Title: Multimodal Transport of Flowers: Taiwan to Mainland China
1- Multimodal Transport of Flowers Taiwan to
Mainland China - AKC Beresford, C Zheng, SJ Pettit
- Transport and Shipping Research Group
- Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University
- International Association of Maritime Economists
Conference - 11th 14th July 2006
- Melbourne
2- MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT COST MODEL
- Traditional approaches to modal choice in
logistics take a unimodal approach, e.g. McKinnon - Attributes of one mode are weighed against those
of another road v rail, sea v air. - Beresford and Dubey, Beresford and Savides took
multimodal approach MTO designs the chain - Least cost, least time, least risk or other
solutions may be obtained - Cost v time, cost v distance, or time v distance
can be modelled
3- MMT COST MODEL (Cont.)
- Classically, intermodal transfer is a cost step
- Ports, terminals, airports, consolidation
centres, inland container depots - Transport is a progress line with
value-addition stemming only from cargo
repositioning - No real change of state of cargo
- Flatter transport line cheaper transport, per
tonne / km - Higher cost step more expensive intermodal
transfer - Model easily adapted to yield total logistics
costs, cost/m3, cost/TEU, cost/tonne
4- MMT COST MODEL (Cont.)
- Model Origin Beresford Dubey (1990)
- Beresford Savides (1997)
- Beresford (1999)
- Beresford Banomyong (2001)
- Model now used by UN as an approach to evaluating
multimodal transport chains - UNESCAP (2003) Transit Transport
- Issues in Landlocked and Transit Developing
Countries - Trans-Asian landbridge routes and shipping
alternatives - Now available at www.unescap.org (2005)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9Background
- 2004
- Taiwans exports to China - US 2.9bn
- Taiwans imports from China - US 1.048bn
- (Taiwan Ministry of Economic Affairs)
- Large volumes especially westbound
- Relatively short distance, Taiwan Guandong
province
10Background
- No direct sailings permitted between PRC and
Taiwan - Transhipment via 3rd party location required
- Hong Kong (HK) is a natural transhipment
location - Cargo handling charges at HK are high
- Overall transport costs via HK are therefore
also high - Multimodal transport solutions varied and
imaginative in effort to keep costs down
11Case Study
- Transport of live plants
- Used to exemplify the commercial considerations
in choosing routes and methods - Cargoes crossing Taiwan Strait mainly primary
products offering little or no opportunities for
value addition - Transport costs thus a major consideration in
route planning - Transhipment is time consuming
12Case Study
- In-transit inventory becomes costly with little
or no chance to offset costs by improving cargo - Producers and traders pressing for permission to
route directly, but change unlikely - Existing and potential routes explored
- Cost minimisation, time schedule control and
service requirements considered together - Core question Which routes offer greatest
flexibility to meet commercial and service
expectations
13Data Collection
- Major MMT operator serving the Taiwan PRC
market provided data - Company is global, fully connected to port
terminals, Inland Container Depots, hauliers and
feeder service providers - Company has a good reputation for quality service
provision - Company provided both quantitative and
qualitative information
14Data Collection
- Interviews used to gather data during July 2005
- Data providers
- importers, shipping lines, terminal operators
- road hauliers, feeder service operators
- Data variables
- route distances
- transport times
- Transport costs
- handling costs
-
15Modal Choice
- Starting point for Taiwan PRC trade
- Road / Water
- Water includes inland waterways and deep sea
- Suited to
- low value / high density cargo e.g. minerals,
agricultural and forest products - high value / high volume cargo e.g. flowers,
plants, shrubs - Water transport is low cost but slow, and
requires pre- and post- transport -
16Modal Choice
- Two types of water transport used
- deep sea container 1000 FEU for Taichung HK
- barges 40 FEU capacity for up-river movement
- Barges equipped with on-board temperature control
-
17(No Transcript)
18Modal Choice
- Use of road transport gives
- accessibility, flexibility, speed, inventory
savings - Road option suffers from
- high unit costs, congestion, schedule
uncertainty - Cargoes must be sufficiently high value to
justify and sustain high transport cost - Classic speed vs. cost vs. inventory trade-offs
-
19Taiwan Flower Industry
- Tropical location
- Pacific rim
- 220 260N
- Warm / hot
- Varied geography
- Natural advantages for flowers / plant
cultivation - Rapid growth in exports to China 1989 2004
- Steady reduction in imports from China
-
20The Market
- Cultural links and booming Chinese economy
pull factors - Active promotion by Taiwan push factor
- Many buyers and sellers well linked esp. in
Guangdong - Largest centre Shunde (Flower World)
- 250 Taiwanese companies covering production and
sales - Buyers come from all over PRC
-
21The Product
- Big species e.g. palm trees for decoration /
parks gardens - Smaller species e.g. cacti for homes offices
- Cut flowers for festivals celebrations
- Species usually mixed in a container
- Fragile require in-transit care moisture and
temp. control - Delays not desirable
- reserve routes required
- accessibility problems
- Reliability and capability are key
-
22Carriers and Operators
- Taiwan Floriculture Export Assocn. (TFEA) is
promotional body - Freight forwarders play major role in mode, route
and method selection - Dominant current solution sea to HK. Truck to
Flower World - Several multimodal alternatives possible
-
23Routes and Modes
Source Authors O original routeing
Table 1 Multimodal transport routeings from
Taichung to Flower World
24Export
- Routeing is via Taichung, but via Kaoshiung
could save time - Transhipment via HK into south China via Shenzen
- 5 ferry terminals and frequent sailings offer
alternatives - Frequencies and speeds vary, but can fit
requirements - Mostly daily except Sundays
-
25Provisional Main Costs
Table 2. Transport Costs
Source Authors
26Existing Sea Road Route
- Pre carriage 100 km
- Taichung HK 688 nm (1273 km)
- HK Flower World 200 km
- Total time lt 7 days
- Total cost US 1472 / FEU
- Consignment shipped on day 3, arrival time in HK
normally a.m. day 5 - Customs levies are high and bring risk of delays
- Road haulage and truck loading / unloading 14
of distance, 40 of cost - Re routeing therefore could reduce costs
substantially -
27(No Transcript)
28Alternative Routes
- Competition between carriers and between routes
could / should reduce costs - Pearl River Delta (PRD) has numerous navigable
rivers and ferry terminals - Many existing feeder (ferry) services between HK
and Shunde - Distance / Time matrix shown in Table 3
- HK Zhongshan Flower World fastest solution
- Fastest not always best
- Road transport damages plants due to vibration
and slewing - Cost or time not therefore enough in service
level evaluation -
29Alternative Routes
Table 3. Distances and Transit Times from Hong
Kong to Flower World
Source Authors Note The average speed of a
container truck is assumed as 60km/hr.
30Existing Route
2
5
3
1
4
31Alternative Route 1
- Taichung - HK - Zhongshan - Flower World
- Sea Ferry Road
- Around 7 days total time
- Total cost 1215 per FEU
- 17 cheaper than current sea road solution
-
32Alternative Route 2
- Taichung HK LHS - Flower World
- Transhipment at HK
- Different ferry terminal, different schedule
- Total cost 1159 per FEU
- Less road transport, small time saving, 21
cheaper than current route -
33Alternative Route 3
- Taichung HK Leliu - Flower World
- Transhipment at HK but schedule too late for same
day completion - Overall time 8 days
- Main cargo on this route is logs plants used as
make-up cargo on ferry - Overall cost is 1209, cheaper than Alt. route 1
but more than Alt. route 2 -
34Alternative Route 4
- Taichung HK Beijiao - Flower World
- Tight transhipment schedule
- Overall time 7 - 8 days
- Long ferry leg, short road haul
- Total cost 1137 per FEU
- Lowest total cost, slowest overall time schedule
-
35Alternative Route 5
- Taichung HK Pinzhou - Flower World
- Tight transhipment schedule
- Overall time 7 - 8 days
- Can be fastest overall and price competitive -
1131 - Saving of 341 over current route (23)
- Tight schedule facilitated by advanced clearance
links into customs network -
36(No Transcript)
37Route Analysis Summary
Distances and Costs from Hong Kong to Flower
World
Source Authors
38Route Analysis SummarySea Road Route
- Fastest but high transhipment and road haulage
costs - Road transport 43 of total cost
- Long clearance times
- Long road journey increases risk of damage
- Occasional road accidents
- Not simple time cost trade-off vis a vis
sea-ferry alternative
39Route Analysis Summary
Cost Comparison between Sea-Road and Hong
Kong-Pinzhou routes
.
40Sea - Road versus Sea/Road/Ferry Combination
Pinzhou Route
41Route Analysis Summary
- Although via Pinzhou appears best, not always
wise to use only one route - Plants are high volume, medium value
- 500 containers / month Taiwan China
- use of more than one terminal reduces pressure
- competition / price brokering
- importers like to spread volume around to
disguise flows - Variable customs treatment encourages spreading
of business -
42Route Analysis Summary
- Business relationships / human factor , agency
preferences contribute to route selection - Overall cost and time very important, but other
factors affect choice of route, method, carrier
etc. -
43Taichung vs Kaoshiung
- Taichung HK 688km
- Kaoshiung HK 343 km
- Sea freight same at 600
- Pricing by commodity / class, not distance
- Road haul, warehouse to
- Taichung - 105 (70km)
- Kaoshiung 361 (225km)
- Routeing via Taichung 1 day slower but 256
cheaper - Kaoshiung used at peak and provides discounts
-
44Conclusions
- Current cross strait restrictions between Taiwan
PRC force route and mode choice - Potential alternatives are available
- All alternative routes offer cost savings
- 3 alternatives also time competitive
- Peak season, slower, more expensive routes
selected on other preference criteria - Optimum multimodal transport solutions may not be
cheapest, fastest or even most reliable but are
a complex mix of these criteria