Multimodal Transport of Flowers: Taiwan to Mainland China

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Multimodal Transport of Flowers: Taiwan to Mainland China

Description:

Multimodal Transport of Flowers: Taiwan to Mainland China. AKC Beresford, C ... Cut flowers for festivals & celebrations. Species usually mixed in a container ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:279
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: sbs7

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multimodal Transport of Flowers: Taiwan to Mainland China


1
  • Multimodal Transport of Flowers Taiwan to
    Mainland China
  • AKC Beresford, C Zheng, SJ Pettit
  • Transport and Shipping Research Group
  • Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University
  • International Association of Maritime Economists
    Conference
  • 11th 14th July 2006
  • Melbourne

2
  • MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT COST MODEL
  • Traditional approaches to modal choice in
    logistics take a unimodal approach, e.g. McKinnon
  • Attributes of one mode are weighed against those
    of another road v rail, sea v air.
  • Beresford and Dubey, Beresford and Savides took
    multimodal approach MTO designs the chain
  • Least cost, least time, least risk or other
    solutions may be obtained
  • Cost v time, cost v distance, or time v distance
    can be modelled

3
  • MMT COST MODEL (Cont.)
  • Classically, intermodal transfer is a cost step
  • Ports, terminals, airports, consolidation
    centres, inland container depots
  • Transport is a progress line with
    value-addition stemming only from cargo
    repositioning
  • No real change of state of cargo
  • Flatter transport line cheaper transport, per
    tonne / km
  • Higher cost step more expensive intermodal
    transfer
  • Model easily adapted to yield total logistics
    costs, cost/m3, cost/TEU, cost/tonne

4
  • MMT COST MODEL (Cont.)
  • Model Origin Beresford Dubey (1990)
  • Beresford Savides (1997)
  • Beresford (1999)
  • Beresford Banomyong (2001)
  • Model now used by UN as an approach to evaluating
    multimodal transport chains
  • UNESCAP (2003) Transit Transport
  • Issues in Landlocked and Transit Developing
    Countries
  • Trans-Asian landbridge routes and shipping
    alternatives
  • Now available at www.unescap.org (2005)

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Background
  • 2004
  • Taiwans exports to China - US 2.9bn
  • Taiwans imports from China - US 1.048bn
  • (Taiwan Ministry of Economic Affairs)
  • Large volumes especially westbound
  • Relatively short distance, Taiwan Guandong
    province

10
Background
  • No direct sailings permitted between PRC and
    Taiwan
  • Transhipment via 3rd party location required
  • Hong Kong (HK) is a natural transhipment
    location
  • Cargo handling charges at HK are high
  • Overall transport costs via HK are therefore
    also high
  • Multimodal transport solutions varied and
    imaginative in effort to keep costs down

11
Case Study
  • Transport of live plants
  • Used to exemplify the commercial considerations
    in choosing routes and methods
  • Cargoes crossing Taiwan Strait mainly primary
    products offering little or no opportunities for
    value addition
  • Transport costs thus a major consideration in
    route planning
  • Transhipment is time consuming

12
Case Study
  • In-transit inventory becomes costly with little
    or no chance to offset costs by improving cargo
  • Producers and traders pressing for permission to
    route directly, but change unlikely
  • Existing and potential routes explored
  • Cost minimisation, time schedule control and
    service requirements considered together
  • Core question Which routes offer greatest
    flexibility to meet commercial and service
    expectations

13
Data Collection
  • Major MMT operator serving the Taiwan PRC
    market provided data
  • Company is global, fully connected to port
    terminals, Inland Container Depots, hauliers and
    feeder service providers
  • Company has a good reputation for quality service
    provision
  • Company provided both quantitative and
    qualitative information

14
Data Collection
  • Interviews used to gather data during July 2005
  • Data providers
  • importers, shipping lines, terminal operators
  • road hauliers, feeder service operators
  • Data variables
  • route distances
  • transport times
  • Transport costs
  • handling costs

15
Modal Choice
  • Starting point for Taiwan PRC trade
  • Road / Water
  • Water includes inland waterways and deep sea
  • Suited to
  • low value / high density cargo e.g. minerals,
    agricultural and forest products
  • high value / high volume cargo e.g. flowers,
    plants, shrubs
  • Water transport is low cost but slow, and
    requires pre- and post- transport

16
Modal Choice
  • Two types of water transport used
  • deep sea container 1000 FEU for Taichung HK
  • barges 40 FEU capacity for up-river movement
  • Barges equipped with on-board temperature control

17
(No Transcript)
18
Modal Choice
  • Use of road transport gives
  • accessibility, flexibility, speed, inventory
    savings
  • Road option suffers from
  • high unit costs, congestion, schedule
    uncertainty
  • Cargoes must be sufficiently high value to
    justify and sustain high transport cost
  • Classic speed vs. cost vs. inventory trade-offs

19
Taiwan Flower Industry
  • Tropical location
  • Pacific rim
  • 220 260N
  • Warm / hot
  • Varied geography
  • Natural advantages for flowers / plant
    cultivation
  • Rapid growth in exports to China 1989 2004
  • Steady reduction in imports from China

20
The Market
  • Cultural links and booming Chinese economy
    pull factors
  • Active promotion by Taiwan push factor
  • Many buyers and sellers well linked esp. in
    Guangdong
  • Largest centre Shunde (Flower World)
  • 250 Taiwanese companies covering production and
    sales
  • Buyers come from all over PRC

21
The Product
  • Big species e.g. palm trees for decoration /
    parks gardens
  • Smaller species e.g. cacti for homes offices
  • Cut flowers for festivals celebrations
  • Species usually mixed in a container
  • Fragile require in-transit care moisture and
    temp. control
  • Delays not desirable
  • reserve routes required
  • accessibility problems
  • Reliability and capability are key

22
Carriers and Operators
  • Taiwan Floriculture Export Assocn. (TFEA) is
    promotional body
  • Freight forwarders play major role in mode, route
    and method selection
  • Dominant current solution sea to HK. Truck to
    Flower World
  • Several multimodal alternatives possible

23
Routes and Modes
Source Authors O original routeing
Table 1 Multimodal transport routeings from
Taichung to Flower World
24
Export
  • Routeing is via Taichung, but via Kaoshiung
    could save time
  • Transhipment via HK into south China via Shenzen
  • 5 ferry terminals and frequent sailings offer
    alternatives
  • Frequencies and speeds vary, but can fit
    requirements
  • Mostly daily except Sundays

25
Provisional Main Costs
Table 2. Transport Costs
Source Authors
26
Existing Sea Road Route
  • Pre carriage 100 km
  • Taichung HK 688 nm (1273 km)
  • HK Flower World 200 km
  • Total time lt 7 days
  • Total cost US 1472 / FEU
  • Consignment shipped on day 3, arrival time in HK
    normally a.m. day 5
  • Customs levies are high and bring risk of delays
  • Road haulage and truck loading / unloading 14
    of distance, 40 of cost
  • Re routeing therefore could reduce costs
    substantially

27
(No Transcript)
28
Alternative Routes
  • Competition between carriers and between routes
    could / should reduce costs
  • Pearl River Delta (PRD) has numerous navigable
    rivers and ferry terminals
  • Many existing feeder (ferry) services between HK
    and Shunde
  • Distance / Time matrix shown in Table 3
  • HK Zhongshan Flower World fastest solution
  • Fastest not always best
  • Road transport damages plants due to vibration
    and slewing
  • Cost or time not therefore enough in service
    level evaluation

29
Alternative Routes
Table 3. Distances and Transit Times from Hong
Kong to Flower World
Source Authors Note The average speed of a
container truck is assumed as 60km/hr.
30
Existing Route
2
5
3
1
4
31
Alternative Route 1
  • Taichung - HK - Zhongshan - Flower World
  • Sea Ferry Road
  • Around 7 days total time
  • Total cost 1215 per FEU
  • 17 cheaper than current sea road solution

32
Alternative Route 2
  • Taichung HK LHS - Flower World
  • Transhipment at HK
  • Different ferry terminal, different schedule
  • Total cost 1159 per FEU
  • Less road transport, small time saving, 21
    cheaper than current route

33
Alternative Route 3
  • Taichung HK Leliu - Flower World
  • Transhipment at HK but schedule too late for same
    day completion
  • Overall time 8 days
  • Main cargo on this route is logs plants used as
    make-up cargo on ferry
  • Overall cost is 1209, cheaper than Alt. route 1
    but more than Alt. route 2

34
Alternative Route 4
  • Taichung HK Beijiao - Flower World
  • Tight transhipment schedule
  • Overall time 7 - 8 days
  • Long ferry leg, short road haul
  • Total cost 1137 per FEU
  • Lowest total cost, slowest overall time schedule

35
Alternative Route 5
  • Taichung HK Pinzhou - Flower World
  • Tight transhipment schedule
  • Overall time 7 - 8 days
  • Can be fastest overall and price competitive -
    1131
  • Saving of 341 over current route (23)
  • Tight schedule facilitated by advanced clearance
    links into customs network

36
(No Transcript)
37
Route Analysis Summary

Distances and Costs from Hong Kong to Flower
World
Source Authors
38
Route Analysis SummarySea Road Route
  • Fastest but high transhipment and road haulage
    costs
  • Road transport 43 of total cost
  • Long clearance times
  • Long road journey increases risk of damage
  • Occasional road accidents
  • Not simple time cost trade-off vis a vis
    sea-ferry alternative

39
Route Analysis Summary
Cost Comparison between Sea-Road and Hong
Kong-Pinzhou routes

.
40
Sea - Road versus Sea/Road/Ferry Combination
Pinzhou Route
41
Route Analysis Summary
  • Although via Pinzhou appears best, not always
    wise to use only one route
  • Plants are high volume, medium value
  • 500 containers / month Taiwan China
  • use of more than one terminal reduces pressure
  • competition / price brokering
  • importers like to spread volume around to
    disguise flows
  • Variable customs treatment encourages spreading
    of business

42
Route Analysis Summary
  • Business relationships / human factor , agency
    preferences contribute to route selection
  • Overall cost and time very important, but other
    factors affect choice of route, method, carrier
    etc.

43
Taichung vs Kaoshiung
  • Taichung HK 688km
  • Kaoshiung HK 343 km
  • Sea freight same at 600
  • Pricing by commodity / class, not distance
  • Road haul, warehouse to
  • Taichung - 105 (70km)
  • Kaoshiung 361 (225km)
  • Routeing via Taichung 1 day slower but 256
    cheaper
  • Kaoshiung used at peak and provides discounts

44
Conclusions
  • Current cross strait restrictions between Taiwan
    PRC force route and mode choice
  • Potential alternatives are available
  • All alternative routes offer cost savings
  • 3 alternatives also time competitive
  • Peak season, slower, more expensive routes
    selected on other preference criteria
  • Optimum multimodal transport solutions may not be
    cheapest, fastest or even most reliable but are
    a complex mix of these criteria
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)