Uncertain Reasoning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Uncertain Reasoning

Description:

Initial results by Arthur Dempster in the late 60's. ... Longstanding debate about the philosophical foundations ... Finite domain O - 'frame of discernment' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:246
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: ime9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Uncertain Reasoning


1
Uncertain Reasoning
  • Dempster-Shafer theory

2
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • Initial results by Arthur Dempster in the late
    60's.
  • Organised and completed by Glenn Shafer in the
    mid 70's.
  • Developed by many authors since then.
  • Longstanding debate about the philosophical
    foundations and formal semantics of this theory.

3
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • Finite domain O - frame of discernment.
  • Elementary proposition singleton subset of O,
    i.e. ?.
  • Proposition arbitrary subset of O.
  • Belief numeric (real) value associated to a
    proposition, Bel(A).

4
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • For any A, A1, ..., An c O
  • 0 Bel(A) 1.
  • Bel( ) 0.
  • Bel(O) 1.
  • Bel(A1 U ... U An) Si1n Bel(Ai) -
    Si,j1iltjn Bel(Ai n Ai) ...
    (-1)n1 Bel(A1 n ... n An).

5
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • Example
  • Bel(A1 U A2) Bel(A1) Bel(A2) - Bel(A1 n A2).

6
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • Towards a more operational characterisation
  • Basic belief mass mapping m from 2O to 0,1.
  • m( ) 0.
  • SAAcO m(A) 1.
  • Bel(B) SAAcB m(A).

7
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • Belief
  • Bel(B) SAAcB m(A).
  • Plausibility
  • Pl(B) 1 Bel(O\B) SAAnB? m(A).

8
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • From a strict formal standpoint, m, Bel and Pl
    are somehow redundant given m, we have Bel and
    Pl given Bel, we have m (this is a little tricky
    to obtain, but it is true) and Pl and given Pl,
    we have Bel and therefore m. conceptually,
    however, they characterise three different facets
    of beliefs.

9
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • m(A) how much an agent believes in proposition A
    alone, with no further assumption about any
    strict subset of A.
  • Bel(A) how much an agent believes in proposition
    A, taking into account the beliefs in all subsets
    of A.
  • Pl(A) the maximal amount of belief that can be
    attributed to A by an agent.

10
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • Interesting property of Bel recall thatBel(A1 U
    A2) Bel(A1) Bel(A2) - Bel(A1 n A2).Assuming
    that A2 O\A1, this expression can be rewritten
    asBel(O) Bel(A1) Bel(A2) Bel(
    ).Therefore,Bel(A1) Bel(O\A1) 1.

11
Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
  • This last property is the distinctive feature of
    the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence this
    theory can explicitly represent ignorance,
    something that is not possible in conventional
    probability theory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com