Title: Last lecture Todays lecture
1Last lecture Todays lecture
- Intro. to course
- Difference between this and other courses
- Professional rather than what is accessible to
all - Mechanics of course
- Intro. to minstrels
- Ambivalent attitudes
- Artist as magic person
- Culturally different attitudes to art and its
functions - Issues of talent East and West
- Body integrity and access to the spirit world
2Understanding art as a magical activity use
distancing
- Ukrainian artists of a certain type (minstrels)
are peculiar - HAVE to be blind
- What is stated is artist has to have physical
stigma, be crippled - Talent does not matter
- Blindness gt apprenticeship
- Cause of blindness
- From birth
- Accident
- Illness
3Attitude toward artist based on attitude toward
art
- Art is good and powerful
- Brings blessings, brings spiritual good
- You DO NOT do it for money
- Do it for the blessings and the spirit
- Earning money from art ONLY for the crippled
- This is a form of begging
- Giving money to a beggar gives blessings like
those that come from art
4Time frame
- Starts 13th, 14th century? Maybe earlier
- We know for sure late 19th century on
- Ends with Stalin and the massacre of minstrels in
1939 - Modern times only a few a blind
- Talent is the basis for deciding who will sing now
5Reconciling talent and handicap
- Some singers are VERY good
- If choice is on basis of blindness, not talent,
how is this possible - Song samples
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11Reconciling talent and physical defect
- Assume talent comes FIRST
- Singer made blind with herbs over the course of
apprenticeship - SURVEY
12Explanation 1 handicap fosters talent
- Compensation for organ inferiority
- Certain amount of sensory ability in each person
- Some faculty lost another compensates
- Blind people hear better, have better sense of
touch, smell, taste (Suprun joke) - Better hearing, touch, might well help with music
- Minstrels mention better memory
- Basis in fact? Suprun does remember better
13But minstrel is a beggar and paid for spiritual
good
- What makes giving him money such a good thing
(one line of reasoning) is his handicap - Issue of body integrity
- Proper life should have body integrity
- If body integrity goes, person is special
- Either special good or special bad
14General body integrity issues
- What to do with amputated arm or leg?
- Throw away?
- Keep? If so, where?
- Bury? If so, where?
- What about soft tissue?
- What to do with uterus removed during
hysterectomy? - What about hard stuff that comes out naturally?
- Teeth, hair, nail clippings
15Slavic (Russian, Ukrainian) ideas
- Life is a cycle
- Person dies and becomes one with the soil
- Crops grow from the soil/body
- Nourish new people
- This is a pre-Christian belief
- Officially not stated official statement in
line with religion, biomedicine
16Evidence for belief in practices
- Commemoration of the dead
- As a specific deceased person at times tied to
date of death - As an ancestor (category of dead as a whole) tied
to holidays in calendar year - Easter, Ascension
- Person goes from specific dead person to ancestor
after one year - Importance of ONE YEAR connected to body decay
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Pre-Christian beliefs affect attitudes toward
monks, saints, relics
- To purify the soul, certain types of monks
practice mortification of the flesh - A kind of burial while alive the cave
monasteries - When a monk dies, cell sealed
- Remains examined after one year
- Either decay or not
22(No Transcript)
23If decay sorted by bone type
- Picture of the skull room in the Kyivan crypt
monastery - No longer an individual part of GROUP of
ancestors - Evidence of double burial one death of the type
we know second death after decay of flesh
24 Flesh does not decay sainthood