Wakefields in Collimators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Wakefields in Collimators

Description:

Why these are different. Collimators are not dominated by ... But they do handle square apertures which our formalism doesn't (yet) PLACET studies (AT) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: RogerB99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wakefields in Collimators


1
Wakefields in Collimators
  • Roger Barlow
  • Adriana Bungau
  • Adina Toader

2
What were doing
  • Collimator wakefields
  • Wakefields in Merlin
  • Geometric and resisitive wakes
  • BDS studies
  • Wakefields in Placet

3
ILC collimators
4
Why these are different
  • Collimators are not dominated by resonance
    structure
  • High order modes may matter

5
Invalid approximations
  • Cant just consider dipole mode
  • Cant assume ???
  • Axial wakes matter as well as radial ones
  • Bunches are not Gaussian
  • Luminosity is lost by emittance growth and jitter

6
Basic Formalism
  • Single particle wake
  • wx??mmWm(s)rm rm-1
  • cos(m-1)?cosm?sin(m-1)?sinm?
  • wy??mmWm(s)rm rm-1
  • -sin(m-1)?cosm?cos(m-1)?sinm?
  • Slice wake
  • wx??mWm(s) rm-1 Cmcos(m-1)?Smsin(m-1)?
  • wy??mWm(s)rm-1 Smcos(m-1)?-Cmsin(m-1)?
  • where
  • Cm ?rm cos(m?) Sm ?rm sin(m?)

7
Whats all that for
  • Wake due to slice is sum of terms like Cm Wm(s)
    rm-1 cos(m-1)?

Mnumber of modes considered
Particle
Slice
Aperture
Avoid N(N-1)/2 calculations Find Cm, Sm for all
slices Sum 2M terms for each of N particles
8
Implementation
  • Particle by particle wake calculations are
    possible (avoid Gaussian assumption)
  • All done in a couple of for loops

9
Merlin
  • Framework adaptable
  • Consider Wx and Wy, not just WT
  • Done by defining new classes inheriting from
    (almost) standard Merlin
  • SpoilerWakeFieldProcessWakefieldProcess
  • SpoilerWakePotentialsWakepotentials
  • SpoilerWakeFieldProcess does the sums
  • SpoilerWakePotentials is pure virtual functions
    Wtrans(s,m), Wlong(s,m)

10
Geometric wakes
  • TaperedCollimatorSpoilerWakePotentials
  • Raimondi formula
  • Wm(s)2(1/a2m-1/b2m)e-ms/a

11
Results
  • Simple setup
  • Increasing offset
  • More modes
  • Note distortion

12
Resistive wakes
  • Different Wtrans, Wlong
  • Work in progress (AB)

13
Application to BDS
  • Studies done (AB) showing small emittance growth
    for reasonable offsets
  • Large emittance growth for unreasonable offsets

14
Other apertures
  • Can use numerical simulations (Echo2D, GdfidL)to
    compute bunch wakes
  • Split into modes (automatic for Echo2D, needs
    work for GdfidL)
  • Extract delta wakes using Fourier deconvolution

15
Bunch to Delta wakes
16
Contrast Raimondi formula
17
Where next
  • Still some problems with FT artefacts that need
    to be sorted
  • Can then use these values in interpolation table
    for Merlin etc

18
Wakes in PLACET
  • Includes wakefields although
  • Only up to 2nd order
  • Not generally extendable
  • Uses some very-short-wake approximation.
    Wakefields only within slice
  • But they do handle square apertures which our
    formalism doesnt (yet)

19
PLACET studies (AT)
  • Comparisons with Merlin predictions
  • Investigate effects of wakefields on Frank
    Jacksons improved ILC BDS collimator
    arrangements

20
Summary and Outlook
  • Lots being done
  • Lots still to do
  • Interesting problems and potentially useful
    results
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com