Title: Engaging Community Colleges A First Look
1(No Transcript)
2- Starting Right Preliminary Findings from fall
2007 Survey of Entering Student Engagement - Angela Oriano-Darnall
- Assistant Director
- Survey of Entering Student Engagement-SENSE
- The University of Texas at Austin
- Jeff Crumpley
- Associate Director
- Community College Survey of Student
Engagement-CCSSE - The University of Texas at Austin
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
3Insert Front Door 2 Clip here
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
4Why focus on entering students?
- National data show that
- students of color
- low income students
- academically underprepared students
- are at greater risk of dropping out
- These are our students!
5Why focus on entering students?
- 14 of new community college students leave
college after their first semester - Community colleges typically lose about half of
their students prior to the students second
college year - Of 41, 008 students in Achieving the Dream Round
One colleges (fall 2002 cohort) 86 earned at
least some credits during first academic term
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
6Why focus on entering students?
- CCSSE data show students typically
- described as high risk are more engaged in
- their college experience than their low-risk
- peers
- Why?
- Highly engaged students are the ones who survive
to the second term! - Maximizing engagement may be essential to retain
high-risk students
- When there are differences in engagement
between low- and high-risk students.
7SENSE offers Quantitative and Qualitative Data
- SENSE survey 4th 5th weeks of the fall
academic term in courses most likely to enroll
entering students - MetLife Foundation Starting Right initiative -
focus groups interviews with new students,
faculty, student services professionals,
presidents
8- 2007 SENSE Pilot Participants
- 22 Pilot Colleges
- 13,300 respondents
- 55 of respondents are entering students
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
9- 2007 Student Focus Group Participants
- Developmental gatekeeper classes
- Almost all were entering students
- Like pilot survey, participants skewed young
majority were 20 and younger
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
10- 2007 Staff/Faculty Focus Group Participants
- Faculty teaching developmental, gatekeeper and
student success classes - Student services professionals
- One-on-one interviews with the president
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
11 SENSE - CCSSE Comparison
12SENSE A Tool for Improvement
Helping students succeed through the equivalent
of the first semester (1215 credit hours) can
dramatically improve subsequent success rates.
- SENSE provides data that
- are grounded in research about what works to
retain and support entering students - identify and help colleges learn from practices
that engage entering students, and - identify areas in which we can improve.
13Selected Preliminary Findings
- What Catches Your Attention?
- First Impressions p.6
- Academic Advising p.7
- Orientation p.10
- Classroom Experience p.12
- Academic Support p.12
14Insert Not So Good Class Here
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
15Entering v. Returning Students
16Colleges Entering v. Pilot Entering Students
17Full-time v. Part-time Students
18Traditional v. Non-Traditional Age Students
19Non-Asian Minority v. White Students
20First-Generation v. Non-First Generation Students
21Developmental v. Non-Developmental Students
22A Holistic Approach Combining Institutional Data
23A Holistic Approach Combining Institutional Data
24- Students Give Advice
- Insert Advice Video Clip Here
- And it Maps to the Literature!
Survey of Entering Student Engagement
25- They need to remember that they hold this
person's future in their hands and with one
wrong action or one wrong word, you can totally
turn them off and they'll turn around, walk out
the door and never come back. - -Student focus group participant
Survey of Entering Student Engagement