Achieving Our Dreams for Student Success: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Achieving Our Dreams for Student Success:

Description:

(UNDER ACHIEVING 3-hr courses) ... Set a course for action change based on institutional ownership of the educational process. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: swin9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Achieving Our Dreams for Student Success:


1
Achieving Our Dreams for Student Success
  • Building on a Strong Foundation

Southampton, EnglandJuly 13, 2005
Randy L. Swing, Ph.D. Co-Director Senior
Scholar, Policy Center on the First Year of
College Fellow, National Resource Center on The
First-Year Experience Students in Transition
2
A Strong Foundation
Dedicated Professionals
Dissemination
Innovation
3
Unfinished Business
  • Churning of Existing Programs
  • Priority Leadership
  • Limited Number of Students Served
  • Coordination Integration
  • Faculty Involvement

4
The good news is that some institutions have
already found ways around these challenges.
The trail has already been blazed and is ready
for others to follow.
5
Perennial Questions about FYS Course Structures
  • How many contact hours per week?
  • What content to cover?
  • Who should teach?
  • Graded or pass/fail?
  • Required or elective?

6
First-Year Initiative Benchmarking Survey
  • 72 colleges universities
  • Over 41, 294 students
  • Over 1,961 course sections

FYI is owned by Educational Benchmarking,
Inc. http//www.webebi.com
7
How many contact hours per week is best?
Answer. . .
  • It all depends...
  • on your goals for the course.

8
FYI Findings....
1 contact hour courses Orientation to Services
2 contact hour courses Study Strategies Peer
Connections Faculty Connections
3 contact hour courses Academic Skills Critical
Thinking
9
Details....
  • (OVER ACHIEVING 1-hr courses)
  • Some 1 contact-hour courses had results that
    were equal to the average for 3-hour courses.
  • (UNDER ACHIEVING 3-hr courses) Some 3
    contact-hour courses had results that were as low
    as the average for 1-hour courses.

10
Structures did NOT account for most of the
variation in outcomes...Something else mattered
more.
11
Engaging Pedagogy Factor
  • Degree to which the course included
  • A variety of teaching methods
  • Meaningful class discussions
  • Challenging assignments
  • Productive use of classroom time
  • Encouragement to speak in class
  • Encouragement for students to work together
  • Meaningful homework

12
Average Engaging Pedagogy Score by Contact Hours
3-hr courses
2-hr courses
1-hr courses
13
  • Some structures improve the chances of high
    Engaging Pedagogy occurring.
  • But structures do not assure high levels of
    Engaging Pedagogy.

14
A Strong Foundation
Quality
Dedicated Professionals
Dissemination
Innovation
15
Cooperative Institutional Research ProgramCIRP
  • Dr. Alexander Astin....
  • Over 30 years data about new college students
  • Colleges have adjusted programs and services in
    response to the changing characteristics of new
    student students.

Student characteristics when they enter college.
16
Learning Outcomes
  • Camp One
  • Direct measures of student knowledge after
    experiencing college.
  • Camp Two
  • Measures of student engagement how they spend
    their timeIndirect measurement of student
    learning

17
Marginalizing the Quality Question
  • Quality of students (at admissions)
  • Quality of Outcomes (at graduation day)
  • Tested knowledge?
  • How engaged in college?

18
A Strong Foundation
Quality
Dedicated Professionals
Dissemination
Innovation
19
Self-fulfilling prophesies
NOT TRUE!
  • Women are not suited for higher education.
  • Higher education is for the elite
    (vocational education is for the lower class).
  • Minority students lack the capacity to excel in
    higher education.
  • Faculty will do whatever they wish you cant
    manage or train faculty.
  • You cannot evaluate the quality of teaching.

NOT TRUE!
NOT TRUE!
NOT TRUE!
NOT TRUE!
20
The Third Wave....
  • Establish high aspirations to truly reach for the
    stars.
  • Seriously evaluate our achievement of these
    highest aspirations
  • Set a course for action change based on
    institutional ownership of the educational
    process.

21
Take aways....
  • We have a strong foundation...
  • innovation
  • dissemination
  • The next challenge is to increase the quality of
    our efforts by focusing on what institutions do
    (rather than what students do).

22
Dont Ever Give Up!
  • Randy L. Swing, Ph.D.
  • Co-Director and Senior Scholar
  • Policy Center on the First Year of College
  • (828) 966-5312
  • swing_at_fyfoundations.org
  • www.fyfoundations.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com