COMP3170 Search 2

1
COMP3170 Search (2)

• Lecture 3
• Hong Kong Baptist University

2
Last week

• Problem formulation
• Uninformed search
• BFS
• uniform cost search
• DFS
• depth-limited search
• Iterative deepening search
• Informed search Best first search
• TODAY more on informed search (A, local search)
  and Constraint satisfaction problems (CSP)

3
A search (4.1)

• Idea avoid expanding paths that are already
  expensive
  
• Evaluation function f(n) g(n) h(n)
• g(n) cost so far to reach n
• h(n) estimated cost from n to goal
• f(n) estimated total cost of path through n to
  goal
  

4
A search example
5
A search example
6
A search example
7
A search example
8
A search example
9
A search example
10
Admissible heuristics

• A heuristic h(n) is admissible if for every node
  n,
• h(n) h(n), where h(n) is the true cost to
  reach the goal state from n.
  
• An admissible heuristic never overestimates the
  cost to reach the goal, i.e., it is optimistic
  
• Example hSLD(n) (never overestimates the actual
  road distance)
  
• Theorem If h(n) is admissible, A using
  TREE-SEARCH is optimal
  

11
Consistent heuristics

• A heuristic is consistent if for every node n,
  every successor n' of n generated by any action
  a,
  
• h(n) c(n,a,n') h(n')
• If h is consistent, we have
• f(n') g(n') h(n')
• g(n) c(n,a,n') h(n')
• g(n) h(n)
• f(n)
• i.e., f(n) is non-decreasing along any path.
• Theorem If h(n) is consistent, A using
  GRAPH-SEARCH is optimal
  

12
Properties of A

• Complete? Yes (unless there are infinitely many
  nodes with f f(G) )
  
• Time? Exponential
• Space? Keeps all nodes in memory
• Optimal? Yes

13
Admissible heuristics (4.2)

• E.g., for the 8-puzzle
• h1(n) number of misplaced tiles
• h2(n) total Manhattan distance
• (i.e., no. of squares from desired location of
  each tile)
  
• h1(S) ?
• h2(S) ?

14
Admissible heuristics

• E.g., for the 8-puzzle
• h1(n) number of misplaced tiles
• h2(n) total Manhattan distance
• (i.e., no. of squares from desired location of
  each tile)
  
• h1(S) ? 8
• h2(S) ? 31222332 18

15
Dominance

• If h2(n) h1(n) for all n (both admissible)
• then h2 dominates h1
• h2 is better for search
• Typical search costs (average number of nodes
  expanded)
  
• d12 IDS 3,644,035 nodes A(h1) 227 nodes
  A(h2) 73 nodes
• d24 IDS too many nodes A(h1) 39,135 nodes
  A(h2) 1,641 nodes
  

16
Relaxed problems

• A problem with fewer restrictions on the actions
  is called a relaxed problem
  
• The cost of an optimal solution to a relaxed
  problem is an admissible heuristic for the
  original problem
  
• If the rules of the 8-puzzle are relaxed so that
  a tile can move anywhere, then h1(n) gives the
  shortest solution
  
• If the rules are relaxed so that a tile can move
  to any adjacent square, then h2(n) gives the
  shortest solution
  

17
Local search algorithms (4.3)

• In many optimization problems, the path to the
  goal is irrelevant the goal state itself is the
  solution
  
• State space set of "complete" configurations
• Find configuration satisfying constraints, e.g.,
  n-queens
• In such cases, we can use local search algorithms
• keep a single "current" state, try to improve it

18
Example n-queens

• Put n queens on an n n board with no two queens
  on the same row, column, or diagonal
  

19
Hill-climbing search

• "Like climbing Everest in thick fog with amnesia"
  

20
Hill-climbing search

• Problem depending on initial state, can get
  stuck in local maxima
  

21
Hill-climbing search 8-queens problem

• h number of pairs of queens that are attacking
  each other, either directly or indirectly
• h 17 for the above state

22
Hill-climbing search 8-queens problem

• A local minimum with h 1

23
Local beam search

• Keep track of k states rather than just one
• Start with k randomly generated states
• At each iteration, all the successors of all k
  states are generated
  
• If any one is a goal state, stop else select the
  k best successors from the complete list and
  repeat.
  

24
Constraint Satisfaction Problems

• Chapter 5
• Section 1 3

25
Outline

• Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP)
• Backtracking search for CSPs
• Local search for CSPs

26
Constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs)

• Standard search problem
• state is a black box any data structure that
  supports successor function, heuristic function,
  and goal test
  
• CSP
• state is defined by variables Xi with values from
  domain Di
  
• goal test is a set of constraints specifying
  allowable combinations of values for subsets of
  variables
  
• Allows useful general-purpose algorithms with
  more power than standard search algorithms
  

27
Example Map-Coloring

• Variables WA, NT, Q, NSW, V, SA, T
• Domains Di red,green,blue
• Constraints adjacent regions must have different
  colors
  
• e.g., WA ? NT, or (WA,NT) in (red,green),(red,blu
  e),(green,red), (green,blue),(blue,red),(blue,gree
  n)
  

28
Example Map-Coloring
Does not violate constraint
All variables are used

• Solutions are complete and consistent
  assignments, e.g., WA red, NT green,Q
  red,NSW green,V red,SA blue,T green
  

29
Constraint graph

• Binary CSP each constraint relates two variables
  
• Constraint graph nodes are variables, arcs are
  constraints

30
Varieties of CSPs

• Discrete variables
• finite domains
• n variables, domain size d ? O(dn) complete
  assignments
• e.g., map coloring, Boolean CSPs (NP-complete)
• infinite domains
• integers, strings, etc.
• e.g., job scheduling, variables are start/end
  days for each job
• need a constraint language, e.g., StartJob1 5
  StartJob3
• Continuous variables
• e.g., start/end times for Hubble Space Telescope
  observations
• linear constraints solvable in polynomial time
  (w.r.t. the number of variables) by linear
  programming

Linear constraint
31
Varieties of constraints

• Unary constraints involve a single variable,
• e.g., SA ? green
• Binary constraints involve pairs of variables,
• e.g., SA ? WA
• Higher-order constraints involve 3 or more
  variables,
• e.g., cryptarithmetic column constraints

32
Example of Higher-Order Constraints
Cryptarithmetic

• Variables F T U W R O X1 X2 X3
• Domains 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
• Constraints Alldiff (F,T,U,W,R,O)
• O O R 10 X1
• X1 W W U 10 X2
• X2 T T O 10 X3
• X3 F, T ? 0, F ? 0

X1 X2 X3 are auxiliary variables 0, 1
Every higher-order, finite domain constraint can
be reduced to a set of binary constraints if
enough aux. variables are introduced
33
Real-world CSPs

• Assignment problems
• e.g., who teaches what class
• Timetabling problems
• e.g., which class is offered when and where?
• Transportation scheduling
• Factory scheduling
• Notice that many real-world problems involve
  real-valued variables
  

34
Standard search formulation (incremental)

• Let's start with the straightforward approach,
  then fix it
  
• States are defined by the values assigned so far
• Initial state the empty assignment
• Successor function assign a value to an
  unassigned variable that does not conflict with
  current assignment
• ? fail if no legal assignments
• Goal test the current assignment is complete
• This is the same for all CSPs
• Every solution appears at depth n with n
  variables? use depth-first search
• Path is irrelevant
• b (n - l )d at depth l, hence n! dn leaves

35
Outline

• Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP)
• Backtracking search for CSPs
• Local search for CSPs

36
Backtracking search

• Variable assignments are commutative, i.e.,
• WA red then NT green same as
• NT green then WA red
• Only need to consider assignments to a single
  variable at each node
• ? b d and there are dn leaves
• Depth-first search for CSPs with single-variable
  assignments is called backtracking search
  
• Backtracking search is the basic uninformed
  algorithm for CSPs
  

37
Backtracking search
38
Backtracking example
39
Backtracking example
40
Backtracking example
41
Backtracking example
42
Improving backtracking efficiency

• Plain backtracking is not effective for large
  problems!
• Can we improve it without any domain-specific
  information?
• General-purpose methods can give huge gains in
  speed
  
• Which variable should be assigned next?
• In what order should its values be tried?
• Can we detect inevitable failure early?

Variable and value ordering Propagation
information
43
Minimum Remaining Values (MRV)

• choose the variable with the fewest legal values,
  e.g. red, green, blue
  
• a.k.a. most constrained variable heuristic

44
Minimum Remaining Values (MRV)Degree Heuristic

• Tie-breaker among most constrained variables
• Most constraining variable
• choose the variable with the most constraints on
  remaining variables
  

45
Least constraining value

• Given a variable, choose the least constraining
  value
  
• the one that rules out the fewest values in the
  remaining variables
  
• Combining these heuristics makes 1000 queens
  feasible
  

46
Propagation Information Forward checking

• Idea
• Keep track of remaining legal values for
  unassigned variables
• Terminate search when any variable has no legal
  values
  

47
Forward checking

• Idea
• Keep track of remaining legal values for
  unassigned variables
• Terminate search when any variable has no legal
  values
  

48
Forward checking

• Idea
• Keep track of remaining legal values for
  unassigned variables
• Terminate search when any variable has no legal
  values
  

49
Forward checking

• Idea
• Keep track of remaining legal values for
  unassigned variables
• Terminate search when any variable has no legal
  values
  

50
Another Propagation Information Constraint
propagation

• Forward checking propagates information from
  assigned to unassigned variables, but doesn't
  provide early detection for all failures
  
• NT and SA cannot both be blue!
• Constraint propagation repeatedly enforces
  constraints locally
  

51
Constraint PropagationArc consistency

• Simplest form of propagation makes each arc
  consistent
• X ?Y is consistent iff
• for every value x of X there is some allowed y

52
Arc consistency

• Simplest form of propagation makes each arc
  consistent
• X ?Y is consistent iff
• for every value x of X there is some allowed y

53
Arc consistency

• Simplest form of propagation makes each arc
  consistent
• X ?Y is consistent iff
• for every value x of X there is some allowed y
• If X loses a value, neighbors of X need to be
  rechecked
  

54
Arc consistency

• Simplest form of propagation makes each arc
  consistent
• X ?Y is consistent iff
• for every value x of X there is some allowed y
• If X loses a value, neighbors of X need to be
  rechecked
• Arc consistency detects failure earlier than
  forward checking
  
• Can be run as a preprocessor or after each
  assignment
  

55
Arc consistency algorithm AC-3

• Time complexity O(n2d3)

56
Outline

• Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP)
• Backtracking search for CSPs
• Local search for CSPs

57
Local search for CSPs

• Hill-climbing, simulated annealing typically work
  with "complete" states, i.e., all variables
  assigned
  
• To apply to CSPs
• allow states with unsatisfied constraints
• operators reassign variable values
• Variable selection randomly select any
  conflicted variable
  
• Value selection by min-conflicts heuristic
• choose value that violates the fewest constraints
  
• i.e., hill-climb with h(n) total number of
  violated constraints
  

58
Example 4-Queens

• States 4 queens in 4 columns (44 256 states)
• Actions move queen in column
• Goal test no attacks
• Evaluation h(n) number of attacks
• Given random initial state, can solve n-queens in
  almost constant time for arbitrary n with high
  probability (e.g., n 10,000,000)
  

59
Summary

• CSPs are a special kind of problem
• states defined by values of a fixed set of
  variables
  
• goal test defined by constraints on variable
  values
  
• Backtracking depth-first search with one
  variable assigned per node
  
• Variable ordering and value selection heuristics
  help significantly
  
• Forward checking prevents assignments that
  guarantee later failure
  
• Constraint propagation (e.g., arc consistency)
  does additional work to constrain values and
  detect inconsistencies
  
• Iterative min-conflicts is usually effective in
  practice