal taxable income before special
    deductions federal deduction for state income
    tax tax exempt interest income- federal bond
    interest income/- differences for differing
    depreciation methods at state level versus
    federal level/- other state-specific
    modifications state-level taxable income

8
Example 1 State-Level Taxable Income
  • Santa Fe Corporations federal TI is 2.1 million
    before its deduction for state income taxes. Its
    books and records also reveal
  • Tax-exempt muni bond income 15,000
  • Interest income on federal bonds 25,000
  • MACRS depreciation (federal) 400,000
  • Straight-line depreciation (state) 320,000
  • Calculate state-level taxable income
  • If all of Santa Fes operations are in one state
    with a 7 income tax rate, calculate federal
    taxable income and federal tax liability

9
Defining State Taxable Income
  • Direct accounting (tracing of sources income and
    deductions)
  • Apportionment of business income
  • Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act
    (UDIPTA)
  • 3-factor apportionment formula
  • sales factor sales in state A/Total sales
  • payroll factor payroll in state A/Total payroll
  • property factor property in state A/Total
    property

10
Apportionment Formula
  • Portion of total taxable income taxed in state A
    ws sales factor wpay payroll factor
    wprop property factor
  • where ws, wpay, and wprop are the weights
    assigned to each factor, and ws wpay wprop 1
  • Traditionally, ws wpay wprop 1/3
  • Recent changes in state tax legislation have lead
    28 states to double-weight the sales factor, so
    that ws 1/2, wpay wprop 1/4
  • 3 states use ws 1, wpay wprop 0

11
Example 2 Apportionment Weighting Alternatives
  • Triad Inc. operates in 3 states. State-level
    taxable income before apportionment is 3 million
    and its apportionment factors are
  • State A State B State C
  • Sales 33 40 27
  • Payroll 20 65 15
  • Property 10 80 10
  • If all 3 states use equal weighting, determine
    income taxable in each state
  • If state As income tax rate is 7, state Bs is
    5 and state Cs is 10, determine state tax
    liability
  • How would your answers change if state B uses
    double-weighting of the sales factor to apportion
    income?

12
Defining the Factors
  • Sales factor
  • gross sales less returns, allowances and
    discounts
  • sales of inventory and services (not occasional
    sales of business property)
  • Inclusion in numerator based on point of
    ultimate destination
  • Throw-back rule sourced in state of origination
    if not taxed in destination state

13
Example 3 Sales Factor with and without Throwback
  • Amsalu Corporation sells products in 3 states
    with the following sales information
  • State A State B State C
  • Gross sales 400,000 300,000 200,000
  • Returns and (10,000) (5,000)
    (1,000)discounts
  • Amsalu ships all products from state A, the
    location of 100 of its property and payroll.
    Total state-level taxable income is 300,000.
    State A assesses 10 income tax state B assesses
    5 income tax but Amsalus activities there do
    not establish nexus. State C assesses no income
    tax.

14
Example 3 continued
  • Assuming that state A does not apply throwback
  • Calculate the state A sales factor
  • Assuming equal weighting, calculate taxable
    income apportioned to state A and state A tax
    liability
  • How would your answers change if state A requires
    throwback?
  • How would your answers change if Amsalu had nexus
    in state B?
  • Calculate state B taxable income and tax
    liability using equally weighted apportionment,
    assuming Amsalu establishes nexus in state B

15
Defining the Factors continued
  • Payroll factor
  • Wages, salary, commissions, other compensation
    paid to employees
  • Inclusion in the numerator based on state in
    which employee primarily performs services
  • Property factor
  • Real and tangible personal property owned or used
    by the business
  • Historical cost of owned property
  • 8 times rental value of leased property

16
Example 4 Apportionment Factors - Payroll
  • Chimera Inc. operates in 2 states, with the
    following payroll information
  • State A State B
  • Officer compensation 200,000 100,000
  • Other compensation 800,000 700,000
  • Calculate payroll factors for both states,
    assuming both include officer compensation
  • How would your answers change if state B does not
    include officer compensation in the payroll
    factor?

17
Example 5 Apportionment Factors - Property
  • Wave Inc. previously operated only in state A.
    This year it expanded into state B. Its
    property information is as follows
  • State A State B
  • Beg. Yr. End Yr. Beg. Yr. End Yr.
  • Land 100,000 100,000 0 200,000
  • Depr. Assets 500,000 600,000 0
    400,000
  • Accum. Depr. (50,000) (60,000) 0
    (20,000)
  • Inventory 200,000 250,000 0
    200,000
  • Wave also leases property in state A for 25,000
    annually
  • Calculate Waves property factors in each state.
    If Wave undertakes no further expansion, would
    you expect next years property factors to be
    comparable?

18
Unitary Reporting
  • For affiliated groups of corporations, most
    states require reporting only by those
    corporations with nexus in the state
  • Typically separate returns for each corporation,
    although some states allow consolidated reports
  • Unitary reporting (a few states) includes in a
    combined return the income, sales, payroll and
    property (in denominator) of all members of
    group, including those without nexus

19
Example 6 Unitary Reporting
  • Parenti Inc. operates entirely in state A its
    subsidiary, Sub Corp. operates entirely in state
    B. 2001 state-level taxable income for Parenti
    was 400,000 and for Sub was 250,000. Other
    information
  • Parenti Sub Total
  • Sales 2,000,000 1,200,000
    3,200,000
  • Payroll 400,000 300,000 700,000
  • Property 900,000 400,000 1,300,000

20
Example 6 continued
  • If state A requires unitary reporting, uses
    double-weighting of sales, and has a 7 tax rate,
    calculate state A taxable income and tax
    liability
  • If state B requires separate (non-unitary)
    reporting, uses equal-weighting, and has a 10
    tax rate, calculate state B taxable income and
    tax liability
  • How would your answers change if both states
    required unitary reporting? Both separate
    reporting?

21
Internet Taxation Issues
  • Nexus issues
  • Location of warehouses retail stores
    establishes physical presence for sales and
    income taxation
  • Most bricks-and-mortar retailers have established
    separate legal entities for their Internet sales
    divisions
  • Economic nexus notion for income tax could extend
    to computer software
  • Other sales tax issues is downloadable,
    digitally transmitted music or software a
    tangible product?
  • Internet Tax Freedom Act imposes moratorium on
    new Internet taxes

22
State Tax Incentive Programs
  • Vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction
  • Some examples of types of incentives offered
  • Investment tax credits, property tax abatements
  • Jobs credits, payroll tax credits
  • State enterprise zones
  • Low-interest financing via industrial development
    bonds
  • Apportionment exclusions
  • Exemption from sales throwback
  • Exclusions of certain property additions
  • Tax increment financing

23
Incentive Program Requirements
  • Many substantial state incentive packages require
    advance negotiation directly with the taxing
    authority or state development agency
  • Legislative caps restrict overall funds available
    but do not specify allocation
  • Certification and documentation requirements are
    often voluminous, and failure to comply fully can
    result in loss of negotiated benefits
  • Specialized tax consultants can be of great
    assistance in negotiations and meeting compliance
    requirements
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)