Wakefields in Collimators

1
Wakefields in Collimators

• Roger Barlow
• Adriana Bungau
• Adina Toader

2
What were doing

• Collimator wakefields
• Wakefields in Merlin
• Geometric and resistive wakes
• BDS studies
• Wakefields in Placet

3
ILC collimators
4
Why these are different

• Collimators are not dominated by resonance
  structures
• Short range (intra bunch) wakefields matter, long
  range (inter bunch) dont
• High order modes may be important

5
Points to note

• Cant just consider dipole mode
• Cant assume ???
• Axial wakes matter as well as radial ones
• Bunches are not Gaussian
• Luminosity is lost by emittance growth and jitter

6
Basic Formalism

• Single particle wake
• wx??mmWm(s)rm rm-1
• cos(m-1)?cosm?sin(m-1)?sinm?
• wy??mmWm(s)rm rm-1
• -sin(m-1)?cosm?cos(m-1)?sinm?
• Slice wake
• wx??mWm(s) rm-1 Cmcos(m-1)?Smsin(m-1)?
• wy??mWm(s)rm-1 Smcos(m-1)?-Cmsin(m-1)?
• where
• Cm ?rm cos(m?) Sm ?rm sin(m?)

7
Whats all that for

• Wake due to slice is sum of terms like Cm Wm(s)
  rm-1 cos(m-1)?

Mnumber of modes considered
Particle
Slice
Aperture
Particle by particle wake calculations are
possible (avoid Gaussian assumption)
8
Implementation

• First find Cm, Sm for all slices
• All done in three for loops
• foreach (particle)
• foreach(mode)
• foreach(slice)

9
Merlin

• Framework adaptable
• Consider Wx and Wy, not just WT
• Done by defining new classes inheriting from
  (almost) standard Merlin
• SpoilerWakeFieldProcessWakefieldProcess
• SpoilerWakePotentialsWakepotentials
• SpoilerWakeFieldProcess does the sums
• SpoilerWakePotentials is pure virtual functions
  Wtrans(s,m), Wlong(s,m)

10
Geometric wakes

• TaperedCollimatorSpoilerWakePotentials
• Raimondi formula for geometric wake
• Wm(s)2(1/a2m-1/b2m)e-ms/a

11
Results

• Simple setup
• Increasing offset
• More modes
• Note distortion

12
Resistive wakes

• Different Wtrans, Wlong
• Work in progress (AB)

13
Application to BDS

• Studies done (AB) showing small emittance growth
  for reasonable offsets
• Large emittance growth for unreasonable offsets

14
Other apertures

• Can use numerical simulations (Echo2D, GdfidL)
  to compute bunch wakes
• Split into angular modes (automatic for Echo2D,
  needs work for GdfidL)
• Extract delta wakes using Fourier deconvolution

15
Bunch to Delta wakes
16
Contrast Raimondi formula
17
Where next

• Still some problems with FT artefacts that need
  to be sorted
• Can then use these values in interpolation table
  for Merlin etc

18
Runs at SLAC ESA

• Data on several collimators
• Analysed at Manchester

19
Collim. Side view Beam view Revised 27-Nov-2006
6 a166mrad r1.4mm (1/2 gap)
10 a166mrad r 1.4mm
11 a166mrad r 1.4mm
12 a166mrad r1.4mm
Exists, from 2006 runs. For reproducibility
Runs 3, 2007
Roughened surface, compare with 12
As 10, in Ti-6Al-4V, polished, cf. 12
As 10, in OFE Cu, polished, cf. collim. 6, 13
20
Results being analysed
21
Wakes in PLACET

• Includes wakefields although
• Only up to 2nd order
• Not generally extendable
• Uses some very-short-wake approximation.
  Wakefields only within slice
• But they do handle square apertures which our
  formalism doesnt (yet)

22
PLACET studies (AT)

• Comparisons with Merlin predictions
• Investigate effects of wakefields on Frank
  Jacksons improved ILC BDS collimator
  arrangements

23
Summary and Outlook

• Lots being done
• Lots still to do
• Interesting problems and potentially useful
  results