Title: STATUS OF PRSPs IMPLEMENTAION IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
1STATUS OF PRSPs IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
IMPLEMENTATION Key Successes Challenges By
Barbara Kalima-Phiri Southern Africa
Trust 20-21st November, 2006
21. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND
- Origins of PRSPs
- core principles
- pressures from Global Jubilee Campaign
- 1995 James Wolfenson
- 1997 - ESAF evaluation
32. Key Lessons Successes of PRSP 1 (Formulation)
- key instruments of accountability and
transparency - aid relationship bwt donors and
recipients - become country-level operational framework for
progress towards MDGs (specific focus and
attention on county specific constraints to
development) - sharper focus on poverty reduction, more open
participatory processes and greater attention to
monitoring poverty related outcomes - Greater ownership of PRSP process by technocratic
Ministries such as MOF - does not translate into
country ownership - Gleneagles G-8 Summit 2005 vs poverty levels
42. Key Lessons Challenges of PRSP 1 (Formulation)
- Time constraints
- Poor institutional arrangements
- Limited participation, consultation involvement
- Weak poverty analysis policy sequencing
- - Eg. Data used lacked depth
comprehensiveness, gender disaggregated data
unavailable on plight of marginalized groups
missing eg Tanzania (10yr old Hsehold survey
Data) - Quality data is essential for contingency
planning and trade-off analysis crucial areas
of achieving real progress in PRSP content
5Challenges of PRSP 1 ..cont..
- Bruce Imboela Zambias PRSPs - champions a
neoliberal program constructed on the sanctity of
the market and seeks to maintain the very
structural processes that engender poverty. - - Because it fails to break, conceptually and
methodologically, from past program failures, the
PRSP is likely to be just the latest installment
in the ever-changing fashionable semantics of the
development community . IMPLICATION FOR THIS -
NO POVERTY REDUCTION - Another missing element of PRSPs - was lack of
support to productive sectors, incl. small and
medium sized enterprises and small farmers and
rural entrepreneurs. In the majority of cases
these critical groups are supposed to benefit
from subsidies THIS DIDNT HAPPEN - unless poverty reduction strategies actively
integrate the poor into the productive sectors,
poverty will not be reduced, and growth will
either not transpire or will be inherently
inequitable.
63. Implementation status
- 2005 49 countries - full PRSPs
- (half in sub-Saharan Africa almost similar
proportion in HIPICs) - 11 more produced IPRSPs and 10 initiated
processes that could result in a full PRS - In southern Africa 5 out of 14 fully
completed, eg Tanzania, Mozambique, Zambia,
Malawi Lesotho Tanz. and Moza among the 1st
wave of countries that adopted and finalized
PRSPs, and in both cases a second generation PRSP
completed in 2005 - Implementation timeframe - on average, for just
over two and a half years. - Several countries - in process of revising their
original strategies. eg Burkina Faso, Uganda -
already done so -
7Implementation status continued
- The DR Congo - recently finalised its full PRSP,
which has to be submitted and approved by the
World Bank/IMF - Angolan cabinet approved the countrys poverty
reduction strategy (Estratégia de Combate à
Pobreza, ECP) in early 2004 was scheduled for a
Joint Assessment by the World Bank and the IMF
during the first quarter of 2006 - Zim. ongoing discussions on possibility of
preparing a PRSP - but current political
situation has forestalled this from being
developed. - April 2006, the government
released the National Economic Development
Priority Plan (NEDPP). - 6 Countries not eligible for PRSPs
-
-
8Southern African countries finished or finalizing
Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs)
(January 2006)
Source Adapted from Roberts (2006)
9Southern African countries not eligible for
PRSPs (Jan 06)
104. Keys issues in implementation
- Ownership
- Financing
- Participation processes
- Policy targeting and impact on poverty
11Ownership
- PRSPs vs other develp. Plans no harmonization,
role of govt. decision making unclear
consolidation on plans - Ministries of Finance not fully engaged link
bwt plans and budget lost - New structures/PRSP Units created on top of
existing ones influence of funding - Boards of IMF/WB Still endorses good/bad Prsps
undermines ownership
12Financing
- General agreement - donor hamornisation
alignment - Effective implementation happening now in many
countries eg Tanzania, Mozambique, Ethiopia etc - CSO Coordination and engagement Intermediary
initiatives - Debt servicing obligations, trade losses
- Donor vs citizen accountability
13 Participatory processes
- PRSP 1 clear CSO participation mechanism
- New challenge failure to maintain participation
during implementation - Growing sense and urgency to define roles
- - NGOs (info. Disseminators, watch dog role,
PEM) - - Private Sector (beneficiaries of tenders)
- - Parliaments growing role in parl. oversight
14Policy Targeting and impact on poverty
- MDG Targets vs PRSPs
- Misalignment bwt PRSP plans MDG targets
timeline 3-5 yrs vs 2015 - Difficulty in translating medium term goals into
year by year national budgets - Lack of prioritization PRSP wish list lack of
focus - Positive trend increasing expenditures towards
aspects (data for 27 countries) - Caution public spending - not better results
poverty reduction but budget outlays indicate PRS
implementation - 40 of 230 million population in SADC abject
poverty
15What policies and processes to drive poverty
reduction?
- Right mix of rights based and sustainable
livelihood approaches - Adoption of responsive policies processes (Global
Monitoring Report) - CSO priorities monitoring poverty trends and
gaps, institutionalization of participation,
regional agenda informed by evidence based
analysis - Cost effective monitoring and evaluation
techniques
16Conclusion
- it is clear that as countries move towards the
next stage in the PRSP process issues of
ownership, financing, participation, and policy
targeting becomes crucial to the success of the
implementation of poverty reduction strategies. - Thank you!