Title: Transaction Exposure
1 Chapter 8 Transaction Exposure
2Chapter 8Transaction Exposure
- Learning Objectives
- Distinguish between the three major foreign
exchange exposures experienced by firms - Identify foreign exchange transaction exposure
- Analyze the pros and cons of hedging foreign
exchange transaction exposure - Identify the alternatives available to a firm
for managing a large and significant transaction
exposure - Evaluate the institutional practices and concerns
of foreign exchange risk management
3Foreign Exchange Exposure
- Foreign exchange exposure is a measure of the
potential for a firms profitability, net cash
flow, and market value to change because of a
change in exchange rates - These three components are the key financial
elements of how we view a firms success, thus a
financial manager must know how to limit the
firms exposure to changes in exchange rates
4Foreign Exchange Exposure
- Types of foreign exchange exposure
- Transaction Exposure measures changes in the
value of outstanding financial obligations
incurred prior to a change in exchange rates but
not due to be settled until after the exchange
rate changes - Operating Exposure also called economic
exposure, measures the change in the present
value of the firm resulting from any change in
expected future operating cash flows caused by an
unexpected change in exchange rates
5Foreign Exchange Exposure
- Translation Exposure also called accounting
exposure, is the potential for accounting derived
changes in owners equity to occur because of the
need to translate financial statements of
foreign subsidiaries into a single reporting
currency for consolidated financial statements - Tax Exposure the tax consequence of foreign
exchange exposure varies by country, however as a
general rule only realized foreign losses are
deductible for purposes of calculating income
taxes
6Foreign Exchange Exposure
7Why Hedge - the Pros Cons
- Opponents of hedging give the following reasons
- Shareholders are more capable of diversifying
risk than the management of a firm if
stockholders do not wish to accept the currency
risk of any specific firm, they can diversify
their portfolios to manage that risk - Currency risk management does not increase the
expected cash flows of a firm currency risk
management normally consumes resources thus
reducing cash flow - Management often conducts hedging activities that
benefit management at the expense of shareholders
8Why Hedge - the Pros Cons
- Opponents of hedging give the following reasons
(continued) - Managers cannot outguess the market if and when
markets are in equilibrium with respect to parity
conditions, the expected NPV of hedging is zero - Managements motivation to reduce variability is
sometimes driven by accounting reasons
management may believe that it will be criticized
more severely for incurring foreign exchange
losses in its statements than for incurring
similar or even higher cash cost in avoiding the
foreign exchange loss - Efficient market theorists believe that investors
can see through the accounting veil and
therefore have already factored the foreign
exchange effect into a firms market valuation
9Why Hedge - the Pros Cons
- Proponents of hedging give the following reasons
- Reduction in the risk of future cash flows
improves the planning capability of the firm - Reduction of risk in future cash flows reduces
the likelihood that the firms cash flows will
fall below a necessary minimum - Management has a comparative advantage over the
individual investor in knowing the actual
currency risk of the firm - Markets are usually in disequilibirum because of
structural and institutional imperfections
10Why Hedge - the Pros Cons
Net Cash Flow (NCF)
NCF
Expected Value, E(V)
Hedging reduces the variability of expected cash
flows about the mean of the distribution. This
reduction of distribution variance is a reduction
of risk.
11Measurement of Transaction Exposure
- Transaction exposure measures gains or losses
that arise from the settlement of existing
financial obligations, namely - Purchasing or selling on credit goods or services
when prices are stated in foreign currencies - Borrowing or lending funds when repayment is to
be made in a foreign currency - Being a party to an unperformed forward contract
and - Otherwise acquiring assets or incurring
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies
12Purchasing or Selling on Open Account
- Suppose Trident Corporation sells merchandise on
open account to a Belgian buyer for 1,800,000
payable in 60 days - Further assume that the spot rate is 0.9000/
and Trident expects to exchange the euros for
1,800,000 x 0.9000/ 1,620,000 when payment
is received - Transaction exposure arises because of the risk
that Trident will something other than 1,620,000
expected - If the euro weakens to 0.8500/, then Trident
will receive 1,530,000 - If the euro strengthens to 0.9600/, then
Trident will receive 1,728,000
13Purchasing or Selling on Open Account
- Trident might have avoided transaction exposure
by invoicing the Belgian buyer in US dollars, but
this might have lead to Trident not being able to
book the sale - Even if the Belgian buyer agrees to pay in
dollars, however, Trident has not eliminated
transaction exposure, instead it has transferred
it to the Belgian buyer whose dollar account
payable has an unknown euro value in 60 days
14Purchasing or Selling on Open Account
Life Span of a Transaction Exposure
15Borrowing and Lending
- A second example of transaction exposure arises
when funds are loaned or borrowed - Example PepsiCos largest bottler outside the US
is located in Mexico, Grupo Embotellador de
Mexico (Gemex) - On 12/94, Gemex had US dollar denominated debt of
264 million - The Mexican peso (Ps) was pegged at Ps3.45/US
- On 12/22/94, the government allowed the peso to
float due to internal pressures and it sank to
Ps4.65/US
16Borrowing and Lending
- Gemexs peso obligation now looked like this
- Dollar debt mid-December, 1994
- US264,000,000 ? Ps3.45/US Ps910,800,000
- Dollar debt in mid-January, 1995
- US264,000,000 ? Ps5.50/US Ps1,452,000,000
- Dollar debt increase measured in Ps
- Ps541,200,000
- Gemexs dollar obligation increased by 59 due to
transaction exposure
17Other Causes of Transaction Exposure
- When a firm buys a forward exchange contract, it
deliberately creates transaction exposure this
risk is incurred to hedge an existing exposure - Example US firm wants to offset transaction
exposure of 100 million to pay for an import
from Japan in 90 days - Firm can purchase 100 million in forward market
to cover payment in 90 days
18Contractual Hedges
- Transaction exposure can be managed by
contractual, operating, or financial hedges - The main contractual hedges employ forward,
money, futures and options markets - Operating and financial hedges use risk-sharing
agreements, leads and lags in payment terms,
swaps, and other strategies - A natural hedge refers to an offsetting operating
cash flow, a payable arising from the conduct of
business - A financial hedge refers to either an offsetting
debt obligation or some type of financial
derivative such as a swap
19Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Maria Gonzalez, CFO of Trident, has just
concluded a sale to Regency, a British firm, for
1,000,000 - The sale is made in March for settlement due in
three months time, June - Assumptions
- Spot rate is 1.7640/
- 3 month forward rate is 1.7540/ (a 2.2676
discount) - Tridents cost of capital is 12.0
- UK 3 month borrowing rate is 10.0 p.a.
- UK 3 month investing rate is 8.0 p.a.
20Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Assumptions
- US 3 month borrowing rate is 8.0 p.a.
- US 3 month investing rate is 6.0 p.a.
- June put option in OTC market for 1,000,000
strike price 1.75 1.5 premium - Tridents foreign exchange advisory service
forecasts future spot rate in 3 months to be
1.7600/ - Trident operates on thin margins and Maria wants
to secure the most amount of US dollars her
budget rate (lowest acceptable amount) is
1.7000/
21Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Maria faces four possibilities
- Remain unhedged
- Hedge in the forward market
- Hedge in the money market
- Hedge in the options market
22Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Unhedged position
- Maria may decide to accept the transaction risk
- If she believes that the future spot rate will be
1.76/, then Trident will receive 1,000,000 x
1.76/ 1,760,000 in 3 months time - However, if the future spot rate is 1.65/,
Trident will receive only 1,650,000 well below
the budget rate
23Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Forward Market hedge
- A forward hedge involves a forward or futures
contract and a source of funds to fulfill the
contract - The forward contract is entered at the time the
A/R is created, in this case in March - When this sale is booked, it is recorded at the
spot rate. - In this case the A/R is recorded at a spot rate
of 1.7640/, thus 1,764,000 is recorded as a
sale for Trident - If Trident does not have an offsetting A/P in the
same amount, then the firm is considered uncovered
24Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Forward Market hedge
- Should Maria want to cover this exposure with a
forward contract, then she will sell 1,000,000
forward today at the 3 month rate of 1.7540/ - She is now covered and Trident no longer has
any transaction exposure - In 3 months, Trident will received 1,000,000 and
exchange those pounds at 1.7540/ receiving
1,754,000 - This sum is 6,000 less than the uncertain
1,760,000 expected from the unhedged position - This would be recorded in Tridents books as a
foreign exchange loss of 10,000 (1,764,000 as
booked, 1,754,000 as settled)
25Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Money Market hedge
- A money market hedge also includes a contract and
a source of funds, similar to a forward contract - In this case, the contract is a loan agreement
- The firm borrows in one currency and exchanges
the proceeds for another currency - Hedges can be left open (i.e. no investment) or
closed (i.e. investment)
26Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Money Market hedge
- To hedge in the money market, Maria will borrow
pounds in London, convert the pounds to dollars
and repay the pound loan with the proceeds from
the sale - To calculate how much to borrow, Maria needs to
discount the PV of the 1,000,000 to today - 1,000,000/1.025 975,610
- Maria should borrow 975,610 today and in 3
months time repay this amount plus 24,390 in
interest (1,000,000) from the proceeds of the
sale
27Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Money Market hedge
- Trident would exchange the 975,610 at the spot
rate of 1.7640/ and receive 1,720,976 at once - This hedge creates a pound denominated liability
that is offset with a pound denominated asset
thus creating a balance sheet hedge
28Tridents Transaction Exposure
- In order to compare the forward hedge with the
money market hedge, Maria must analyze the use of
the loan proceeds - Remember that the loan proceeds may be used
today, but the funds for the forward contract may
not - Because the funds are relatively certain,
comparison is possible in order to make a
decision - Three logical choices exist for an assumed
investment rate for the next 3 months
29Tridents Transaction Exposure
- First, if Trident is cash rich the loan proceeds
might be invested at the US rate of 6.0 p.a. - Second, Maria could use the loan proceeds to
substitute an equal dollar loan that Trident
would have otherwise taken for working capital
needs at a rate of 8.0 p.a. - Third, Maria might invest the loan proceeds in
the firm itself in which case the cost of capital
is 12.0 p.a.
1,720,976 Treasury bill 6 p.a. or
1.5/quarter 1,746,791
1,720,976 Debt cost 8 p.a. or
2.0/quarter 1,755,396
1,720,976 Cost of capital 12 p.a. or
3.0/quarter 1,772,605
30Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Because the proceeds in 3 months from the forward
hedge will be 1,754,000, the money market hedge
is superior to the forward hedge if Maria used
the proceeds to replace a dollar loan (8) or
conduct general business operations (12) - The forward hedge would be preferable if Maria
were to just invest the loan proceeds (6) - We will assume she uses the cost of capital as
the reinvestment rate
31Tridents Transaction Exposure
- A breakeven investment rate can be calculated in
order to forgo numerous calculations and still
aid Maria in her decision
- To convert this 3 month rate to an annual rate,
32Tridents Transaction Exposure
- In other words, if Maria can invest the loan
proceeds at a rate equal to or greater than 7.68
p.a. then the money market hedge will be superior
to the forward hedge - The following chart shows the value of Tridents
A/R over a range of possible spot rates both
uncovered and covered using the previously
mentioned alternatives
33Tridents Transaction Exposure
34Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Option market hedge
- Maria could also cover the 1,000,000 exposure by
purchasing a put option. This allows her to
speculate on the upside potential for
appreciation of the pound while limiting her
downside risk - Given the quote earlier, Maria could purchase 3
month put option at an ATM strike price of
1.75/ and a premium of 1.5 - The cost of this option would be
35Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Because we are using future value to compare the
various hedging alternatives, it is necessary to
project the cost of the option in 3 months
forward - Using a cost of capital of 12 p.a. or 3.0 per
quarter, the premium cost of the option as of
June would be - 26,460 ? 1.03 27,254
- Since the upside potential is unlimited, Trident
would not exercise its option at any rate above
1.75/ and would purchase pounds on the spot
market - If for example, the spot rate of 1.76/
materializes, Trident would exchange pounds on
the spot market to receive 1,000,000 ? 1.76/
1,760,000 less the premium of the option
(27,254) netting 1,732,746
36Tridents Transaction Exposure
- Unlike the unhedged alternative, Maria has
limited downside with the option - Should the pound depreciate below 1.75/, Maria
would exercise her option and exchange her
1,000,000 at 1.75/ receiving 1,750,000 - Less the premium of the option, Maria nets
1,722,746 - Although this downside is less than that of the
forward or money market hedge, the upside
potential is not limited
37Tridents Transaction Exposure
- As with the forward and money market hedges,
Maria can also calculate her breakeven price on
the option - The upper bound of the range is determined by
comparison of the forward rate - The pound must appreciate above 1.754/ forward
rate plus the cost of the option, 0.0273/, to
1.7813/ - The lower bound of the range is determined in a
similar manner - If the pound depreciates below 1.75/, the net
proceeds would be 1.75/ less the cost of
0.0273/ or 1.722/
38Tridents Transaction Exposure
39Tridents Transaction Exposure
Option cost (future cost) 27,254
Proceeds if exercised
1,750,000
Minimum net proceeds
1,722,746
Maximum net proceeds
unlimited
Breakeven spot rate (upside)
1.7813/
Breakeven spot rate (downside)
1.7221/
40Strategy Choice and Outcome
- Trident, like all firms, must decide on a
strategy to undertake before the exchange rate
changes but how will Maria choose among the
strategies? - Two criteria can be utilized to help Maria choose
her strategy - Risk tolerance - of the firm,as expressed in its
stated policies and - Viewpoint Marias own view on the expected
direction and distance of the exchange rate
41Strategy Choice and Outcome
- After all the strategies have been explained,
Trident now needs to compare the alternatives and
their outcomes in order to choose a strategy - There were four alternatives available to manage
this account receivable and Maria has a budget
rate at which she cannot fall below on this
transaction
42Strategy Choice and Outcome
Remain uncovered Unknown
Forward Contract hedge _at_ 1.754/ 1,754,000
Money market hedge _at_ 8 p.a. 1,755,396
Money market hedge _at_ 12 p.a. 1,772,605
Put option hedge _at_ strike 1.75/
Minimum if exercised 1,722,746
Maximum if not exercised Unlimited
43Managing an Account Payable
- Just as Marias alternatives for managing the
receivable, the choices are the same for managing
a payable - Assume that the 1,000,000 was an account payable
in 90 days - Remain unhedged Trident could wait the 90 days
and at that time exchange dollars for pounds to
pay the obligation - If the spot rate is 1.76/ then Trident would
pay 1,760,000 but this amount is not certain
44Managing an Account Payable
- Use a forward market hedge Trident could
purchase a forward contract locking in the
1.754/ rate ensuring that their obligation will
not be more than 1,754,000 - Use a money market hedge this hedge is
distinctly different for a payable than a
receivable - Here Trident would exchange US dollars spot and
invest them for 90 days in pounds - The pound obligation for Trident is now offset by
a pound asset for Trident with matching maturity
45Managing an Account Payable
- Using a money market hedge
- To ensure that exactly 1,000,000 will be
received in 90 days time, Maria discounts the
principal by 8 p.a.
- This 980,392.16 would require 1,729,411.77 at
the current spot rate
46Managing an Account Payable
- Using a money market hedge
- Finally, carry the cost forward 90 days in order
to compare the payout from the money market hedge
- This is higher than the forward hedge of
1,754,000 thus unattractive
47Managing an Account Payable
- Using an option hedge instead of purchasing a
put as with a receivable, Maria would want to
purchase a call option on the payable - The terms of an ATM call option with strike price
of 1,75/ would be a 1.5 premium
- Carried forward 90 days the premium amount is
comes to 27,254
48Managing an Account Payable
- Using an option hedge
- If the spot rate is less than 1.75/ then the
option would be allowed to expire and the
1,000,000 would be purchased on the spot market - If the spot rate rises above 1.75/ then the
option would be exercised and Trident would
exchange the 1,000,000 at 1.75/ less the
option premium for the payable
Exercise call option (1,000,000 ?
1.75/ 1,750,000 Call option premium (carried
forward 90 days) 27,254 Total maximum
expense of call option hedge 1,777,254
49Risk Management in Practice
- Which Goals?
- The treasury function of most firms is usual
considered a cost center it is not expected to
add to the bottom line - However, in practice some firms treasuries have
become aggressive in currency management and act
as profit centers - Which Exposures?
- Transaction exposures exist before they are
actually booked yet some firms do not hedge this
backlog exposure - However, some firms are selectively hedging these
backlog exposures and anticipated exposures
50Risk Management in Practice
- Which Contractual Hedges?
- Transaction exposure management programs are
generally divided along an option-line those
which use options and those that do not - Also, these programs vary in the amount of risk
covered these proportional hedges are policies
that state which proportion and type of exposure
is to be hedged by the treasury
51Summary of Learning Objectives
- MNEs encounter three types of currency exposure
(1) transaction (2) operating and (3)
translation exposure - Transaction exposure measures gains or losses
that arise from the settlement of financial
obligations whose terms are stated in a foreign
currency - Operating exposure measures the change in the
present value of the firm resulting from any
change in future operating cash flows caused by
an unexpected change in exchange rates - Translation exposure is the potential for
accounting-oriented changes in owners equity
when a firm translates foreign subsidiaries
financial statements to consolidated financial
statements
52Summary of Learning Objectives
- Transaction exposure arises from (1) purchasing
or selling on credit and prices are stated in
foreign currencies (2) borrowing or lending
funds when repayment is to be made in a foreign
currency (3) being party to an unperformed
forward contract and (4) otherwise acquiring
assets or liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies - Considerable theoretical debate exists as to
whether or not firms should hedge currency risk
53Summary of Learning Objectives
- Transaction exposure can be managed by
contractual techniques and certain operating
strategies. Contractual techniques include
forward contracts, money market and option hedges - The choice of which hedge to use depends on the
individual firms currency risk tolerance and its
expectations of the probable movement of exchange
rates over the transaction exposure period
54Summary of Learning Objectives
- In general, if an exchange rate is expected to
move in a firms favor, the preferred contractual
hedges are those which allow the firm to
participate in some of the upside potential, but
protect it against adverse exchange rate
movements - In general, if an exchange rate is expected to
move against the firm, the preferred contractual
hedge is one which locks-in an exchange rate
55Summary of Learning Objectives
- Risk management in practice requires a firms
treasury department to identify its goals. Is
the treasury a cost or a profit center? - Treasury must also choose which contractual
hedges it wishes to use and what proportion of
the currency risk should be hedged.
Additionally, treasury must determine whether the
firm should buy and/or sell currency options, a
strategy that has historically been risky for
some firms and banks