Ontology Arcs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Ontology Arcs

Description:

... of frame semantics including some Jackendoff/Levin style lexical semantics. ... The car turned from the street into the driveway. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: lsl
Category:
Tags: arcs | ontology

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ontology Arcs


1
Ontology Arcs
2
What will our annotation be used for?
  • Statistical people are supposed to be able to
    train something based on our annotations and our
    texts.
  • IE, QA, etc.
  • What exactly will they train?
  • Proposal Limited version of frame semantics
    including some Jackendoff/Levin style lexical
    semantics.

3
What are semantic roles for?Which meanings are
related?
  • Sam opened the door with a key.
  • The key opened the door.
  • The door was opened by Sam with a key.
  • Sams opening of the door with a key.
  • Sam opened the door by turning the key.
  • Sam bought a toy from Sue.
  • Sue sold a toy to Sam.
  • Sam took a bus to school.
  • Sam ascended to the bus and went to school.
    (Hebrew)
  • Sam riding on the bus, went to school.
    (Japanese)
  • Sam sat on the bus, went to school. (Chinese)
  • Sam went to school by bus.
  • Sam went to school by taking a bus.

4
What are semantic roles for?Predicting deep
subject/object and other syntactic stuff
  • Agent (or the thing that has the most agentive
    properties) will be subject of an active voice
    sentence in a nominative-accusative language.
  • Other syntactic stuff
  • Variation in case marking with agentivity.
  • How the causee is expressed in a complex
    causative construction. (a or par o or ni)
  • We probably dont care about this.

5
What are semantic roles for?Support some kinds
of inference.
  • For a change verb (state, location), etc. After
    the action is finished, the theme is no longer at
    the source (location or state) and is at the goal
    (location or state).
  • The solution turned from green to red.
  • The car turned from the street into the driveway.
  • For telic verbs, if the action is started and not
    finished, then the theme has not reached the
    goal.
  • Sam started to walk to school, but then stopped.
    He has not reached school.
  • (Started means really started, not got ready to
    start.)
  • For activity verbs, if the agent starts to do the
    action and stops, the agent has done the action.
  • Sam started to draw, but then he stopped. He has
    drawn.
  • For telic verbs of creating, the theme doesnt
    exist until the action is finished. Then it
    exists.
  • Sam built a house.

6
Pros and Cons of approaches
  • Verb-specific roles
  • Pro
  • Once you pick the role names, there is probably
    high agreement on assigning NPs to roles.
  • Identifies paraphrase relations using the same
    verb.
  • Con
  • You cant tell that a writer and a singer
    have anything in common. So you cant generally
    apply any inferences related to agentivity.

7
PropBank
  • Combination of verb specific roles and marker of
    deep subject/object.

8
Pros and Cons
  • The Jackendoff motion metaphor/localist approach
  • Agent, theme, source, goal, path
  • Motion, state, possession, telling, creating,
    reaching/extending, attaching
  • Pros
  • Identify paraphrase relations using the same
    verb.
  • Support some inferences across different verbs.
  • Cons
  • We didnt get high intercoder agreement
  • But we can improve the definitions and work on
    common confusions.
  • The motion metaphor doesnt cover every verb.
    (risk death, spare his life, the car rumbled,
    identify some problems)
  • At the point where the motion metaphor breaks
    down, assigning a role becomes unscientific.
  • Would be better if NPs could have dual roles
    agent/theme, agent/source, etc.
  • Its never clear how experiencer verbs fit in.

9
Pros and Cons
  • Frame semantics
  • Commercial transaction, use transportation, etc.
  • Pros
  • Supports paraphrase relations using the same
    verb.
  • Supports paraphrase relations across verbs
    (assuming that the ontology assigns the verbs to
    the same frame)
  • Once the frame is identified, there is probably
    high agreement on assigning roles.
  • Cons
  • Framenet gets rearranged every once in a while.
  • Maybe a verb can be in more than one frame or
    maybe the frame depends on the situation
  • Sam took a bus to school for one dollar.
  • Transportation or commercial transaction?
  • Framenet currently has multiple inheritance.
    Transportation events are types of commercial
    transactions.
  • Problem of assigning roles gets turned into a
    problem of assigning frames.

10
Proposal
  • For the rest of Year 1
  • Try to improve the definitions and common
    confusions of the Jackendoff system.
  • After Year 1
  • Agentivity
  • Lexical aspect? (activity, accomplishment,
    achievement, state)
  • Multiple frames
  • Jackendoff motion metaphor is one kind of frame
  • Levin verb classes are also frames
  • E.g., Emit sound (rumble), change location, etc.
  • Identify some number of other frames from
    framenet that cover a lot of ground.
  • Annotators are responsible for frame name
    (assuming that it changes with the context) and
    the roles.
  • There can be more than one frame name and more
    than one set of roles.

11
Proposal
  • Useful for IE and QA and maybe even MT.
  • Funding agencies can add frames that they are
    interested in, e.g., use weapon.
  • Should be ok cross-linguistically.
  • By assigning multiple frames, conflations can be
    identified
  • Float into the cave.
  • Take the bus to school.
  • Rumble down the street.
  • Hammer the nail flat.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com