INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN COASTAL COMMUNITIES IN THE PHILIPPINES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN COASTAL COMMUNITIES IN THE PHILIPPINES

Description:

Southeast Asia Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in ... Twelfth largest fish producer,1998 (1.8 M mt) Eighteenth aquaculture producer (135 mt) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: valued982
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN COASTAL COMMUNITIES IN THE PHILIPPINES


1
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN COASTAL COMMUNITIES
IN THE PHILIPPINES
Maria Rebecca A. Campos, Ph.D. Economy and
Environment Program for Southeast Asia
(EEPSEA) and Southeast Asia Regional Center for
Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture
(SEARCA)
2
NATIONAL STATISTICS
  • Twelfth largest fish producer,1998 (1.8 M mt)
  • Eighteenth aquaculture producer (135 mt)
  • Since 1991, fish catch declined at about 5.4
    yearly
  • 2.34 population growth rate

3
PHILIPPINE SITUATION
  • Direct income to 1.3 M fishers and their families
  • Ave earning of USD 78 per month or over USD 1.225
    B worth of employment annually

4
Lamon Bay Statistics
  • Fifth highest commercial fishing ground
  • Ninth highest municipal fishing ground
  • Since 1985, fish catch declined at about 13.5
    yearly (gt 5.4 national average)
  • 3.62 population growth rate

5
General Objective
To identify and assess the capability of
local institutional mechanisms in the
implementation of fisheries policies in the
Philippines
6
Data Gathering
  • Reconnaissance survey
  • Secondary data collection
  • Key informant interview

7
Data Analysis

7S McKenzie Framework SWOT

8
7S McKenzie Framework
Structure
Superordinate Goal
Systems
Strategy
Style
Skills
Staff
9
STRUCTURE
  • Composition
  • Functions
  • Physical, financial, manpower resources
  • Linkages with other organizations

10
SYSTEMS(working within the organization)
  • Information systems
  • Monitoring and evaluation system
  • Rules and policies on members

11
STYLE
  • Leadership within the organization
  • Characteristics of the leadership

12
STAFF
  • Number and qualifications of the staff upon entry
  • Description of work
  • Level of awareness of policies/institutions

13
SKILLS
  • Of the existing manpower complement
  • Relevant trainings before entry
  • Relevant on-the-job trainings attended
  • Plans for staff development

14
STRATEGIES
  • Approaches used to meet the vision, mission and
    goals

15
SUPERORDINATE GOAL
  • Assessment of the collective sum of the 6S plus
    the shared values of the staff towards the
    attainment of vision, mission and goals

16
Data Analysis 7S McKenzie Framework
17
SWOT
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses
  • Opportunities
  • Threats

18
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
  • Declining
  • BFAR statistics show that average productivity
    per gill net was 52 kg. in 1965.
  • 1975, these figure dropped to 19 kg,
  • This study revealed that at present the average
    productivity per boat during the 10-month
    monitoring is 4.48 kg.
  • This shows that the average productivity per boat
    (gill net) had been declining through the years.
     

19
LOCAL FISHERIES POLICIES
  • Local fisheries policies emerged in the form of
    policy instruments such as
  • municipal ordinance (MO) passed by the
    Sangguniang Bayan (SB)
  • municipal order (MOr) issued by the local chief
    executive and
  • resolutions forwarded by concerned groups to the
    SB for consideration and adoption.

20
Classification of Local Fisheries Policies
  • Regulatory-monitoring the conduct of illegal
    fishing activities and apprehension of those
    caught violating fisheries regulations
  • Developmental-carrying out fisheries related
    projects

21
Table 1. Status of the local institutional
mechanisms in the implementation of fisheries
policies, Philippines
22
Comparative Analysis of the Existing
Institutional Mechanisms Implementing Fisheries
Policies
23
Comparative Analysis of the Existing
Institutional Mechanisms Implementing Fisheries
Policies
24
Comparative Analysis of the Existing
Institutional Mechanisms Implementing Fisheries
Policies
25
Comparative Analysis of the Existing
Institutional Mechanisms Implementing Fisheries
Policies
26
Comparative Analysis of the Existing
Institutional Mechanisms Implementing Fisheries
Policies
27
Comparative Analysis of the Existing
Institutional Mechanisms Implementing Fisheries
Policies
28
Summary of SWOT by Institutional Mechanism
29
Summary of SWOT by Institutional Mechanism
30
Effectivity of policies?
most people surveyed felt
that existing policies were slightly effective
exceptions were those relating to
sanctuaries, permits licenses which were
perceived as ineffective 84 respondents
operating without fishing licenses
After assessing the declining productivity and
resource quality data Therefore, policy
failure
31
CONCLUSIONS
32
MFARMC
  • Has the legal mandate to perform the regulatory
    and developmental functions related to fisheries
  • The capability of members to perform such
    functions is the question
  • Have the proper number of members, but their
    skills may not be honed towards identifying the
    types of violations of fisheries policies that
    may be committed in their respective areas
  • Limited training and education in relation to the
    performance of functions on monitoring fisheries
    activities
  • NGOs provided the members a wide range of
    assistance

33
Bantay Dagat
  • May not be capable of implementing fisheries
    policies
  • Apprehension of fishermen found violating
    fisheries policies
  • Limited capability of the members to really
    identify violations pertaining to fisheries
    policies
  • Membership of fish examiner (OMA) was seen as an
    advantage
  • It might be difficult to sustain the
    participation of such a staff member since he may
    not be always available during the operations of
    the organization

34
OMA
  • Generally involved in developmental activities on
    fisheries
  • Main function implementation of programs and
    projects on fisheries
  • Usually, it does not perform functions that are
    regulatory in nature, except when some of them
    were involved in Bantay Dagat operations
  • Also faced with difficulties to include limited
    manpower complement and finances, as well as the
    necessary physical resources to perform its
    mandated functions

35
MAFC
  • Has been operational in Real even before the
    formation of MFARMC
  • Performs some of the functions of MFARMC
  • Activities geared towards the implementation of
    projects on fisheries, rather than regulatory
  • Also plagued with problems on limited manpower,
    physical and financial resources

36
RECOMMENDATIONS
37
  • The role of MFARMC, MAFC and OMA should be on
    monitoring the compliance of fishermen to
    existing laws on fisheries
  • Regulatory function
  • Actual apprehension of violators of fisheries
    policies should be given to members of the
    Philippine Navy and the Philippine Coast Guard
  • It may be very difficult for Bantay Dagat as a
    composite team to perform the usual operations
  • Puts the lives of the members in danger

38
  • An M E system should be imposed if the role of
    institutional mechanisms will be limited to
    monitoring compliance with existing fisheries
    policies
  • Approach must be community-based to solicit the
    participation of the local people
  • BFARMC as the barangay level mechanisms to
    implement fisheries policies can be looked into.
  • BFARMC not legally included as mechanism into the
    New Fisheries Code

39
  • Implementation of the M E system would require
    the proper education for members of the different
    institutional mechanisms to implement fisheries
    policies
  • Education here includes learning about how to
    detect violations of policies considering the
    technical aspects of fisheries
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com