Cultural selection and its influence on perceptions of reputation within organisations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Cultural selection and its influence on perceptions of reputation within organisations

Description:

a mediating influence on human action (Dil, 1980; Durham, 1991; Milton, 1996) an information source that shapes action and meaning for a specific group ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: john1139
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cultural selection and its influence on perceptions of reputation within organisations


1
  • Cultural selection and its influence on
    perceptions of reputation within organisations
  • Kim A. Johnston
  • James L. Everett
  • Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
    Australia

2
  • Background of study
  • Organisational reputation has been linked to
    sensemaking experiences of organisational members
    (van Riel Fombrun, 2007)

3
  • Research problem
  • Explore and describe the role of cultural
    selection on development of member
    conceptualisations of organisational reputation.

4
  • Central premises
  • Managements
  • worldviews influence how they interpret
    environmental changes and subsequent responses
    (Weick, 1979).
  • assumptions of their environmental reality shape
    what they value (Hatch, 1993).
  • perception of environmental reality is
    distinguished by their understanding of the real
    and conceived elements outside the organisations
    boundaries (Robbins Barnwell, 2006).

5
Theoretical foundations
6
  • Weicks (1969, 1979) Sociocultural model of
    organising
  • Relational communication model
  • Principle of organising is to reduce equivocality
  • Prominent theoretical presence in literature
  • Organisational ecology
  • concept of ecology describes the behavioural
    interdependences of working systems to their
    environment (Dil, 1980)
  • Communication strategy
  • internal organisational factors that shape
    communication with stakeholders (Seeger, Sellnow,
    Ulmer, 2001)

7
Selection
Retention
Ecological change
Enactment
(Weick 1969, 1979) A process model - social
interaction to reduce equivocality
8
  • The Culture Concept
  • a mediating influence on human action (Dil, 1980
    Durham, 1991 Milton, 1996)
  • an information source that shapes action and
    meaning for a specific group (Durham, 1991
    Milton, 1996 Norlin et al., 2003)
  • will bias decisions to ensure congruency with
    existing organisational values and belief systems
    (Durham, 1991)
  • expressed as patterns of assumptions by a group
    as a way of coping with adaptation and
    integration (Schein, 1984)
  • ? Concept of culture is theoretically crucial to
    the analysis of the problem of adapting to
    environments enacted by organisational members
    (Everett, 2002)

9
  • Culture as criterion cultural selection
  • Definition the differential social transmission
    of cultural variants through human
    decision-making or simply as preservation by
    preference (Durham, 1991, p.198).
  • Describes the capacity of the cultural system to
    influence the nature of its own evolution
    (Durham, 1991).
  • Selection processes change the information that
    people act upon
  • In an organisational setting, selection
    processes operate by affecting the information
    and resources available to people, workgroups,
    organisations, and populations (Aldrich, 1999,
    p. 29).
  • Through cultural selection organisational members
    can be situated in and interact with their
    environment through negotiated meanings (Milton,
    1996).

10
  • The role of cultural selection as units
    influencing organizing leads to the key research
    question guiding this study
  • What is the role of cultural selection in the
    development and maintenance of organisational
    member perceptions of organisational reputation?

11
  • Method
  • Framed in Interpretivist epistemology
  • Designed in tradition of organisational
    ethnography
  • Follows social science approaches that explore
    social influences on how people construct meaning
    in natural settings (e.g., Hammersley,1990
    Neuman, 2003)
  • Study site
  • State chapter of national Australian NGO
  • Data
  • 20 depth interviews (1.5 hr av)
  • Non participatory observation - 6 months
  • direct and event- based meetings

12
  • Data analysis
  • Thematically focussed
  • words, paragraphs and actions of members,
    organised around direct experience, social
    action, talk and supplementary data
  • NVivo 7 used to assist in the storing and
    retrieval of data.
  • Limitations
  • Access and time constrained by modern realities
  • Researcher interpretation ( -)

13
  • Analysis and Findings
  • Member perceptions of the focal organisations
    reputation consistent
  • symbol (logo) of the focal organisation
  • complex disaster organisation.
  • Themes
  • public respect
  • high levels of esteem
  • serious organisation emerged
  • a crisis and disaster based organisation

14
Figure 1 organisational members perceptions of
the organisations reputation
15
  • Cultural criteria acting on Selection processes
  • Evident when examining communication responses
  • our way of doing things
  • people just make general comments. Oh it's
    (our org name), if anything's going on, it's,
    Oh, it's just (our org name). So I think
    that's fairly consistent, yeah. (Marketing and
    communication officer) 
  • ? rational for that way or response was
    unknown.
  • Yep, and what it does do is, it permeates
    through the organisation, where people say,
    "That's unfortunately the (org name) attitude."
  • Q What is that?
  • The (org name) attitude? It's a not-for-profit
    psyche that a lot of people have. (Senior
    manager) 
  • Disaster organisation scope of services
    compromised
  • I think people know what they want to know and
    if they need Meals on Wheels then they'll find
    out about Meals on Wheels or if save-a mate
    they are at that level of their life or in that
    age group. or is there in that arena of taking
    drugs or what ever, they will know all about
    that. So I don't think you can say, as a person
    you know about all the services because you going
    to know about what is relevant and applicable to
    you. So I don't think that's ever an achievable
    goal. I don't even know about everything we do,
    but that's not necessarily a failure on our
    communications. I think that it's I know what's
    applicable now to (our region) and my role and
    what I need to know. (Marketing and communication
    officer)
  • High brand recognition for evaluating
    communication action extended to other
    communication actions
  • I am following what was done last year it
    seems to be the same every year, like a recipe,
    because people know who we are and what we are
    asking for why change if people know what to
    expect even though it could be made better
    (Marketing and communication officer)
  • Sharing risk - Having a discussion, avoiding
    documentation and awareness of consequence
  • At various times, depending on the particular
    relationships because bearing in mind that in
    some national functions or national programs
    our program managers will have developed a
    relationship with their national managers and so
    how those programs work in being implemented is
    actually based a lot on how those relationships
    work. (Executive)

16
Figure 2 Interplay of perceptions of reputation
and cultural criteria acting on drivers of
response
17
  • Implications
  • Reinforces the value of a sociocultural
    perspective
  • organisational adaptation
  • Role of public relations to facilitate adaptation
  • Response based on the ability of the organisation
    to interpret, understand or translate equivocal
    environmental information (Beer et. al, 2005
    Weick, 1979)
  • Internal reputation results from mindful
    collective internal processes that interpret and
    analyse environmental equivocality or change
    (Weick, 1979 Weick Sutcliffe, 2001).

18
  • Contribution
  • Understanding the guiding influence of cultural
    selection on the beliefs and values that
    constitute an organisations culture, on public
    relations actions and messages (communication
    strategy) reflect the action of cultural
    selection as much as it reflects perceived
    imperatives of the environment.
  • In the context of organisational reputation, a
    core domain of public relations practice, much of
    the focus of practice is on environmental
    scanning and interpretation.

19
  • Future research
  • With additional research in this area, we may
    well find that the historical emphasis on
    scanning and monitoring of environmental factors
    is a less essential task for effective public
    relations practice that the practitioners
    competency in the analysis of cultural processes
    within an organisation.
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com