The Many Uses of Upwardgoing Muons in SuperK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Many Uses of Upwardgoing Muons in SuperK

Description:

Muons traveling up into Super-K from high-energy nm reactions in the rock below ... a model to get a good fit over 5 orders of magnitude in energy and 4 in baseline ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: alech
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Many Uses of Upwardgoing Muons in SuperK


1
The Many Uses of Upward-going Muons in Super-K
  • Muons traveling up into Super-K from high-energy
    nm reactions in the rock below provide a
    high-energy insight into many different problems.

Alec Habig, Univ. of Minnesota Duluth for the
Super-K Collaboration
2
Upward-going m
  • High energy nm can interact in rock some distance
    away and still produce a m seen by detector
  • Higher energy particles, more range, more
    effective volume!
  • Increasing target mass at high E offsets falling
    nm spectra
  • Down-going entering cosmic ray muons restrict
    this technique to upward-going entering muons

3
Up-ms in Super-K
  • For SK-I
  • 4/96 to 7/01
  • 1678 live-days up-thru (1657 up-stop)
  • More than other SK analyses, this one is
    insensitive to poor detector conditions
  • For gt7m path (gt1.6 GeV)
  • 1878 thru-m
  • 456 stop-m

4
Atmospheric nm
  • Up-m flux is presented as a function of cosq and
    thus baseline
  • cosq-1 (Up) have L10,000 km
  • cosq0 (Horizontal) have L500 km
  • Lower E, longer L ns oscillate more
  • The data match the oscillated MC far better than
    the non-oscillated MC
  • sin22q1.0, Dm22.7x10-3

5
Energy Lever Arm
  • For nm seen as up-m
  • Typical En 10 GeV for stop-m, 100 GeV for
    thru-m
  • Compare to contained event energies GeV
  • From the soft atmospheric n spectrum. A harder n
    spectrum would produce a larger fraction of high
    energy parent n
  • Disadvantage for any single event, the parent n
    energy is known only to be larger than the
    observed m energy

6
nm, nt Oscillation
  • Even with comparatively small statistics and
    lousy energy resolution, the observation of nm
    disappearance at higher energies further refines
    the oscillation fit
  • Left 90 C.L. contours with and without up-m
    data
  • Best fit (physical region)
  • sin22q 1.0
  • Dm2 2.5x10-3

90 C.L. FC,PC Alone With up-m
(absolute best fit slightly unphysical at
sin22q1.03)
7
nm to nsterile?
  • High energy n experience matter effects which
    suppress oscillations to sterile n
  • Matter effects not seen in up-m or high-energy PC
    data
  • Reduction in neutral current interactions also
    not seen
  • constrains ns component of nm disappearance
    oscillations
  • Pure nm-ns disfavored
  • ns fraction lt 20 at 90 c.l.

8
Unusual Models
  • Alternative ways to make nm disappear without
    invoking standard nm,nt flavor oscillations
    include
  • Lorentz invariance violation
  • Neutrino decay, decoherence
  • Fits using all available SK n data
    (FCPCNCmultiring up-m, 190 d.o.f.) strongly
    constrains many such models
  • Hard for a model to get a good fit over 5 orders
    of magnitude in energy and 4 in baseline
  • Long t nm decay and nm decoherence disfavored but
    not eliminated

9
Galactic Atmospherics?
  • Cosmic rays interact with interstellar medium as
    well as our atmosphere
  • Would also produce n
  • ISM most dense at low galactic latitudes
  • Do we see excess n in the galactic plane?
  • A search for these n does not see this weak signal

10
Astrophysical n
  • A hard n spectrum more likely a n signal will be
    seen as up-m
  • n space-time coincidences with GRBs not seen at
    any energy in SK
  • AGNs or other astrophysical sources would produce
    point sources of high-energy n
  • All sky searches for such point-sources are
    negative
  • Unbinned searches for unusual clustering of up-m
    also negative

11
Pick a Source, Any Source
  • To test your favorite model of n production at
    some high energy astrophysical source
  • Up-m near sources counted, a sampling shown here
  • Expected count from atm.n background calculated
  • No excess seen, flux limits computed

12
WIMP Detection
  • WIMPs could be seen indirectly via their
    annihilation products (eventually nm) if they are
    captured in a gravitational well
  • WIMPs of larger mass would produce a tighter n
    beam
  • Differently sized angular windows allow searches
    to be optimized for different mass WIMPs

13
WIMP Results
  • The Sun, Earth, and Galactic center are potential
    WIMP traps
  • No excess of n are seen in any angular cone about
    them
  • Upper limit of WIMP-induced n calculated
  • Varies as a function of possible WIMP mass
  • Lower limits for higher masses are due to the
    better S/N in smaller angular search windows

14
Probing for WIMPs
  • Most model dependence in indirect searches lies
    in the cross-section
  • Most conservative limits are taken for other
    uncertainties
  • Direct-detection experiments also do not know
    cross-sections
  • Comparisons can be made between direct and
    indirect searches
  • Both spin-dependent (left) and spin-independent
    (right) WIMP-nucleon interactions can be probed
    (a la Kamionkowski, Ullio, et al)

15
Summary
  • The high-energy end of the nm spectrum observed
    by Super-K is seen as up-going m
  • The extra lever arm in energy contributes to
    oscillation parameter estimation out of
    proportion to the small statistics and poor
    energy resolution of the sample
  • The high parent n energies allow probes of
    unusual areas of physics and astrophysics
  • Nothing unexpected seen, unfortunately

The presenter gratefully acknowledges support for
this poster from the National Science Foundation
via its RUI grant 0098579, and from The Research
Corporations Cottrell College Science Award
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com