Title: Image Processing Steps
1Biodiversity Implications of Forest Disturbance
and Related Landscape Dynamics in the Brazilian
Amazon
Mark A. Cochrane1,2, David P. Roy1, Carlos Souza
Jr.2, Jos Barlow3, Eugenio Arima4, Izaya Numata1,
Christopher P. Barber1, Luiz Mestre1, Rafael
Andrade1, and Sanath Kumar1
1 Geographic Information Science Center of
Excellence, South Dakota State University,
Brookings, SD USA 2 IMAZON, Instituto do Homem e
Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, Belém, PA Brazil 3
Lancaster University, Lancaster United Kingdom 4
Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva NY USA
2What is the project?
- The fundamental hypothesis underlying this
project is that the biodiversity levels of
Amazonian forests are strongly related to two
competing factors forest disturbance and time
since last disturbance
3The Brazilian Amazon
Amazon humid tropical forest biomes 6.4 km2
Portion in Brazil 4 km2
Source WWF
4(No Transcript)
5Human Access to Forest
85 of deforestation within 50 km of main roads
73,000 km of official roads in region
240,000 km of unofficial roads
Expansion rates gt 40 km / 10,000 km2 / year
Source IBGE, IMAZON
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13- Forest wildfires Interact with ongoing threats
to the Amazon
14How do we propose to test this?
- Our approach is straightforward
- 1) Determine recent forest disturbance history
across the Brazilian Amazon (2000-2009) - 2) Conduct extensive field studies of indicator
taxa, stratified by disturbance history, to
determine biodiversity responses - 3) Model the determinants of fire ignition and
fire spread - 4) Predict the current and future levels of
biodiversity similarity in disturbed forests
spatially across the Brazilian Amazon.
15Phase 1. Imagery Acquisition and Processing
16Image Processing Steps
(2) Build Spectral Library
(1) PRE-PROCESSING
Image Registration Radiance Conversion
Estimate Visibility and water vapor
Correct Haze?
Reflectance Space
Atmospheric Correction (ACORN)
No
Yes
Apply Carlottos Technique
Pixel Purity Index - (PPI)
(4) Enhance and Detect Canopy Damage
(3) SMA
40 million pixels
NDFI
CCA
Visualization
SVDC
NDFI 0.75
Scatter matrix Spectral curves
Extract Patios
Generic Image Endmembers
Canopy Damage
Soil 10 1 pixel Area 4 pixels
GV NPV Soil Shade 1
Souza Jr. et al. (2005), RSE
17Haze Correction
Contaminated Image
Corrected Image
Ji-Parana, 231/67 R3, G2, B1
18Normalized Difference Fraction Index
Souza Jr. et al. (2005), RSE
19NDFI
226/68 - 2001 (Sinop - MT)
20NDFI
226/68 - 2000 (Sinop - MT)
21NDFI
226/68 - 2001 (Sinop - MT)
22NDFI
226/68 - 2003 (Sinop - MT)
23Mapping Forest Damage History
24Characterizing Forest Fragmentation
25Age map
- Derived from Landsat time series
- Used for calculation of fragmentation features
Time series Land cover map
Age map
S.G.Forest
26Persistence of Forest Edge (Ariquemes)
Remaining edge
27Class 1
28Phase 2. Biodiversity Field Studies
- The spatial database of forest disturbance is
used to stratify and interpret our field studies
investigating the response of 4 major indicator
taxa (birds, dung beetles, trees and ants) as a
function of disturbance history and time since
last disturbance.
29Both birds and dung beetles are good indicators
of community change in most other faunal groups
Barlow et al. 2007 PNAS
30Both birds and dung beetles hold large numbers of
species that are restricted to primary forest
Many wide ranging species
Mostly territorial or habitat specialists
Barlow et al. 2007 PNAS
31Both birds and dung beetles are highly cost
effective to sample you get good information on
habitat integrity for a low cost
Gardner, Barlow et al. 2008 Ecology Letters
32Selecting effective biodiversity indicators
- Wide variability in cost of surveying different
taxa - Some taxa (e.g. birds and dung beetles) are of
high performance for evaluating forest management
systems in the Brazilian Amazon because they - Are sensitive indicators of changes in forest
integrity - Can be surveyed cost effectively
- Ants share similar ecological attributes as birds
and dung-beetles - They are cheap to sample
- Species rich, with many different functional
groups - Most do not move large distances from their
colonies (if you find them in a habitat, they
come from that habitat).
33Methods Dung Beetles
- Baited pitfall traps (human faeces)
- 5 traps per transect, run for 4 days.
- Follows methods discussed at global Scarabnet
meetings, and used effectively in many Amazonian
studies - Complemented by un-baited flight intercept traps
34Fire-mediated dieback and compositional cascade
Barlow and Peres 2008
35POINT COUNTS
Observation and recording 10 point counts per
day per site 0630 h - 0900 h 10 min. bird
observation and recording, spaced at least 150m
each other, intending to avoid double
bird-counting (Parker, 1991). Along each
mist-net transects and other trails.
36MIST NETS
Less individuals sampled compared to point
counts BUT It is independent of observer
accuracy Capture mainly understory birds Samples
species that are not singing Possibility to mark
(banding) and measure
37 MEASURING We will measure
Wings Tarsus
Bill Weight
38Expected Results
A large-scale comparison of effects of fire on
Amazonian bird communities. A long-term
comparison of effects of fire on Amazonian bird
communities. One of the best overviews comparing
Amazonian bird communities in different Amazonian
States (500 sp).
39Phase 3 Characterizing Fires (Starting June 2008)
- Integration of Landsat based analyses of forest
disturbance with MODIS-derived fire products will
enable us to accurately separate fires into their
three main types - (1) deforestation fires, where slash is burned,
creating relatively hot fires that burn for
several hours - 2) maintenance fires, which rapidly burn as
narrow fire lines through grass and early second
growth - 3) forest fires, escaped fires in standing
forests which vary from extremely low intensity
in previously undisturbed forests to high
intensity in previously burned or logged forests
40Phase 4 Spatio-socioeconomic modeling (starting
June 2008)
- We will use spatial regressions of economic
(farmgate prices for soybean and beef),
physical-geographic (precipitation, soil types,
vegetation types, distance to previous
deforestation, and land protection status (e.g.
indigenous lands, conservation units)) and land
cover (disturbance history) factors to model
probability surfaces of fire ignition and fire
spread. - MODIS fire detections will be used to validate
the ignition event model for 2000-2009 and the
composite burned area product (Phase 3) will be
used to validate the fire spread model over the
same time period. - Once validated, the models will be run using
likely economic and rainfall scenarios to create
spatio-temporal predictions of disturbance
frequency and expected biodiversity impacts for
the 2010-2019 time period.
41Reprise of Project Objectives
- Develop a basin-wide spatial database of all
forest disturbance (selective logging,
fragmentation, fire, deforestation) from
2000-2009, based on NDFI analyses of annual
Landsat imagery. - Derive regional estimation functions of expected
biodiversity similarity based on disturbance
history (disturbance metric) and
time-since-last-disturbance (resilience metric)
derived from stratified field data collected for
four separate taxa (woody plants, birds, dung
beetles and ants). - Develop a basin-wide spatial and temporal
datasets of all fires by type (1) deforestation
fires 2) maintenance fires 3) forest fires,
using MODIS and Landsat data. - Model economic, physical-geographic and land
cover factors affecting fire ignition and spread
from 2000-2009 to create probability surfaces of
fire ignition and fire spread. - Create a basin-wide map of probable biodiversity
alterations in current standing forests across
the Brazilian Amazon and predictions of future
changes in these conditions over the next 10
years (2010-2019) based on likely economic and
climate scenarios. (Starting late 2009)
42(No Transcript)