Comments from NWSHQ Perspective

1
Comments from NWSHQ Perspective

• Need to produce table showing 68 baseline
  option products vs products that PG is working on
• What is link between PG and AWG?
• AWIPS-II CIs need to become recognized as
  official developers (similar to OAR/GSD, NWS/OHD)
• PG interaction with NWS operations
• Need to have a liaison located at WFO or NCEP
  Center (like done now at SPC)
• Could cover multiple WFOs
• Liaison associated with CIRA could reside in
  Boulder or Cheyenne WFO and also spend time in
  surrounding WFOs (Pueblo, Grand Junction, Salt
  Lake City)
• Liaison associated with CIMSS could reside in
  Milwaukee WFO and also spend time in surrounding
  WFOs (LaCrosse, Chicago, Green Bay)
• Liaison associated with SPoRT (at Huntsville WFO)
  could also spend time in surrounding WFOs
  (Mobile, Jackson, Birmingham, Nashville,
  Peachtree City)
• Liaison with NHC (associated with CIRA) could
  also spend time in FL WFOs

2

• Proving Ground Products and Activities
• vs
• GOES-R 68 FPS Products

3
GOES-R Baseline Products (C) Characterization,
(H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization
3
May 18, 2009
4
GOES-R Baseline Products (C) Characterization,
(H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization
4
May 18, 2009
5
GOES-R Baseline Products (C) Characterization,
(H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization
5
May 18, 2009
6
GOES-R Option 2 Products (C) Characterization,
(H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization
6
May 18, 2009
7
GOES-R Option 2 Products (C) Characterization,
(H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization
7
May 18, 2009
8
GOES-R Other Proving Ground Efforts
8
May 18, 2009