ARD Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

ARD Committee

Description:

Differences between TAKS and SDAA II do not affect level of TEKS curriculum assessed ... Is knowledgeable about the general curriculum ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: regio86
Category:
Tags: ard | committee

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ARD Committee


1
ARD Committee Decision-Making Process for the
Texas Assessment Program 2004-2005 Region
XIII Education Service Center
2
Objectives
  • Review the background on state and district
    assessments and the requirements for the ARDC
    decision making process
  • Provide information so ARDCs can make informed
    decisions about statewide and districtwide
    assessments
  • Review changes in the decision making guidelines
    for statewide assessments for the 2004-05 school
    year

3
  • Background and Overview
  • 2004-2005 Texas Assessment Program Components
    By Grade
  • TAKS
  • Gr. 3-9 (Reading)
  • Gr. 3-10 and Exit (Math)
  • Gr. 4 and 7 (Writing)
  • Gr. 10 and Exit (ELA)
  • Gr. 5, 10 and Exit (Science)
  • Gr. 8, 10 and Exit (SS)
  • Spanish TAKS
  • Gr. 3-6 (Reading)
  • Gr. 3-6 (Math)
  • Gr. 4 (Writing)
  • Gr. 5 (Science)

4
  • Background and Overview
  • 2004-2005 Texas Assessment Program Components
    By Grade
  • SDAA II
  • Gr. 3-9 (Reading)
  • Gr. 3-10 (Math)
  • Gr. 4 and 7 (Writing)
  • Gr. 10 (ELA)
  • RPTE
  • Gr. 3-12
  • Observation Protocols
  • Gr. K-2 (Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing)
  • Gr. 3-12 (Listening, Speaking, Writing)
  • LDAA
  • Gr. 3-11 (all subjects)

5
  • Instructional decisions should always inform and
    guide assessment decisions.

6
Differences Between SDAA II and TAKS
  • Larger font size
  • More white space
  • Slightly shorter reading and writing passages
  • More illustrations accompanying passages and test
    items
  • Slightly fewer items on some tests
  • SDAA II assesses ALMOST all the same TEKS as TAKS
    (see SDAA II/TAKS/TEKS Correlation Guide)
  • Differences between TAKS and SDAA II do not
    affect level of TEKS curriculum assessed

7
(No Transcript)
8
  • Background and Overview
  • What is LDAA?
  • LDAA Locally Determined Alternate Assessment
  • LDAA is to be administered when
  • ARDC determines that TAKS and SDAA II are not
    appropriate, OR
  • ARDC determines that TAKS is not appropriate and
    no SDAA II exists for that subject
  • There is no state-mandated or state-approved list
    of appropriate LDAAs
  • ARDC is to select the appropriate LDAA based on
    the instruction the student is receiving
  • The LDAA will be either TEKS-based or Functional

9
Putting the Assessment Decisions in Context
  • Components of Effective ARD Committee Decision
    Making
  • Required ARDC Members
  • Eligibility
  • Educational Needs
  • Educational Program/Placement
  • Statewide/Districtwide Assessment

10
Required ARDC Members
  • Parent(s)
  • At least one general education teacher of the
    student (if the student is, or may be,
    participating in the general education
    environment)
  • At least one special education teacher/service
    provider of the student
  • A representative of the district who
  • Is qualified to provide or supervise the
    provision of specially designed instruction
  • Is knowledgeable about the general curriculum
  • Is knowledgeable about the availability of
    resources in the district, AND
  • Has the administrative authority to commit the
    resources of the district
  • An individual who can interpret the instructional
    implications of evaluation data
  • Other individuals with knowledge or special
    expertise regarding the student (e.g.,
    AI/VI/CATE/LPAC representative)
  • The student, if appropriate

11
Questions for Discussion
Required ARDC Members
  • How will the required members of the ARDC impact
    the decision-making process for state assessment?
  • What processes need to be in place at your campus
    so all members come to the ARDC meeting prepared?
  • Who should sit as the district representative at
    your ARDC meetings?

12
Eligibility
  • At each meeting, the ARDC must consider whether
    the student is, or continues to be, eligible to
    receive special education services.
  • Eligibility involves
  • Is there a disability?
  • Is there a need for special education services
    (and possibly related services) as a result of
    the disability?

13
Questions for Discussion
Eligibility
  • How does the students disability impact the
    decision making about instruction?
  • How does the students disability impact the
    decision making about assessment?

14
Present Levels of Educational Performance
Educational Needs
  • TEKS level
  • Performance in current curriculum/IEP
  • Services necessary to continue to progress
    in/access TEKS
  • Benchmark data
  • Curriculum based measures
  • Response to instructional intervention
  • Language acquisition (LEP)

15
Educational Needs
Performance on Statewide and Districtwide
Assessments
  • Confidential Student Report
  • Benchmark data
  • Grades
  • Which assessment did the student take last year?
    Performance level?
  • Did the assessment level last year match the
    curriculum stated in the IEP?
  • How far off enrolled grade level was the
    curriculum for the IEP set?

16
Questions for Discussion
Educational Needs
  • How does information about current educational
    performance impact decisions regarding current
    year instruction?
  • What processes are in place to ensure that the
    instructional levels are based on educational
    need?

17
Educational Program and Placement
  • Each year, the ARDC must determine the
    educational program for the student for the
    upcoming year
  • This involves decision-making relating to
  • Curriculum
  • TEKS
  • Individualized goals and objectives
  • Accommodations
  • Specially designed instructional services
    (special education services)

18
Educational Program and Placement
  • Data Sources that are used in determining
    appropriate instruction/curriculum
  • FIE
  • Classroom performance
  • Curriculum based measures
  • Performance on past statewide assessments (by
    objective)
  • Performance on district benchmarks

19
Questions for Discussion
Educational Program and Placement
  • What is the current program?
  • To what extent is the student accessing the
    general curriculum/TEKS?
  • What kinds of accommodations have been used that
    have realized the greatest success?
  • Are we accommodating or modifying?
  • Which TEKS will form the basis for this years
    goals and objectives?

20
Accommodation or Modification
Educational Program and Placement
  • Accommodation
  • a change in teaching or learning strategies based
    on the specific needs of a student with a
    disability (e.g., oral testing, highlighted
    textbooks, short answer tests)
  • Does NOT change the content of instruction.
  • Modification
  • a change in the curriculum of a course (e.g.,
    eliminating one or more of the TEKS or changing
    the grade level of certain TEKS)
  • Changes the content of instruction

21
Questions for Discussion
Educational Program and Placement
  • On your campus, do most IEPS developed on your
    campus
  • Accommodate instruction?
  • Modify content of instruction? To what extent?
  • How will this inform placement decisions later
    on?
  • What is the relationship between your placement
    decisions and the goals and objectives?
  • What is the relationship between your placement
    decisions and assessment?

22
Educational Program and Placement
  • Instructional decisions should always inform and
    guide assessment decisions.

23
Statewide and Districtwide Assessment
  • Students with disabilities who are receiving
    special education services are included in
    statewide AND districtwide assessments
  • A student with a disabilitys IEP must include
  • A statement of any individual accommodations that
    are needed in order for the student to
    participate in statewide or districtwide
    assessments of student achievement
  • 2. IF the ARDC determines that a student is not
    going to participate in a statewide or
    districtwide assessment, the IEP must specify
  • Why the assessment is inappropriate, and
  • How the student will be assessed

24
Statewide and Districtwide Assessment
  • Statewide Assessments
  • TAKS
  • TAKS/Spanish TAKS (without accommodations)
  • TAKS/Spanish TAKS (with accommodations)
  • SDAA II
  • SDAA II (without accommodations)
  • SDAA II (with accommodations)
  • LDAA
  • LDAA TEKS-based
  • LDAA Functional
  • RPTE
  • Observation Protocols
  • Early Reading Assessment (TPRI/Tejas Lee)

25
Statewide and Districtwide Assessment
  • District Assessments
  • TO BE DETERMINED BY DISTRICT
  • Other norm/criterion referenced assessments
  • District developed/administered assessments
  • Process followed by ARDC will be similar to
    process followed for statewide assessments

26
What decisions?
Statewide and Districtwide Assessment
  • Which assessment?
  • Which version?
  • Which level?
  • Instructional
  • Achievement
  • What accommodations?

27
Statewide and Districtwide Assessment
  • Instructional decisions should always inform and
    guide assessment decisions.

28
Statewide and Districtwide Assessment
  • Terminology Clarifications
  • Exempt/exemption
  • No child with a disability is exempt from
    assessment
  • The question is Which assessment?
  • Accommodations vs. Modifications
  • Frequently used interchangeably in TEC and IDEA
  • For this presentation
  • Accommodation a change in teaching or learning
    strategies based on the specific needs of a
    student with a disability (e.g., oral testing,
    highlighted textbooks, short answer tests)
  • Modification a change in the curriculum of a
    course (e.g., eliminating one or more of the TEKS
    or changing the grade level of certain TEKS)

29
Statewide and Districtwide Assessment
Determining which State Assessment to
Administer
30
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com