Response to Intervention - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Response to Intervention

Description:

Students who need more support in addition to the core curriculum ... Opportunity to narrow focus of the curriculum ... supplemental curriculum protocols ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: BTO85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Response to Intervention


1
Response to Intervention
  • Barbara Slaga
  • Assistant Superintendent for
  • Student Services and ESE
  • Bill R. Tomlinson
  • Director
  • Exceptional Student Education
  • Mary Krause
  • Executive Director
  • School Renewal, Title I, Title III, Migrant

2
What is RtI?
  • Response to Intervention (RtI) is the practice of
    providing high quality instruction and
    interventions
  • Matched to student need,
  • Monitoring progress frequently to make decisions
    about changes in instruction or goals, and
  • Applying student response data to important
    educational decisions.
  • RtI should be applied to decisions in general,
    remedial, and special education, creating a well
    integrated system of instruction/intervention
    guided by student outcome data.

3
What is RtI?
  • This is a multi-tiered approach to providing
    services and interventions to all students at
    increasing levels of intensity based on progress
    monitoring and data analysis.

4
What is RtI?
  • Tier I is the foundation and consists of
    scientific, research based core instructional and
    behavioral methodologies, practices, and supports
    designed for all students in the general
    curriculum.

5
What is RtI?
  • Tier II, supplemental instruction and
    interventions are provided to those students for
    whom data suggest additional instructional
    support is warranted.

6
What is RtI?
  • Tier III consists of intense instructional
    interventions provided with the goal of
    increasing an individual students rate of
    progress.

7
Three Tiered Model of School Supports Example of
an Infrastructure Resource Inventory
Academic Systems
Behavioral Systems
Tier III Comprehensive and Intensive
Interventions ( Few Students) Students who need
Individualized Interventions
Tier III Intensive Interventions ( Few
Students) Students who need Individual
Intervention
Tier II Strategic Interventions (Some
Students) Students who need more support in
addition to the core curriculum
Tier II Targeted Group Interventions (Some
Students) Students who need more support in
addition to school-wide positive behavior program
Tier I Universal Interventions All students all
settings
Tier I Core Curriculum All students
8
A New 3-Tiered PBS Model?
Intensive Supplemental Services Primary/Unive
rsal
Changing the triangle Think of the lava as
children moving across the continuum Another
way to look at the RTI process. As students get
hot they move up the lamp. As they cool down,
they go back down again into the universal level.

9
What is RtI?
  • RtI should be applied to
  • decisions in general,
  • remedial, and
  • special education,
  • creating a well integrated system of
    instruction/intervention guided by student
    outcome data.

10
What are Interventions?
  • Targeted assistance based on progress monitoring
  • Administered by classroom teacher, specialized
    teacher, or external interventionist
  • Provides additional instruction
  • Individual
  • Small group
  • And/or technology assisted

11
What are Interventions?
  • Match curricular materials and instructional
    level
  • Modify modes of task presentation
  • Cue work habits/organizational skills
  • Modify direct instruction time
  • Modify guided and independent practice
  • Modify instruction time
  • Ensure optimal pacing

12
What are Interventions?
  • Teach additional learning strategies
  • Organizational
  • Metacognitive
  • Work habits
  • Change to curriculum
  • Add intensive one to one or small group
    instruction
  • Change scope and sequence of tasks
  • Increase guided and independent practice
  • Change types and method of corrective feedback
  • Increase task structure (e.g., directions,
    rationale, checks for understanding, feedback
  • Increase task relevant practice
  • Increase opportunities to engage in active
    academic responding (e.g., writing, reading
    aloud, answering questions in class
  • Decrease group size
  • Increase the amount and type of cues and prompts

13
Interventions are NOT
  • Preferential seating
  • Shortened assignments
  • Parent contacts
  • Classroom observations
  • Suspension
  • Doing MORE of the same/general classroom
    assignments
  • Retention
  • Peer-tutoring-unless scientifically based

14
Tier I Core Instruction and
Universal Interventions
  • Behavioral Systems
  • School-wide positive behavior supports
  • Articulated expectations
  • Social Skills instruction
  • Pro-social and pro-active discipline strategies
  • Academic Systems
  • Quality core curriculum
  • Quality instructional strategies
  • Differentiated instruction
  • Embedded interventions

Universal Screening Continuous progress
monitoring
  • Interventions
  • Improve quality of instruction to all
    students
  • Improve attendance

15
Characteristics of Tier II Interventions
  • Available in general education settings
  • Opportunity to increase exposure (academic
    engaged time) to curriculum
  • Opportunity to narrow focus of the curriculum
  • Sufficient time for interventions to have an
    effect (10-30 weeks)
  • Often are standardized supplemental curriculum
    protocols

16
What is a good response to Tier II intervention?
  • Good Response
  • Gap is closing
  • Can extrapolate point at which target student
    will come in range of peers-even if it is a
    long range
  • Questionable response
  • Rate at which gap is widening slows considerably,
    but gap is still widening
  • Gap stops widening but closure does not occur
  • Poor Response
  • Gap continues to widen with no change in rate

17
Characteristics of Tier III Interventions
  • Intensive Interventions
  • Developed from individualized student
    problem-solving
  • Assumption is that more of the problem lies
    within the student
  • Goals is to find successful interventions first
  • Based on intensity of the interventions
    required for student success, determination could
    be made about eligibility for special education
  • Should comprise about 4-5 of student population
  • Criteria for Good Response is same as Tier II

18
Activity
  • Divide into groups of Six (6)
  • Each table will have the components of a
    pyramid/triangle.
  • Along with the components of the pyramid/triangle
    you will have scientific-research based
    interventions.
  • Place the intervention on the triangle in the
    area of the pyramid where the intervention would
    be most appropriately utilized.

19
Response to Intervention
  • Student outcome data are crucial to
  • Make accurate decisions about the effectiveness
    about general and remedial education
    instruction/interventions
  • Undertake early identification/intervention with
    academic and behavioral problems
  • Prevent unnecessary and excessive identification
    of students with disabilities
  • Make decisions about eligibility about special
    program, including special education and
  • Determine individual education programs and
    deliver and evaluate special education services.

20
Impact of RtI Implementation
  • Maximum effect of core instruction for all
    students and interventions for at-risk learners
  • Significant improvements in pro-social behaviors
  • Reduction in over-representation of diverse
    student groups in low academic performance,
    special education, suspension/expulsion, and
    alternative education.
  • Reduction in referrals for special education
  • Overall improvement in achievement rates

21
Response to Intervention
  • Learning rate and level of performance
  • High Quality Instruction/Intervention
  • Is defined as
  • Instruction or intervention matched to student
    need that has been demonstrated through
    scientific research and practice to produce high
    learning rates for most students.
  • This is the primary source of information used in
    ongoing decision making.
  • Learning rate refers to a students individual
    growth in achievement or behavior competencies
    over time.
  • Learning rates and levels of performance vary
    significantly across students.

22
Response to Intervention
  • Important Educational Decisions
  • Important Educational Decisions about intensity
    and the likely duration of interventions are
    based on individual student response to
    instruction across multiple tiers of
    intervention.
  • Decisions about the necessity of more intense
    intervention, including eligibility for special
    education and/or exit from special education or
    other services, are informed by data on learning
    rate and level.

23
Why do we need RtI?
  • Research supporting transition to RtI
  • Scientifically-based instruction and
    interventions
  • Evidence-based practices
  • Multi-tier models of increasing intensity
  • Systematic ongoing progress monitoring and
    formative evaluation
  • Functional assessments leading to intervention

24
Why do we need RtI?
  • Problems with the traditional system
  • Separation of special ed and general ed
  • Undocumented benefits of special ed services
  • Eligibility procedures unrelated to intervention
  • Wait-to-Fail Model (reactive)
  • Over representation of some minority groups
  • Over identification of students with disabilities
  • Failure to serve at-risk and low achieving
    students

25

Paradigm Shift
  • Eligibility focus
  • Diagnose and Place
  • Get Label
  • Outcome focus
  • Problem Solving and Response to Intervention
  • Get Help

26
Traditionalvs.Response to Intervention
Intervention
Traditional-
Get Label
Intervention
J
Response to Intervention-
Get Help
27
Thinking Differently
  • All Education Initiative, not just ESE anymore
  • Focus on interventions not placement
  • Aim of assessment is to identify effective
    interventions
  • Effective interventions are identified prior to
    eligibility
  • Student outcomes drive decisions
  • PS RtI is continual and fluid

28
Why is this urgent?
  • Emotional/Behavioral Disabilities (EB/D) Rule
    Revisions, Effective July 1, 2007
  • Floridas Differentiated Accountability System
  • Specific Learning Disabilities Rule Revision,
    Could be as early as October 31, 2008

29
Florida Differentiated Accountability
System/School Categories
30
What does it Link to?
  • BPIE Best Practices for Inclusive Education
  • PBS Positive Behavioral Supports
  • FLIP First Line Intervention Program
  • FBA Functional Behavioral Assessment
  • BIP Behavior Intervention Plan
  • E/BD Rule Emotional/Behavioral Disabilities Rule

31
Where are WE Now? Where are WE Going?
  • Reading and Behavior strategies are in place
  • The District K-12 Reading Plan
  • Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
  • Where we still need to go
  • Mathematics
  • Improve progress monitoring, data collection and
    documentation

32
Objectives for District Level Consensus Building
  • Develop a shared vision that Response to
    Intervention is an all education initiative led
    by general education and that RtI and
    problem-solving will result in more productive
    and equitable outcomes for students.
  • Identify the administrative support structures
    necessary for systemic planning and
    implementation of RtI.
  • Identify the stakeholders in the district, inform
    them about RtI and assure the stakeholders that
    their input will be considered in the development
    of the infrastructure
  • Develop a common understanding regarding the
    scope of RtI implementation.

33
Next Steps
  • Staff Development
  • Orientation of staff
  • Data Analysis
  • Problem-Solving
  • Refocus Student Support Team to Problem Solving
    Team
  • Progress Monitoring
  • Pilot Schools
  • Parkway Elementary
  • Palm Pointe K-8

34
Tools to Support Districts and Schools
  • District/School Self-assessment Tool (Appendix B
    of the Statewide RtI implementation Plan)
  • Critical Components for District Planning
    (Appendix C of the Statewide RtI implementation
    plan)
  • On-Line Introductory Training Course (s)
  • http//floridarti.usf.edu/introcourse
  • Earn 5 in-service credits, free!

35
Special Thanks to those already involved
  • Donna Dorio
  • Denise Snure
  • Robert ONeill
  • Robert Brugnoli
  • Sheri Reichard
  • Svetlana Montgomery
  • Nick Zrallack
  • Barbara Casteen
  • Christine Kerstyn
  • Alice Lee
  • Anne Marie Hays-Nail
  • Ucola Baxter
  • Sandra Akre
  • Sheri Balcer
  • Bill Tomlinson
  • Nancy Brown
  • Bennett Buckles
  • Karlheinz Haas
  • Sharon Bittle
  • Chris Taylor

36
Show Me the Data!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com