A Questionbased Approach to Educational Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

A Questionbased Approach to Educational Planning

Description:

Trend analysis. Combinations. Others . . . 'Educational Need' Defined (general) ... Trend analysis is a more proactive, anticipatory, future-oriented approach to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:797
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: thomas278
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Questionbased Approach to Educational Planning


1
A Question-based Approach to Educational
Planning
  • Thomas J. Sork
  • The University of British Columbia
  • December 3, 2001

2
A Skilled Program Planner is
  • Technically capable
  • Politically aware
  • Ethically responsible

3
Basic Elements of Program Planning
4
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
5
Context Defined
The interrelated conditions in which something
exists or occurs. Websters Collegiate
The circumstances relevant to something under
consideration. Concise Oxford
6
Analyze Planning Context
  • What factors are important?
  • How will they affect planning?

7
Some Contextual Factors
  • Mission/purpose
  • Formal/informal authority
  • History/traditions
  • Internal/external political climate
  • Role of education
  • Structure
  • Accountability framework
  • Cooperative/competitive relationships
  • Social/economic forces
  • Reputation/status
  • Others . . .

8
Analyze Learner Community
  • Who are the learners?
  • What learner characteristics are important to
    planning?
  • How will they affect planning?

9
Some Learner Characteristics
  • Gender
  • Cultural/ethnic background
  • Educational level
  • Employment/work history
  • Work/family obligations
  • Attitude toward education
  • Disabilities
  • Barriers/deterrents to participation
  • Age
  • Facility with languages
  • Learning styles
  • Sources of information
  • Social networks
  • Economic circumstances
  • Others . . .

10
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
11
Justify and Focus Planning
  • Needs assessment
  • Interest inventory
  • Market test
  • Problem analysis
  • Trend analysis
  • Combinations
  • Others . . .

12
Educational Need Defined(general)
A gap or discrepancy between a present capability
(PC) and a desired capability (DC).
13
Capability Defined
The capacity to think and to act in specific
ways.
14
More capable
Desired capability
n
Educational need
l
Less capable
Present capability
Time
15
Methods of Gathering Information
  • Written surveys
  • Telephone surveys
  • Individual interviews
  • Group interviews
  • Nominal groups
  • Focus groups
  • Delphi technique
  • Talking circles
  • Incident analysis
  • Doc./lit. analysis
  • Observations
  • Self-assessments
  • Tests/examinations
  • Job analysis/DACUM
  • Practice audits
  • Others

16
Interest Inventory
  • Most interest inventories ask some form of the
    following
  • Which of these possible programs are you
    interested in attending?
  • OR
  • What programs would you like us to offer?

17
Market Test
  • How many people will buy this program and what
    will they think of it after they use it?
  • What changes should we make to the program based
    on the market response?

18
Problem Analysis
  • Any systematic effort to understand the origins
    and possible solutions to a recognized problem.
    Once possible solutions are identified, those
    that can be implemented via education or training
    programs become the basis for the rest of the
    planning process.

19
Trend Analysis
  • Trend analysis is any process that studies an
    existing trend (social, technological, economic,
    educational, etc.) to determine what might happen
    in the near-term future that could be the basis
    of an education or training program. Trend
    analysis is a more proactive, anticipatory,
    future-oriented approach to planning than
    needs-based approaches.

20
Combinations
  • Two or more of these methods to justify and focus
    planning can be combined to take advantage of the
    strengths of each. This may require added work
    but can also produce more detailed information
    about what should be included in the program.

21
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
Clarify Intentions
22
Clarify Intentions
  • Objectives
  • Purposes
  • Processes
  • Content
  • Benefits
  • Outcomes
  • Combinations
  • Others . . .

23
Different Forms of Objectives
  • Tylers approach
  • Magers approach
  • Gronlunds approach
  • Gagne, Briggs Wagers approach

24
Tylers Approach
  • Objectives should not describe behaviours of
    instructors. Rather, they should describe changes
    that will take place in students. An objective
    should have two components
  • The behaviour to be developed
  • The area of content or life in which the
    behaviour is to be applied.

25
Magers Approach
  • Useful objectives contain three elements
  • Performancewhat the learner is expected to be
    able to do.
  • Conditionsthe important conditions under which
    the performance is to occur.
  • Criterionstandard of acceptable performance
    quality of the performance.

26
Gronlunds Approach
  • Objectives should describe what students will be
    able to do following instruction, but this can be
    done at two levels
  • General instructional objectives provide an
    overall view of outcomes.
  • Specific learning outcomes are detailed
    descriptions of what students will be able to do
    following instruction.

27
Gagne, Briggs and Wagers Approach
  • Suggest a five-component objective
  • Situationfaced by the learner.
  • Learned capability verbone of nine.
  • Objectcontent of performance.
  • Action verbdescribes performance.
  • Tools, constraints, or special conditionsrelated
    to the performance.

28
Purposes Approach
  • A purpose statement is usually more general than
    an objective, but can do a good job of
    communicating program intent. Example
  • The purpose of this program is to encourage
    participants to adopt innovative approaches to
    conflict resolution and to show how conflict
    resolution strategies can be used to improve
    organizational effectiveness.

29
Processes Approach
  • Describes what will take place during the
    program. Intentions are inferred from this
    description. Example
  • This program will provide participants an
    opportunity to assess their current assertiveness
    skills, to practice new skills in simulated work
    situations, and to develop strategies to apply
    these skills in their work, family and social
    lives.

30
Content Approach
  • Describes the content of a program and leaves it
    to the reader to infer what outcomes might result
    from exposure to the content
  • Example This program includes An Introduction
    to Transformational Learning Distinguishing
    Transformational from Other Types of Learning
    Recent Research on Transformational Learning
    Facilitating Transformational Learning
    Evaluating the Outcomes of Transformational
    Learning

31
Benefits Approach
  • Describes the anticipated benefits to
    participants of attending the program. Example
    By attending this program you will be able to
    (1) have greater influence on people, (2) add
    power and polish to your professional image, and
    (3) handle difficult people.

32
Outcomes Approach
  • Learning outcomes describe the capabilities that
    learners will develop as a result of
    participating in programs. They are somewhat
    different from objectives because outcomes
    describe how learning will be applied after the
    program is completed.

33
Combinations
  • Two or more of these can be combined to
    communicate program intentions. For example,
    purpose, content and objectives can all be used
    to communicate program intent. Other combinations
    are also possible. Use as few or as many as
    necessary to communicate program intentions to
    stakeholders and the learner community.

34
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
Clarify Intentions
Prepare Instructional Plan
35
Prepare Instructional Plan
  • includes . . .
  • Selecting content, skills activities
  • Sequencing activities
  • Scheduling feedback
  • Developing a motivational plan
  • Specifying instructional resources
  • Attending to aesthetics

36
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
Prepare Administrative Plan
Clarify Intentions
Prepare Instructional Plan
37
Prepare Administrative Plan
  • includes . . .
  • Deciding on date, time location
  • Arranging for facilities amenities
  • Financing budgeting
  • Developing a marketing plan
  • Designating responsibilities
  • Setting monitoring timelines

38
Budget Concepts
  • Fixed costs
  • Variable costs
  • Overhead or indirect costs
  • Break-even point

39
Break-Even Chart
Revenue
Costs Revenue
Break-even Point
Variable Costs
10,000
4,500
Fixed Costs
50
No. of Registrants
40
Marketing/Promoting the Program
  • Means of communication
  • Content of the message
  • Timing
  • Support services

41
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
Develop Summative Evaluation Plan
Formative Evaluation
Prepare Administrative Plan
Clarify Intentions
Prepare Instructional Plan
42
Develop Summative Evaluation Plan
  • includes . . .
  • Identifying involving stakeholders
  • Determining purpose
  • Gathering evidence
  • Developing and applying criteria
  • Making judgements
  • Reporting results

43
Program Evaluation Defined
the process of judging (or a judgment as to)
the worth or value of a program. This judgment is
formed by comparing evidence as to what
the program is with criteria as to what the
program should be. Steele, 1970
44
Criteria
Comparison
Judgement
Evidence
45
Possible Evaluation Stakeholders
  • Participants
  • Planners/administrators
  • Instructors
  • Program staff
  • Sponsors
  • Employers
  • Professional associations
  • Labour unions
  • Governments
  • Advisory groups
  • Board members
  • Others...

46
Kirkpatricks Evaluation Levels
1. Reaction ? How well did the participants like
the program? 2. Learning ? What principles,
facts and techniques were learned? What
attitudes were changed? 3. Behavior ? What
changes in job behavior resulted from the
program? 4. Results ? What were the tangible
results of the program in terms of reduced
costs, improved quality, improved quantity, etc?
47
Evaluation Evidence
  • Written questionnaires
  • Interviews/discussions
  • Nominal/focus groups
  • Supervisor ratings
  • Peer ratings
  • Self-ratings/assessments
  • Reflective journals
  • Tests
  • Record/report analyses
  • Observations/videos
  • Simulations/role plays
  • In-basket exercises
  • Program/learning portfolios
  • Cost-benefit/ROI analyses
  • Others

48
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
Develop Summative Evaluation Plan
Formative Evaluation
Prepare Administrative Plan
Clarify Intentions
Prepare Instructional Plan
49
Formative Evaluation . . .
  • . . . involves analyzing the decisions and
    actions taken at each stage of planning to
    determine if the design of the program can be
    improved before it is implemented.

50
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
Develop Summative Evaluation Plan
Formative Evaluation
Prepare Administrative Plan
Clarify Intentions
Prepare Instructional Plan
51
Basic Elements of Program Planning
Analyze Planning Context Learner Community
Justify Focus Planning
Develop Summative Evaluation Plan
Formative Evaluation
Prepare Administrative Plan
Clarify Intentions
Prepare Instructional Plan
52
Three Domains of Program Planning
53
Three Domains of Program Planning
Technical
54
Three Domains of Program Planning
Technical
Social-Political
55
Three Domains of Program Planning
Technical
Social-Political
Ethical
56
Adult educators have spent the last fifty years
trying to develop ever more sophisticated
approaches to planning in the technical-rationale
tradition. We have suffered from a fixation on
linear, tidy, and familiar models that treat a
complex social process as unproblematic. It is
time that we shifted focus from finding the
perfect planning model to asking the right
questions (Sork, 2000, p. 186).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com