Felstiner, William L.F., Richard L. Abel and Austin Sarat. 198081. "The Emergence and Transformation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Felstiner, William L.F., Richard L. Abel and Austin Sarat. 198081. "The Emergence and Transformation

Description:

The path to litigation can be thought of as ... Romantic partner dumps you. Professor gives unfair LGST10 exam. Blaming ... car dealers, romantic situations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ScottB6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Felstiner, William L.F., Richard L. Abel and Austin Sarat. 198081. "The Emergence and Transformation


1
Felstiner, William L.F., Richard L. Abel and
Austin Sarat. 1980-81. "The Emergence and
Transformation of Disputes Naming, Blaming,
Claiming." Law and Society Review 15, No. 3-4
631-654.
2
Main Points
  • Litigation is not an automatic result of a
    perceived injury.
  • The path to litigation can be thought of as
    composed of 3 stages and, at any stage, a party
    could choose not to eventually invoke litigation
    for a variety of reasons

3
Naming
  • An injury must be recognized as a wrong that the
    individual has suffered
  • Galanter (1983) called this a perceived
    injurious experience
  • Must perceive you have been injured
  • We could suffer many injuries we do not perceive
  • e.g., smoking, asbestos,
  • Or are convinced by existing culture is not
    harming us
  • e.g., gender roles in 17th Century

4
Naming
  • An injury is named when we identify it as an
    injury
  • Identification as an injury is
  • Strongly influenced by existing social norms and
    prior law
  • Changing as we understand and explain actions
    using scientific information

5
Naming
  • Failure to name an event as an injury precludes
    the possibility of litigation

6
Blaming
  • Attribute blame for our injury to an identifiable
    entity
  • Believe that some identifiable entity caused our
    injury
  • Most blamed entity would be yourself
  • E.g., Cut yourself shaving fall over while
    running etc
  • Historically, next was Act of God
  • Natural disaster or bad luck
  • E.g., Hurricane Earthquake Tree falls on you in
    forest

7
Blaming
  • If blaming other party for injury to you
  • Based on belief they caused your injury to occur
  • For example,
  • University allows building to fall on you
  • Romantic partner dumps you
  • Professor gives unfair LGST10 exam

8
Blaming
  • The failure to attribute blame to an identifiable
    entity means unlikely for litigation to occur

9
Claiming
  • Asking blamed party that you identified to take
    responsibility for the injury you attributed to
    their actions
  • Usually a request to return to former status or
    be compensated for failure to do so

10
Claiming
  • Some injuries are named and blamed but are not
    claimed because you do not believe that any
    positive action will result from claiming
  • Ongoing relationships tend to lessen likelihood
    of claiming
  • car dealers, romantic situations
  • Complete strangers with no likely chance of
    re-encountering lessen claiming
  • knocked over while skiing

11
Consequences
  • Many activities do not result in a dispute
    because they are named, blamed, and claimed and
    other party accepts responsibility as defined by
    your claim
  • Person 1 Dude, you just spilled beer all over
    my couch and it will stain it. Clean it up, you
    slob
  • Naming , Blaming , Claiming
  • Person 2 OK
  • Accepted responsibility and agreed to attempt to
    return injured party to former status

12
Consequences
  • Some things that harm us are not initially
    identified as injuries and do not lead to naming,
    blaming, or claiming
  • 1945 This cigarette is really good for me
    because it calms me down
  • 1965 This DDT really gets rid of the pests in
    the corn
  • 1985 These silicon breast implants look great

13
Multiple Stage Process
  • Original Process
  • Naming
  • Blaming
  • Claiming
  • Constructed and framed in our own everyday
    language
  • Legal Version
  • Naming
  • Blaming
  • Claiming
  • Constructed and framed in the language of law as
    it exists at that time

14
Example
  • Own version
  • My neighbor has had my snow-blower in her garage
    since she used it last winter. I will ask her to
    return it
  • Legal Version
  • My neighbor failed to return my snow-blower for
    the last 5 months. The legal action of detinue
    and replevin will force her to return it.

15
Consequence
  • Some injuries that are named, blamed, and claimed
    are not able to be transformed into legal actions
  • This is changing based on increasing knowledge
    and a changing legal system in response to social
    demands, according to Lawrence Friedman in Total
    Justice (New York, Russell Sage 1985)

16
Consequences
  • Litigation only deals with activities
  • that are classified as injuries in a social
    context
  • That are blamed on identifiable others
  • That can be claimed
  • That are not resolved and remain a dispute
  • That can be framed in legal terms

17
Consequences
  • Many potential and existing injuries do not find
    their way to becoming litigation and the law
    deals with only a small and select subset of all
    forms of such events
  • Litigation requires a dispute to be unresolved by
    other means before it gets to the point of
    invoking the law

18
But
  • Existing laws shape and define the social norms
    for constructing injuries, attributing blame, and
    recognizing the possibilities of claiming
  • It is not neutral in this process

19
Role of Law
  • The call upon the legal system is constructed by
    decisions made by individuals and shaped by their
    social understanding of injuries and the
    resolution of disputes
  • Law is constructed to deal with these unresolved
    disputes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com