HighStake State Mathematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

HighStake State Mathematics

Description:

Based on the results in the table, how many times is Patrick's spinner likely to land on red? ... Include a description of what Patrick's spinner probably looks like. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: www42
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HighStake State Mathematics


1
High-Stake State Mathematics AssessmentCRs and
BCRsThe Secrets Revealed
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics
(NCTM)St. Louis, April 2006
Beth Schefelker, Teaching SpecialistMilwaukee
Public Schoolsschefeba_at_mail.milwaukee.k12.wi.us
Laura Moranchek, NAEP CoordinatorWI Department
of Public Instructionlaura.moranchek_at_dpi.state.wi
.us
2
NCTM Principles Standards Communication Standard
  • Organize and consolidate their mathematical
    thinking through communication
  • Communicate their mathematical thinking
    coherently and clearly to peers, teachers, and
    others
  • Analyze and evaluate the mathematical thinking
    and strategies of others
  • Use the language of mathematics to express
    mathematical ideas precisely.

3
Standards Required by No Child Left Behind
(NCLB)
  • Content Standards what students know and should
    be able to do at specified grade levels
  • Performance Standards how students show that
    they meet content standards
  • Proficiency Standards how well students must
    perform

4
Wisconsin Model Academic Standard for Mathematics
A. Mathematical Processes
5
(No Transcript)
6
"Make this the golden rule, the equivalent of the
Hippocratic oath Everything we ask a child to do
should be worth doing." Philip Pullman, ISIS
speech, April 1, 2003
7
Alarming Data.
  • WKCE Data Analysis Constructed Response
  • Milwaukee Public Schools

8
Score Points Constructed Response (CRs)
  • Grades 3 8
  • Three Points
  • One Point Content
  • Two Points Process
  • Grade 10
  • Two Points - Brief Constructed Response
  • One Point Content
  • One Point Process
  • Four Points - Extended Constructed Response

9
Changing the Status Quo!
  • How do we get educators to value the importance
    of being able to communicate mathematically?
  • What changes need to be made in everyday
    classroom practice to support students ability
    to effectively communicate?

10
Session Goals
  • To inform participants of the development of CR
    items.
  • To engage participants in the process used to
    score CR items.

11
Who Scores the Items?
  • All scorers have a 4-year degree.
  • Scorers work 7 hour shifts.
  • Each scorer scores approximately 150-300
    papers/day.
  • Scorers are trained on every item and subject to
    frequent accuracy checks.

12
Directions for aSimulated Scoring Session
  • Complete the question independently.
  • Compare responses to the rubric.
  • Practicing on a series of student work samples.
  • Benchmark examples
  • Student Anchor papers
  • Qualifying Round 1 and 2

13
Patrick spins a spinner that has three colors.
He spins it 10 times and records his results in
a table below. Patricks
Spinner Results
Step A Next Patrick will spin the spinner 50
times. Based on the results in the table, how
many times is Patricks spinner likely to land on
red? Answer_____________ times Step B Use
math to explain why your prediction is valid.
Use words and/or numbers in your explanation.
Include a description of what Patricks spinner
probably looks like. _____________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________
14
Scoring Rubric
  • Three Points Possible
  • Step A Mathematical Content
  • 1 point Correct
  • 0 points Incorrect
  • Step B Mathematical Process
  • 2 points Demonstrates a thorough understanding,
    uses appropriate mathematical procedures or
    concepts to explain or justify the response to
    Step A
  • 1 point Demonstrates only partial
    understanding, lacks an essential understanding
    of the underlying mathematical concepts used to
    provide the response to Step A
  • 0 points Provides a completely incorrect
    explanation or justification or one that cannot
    be interpreted, or no response at all

15
WKCE-CRT CRs Simulated Scoring Practice
Benchmark Papers Anchor Papers B1________
A1__________ B2________ A2__________ B3___
_____ A3__________ B4________ A4__________
B5________ A5__________ B6________ A6_____
_____ A7__________
A8__________ A9__________
A10_________
16
WKCE-CRT CRs Simulated Scoring Practice
Benchmark Papers Anchor Papers B1__1/2__
A1___1/1_____ B2__1/1___ A2___1/1_____ B3__
0/2__ A3___1/2_____ B4__1/0__ A4___1/2_____
B5__0/0__ A5___0/0_____ B6__0/0___ A6___0
/0_____ A7___1/1_____
A8___1/0____ A9___0/0_____
A10__0/1_____
17
WKCE-CRT ConstructedResponse Simulated
Scoring Practice
  • Qualifying Round 1 Qualifying Round 2
  • Q1-1__________ Q2-1__________
  • Q1-2__________ Q2-2__________
  • Q1-3__________ Q2-3__________
  • Q1-4__________ Q2-4__________
  • Q1-5__________ Q2-5__________
  • Q1-6__________ Q2-6__________
  • Q1-7__________ Q2-7__________
  • Q1-8__________ Q2-8__________
  • Q1-9__________ Q2-9__________
  • Q1-10_________ Q2-10_________
  • _________ accurate ___________ accurate

18
Things to Ponder
  • In what way can we assist students to build clear
    coherent mathematical communication?
  • How can we support growth and development of
    others in their understanding of the
    Communication Standard?

19
Questions and Contact Information
Beth Schefelker, Teaching SpecialistMilwaukee
Public Schoolsschefeba_at_mail.milwaukee.k12.wi.us
Laura Moranchek, NAEP CoordinatorWI Dept of
Public Instructionlaura.moranchek_at_dpi.state.wi.us
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics
(NCTM)St. Louis, April 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com