Title: CPECSC 481: KnowledgeBased Systems
1CPE/CSC 481 Knowledge-Based Systems
- Dr. Franz J. Kurfess
- Computer Science Department
- Cal Poly
2Course Overview
- Introduction
- Knowledge Representation
- Semantic Nets, Frames, Logic
- Reasoning and Inference
- Predicate Logic, Inference Methods, Resolution
- Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Probability, Bayesian Decision Making
- Expert System Design
- ES Life Cycle
- CLIPS Overview
- Concepts, Notation, Usage
- Pattern Matching
- Variables, Functions, Expressions, Constraints
- Expert System Implementation
- Salience, Rete Algorithm
- Expert System Examples
- Conclusions and Outlook
3Overview Reasoning and Uncertainty
- Motivation
- Objectives
- Sources of Uncertainty and Inexactness in
Reasoning - Incorrect and Incomplete Knowledge
- Ambiguities
- Belief and Disbelief
- Probability Theory
- Bayesian Networks
- Dempster-Shafer Theory
- Certainty Factors
- \Approximate Reasoning
- Fuzzy Logic
- Important Concepts and Terms
- Chapter Summary
4Logistics
- Introductions
- Course Materials
- textbooks (see below)
- lecture notes
- PowerPoint Slides will be available on my Web
page - handouts
- Web page
- http//www.csc.calpoly.edu/fkurfess
- Term Project
- Lab and Homework Assignments
- Exams
- Grading
5Bridge-In
6Pre-Test
7Motivation
8Objectives
9Evaluation Criteria
10Introductions
- reasoning under uncertainty and with inexact
knowledge - heuristics
- ways to mimic heuristic knowledge processing
- methods used by experts
- empirical associations
- experiential reasoning
- based on limited observations
- probabilities
- objective (frequency counting)
- subjective (human experience )
- reproducibility
- will observations deliver the same results when
repeated
11Dealing with Uncertainty
- expressiveness
- can concepts used by humans be represented
adequately? - can the confidence of experts in their decisions
be expressed? - comprehensibility
- representation of uncertainty
- utilization in reasoning methods
- correctness
- probabilities
- relevance ranking
- long inference chains
- computational complexity
- feasibility of calculations for practical purposes
12Sources of Uncertainty
- data
- missing data, unreliable, ambiguous, imprecise
representation, inconsistent, subjective, derived
from defaults, - expert knowledge
- inconsistency between different experts
- plausibility
- best guess of experts
- quality
- causal knowledge
- deep understanding
- statistical associations
- observations
- scope
- only current domain?
13Sources of Uncertainty (cont.)
- knowledge representation
- restricted model of the real system
- limited expressiveness of the representation
mechanism - inference process
- deductive
- the derived result is formally correct, but wrong
in the real system - inductive
- new conclusions are not well-founded
- unsound reasoning methods
14Uncertainty in Individual Rules
- individual rules
- errors
- domain errors
- representation errors
- inappropriate application of the rules
- likelihood of evidence
- for each premise
- for the conclusion
- combination of evidence from multiple premises
15Uncertainty and Multiple Rules
- conflict resolution
- if multiple rules are applicable, which one is
selected - explicit priorities, provided by domain experts
- implicit priorities derived from rule properties
- specificity of patterns, ordering of patterns
creation time of rules, most recent usage, - compatibility
- contradictions between rules
- subsumption
- one rule is a more general version of another one
- redundancy
- missing rules
- data fusion
- integration of data from multiple sources
16Basics of Probability Theory
- mathematical approach for processing uncertain
information - sample space setX x1, x2, , xn
- collection of all possible events
- can be discrete or continuous
- probability number P(xi)likelihood of an event
xi to occur - non-negative value in 0,1
- total probability of the sample space is 1
- for mutually exclusive events, the probability
for at least one of them is the sum of their
individual probabilities - experimental probability
- based on the frequency of events
- subjective probability
- based on expert assessment
17Compound Probabilities
- describes independent events
- do not affect each other in any way
- joint probability of two independent events A and
BP(A ? B) n(A ? B) / n(s) P(A) P (B) - where n(S) is the number of elements in S
- union probability of two independent events A and
BP(A ? B) P(A) P(B) - P(A ? B) P(A) P(B)
- P(A) P (B) - where n(S) is the number of elements in S
18Conditional Probabilities
- describes dependent events
- affect each other in some way
- conditional probability of event a given that
event B has already occurredP(AB) P(A ? B) /
P(B)
19Advantages and Problems of Probabilities
- advantages
- formal foundation
- reflection of reality (a posteriori)
- problems
- may be inappropriate
- the future is not always similar to the past
- inexact or incorrect
- especially for subjective probabilities
- knowledge may be represented implicitly
20Bayesian Approaches
- derive the probability of a cause given a symptom
- has gained importance recently due to advances in
efficiency - more computational power available
- better methods
- especially useful in diagnostic systems
- medicine, computer help systems
- inverse or a posteriori probability
- inverse to conditional probability of an earlier
event given that a later one occurred
21Bayes Rule for Single Event
- single hypothesis H, single event EP(HE)
(P(EH) P(H)) / P(E)or - P(HE) (P(EH) P(H) / (P(EH)
P(H) P(E?H) P(?H) )
22Bayes Rule for Multiple Events
- multiple hypotheses Hi, multiple events E1, ,
Ei, , EnP(HiE1, E2, , En) (P(E1, E2, ,
EnHi) P(Hi)) / P(E1, E2, , En)or - P(HiE1, E2, , En) (P(E1Hi) P(E2Hi)
P(EnHi) P(Hi)) / ?k P(E1Hk) P(E2Hk)
P(EnHk) P(Hk)with independent pieces of
evidence Ei
23Advantages and Problems of Bayesian Reasoning
- advantages
- sound theoretical foundation
- well-defined semantics for decision making
- problems
- requires large amounts of probability data
- sufficient sample sizes
- subjective evidence may not be reliable
- independence of evidences assumption often not
valid - relationship between hypothesis and evidence is
reduced to a number - explanations for the user difficult
- high computational overhead
24Dempster-Shafer Theory
- mathematical theory of evidence
- notations
- frame of discernment FD
- power set of the set of possible conclusions
- mass probability function m
- assigns a value from 0,1 to every item in the
frame of discernment - mass probability m(A)
- portion of the total mass probability that is
assigned to an element A of FD
25Belief and Certainty
- belief Bel(A) in a subset A
- sum of the mass probabilities of all the proper
subsets of A - likelihood that one of its members is the
conclusion - plausibility Pl(A)
- maximum belief of A
- certainty Cer(A)
- interval Bel(A), Pl(A)
- expresses the range of belief
26Combination of Mass Probabilities
- m1 ? m2 (C) ? X ? YC m1(X) m2(Y) / 1- ?X ?
YC m1(X) m2(Y) where X, Y are hypothesis
subsets and C is their intersection
27Advantages and Problems of Dempster-Shafer
- advantages
- clear, rigorous foundation
- ability oto express confidence through intervals
- certainty about certainty
- problems
- non-intuitive determination of mass probability
- very high computational overhead
- may produce counterintuitive results due to
normalization - usability somewhat unclear
28Certainty Factors
- shares some foundations with Dempster-Shafer
theory, but more practical - denotes the belief in a hypothesis H given that
some pieces of evidence are observed - no statements about the belief is no evidence is
present - in contrast to Bayes method
29Belief and Disbelief
- measure of belief
- degree to which hypothesis H is supported by
evidence E - MB(H,E) 1 IF P(H) 1 (P(HE) -
P(H)) / (1- P(H)) otherwise - measure of disbelief
- degree to which doubt in hypothesis H is
supported by evidence E - MB(H,E) 1 IF P(H) 0 (P(H) -
P(HE)) / P(H)) otherwise
30Certainty Factor
- certainty factor CF
- ranges between -1 (denial of the hypothesis H)
and 1 (confirmation of H) - CF (MB - MD) / (1 - min (MD, MB))
- combining antecedent evidence
- use of premises with less than absolute
confidence - E1 ? E2 min(CF(H, E1), CF(H, E2))
- E1 ? E2 max(CF(H, E1), CF(H, E2))
- ?E ? CF(H, E)
31Combining Certainty Factors
- certainty factors that support the same
conclusion - several rules can lead to the same conclusion
- applied incrementally as new evidence becomes
available - Cfrev(CFold, CFnew)
- CFold CFnew(1 - CFold) if both gt 0
- CFold CFnew(1 CFold) if both lt 0
- CFold CFnew / (1 - min(CFold, CFnew)) if
one lt 0
32Advantages and Problems of Certainty Factors
- Advantages
- simple implementation
- reasonable modeling of human experts belief
- expression of belief and disbelief
- successful applications for certain problem
classes - evidence relatively easy to gather
- no statistical base required
- Problems
- partially ad hoc approach
- theoretical foundation through Dempster-Shafer
theory was developed later - combination of non-independent evidence
unsatisfactory - new knowledge may require changes in the
certainty factors of existing knowledge - certainty factors can become the opposite of
conditional probabilities for certain cases - not suitable for long inference chains
33Fuzzy Logic
- approach to a formal treatment of uncertainty
- relies on quantifying and reasoning through
natural language - uses linguistic variables to describe concepts
with vague values - tall, large, small, heavy, ...
34Get Fuzzy
35Fuzzy Set
- categorization of elements xi into a set S
- described through a membership function m(s)
- associates each element xi with a degree of
membership in S - possibility measure Possx?S
- degree to which an individual element x is a
potential member in the fuzzy set S - possibility refers to allowed values
- probability expresses expected occurrences of
events - combination of multiple premises
- Poss(A ? B) min(Poss(A),Poss(B))
- Poss(A ? B) max(Poss(A),Poss(B))
36Fuzzy Set Example
membership
tall
short
medium
1
0.5
height (cm)
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
37Fuzzy vs. Crisp Set
membership
tall
short
medium
1
0.5
height (cm)
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
38Fuzzy Inference Methods
- how to combine evidence across rules
- Poss(BA) min(1, (1 - Poss(A) Poss(B)))
- implication according to Max-Min inference
- also Max-Product inference and other rules
- formal foundation through Lukasiewicz logic
- extension of binary logic to infinite-valued logic
39Example Fuzzy Reasoning
40Advantages and Problems of Fuzzy Logic
- advantages
- general theory of uncertainty
- wide applicability, many practical applications
- natural use of vague and imprecise concepts
- helpful for commonsense reasoning, explanation
- problems
- membership functions can be difficult to find
- multiple ways for combining evidence
- problems with long inference chains
41Post-Test
42Evaluation
43Use of References
- Giarratano Riley 1998
- Russell Norvig 1995
- Jackson 1999
- Durkin 1994
Giarratano Riley 1998
44Important Concepts and Terms
- natural language processing
- neural network
- predicate logic
- propositional logic
- rational agent
- rationality
- Turing test
- agent
- automated reasoning
- belief network
- cognitive science
- computer science
- hidden Markov model
- intelligence
- knowledge representation
- linguistics
- Lisp
- logic
- machine learning
- microworlds
45Summary Chapter-Topic
46(No Transcript)