Title: Leadership
1Leadership
- There is nothing more difficult to take in hand,
more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in
its success, than to take the lead in the
introduction of a new order of things. - Machiavelli 1513
2Leadership
- The romance of leadership is still debated in
organisational theory analysis - 'Is there any evidence for a systematic
relationship between leadership styles and
organisational performance? Jaffee, 200186 - Subtext (p87)
- A means of generating stories about how kinds
of power influence can be exerted - but the role of leadership in organisations is
concerned with exerting control over meanings
interpretations of important groups - its effectiveness is as a political tool
- Meindl et al 1985, cited in Jaffee, 2001
3A source of political control and influence
- An more negative argument within organisational
sociological tradition - concerned with how leadership can influence how a
situation is defined - challenges managerial psychology views i.e
leadership as an element of group and
organisational functioning (seen by some as
managerialist ideology)
4Leadership Conceptual and practical dilemmas
- Leadership
- best understood in high profile, public figure
sense - often associated with male attributes, which may
limit its definitions and therefore, what happens
in reality - may create problems for women put into leadership
roles - we dont like the bad ones (Hitler, Maxwell)
- we feel its absence (leaderless group,
directionless organisation)
5Psychological view of what is a leader - Kelly,
1991
- Nominators may make selections of leaders
differently, depending upon their understanding
of what the situation demands (originality
defence of group devotion to duty, etc.) - Leader
- one who performs a variety of jobs popularly
recognised as "leadership" jobs (socially
constructed) - needs to understand his/her role in group social
processes - selectors anticipate role that they expect to be
played - Dynamic, socio-psychological interplay between
followers leadership (e.g. political parties)
6Authority and Leadership
- Max Webereffective exercise of authority
requires the authority figure to possess
legitimacy, thru. charisma, reputation, lineage
or exceptional credentials. - Katz Kahn (1966)occupying a formal position of
authority is not enough must possess qualities
to motivate energise others. - Henry Mintzberg (1973) All managers adopt a
leader role as one of their roles - to integrate
individual goals/needs organisational
goals/needs.
7Four approaches to leadership
- Trait theories Brynman 1996 reviewed literature
to elicit essential e.g. physique, height,
intelligence, sociability, assertiveness - no
commonality. - Leadership functions and stylesTannenbaum et al
1961, Likert 1961 Adair, 1965 e.g. task leaders
vs. social leaders participative or exploitative - Contingency or situational leadership concerned
with relationships between traits/styles the
situation or context (Fieldler 1967 Hersey,
Blanchard Johnson, 1998) - "New Leadership" ..... Transformationalcreate
organisational climate/culture that motivates
stimulates continuous learning, quality self
initiative e.g. transformational leadership
(Bass, 1997)
8Management versus Leadership
- 'Leadership'
- a road, a way, steering a ship at sea, giving a
sense of direction. - 'Management' (Latin manus) - a hand
- 19thC corporatism industrialisation -
managerial agents - Managers and Leaders are they different?
(Zaleznik 1977 HBR) - management leadership - related but different
roles
9Bennis (1989)
- Managers
- administer, copy, maintain
- focus on systems structure
- rely on control
- short-range view - bottom line
- ask how when
- accept the status quo
- classic good soldier
- do things right
- Leaders
- innovation originality
- develop
- focus on people inspire trust
- long-range view - the horizon
- ask what why
- challenge the status quo
- are their own person
- do the right things
What is the purpose and effect of this type of
listing/comparison? What is the status of this
as theory?
'the liberation of talent rather than restraint
by rule Leaders aim at 'winning hearts and
minds'. Mere managers aim at optimising the use
of 'resources'. (Peters Austin, 1985).
10Maintaining or losing leadership
- Followers have expectations (e.g. Kelly 1991)
- socio-emotional competence especially group
reflection (West 1997) - task competence (Fincham Rhodes 1999)
- Gap may exist between actual perceived
competence influences willingness of followers
to comply - Price Garland, 1981 - Idiosyncratic credit permission to deviate from
group norms - maintaining credit is crucial to
surviving in leadership position, Hollander, 1958
11Classical management functions
- Fayol
- plan, organise, direct, control resources to
achieve objectives. - Generate follow
- policies, rules procedures (admin. gt mgt?)
- seek order control.
- handle direct resources
- money, materials, equip't, space, facilities,
- information technology
- use of time
- people
- Have 'subordinates' and communicate
- enable others to understand information,
instructions or ideas - Telling people what to do how to do it gt vision
giving a sense of direction?
12Leadership organisational effectiveness
- Common-sense research link between mgr-leader
behaviour subordinate performance. - belief that business success has much to do with
'leadership'. - mgt devel. programmes emphasise mgr/leadership
style. - Can leadership skills really be developed?
- simulated field experience (outward bound)?
- assessment centre (workshop selection devel)?
- coaching mentoring
- going on a leadership course?
- meditation?
- reading a book, watching the TV?
- playing team games e.g. rugby, hockey?
- Drake's Drum?
13Academic practitioner recipes
- a mix of traditional behavioural science
approaches - few analytical studies of leadership offer much
to the practical manager (Adair) - academic doubts. Textbooks tend to
- report 'theories' few query the validity of each
approach - the imply prescriptions ? industry selling
- Elixirs, recipes, 'leadership development'
packages interpersonal skills, motivating,
listening, participative problem solving,
assertiveness transforming skills
14Unitary (vs. pluralistic) frame of reference
- One set of values, beliefs, commitments
- Shared understanding commitment to objectives
- One source of leadership
- Team members - All pulling in the same direction
- Potential for harmony is assumed if leader
communicates well - Disagreements ? the result of misunderstanding
- Dissidents "rabble" hypothesis
Alan Fox Research Paper to Donovan Commission
1968
15How do different 'styles' affect an organisation?
- wide ranging open to question
- difficult to research - what are the variables?
- difficult to
- separate fact from fiction
- attribute cause effect in different contexts
organisational settings over time - ambiguity of measures of organisational
performance - gap between perception of practitioners
behavioural scientists
16Exercise
- What figures in your life do you regard as
leaders? - What are the characteristics that they possess?
List the qualities. Which ones keep recurring? - In your view, do organisations need leaders? If
not, what would be the consequences (good or bad)
of an absence of leaders in organisations?
17Leadership traits approach
- Bird 1940, Brynman 1996 identified traits from
'the literature'. Few common to all studies - everyday wisdom on common traits
- wide range of trait descriptors variety of
'leaders' (heroes and villains) - difficult to
agree on one list - when leaders behave towards followers in
different ways, how much is cause, how much is
effect? - do some 'qualities' indicate potential
differentiate the 'effective from the
ineffective' - non-leaders often possess the same traits as
leaders - Conclusion?
- Consider followers situation that L. occurs in.
18The leadership style approaches
- Mayo Hawthorne experiments (Roethlisberger
Dickson, 1939) - 'permissive', sensitive leadership behaviour ?
more output - Relay Assembly room - increased output influenced
by 'permissive' management of researchers - Bank Wiring room - links management style,
employee attitudes and behaviour - Kurt Lewin (1939) - adult leaders in boys' hobby
club - autocratic, laissez faire, democratic leader
styles the behaviour/performance of youth
groups - language model linking "styles" ? subordinate
performance - Democratic style reflects dominant social values
- Impetus for further study - Michigan Ohio State
19Ohio State studies (two factor theories)
- two (independent) L - dimensions
- initiating structure (task centred)
- consideration (interpersonal relationships)
- "measure" perception style preferences
- in various settings ? inventories development
prescriptions. - Effectiveness reflects
- task completion
- member satisfaction
Flieshman 1953 Stogdill (1948, 1956)
- Supervisors
- High task - productive but high turnover, lower
morale - High consideration - high morale, low
productivity - Over-generalised conclusions
- Ideal L high on initiation consideration.
- Participative styles preferred
20Critique of Ohio Studies
- output measures can often be favourably affected
in the short term by authoritarian leadership. - The problems of social research
- Hawthorne effect
- Abstracted empiricism
- likelihood that a change in performance is
related to more than one variable
21Michigan Leadership Studies
Managerial Grid
- programmes for changing style org. culture
- 'proprietary' approaches to assessment training
- diagnosis treatment
- Blake - Moulton Managerial Grid (1968)
- Extended with contingency focus
- Tannenbaum (1958)
- Reddin (1970)
- Hersey Blanchard (1977)
1.9
9.9. the ideal one-best style
High
1.1
9.1.
Low
Low
High
Concern for production
22Critique of style theories
- Universality of the style?
- weak evidence for usefulness of 'style' theories
- Style changes often assoc. with changes in org.
structure other mgt competencies . - Fiedler (1967) - Are participative, considerate
styles really better than trad. authoritarian
or directive? - Ineffective L-training - weak transfer of
behaviour change from directive to participative
23Group dynamic/process approach
- Leadership determined by
- group setting not the individual or the whole
organisation - common functional behaviours
- a. task
- b. socio-emotional needs of group (c)
individuals. - failure in one affects the other two (performance
satisfaction). - Leader contributions?
- Structuring - integrating - calming - supporting
- controlling - one 'leader' may not necessarily perform all
- roles from 'trouble-shooters' to 'counsellors'
(Belbin) - Drake's Drum again - 'Cometh the hour, cometh the
man'
24Tannenbaum-Schmidt Continuum
Boss-centred
Follower-centred
use of authority by leader
decision making action freedom for followers
Position on continuum based on situational
factors value system, wants, confidence,
willingness.
25Adair Action-centred leadership
Simple model useful for junior mgt
training functional situational emphasis on
task situation socio-emotional needs Aware of
group processes, people in group, nuances of
behaviour, interpersonal skills
26Critique of Group Dynamics approach
- If leadership behaviour is situationally group
related what happens when the situation or group
changes? - Does the organisation function sub-optimally?
- ignores wider organisational demands on leader
group. - Yet
- we comprehend how leaders may relate to followers
situations
27Reddin 3-D (style-contingency approach)
High
High
Low
Low
High
Low
Task
28Situational leadership (Hersey Blanchard 1977
82)
- contingency approach
- follower maturity a critical situational variable
- two dimensions
- task style
- relationship style
- Four styles
- telling, selling, participating, delegating.
- follower maturity
- degree of achievement motivation
- willingness to take on responsibility
- education or experience
29Problems with contingency theories?
- what causes what - in real life?
- as with style theories, difficult to understand
why there should be a favourable view of the
leader in some groups. - 'permissive' leadership the consequence gt the
cause of group effectiveness.
30Social learning theory and leadership
- a model for continuous interaction between the
environment (macro variables subordinates) and
leader's behaviour, perception and cognition. - leader subordinates/followers
- have negotiable, interactive relationship
- learn to modify or influence each other's
behaviour by giving or holding back desired
rewards - Davis and Luthans, 1980
- Sims Lorenzi, 1992, The New Leadership
Paradigm, Sage
31Why the search for the Grail ?
- exercising effective-L is more more difficult
- economic shifts Pacific Rim and China etc.
- political change South Africa, CIS, Italy, Japan
Europe - big transnational firms
- less goodwill traditional deference towards
leaders - Many skills techniques of today's senior execs
are being superseded. Which ones? - Competition changing markets, products,
technologies expectations dictate adaptability
and innovation in strategic decision making,
marketing, organisation - leadership
32Transformational leadership theory
- Context? late-20thC national global pol-econ.
change - Contributors Downton (1973), Burns (1978), Bass
(1985), Bennis Nanus (1985), Tichy Devanna
(1986) - Bass surveyed 70 execs"In your careers, who
transformed you in Burns' terms (raised
awareness, move up Maslow hierarchy . to
transcend self-interest etc). - Answer usually an organisational superior.
33From Laissez faire to Transactional
- Laissez-faire
- not really leaders at all, avoid intervention,
weak follow up, passivity, potential for
confusion - Transactional leaders
- management by exception
- passive set standards/objectives, wait for,
react to, reluctant intervention. Status quo - active standards/objectives, monitor, correct,
look for error, enforce rules/procedures. Low
initiative risk-taking - constructive transactions, contingent rewards
- agree standards/objectives, feedback, PR rewards
- outcome performance that meets expectations.
- Simplified in One-Min. Manager (Blanchard
Johnson 1982). Airport business books
34Transactional leadership
- Mixed evidence - it may be desirable, even
necessary. Contingent rewards underpin PRP - do
they? - Laissez-faire transactional in directive,
consultative, participative delegative styles - directive Mgt by Exception'These are the rules
and this is how you've broken them'. - participative Mgt by ExceptionLet's work
together to identify mistakes' - Weaknesses
- Carrot/stick rewards, emphasis on plans, targets,
systems, controls - management gt leadership
- fails to develop, motivate, bring to full
potential (Bass)
35The transformational leader (Basss four 'I's)
- promotes
- follower desire for achievement
self-development. - teams, esprit de corps, autonomy, synergy,
belief, value - Four 'I's.
- lndividualised consideration (IC)
- Intellectual stimulation (IS)
- Inspirational motivation (IM)
- ldealised influence (charisma) (II)
36Individualised consideration Intellectual
stimulation
- IC
- identifying individuals' needs abilities, opps.
to learn, delegating, coaching giving
developmental feedback. Spend time with
individuals e.g. mentoring. - IS
- question status quo, encourage imagination,
creativity, logical thinking intuition. - unorthodoxy in character, symbolise innovation.
- compare 1960s UK motorcycles Swiss watch market
to Yamaha and Seiko
37Inspirational motivation ldealised influence
- IM
- Clear vision, problems as opportunities, language
symbols - I had a dream ...
- Ask not what America can do for you. Ask what
you can do.. - Go the extra mile. Iacocca at Chrysler.
- II
- Confident in communicating a virtuous vision
- The buck stops here'. Purpose, persistence,
trust, accomplish gt failure. Respected for
personal ability
Leadership .. the priceless gift you earn from
those who work for you. I have to earn the right
to that gift, and continuously re-earn
(it). John Harvey-Jones (ICI)
- Gandhi, Luther King, Thatcher, Blair
- Hitler, Jim Jones
38Bass's model
effective
passive
Active
ineffective
39Is transformational leadership cross-cultural?
- exporting participative management or Theory Y
from the USA to authoritarian cultures is like
'preaching Jeffersonian democracy to managers who
believe in the divine right of kings'. - Haire, Ghiselli and Porter 1966
- Leadership - a universal phenomenon?
- context culture influences
- Bass presents evidence from studies in Italy,
Sweden, Canada, New Zealand, India, Japan
Singapore - suggests that the model needs only fine-tuning
across cultures ??
40Motivated in spite of leader? Do we really need
'em?
- 1970s dissatisfaction with leadership theory
research in explaining effect on motivation
performance - 'Substitutes' theory of leadership (Kerr
Jermier 1978) - Are there substitutes making L-behaviour
unnecessary e.g. - 'Professional', competent people do not need
'leadership' to perform well to be motivated.
Depends on - the individuals, the work, the organisation its
structure, feedback, intrinsic job satisfaction,
group cohesion, weak authority or remoteness of
the leader
41Exam Question
- Review alternative leadership theories and
analyse their value in terms of - (a) guiding decisions in selecting managers to
run modern organisations - (b) giving pointers to individuals in developing
skills and abilities that, in a range of
situations, may further their career aspirations.