Title: Legal Update: Health Care Reform
1Legal Update Health Care Reform
- How the Presidential Election Affects Upcoming
Legislation - - Whats New on the Horizon?
- Adam V. Russo, Esq.
- The Phia Group, LLC
- The Law Offices of Russo Minchoff
- February 7, 2008
2The Uninsured
- Some 47 million Americans dont have health
insurance - 15 of population - Includes 10 million illegal immigrants who
wouldnt be covered under proposed national care. - Fails to take account of Medicaid as it includes
millions who are eligible but havent applied. - The number includes many who could buy insurance
but haven't. -
- 18 million of the uninsured have an annual income
of more than 50,000, which puts them in the top
half of income distribution. - 25 of uninsured have been offered
employer-provided insurance but declined. - 17 million people under 65 are covered by
individually purchased insurance, about 10 as
many as the 164 million covered under employer
plans.
3Increasing Health Care Costs
- Over the last 6 years, premiums have skyrocketed
5 times as fast as general inflation. - Premiums are 4 times workers earnings and twice
the growth of business income. - Combined premium and out-of-pocket costs for an
American family of four now average 14,500. - Consider this number in light of the fact that
one quarter of US workers make less than
20,000/year, and one-third of households earn
less than 37,000.
4Workforce Connections
- There are numerous people whose livelihoods
depend on the current health care system. - According to researchers at Pricewaterhouse
Coopers, one in eight US residents has a job
connected to the health care system. - It currently comprises 16 of the gross national
product. - What would be the impact of massive health care
reforms on the economy?
5Self-funded Plans
- Self-funding, stimulated by the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974,
is a product of health care inflation. - Although the intent of ERISA was to protect
pension benefits, it also provided pre-emption of
state laws for self-insured plans. - ERISA pre-emption makes it cheaper for employers
to offer health coverage since self-insured plans
are not required to cover all of the benefits
state mandates require insured plans to provide,
such as chiropractic care or alternative
medicine. - 53 of employers self-insure their health benefit
programs, according to a KFF/HRET survey.
6State Mandated Changes
- For serious health care reform, keep an eye on
the states. - No states proposed plan for universal coverage
is the same, although there are similar
strategies for covering the uninsured. -
- Under state mandates, innovation and consensus
can be easier to achieve because there are fewer
people involved. - However, a state-based system can be more complex
to understand because there are so many
differences among states. - Illinois has developed a program designed to
insure all children and 27 other states such as
CA, PA, and NY are exploring to achieve
state-wide coverage. - Massachusetts has been receiving much attention
because of its efforts to achieve universal
health coverage.Â
7Maryland A New Approach
- Bill to extend coverage to 140,000 people puts
Maryland among a number of states attempting to
lower the number of uninsured at state level. - By expanding Medicaid to 100,000 adults and
subsidies to the smallest companies (2 to 9
workers), the state focuses on those who turn up
in emergency rooms that provide free care for
routine catastrophic illnesses. - Firms and their employees would get annual
subsidies to cover the cost of health insurance. - The new law has a provision not included in
similar programs offered by other states workers
must be offered plans with wellness programs. - By signing up for free gym memberships, weight
management, smoking cessation, and agreeing to
control chronic conditions such as diabetes,
workers are eligible for cash rewards or lower
deductibles. - Lawmakers said this bill is aimed at the very
poor and lays the foundation for more ambitious
moves in the future.
8Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. San
Francisco
- 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed District
Court for N. District of CA, permitting San
Franciscos new health care ordinance to go into
effect. - 9th Circuits reasoning does not persuasively
implement the ERISA preemption case law of US
Supreme Court. - Opinion puts 9th Circuit in direct conflict with
4th Circuit, which held Marylands Wal-Mart
Act, a similar employer mandate, preempted by
ERISA. 4th has the better argument as its
opinion reflects US Supreme Court holdings. - The law was successfully challenged in District
Court by Golden Gate Restaurant Association,
representing over area establishments, which
argued that the law would violate ERISA -
conflicting local, state and federal benefit
plans. - Courts attitude makes it likely that a proposed
state health care law, which CA Assembly and Gov.
Schwarzenegger support, will survive any legal
challenge. - Like SF, state measure depends in part on funding
from employers. The Senate has yet to take up the
bill.
9Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. San
Francisco
- The decision allows the city to require
businesses with over 20 employees to pay a fee to
help cover employees health care costs and will
help about 20,000 people without insurance. - In SF, program to provide care for 73,000
uninsured adults. - Estimated 200 million annual cost to be covered
by state and local taxes and by payments from
patients based on their income. - The rest, less than 20, would come from fees
paid by employers who don't offer insurance. - About 7,350 residents were enrolled in the
program in 2007, when eligibility was limited to
those making less than the federal poverty level
of 10,310. - That left 26,000 uninsured out of the program.
Some are among an estimated 20,000 employees in
San Francisco whose companies provide no
insurance. - Ordinance provides coverage for those employees -
some of them nonresidents - either in the city
program or in a new health plan offered by their
employers.
10Presidential Election Guide
- Every front-runner has proposed reforming
healthcare. - The primary differences among candidates are the
level of financial responsibility of paying for
care and whether coverage is mandatory. - None of the candidates want to reduce the role
that states play in financing, regulating,
monitoring, and administering the nations health
care system. - Republican candidates favor a system that relies
more on the individual and private insurers
rather than employers or government to
purchase/manage care. - Democratic candidates propose building on the
employer-based system and expanding public
programs.Â
11Presidential Candidates and Their Health Care
- NPR's Julie Rovner decided to uncover the type of
care the candidates had. - Rovner stated that it was like pulling teeth to
get info from candidates even though health care
is one of the top issues in the race. - Candidates in the US House and Senate are
eligible for taxpayer-subsidized coverage through
the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan
(FEHBP). - Marilyn Moon, health director for the American
Institutes for Research, said the FEHBP is OK,
but not "gold-plated.
12Presidential Candidates and Their Health Care
- Most Democratic candidates offer their campaign
workers health coverage. - Republicans were more reluctant to talk about
their coverage - Huckabee, and Romney wouldn't
say. - McCain offers health insurance to his campaign
staff. - Huckabee and Romney wouldn't say if they cover
their staffs. - McCain gets coverage in three ways - veterans'
care (served in the military), the Senate
health-insurance program, and his wife's
supplementary insurance.
13Overall Democratic Plan
- Democratic candidates call for mandates on
individuals and/or businesses to obtain coverage
and fund their proposals, in part by rolling back
Bushs tax cuts for Americans earning over
250,000. - Democrats are competing amongst themselves over
who has the better plan to control costs and
approach universal coverage. - The candidates would require insurers to
guarantee coverage, by limiting or subsidizing
premiums. - The candidates would allow insurers to sell
individual policies nationally instead of state
by state. - All democratic candidates support a form of
universal healthcare.
14(No Transcript)
15Hillary Rodham Clinton - Democrat
- Wants universal health-care coverage by the end
of her second term. - Establish the "American Health Choices Plan" to
ensure all Americans have portable, affordable,
quality care allowing employees to keep current
plans. - Give income-related tax credits to working
families to make coverage affordable. Offer a tax
credit to small businesses to begin or continue
coverage. - The choice to buy insurance as part of the FEHBP
or a choice of private insurers offering the same
benefits. - Allow states to band together, if desired, to
offer similar plans. - Ensure that insurance companies doing business
with the federal government cover high-priority
preventive services. - The plan doesnt include details on whether
illegal immigrants will be covered.
16(No Transcript)
17Barack Obama - Democrat
- Requires children to get insurance now aims for
universal coverage by 2012. - Plan includes affordable, comprehensive and
portable health coverage for all, modernizing the
system to contain costs, and improve the quality
of care. - Those who have insurance through their employers
or who qualify for Medicaid or SCHIP would be
able to keep that coverage. - A new public insurance program would be created
for those without coverage. You could not be
turned away because of illness or pre-existing
conditions. - The federal public health insurance program would
be similar to the health care program for federal
employees. - Participating insurers to offer benefits similar
to those in the new public plan.
18Overall Republican Plan
- Republicans focus on tax incentives to encourage
Americans to obtain coverage and avoid new or
expanding government programs. - Republicans want to avoid federal regulation that
would tell insurers whom they have to cover and
how much they may charge. - Their Achilles' heel is the dependence on the
private market, which often rejects applicants
with health problems they do not support
univeral health care coverage. - The self-employed and others seeking individual
coverage would be subject to a marketplace in
which insurers generally pick the healthiest
applicants. - Federal tax breaks dont solve the problem people
in less than perfect health have finding
coverage.
19(No Transcript)
20Mitt Romney - Republican
- Wants expansion of Health Savings Accounts,
allowing tax-free savings for medical expenses,
if you buy a high-deductible plan to be used for
catastrophic medical situations. - Encourages states to develop market based health
care programs. - Opposed to a national version of the plan he
supported for Massachusetts while Governor, which
requires all to have insurance. - Would extend coverage to all Americans through
the power of the market, not through taxes or
government reforms. - Calls for tax deductions allowing individuals to
deduct out-of-pocket expenses and costs for
insurance not provided by an employer. - Wants states to individually reform health care
by expanding and deregulating their own
marketplaces.
21(No Transcript)
22Mike Huckabee - Republican
- Believes the health care system in the US is
irrevocably broken. - Advocates market-based health care, making
private insurance affordable through tax
deductions and cost control measures. - A strong advocate of preventive care (he lost
over 100 pounds), proposes overhaul of system
with input from private sector, providers,
Congress. - Supports move to a consumer-based, not
employer-based, system, as well as make health
insurance more portable from one job to the next.
- Proposes insurance tax deductions - credits for
low-income families. - Use the states as labs for new market-based
strategies and a complete reform of medical
liability. - Broaden HSA to include more than just accounts
with high deductible limits.
23(No Transcript)
24John McCain - Republican
- Has pledged affordable care for every American
without a Federal mandate. Insurance policies
would be portable, following the individual, not
the job. - Believes that controlling costs is the key to
making care affordable, saving Medicare and
Medicaid, and protecting health benefits for
retirees. - 3 primary goals paying only for quality care,
offering diverse insurance choices, and restoring
a sense of personal responsibility. - He believes individuals should have a variety of
plans to choose from and would offer tax credits
and HSAs to help pay for them. - Tax credit of 2,500 (5,000 for families) to
anyone who buys insurance. - Favors allowing safe prescription drugs to be
imported and more generic drugs to be on the
market to control drug costs.
25Issues for Health Care Improvement
- Lack of Accountability For Public Funds
- Problems of uninsured population are ill-served
when public dollars are spent on unneeded or
non-existent medical equipment under Medicare
fraud. - Largest area for fraud is the southern district
of Florida. Feds visited companies that charged
Medicare for prosthetics, costly AIDS drugs, air
mattresses, etc. Only a few products were
purchased/delivered to patients. - Cash went into pockets of company operators - one
purchased a Rolls Royce valued at 200,000. Many
offices are little storage closets. - Examples include a 2 million ankle brace for a
patient whose foot had been amputated and payment
of bills for a new hospital style bed, at the
rate of one per month, for a single patient. - Officials say that its easy to win a provider
billing number from Medicare. - Companies continued to bill 400,000 even after
Health and Human Services inspector general
determined that the businesses did not exist.
26Outpatient Treatment Centers and Physician
Self-Referrals
- According to McKinsey Global Institute, a
significant cost driver in health care system is
found in the emergence of out-patient treatment
centers. - The treatments include ambulatory surgery
centers, diagnostic imaging centers, drug rehab
clinics, mental health clinics and non-physician
offices. - US spends 37 more than other countries - The
practice of referring patients to facilities in
which physicians have a financial interest has
provided a significant loophole. - Additional procedures are driven by financial
incentives both to support the lease, purchase
and operation of equipment and by the
profitability of the procedures, the use of which
depends on subjective clinical judgment. - Using 2004 data from a CA insurer billed for
advanced imaging, 33 of providers who submitted
MRI bills and 22 who submitted CT scan bills
were classified as self-referral. - Among them, 61 who billed for MRI and 64 who
billed for CT were involved in lease or
payment-per-scan referral arrangements.
27Cost-Shifting To Health Plans
- When a WC carrier denies payment of claims, the
injured partys health insurance is responsible
for payment. - One of the worst ways that health care costs are
elevated for plans takes place when WC carriers
refuse to pay legitimate claims and direct the
claimants to their health plans. - If suit is filed, and the WC carrier settles, the
carriers never inform the health plan and leave
those funds unrecoverable. - When a potentially liable third party, say
WalMart, refuses to pay a claim by a customer
claiming injury on the premises, who picks up the
bill? Again, its the customers health
insurance. - As long as health insurance is viewed as the
default payer of claims for every accident, the
cost of health care will always be inflated.
28What Can Be Done? Plenty!
- Review Revise plan language specifically COB,
exclusions and subrogation/reimbursement. - Be aggressive with recoveries from WC, auto
carriers and responsible parties. - Better identify recovery/exclusion opportunities
through focused claim review. What claims are
you reviewing? Diag codes, dollar amounts? - Understand State and Federal laws relating to
Plan rights. - Update your procedures and investigations ask
the right questions and obtain the correct info. - Just because a liable third party denies
responsibility, doesnt mean you have to close
your file and pay you have rights.
29New DOL Proposed Rules on Disclosing TPA
Compensation
- Broker Fees Must Be Disclosed Separately From TPA
Fees Upfront. - TPAs who attended the SPBA 2007 Spring Meeting
conveying concerns about hidden broker fees in
the TPA's compensation to the DOL gave rise to a
proposed rule from the DOL requiring broker
commissions to be disclosed separately from TPA
fees. - If a broker requests the TPA to include their fee
in the TPA fee and not list their portion
independently, you can say that DOL regulations
require the broker commission to be disclosed as
a unique item. - This provision is a part of a much broader rule
on plan service provider fee disclosure to plan
sponsors and was not designed to specifically
target brokers of TPAs.  - The broker issue is buried in an exception to
reporting aggregate plan service provider fees.Â
The exception can be found at
2550.408b-2(c)(1)(iii)(A)(3).
30New DOL Proposed Rules on Disclosing TPA
Compensation
- The DOL's Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA) proposed rule requires plan
service providers (TPAs) to disclose compensation
they will receive and any conflicts of interest
in connection with services to the Plan. -
- The new rule sets forth the items that must be in
writing and disclosed to the Plan Fiduciary
(i.e., plan sponsor) before the contract begins. - Some TPAs already disclose compensation
arrangements in contracts but others are not as
explicit in disclosure as will be required under
proposal. - Any contracts that are based solely on a
handshake or meeting of the minds will no longer
be allowed. - While this rule is proposed, the rule is
clarifying an already existing regulation and
courts may apply this proposal to existing
contracts.       Â
31New DOL Proposed Rules on Disclosing TPA
Compensation
- Motivation for the Proposal - DOL recognizes that
the increasing complexity in the way service
providers are compensated makes it challenging
for plan sponsors to understand what the plan
actually pays for specific services and whether
compensation arrangements pose any potential
conflicts of interest. -
- The goal of the proposal is to provide
comprehensive and useful information to plan
sponsors when entering service contracts. - This is not a new concept or change of policy.Â
This was the intent of ERISA from the start. - This issue will be discussed further at the SPBA
Spring Meeting in April 2008.
32Contact Info Adam V. Russo, Esq.
- The Phia Group
- arusso_at_phiagroup.com
- Phone 781-535-5678
- The Law Offices of Russo Minchoff
- adam_at_russominchofflaw.com
- Phone 781-535-5660
- Visit my blog at www.passionforsubro.com for
articles, news, and current issues affecting the
self-insured industry.