Title: Religion, fundamentalism and authoritarianism
1Religion, fundamentalism and authoritarianism
2Fundamentalism
- Religious fundamentalism can be traced back to a
series of 80 pamphlets called The Fundamentals
that were published in the U.S. between 1910 and
1915. - The notion that basic principles of the Christian
faith exist that could never be modified goes
back to the The Fundamentals and persons who
preached these writings came to be called
fundamentalists. - Nowadays the term arises in many contexts.
3The Religious Fundamentalism Scale
- In the current context fundamentalism has been
defined not as a particular set of doctrines but
as an attitude about those beliefs, whatever the
tenets may be. - Altemeyer and Hunsberger (2004) developed a
12-item attitude scale named the Religious
Fundamentalism Scale (RFS). - The scale is unidimensional and has demonstrated
high levels of reliability.
4The religious fundamentalism scale
- Examples of items
- To lead the best, most meaningful life, one must
belong to the one, fundamentally true religion - When you get right down to it, there are
basically only two kinds of people in the world
the Righteous, who will be rewarded by God and
the rest, who will not.
5The religious fundamentalism scale
- Three times as many fundamentalist Protestants
appear among the high RFS scorers as one would
expect from their proportion of the overall
sample. - Jews score low as a group while Muslims score
high. - High fundamentalists are slightly more likely to
be females than males. - High fundamentalists go to church much more often
than most people do.
6Religious beliefs
- High fundamentalists scored high on belief in
God. - RFS scores correlated strongly with belief in
creation science. - Fundamentalists religious beliefs correlated
strongly with measures of happiness, joy and
comfort (Hunsberger Altemeyer, in press).
7Proselytizing
- 88 of highly fundamentalist parents would tell a
teenager that atheism was wrong and that their
religion was right. - Only 11 of atheist parents said they would say
religion was wrong and atheism was right. - 94 of fundamentalist parents said that they
wanted their own children to have the same
religious beliefs that they have. - Only 4 of atheists said that they wanted their
children to be atheist (Hunsberger Altemeyer,
in press).
8Proselytizing
- Fundamentalists are more zealous about their
religion than others about their belief system
such as socialists, capitalists,
environmentalists, feminists (Altemeyer, 1996). - 84 of fundamentalists agree that born-again
Christianity should be taught in public school
(Hunsberger Altemeyer, in press). - No atheists believed that atheism should be
taught in public school (Hunsberger Altemeyer,
in press).
9Web Site
- Mormon Missionaries An Overview - LDS Missionary
(http//www.youtube.com/watch?vCFdFkgdzCxs) - Mormon Missionaries Debating A Georgia Preacher
(http//www.youtube.com/watch?v8YPyvJacwUI) - About Mormon Missionary (http//www.youtube.com/wa
tch?vm7fcux74xFY)
10Dogmatism
- Dogmatism, defined as relatively unchangeable,
unjustified certainty, is measured by 20-item DOG
scale (Altemeyer, 1996). - Sample item
- The things I believe in are so completely true, I
could never doubt them. - Most of the highly dogmatic people are religious
fundamentalists.
11Dogmatism
- 93 of highly fundamentalist parents said that
they would continue to believe in Jesus even if
evidence was presented to the contrary. - 53 of atheist parents said that they would
continue to believe in atheism even if evidence
was presented to the contrary. - All fundamentalists said that they could never
change their minds about God. - 43 of atheists said that they could think of
things that would make them believe in God
(Hunsberger Altemeyer, in press).
12Relationships with prejudice
- Altemeyer (2003) measured religious ethnocentrism
sample item - I would be against letting some other, different
religion use my church for its services when we
were not using it. - RFS scores correlated highly with religious
ethnocentrism scores (Altemeyer, 2003).
13Relationships with prejudice
- Altemeyer (1996) developed the Attitude Toward
Homosexuals Scale (ATHS). - Sample item
- Homosexuals should be locked up to protect
society - Studies have found correlations ranging from .41
to .61 between the ATHS and fundamentalism. - Among Hindus, Muslims, and Jews, the higher the
persons ATHS score the higher was their RFS score
(Altemeyer, 1996)
14Relationships with prejudice
- Altemeyer (1996) developed the Manitoba
Ethnocentrism Scale (MES). - Sample item
- Black people as a rule are, by their nature, more
violent than white people are. - The RFS and MES correlations ranged from .17 to
.33.
15How do people become fundamentalists
- University students RFS scores correlate about
.50 to .65 with their parents. - Only 64 of Canadian respondents still consider
themselves members of the religion in which they
were raised. - Other faiths convert to fundamentalism.
- Fundamentalism attracts disaffected youth raised
with no religion (Altemeyer Hunsberger, 1997). - Some adults join fundamentalist faiths when they
get married. - Some join from mainstream faiths that have
undergone liberalization.
16How do people become fundamentalists
- The percentage of religious conservatives in
Canada has remained about 8 since 1871 (Bibby,
2002). - The number of Americans who called themselves
fundamentalist as opposed to moderate or
liberal peaked at 36 in 1987 and dropped to
31 in 1998 and 2000 (Davis et al., 2000).
17Authoritarianism
- Two kinds of authoritarian personalities exist
leaders (social dominators) and followers. - Dominators do not tend to be religious.
- Followers tend to be religious fundamentalists.
18Key Book
- Adorno,T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J.
Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian
personality. New York Harper
19Right wing authoritarianism
- Right-wing authoritarianism is defined as the
covariation of three attitudinal clusters in a
person - authoritarian submission, authoritarian
aggression, and conventionalism (Altemeyer,
1981). - Right-wing, not in a political sense, but in a
social psychological sense. - The Right-wing Authoritarian Scale (RWAS)
comprises 20 items (Altemeyer, 1996). - Sample items include
- The old fashioned ways and the old fashioned
values still show the best way to live - There is no ONE right way to live life
everybody has to create their own way (reverse
scored)
20Evidence for validity
- Persons who score high on the RWAS trust and
support established authorities stronger and
longer than most do. - Highly prejudiced persons turn out to be either
social dominators or right-wing authoritarians. - In both U.S. and Canadian legislatures RWAS
scores almost always differentiate liberal from
conservative caucuses (Altemeyer, 1996).
21Personal origin of right-wing authoritarianism
- Student RWA scores correlate about .40 with their
parents scores. - Right-wing authoritarians tend to dislike
homosexuals but most of them have never known one
as far as they know (Altemeyer, 1998).
22Cognitive Weaknesses
- High RWAs produce many cognitive blind spots,
e.g., they tend to endorse slogans that
contradict each other they would punish a hippie
much more than they would punish an accountant
for the same crime. - They are susceptible to manipulators, such as
social dominators, who tell them what they want
to hear.
23Connection between right-wing authoritarianism
and religious fundamentalism
- Most authoritarians are fundamentalists and vice
versa. - Fundamentalists are more concerned with
sentiments of submission, aggression, and
conventionalism than one fundamentally true
religion. - They score highly on the RWA scale because they
strongly tend to be right-wing authoritarians. - Fundamentalists are brought up to believe such
teachings as the deepest layers of hell are set
aside for those who abandon Gods true religion
(Altemeyer Hunsberger, 1997).
24Connection between right-wing authoritarianism
and religious fundamentalism
- Such teachings may result in fundamentalist
children being brought up with ethnocentric
views. - This training could create a template for later
racial and ethnic ethnocentrism (Altemeyer,
2003).
25The chicken and the egg and the apprehension
- Partial correlations reveal that RFS scores
explain variance in religious fundamentalism over
and above RWA scores while RWA scores explain
variance in non-religious authoritarianism over
and above RFS scores. - Fundamentalism can therefore usually be viewed
as a religious manifestation of right-wing
authoritarianism (Altemeyer, 1996, p. 161).