Title: Best Practices
1Best Practices CPM Discussion Session
- Stateside Assignment Sessions
- November 2006 at ILC
- Prepared by Dr. Jim Slack of GRD
2What We Have Learned FromPeople Group Growth
through On-Site CPM Assessments
- Common Characteristics
- Seen within 12 On-Site
- CPM Assessments
- International Learning Center Edition
- November 2006 Edition
3Where Did This Summary of CPM Characteristics
Come From?
- Each of the items included in this presentation
came from on-site, professionally researched, CPM
assessments. - A number of likely CPMs have been assessed
through on-site interviews observations by a
team of biblically and missiologically aware
interviewers. - In most cases, interviews were chosen through a
use of random sampling methodology of members and
pastors within the likely CPM. The interviewing
of two members to one pastoral type leader was
the usual interview selection approach.
4Where Did This Summary of CPM Characteristics
Come From?
- 12 of the on-site assessments were found to match
the definition of a Church Planting Movement.
(Interview results were evaluated in light of the
IMBs published booklet on Church Planting
Movements.) - This approach provides the reader of this
information with the criteria used which should
provide a base for understanding and discussing
the evaluative statements made about the various
CPMs. - CPM Assessment interviews typically reach 7,000
Excel pages of notes. - The characteristics, to make this list, had to be
evident in a significant majority (beyond 75) of
the 12.
5What We Have Learned About CPMs
- A CPM is the work of God. Each CPM had its own
footprint. - None of the assessed CPMs were found to be the
result of human efforts that resulted from
mechanically copying other strategies. - Also, it was seen in the studies that a CPM can
be thwarted, blocked, or the victim of ceilings
placed on the movement due to poor practices,
ill-timed good practices, or by not meeting that
CPMs needs. - Evidence exists that CPMs can be missed or
short-circuited, or frozen in time due to poor
practices even after it emerged as a full-blown
CPM.
6Consistency in CPM Assessments
- Research of different CPMs over a period of
years and in varied settings to be compared with
each other, should follow the same research
technology and process as much as possible. - Research results from each CPM assessment, in
order to be accurate and valid, should be
evaluated and measured against the same basic
principles or criteria. - Thus, it is necessary for viewers of this
module to include the definition of a CPM that
was used in each assessment. A Church Planting
Movement is a rapid and multiplicative increase
of indigenous churches planting churches within a
given people group or population segment.
7Consistency in CPM Assessments
- This presentation is designed as an overview of
the common, positive characteristics seen within
the 12 on-site assessed CPMs. - Therefore, the evaluation principles, or
criteria, will not be provided. However, it is
necessary to mention the churches planting
churches item. For the teams, this meant that
the churches started could be traced to the
awareness, intent and involvement of someone, or
someone's, from another local church. The
someone could have been a pastor, a member, or
members, who went out and was key in the
emergence of a new church. At least 51 of the
churches, old and new, should meet that criteria
for the team to recognize it as being a CPM. The
12 CPMs that led to the characteristics in this
document qualified at a much higher percentage
than 51.
8What We Have Learned About CPMs
- The church planting model or strategy that was
used which resulted in the first generation of an
emerging CPM was found in the interviews to be a
major issue in relation to the emergence of a
CPM. - Of greater concern it seems are the negative
items that can easily block, put a ceiling on, or
bring certain plateauing and decline to an
emerging or existing CPM. - Beyond these, when looking at all 12
assessments there are common characteristics that
appear in a majority of the CPMs. In this
document, only 19 common and positive ones will
be included.
9Nineteen (19) Common Characteristics within the
12 CPMs
- On-site prayers, coming from within the churches,
which often was directed toward specific people
in need, spiritually or physically, were common. - Almost only within Islamic settings, but within
every Islamic assessment, there were testimonies
of pre-conversion dreams of Muslims that spoke
to that person of Isa (Jesus Christ) as Messiah.
Some dreams pointed the person to a way of
hearing of Isa. - The habitual care, and often sacrificial
benevolent help, provided by believers within
churches met the needs of fellow church members
and the lost around them. This was a major
characteristic in every Hindu CPM assessment and
was common in the other CPMs. The testimony of
healings were common.
10Common Characteristics within the CPMs
- Believing, and even some not-yet converted church
attendees, who, due to Gospel presentations they
heard, were able and regularly did successfully
answer persistent ethnic, cultural worldview
questions of lost neighbors, family members,
critics and persecutors that the Holy Spirit used
to draw them to Christ and their church
fellowship. - Minimal outside presence and dependence on an
outside presence was characteristic of third,
fourth and successive generations of churches.
(Where it was observed in successive generations,
the movement tended to be slowing and hindered in
its free flow and continuation.)
11Common Characteristics within the CPMs
- Pastoral leaders in each assessed CPM were lay
leaders who came from the locales where the
churches were started. In none of the
assessments were those conducting the interviews
asked Where are we going to get leaders for our
emerging churches? - Most pastoral leaders fed and cared for their
families through bi-vocational means with only a
small percentage being full-time, paid pastors.
Members in churches within the CPMs were found to
be giving sacrificially and regularly to their
pastors care. In none were the majority
supported by their churches.
12Common Characteristics within CPMs
- Believers testified of exciting and very
meaningful worship sessions. Some were private
while others were public. Believers in them
commonly felt they belonged and that they were
among friends, while at the same time speaking
with concern of their own personal weaknesses and
imperfections. - Emerging and existing churches found their own
pastor from their fellowship of believers, and
personally testified that they recognized that
person as their pastoral leader. Many churches
recognized two or three persons as their group of
pastors. Pastors tended to define themselves as
a pastor-evangelist.
13Common Characteristics within CPMs
- Churches emerged primarily from a believer who
came seeking the Man of Peace, also from lay
pastors from the church that started them, and
from members of close churches whose burden for
lost neighbors, lost family members, and even for
their lost detractors, pushed them into authentic
witnessing experiences. Only in a few cases was
there common conversions and churches started as
a result of canned personal or mass media
presentations.
14Common Characteristics within CPMs
- Witness and church planting, with rare
exceptions, was conducted in the heart language
of the people group that experienced the Church
Planting Movement. (In fact, in some cases, the
movement was not able to move beyond the people
group because believers did not understand the
other groups language or dialect of their own
language.) - Local, on-site training was more effective,
pervasive and reproduced more in the succeeding
generation/s than was training held outside the
local setting. In persecuted settings, non-local
training provided at more distant sites, brought
its own types of dangers.
15Common Characteristics within CPMs
- Indigenous church planting practices were a major
contribution to the ability of churches within
the CPM to multiply. This was especially true
where initially non-indigenous practices
transitioned to become indigenous soon after
coming into being. Those tended to reproduce
more often and sooner. (Indigeniety within the
CPMs included financing themselves securing
their own leaders from within their emerging
church housing themselves according to the local
style and at the level of the local economy
extending themselves as a witness and as a church
among the lost as a result of their own resources
and spiritual awareness's.) - Most pastoral leaders interviewed were either 1)
the original Man of Peace, or 2) the lay person
who came from a nearby church to start their
church, or 3) persons chosen from within the
emerging church group as they matured to be a
church.
16Common Characteristics within CPMs
- Throughout the interviews, members were aware
that their group was a church and spoke of their
group as being a church. - Among the twelve CPMs, except for two of them,
the church members recognized their pastor as the
handler of the ordinances who did administer
the ordinances. (Within the two who didnt,
churches in that CPM was moving in that direction
while in the other CPM the CPM churches wanted to
do so but deferred to a long-existing
institutional church pattern. Most of these said
they could not wait long for the Convention to
recognize their rights as churches.)
17Common Characteristics within CPMs
- Within each of the CPMs, emerging churches
housed their church, meeting in homes, offices,
warehouses, barns, factories, schools, hospitals,
health clinics, grain sheds, and other places.
Some groups, mainly the Kekchi as they became
churches, provided for themselves separate
buildings for their churches. By contrast, a
majority of the churches in the other CPMs tended
to stay in the facilities they were in as they
emerged to be a church. Very few of the CPMs
used resources from outside the people group to
provide housing for their worship events.
18Common Characteristics within CPMs
- In persecuted settings, which included Islamic
settings, most of the churches emerged with
private (underground) worship sessions which
tended to become public within four to six months
of their recognizing themselves as a church. In
most cases, it was their burden for the lost that
brought them out and into public worship
sessions. - Throughout the 12 CPM assessments, the
interviewers did not find continuing C-5
situations. Most believers said they could not
remain in their previous religion more than four
to six months. Most could not understand why we
would ask why they came out of their former
religion. Their common answer was There is
nothing there that I want to go back to. (This
is the last of these characteristics.)
19What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Among all of the characteristics observed
within CPMs, the issue of the model used, or that
exists, when planting churches is very
significant. - The church planting model, healthy or unhealthy,
biblically sound or not biblically sound, using
best practices or poor practices, that exists
when a CPM emerges tends to become the permanent
model of that CPM. If the model is good, the CPM
tends to survive.
20End of the CPM Characteristics
- Prepared by Dr. Jim Slack
- IMB Field Assessments Consultations
- November 17, 2006 Edition
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23CPM Stoppers or Ceiling Setters
- Securing pastors from outside the CPM, and for
sure from outside the ethnic group - Working in a language other than the colloquial
language of the ethnic group. - Using outside resources to provide land for
churches provide buildings for the churches
provide support for pastors meaning, providing
resources that are not at an indigenous level of
the ethne.
24CPM Stoppers or Ceiling Setters
- Requiring local church baptisms to be conducted
by official baptizers who live beyond the
churches and who represent an institutional
validating structure. - Regularly taking pastoral leaders outside the
geographic setting of his local church to be
trained and validated. (This means reversing
the on-site training characteristic.)
25(No Transcript)
26What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Definition of church. The model defines church.
- Just any ole model wont do, and what results in
a CPM in one setting among people groups wont
necessarily result in the emergence of a CPM in
other people groups. - Indigeniety is a major concern?
- Minimize subsidy and move to an indigenous
approach as soon as possible. - Subsidy, if continued, will put a ceiling on
growth that tends to become dependent on the
subsidy.
27What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Indigeniety concerns continued
- Subsidy shapes the churches in its image
- Indigeniety includes outside finances
- Indigeniety includes the issue of outside
personnel - Indigeniety includes methods that are not natural
or reproducible within the people group - Indigeniety means natural or compatible with the
local surroundings
28What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Infinitively reproducible. If a model is
indigenous, it should be infinitively
reproducible in all of its parts by (lay)
believers in local churches. Again, in this case
indigenous means in and of each local church. - Seeks the resources from within the Harvest.
Indigenous means that the resources are found and
secured from within the harvest. This is even
true when resources are available from outside
the harvest. The model of reducibility is the
issue.
29What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Close to indigeniety are language issues
choices. - The New Testament example and expectation is the
use of the heart language (See Acts 2 and the
Pentecost event) - A critical missions discussion is between heart
language or classical language. Gods language
choice of giving us the New Testament was
Koine, a street version of Greek. God did not
choose Classical Greek. - God chose the idiom of the heart language for His
Gospel. - Added to Scriptural examples is the fact that
each persons worldview resides in their heart
language idiom. Heart language use was in every
CPM.
30There Is Now The Need For A Brief Interlude
Concerning Language
- In Old and New Testament Scripture laos and ta
ethne are referenced at least 2000 times. - A Ta ethne, defined also in Acts 2 as heart
language is our norm. An illustration today is - Asian is a Category, not a Ta Ethne
- Filipino is a Category, not a Ta Ethne
- Tagalog, Ilocano, Cebuano and 187 other groups
are ta ethne people groups
31A Brief Interlude Concerning Language Continued
- West African is a Category Not A ta ethne
- Nigerian is a Category Not A ta ethne
- Yoruba is a ta ethne, as is
- Ibo, Hausa and 428 other Nigerian ta ethnes
- Hispanic is a Category Not A ta ethne
- Guatemalan is a Category Not A ta ethne
- Kekchi is a ta ethne
32Now, Back To What We Have Learned About CPMs
- CPM churches are praying churches.
- The prayer habits of churches within the CPMs we
have assessed are phenomenal - Most of the churches in every CPM we assessed had
multiple prayer sessions each week. In every
assessment, we were told of all-night prayer
meetings - CPMs exhibit a multiplication mindset. This
workshop has already covered this topic. - Churches planting new churches is the norm
- Church planting has become generational
33Now, Back To What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Close to use of the people groups heart language
idiom is the provision of Scripture for use in
engagement, evangelism, church planting,
discipleship and leader mentoring. - Lack of Scripture due to illiteracy is a major
issue in all but one of the assessed CPMs. - In many of the Islamic CPM settings, many of the
Islamic converts had a memorized Quran, while
immediately after becoming a believer, had no
Christian Bible, mainly due to illiteracy.
34What We Have Learned About CPMs
- For those in the USA who are praying for a CPM in
their people group, Scripture heart language
evangelization will also be an issue. - Today, some of the CPMs face back-tracking in
order to solve the orality-literacy problems by
giving the believers an oral Bible until they
have or can handle written Scripture. - A lot of syncretism results from moving one
language upthe Great Compromiseon the language
tree. Leader accommodation, social correctness
economics lurks here.
35What We Have Learned About CPMs
- A Lay leadership model should be foundational.
- Lay leader models, styles, should follow New
Testament and not historic, traditional patterns
or models - Church planting should move to churches planting
churches as soon as possible
36What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Training and mentoring is a major issue in most
of the CPMs. - Those interviewed, members and pastors, in each
of the CPMs said they needed more training. - Assessors concluded in all but 2 of the CPMs,
training of leaders was a serious need that could
lead to weaknesses or plateauing if not provided. - Training in most CPMs was seen to be very
academic and not functional at lay understanding
levels. Training in most was very literate when
more oral methods were needed.
37What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Highly effective churches planting churches in
the observed CPMs implies the following - Finding and keying on the Man of Peace is the
most common engagement practice seen within the 9
assessed CPMs. - Staying with the Man of Peace to the point of the
gathering of a group the conversion of the Man
of Peace and many in the group and the Man of
Peace becoming the pastor of the group is common
among most but not in every one.
38What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Highly effective churches planting churches in
the observed CPMs implies the following - If the Man of Peace does not convert and mature
to be the pastor, the pastor is secured from
within each emerging church - Resistant to importing pastors from the outside,
even from other sectors of the people group - SC, Church Planter, does not pastor any of the
churches, and especially any of the first ones.
The only model is a local model. -
39What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Highly effective churches planting churches in
the observed CPMs implies the following - Churches planting churches follow New Testament
patterns, especially the four self items. We
saw self-correcting where Scripture was
available, possessed, understood used. - The churches that operated according to
congregational polity replicated themselves more
easily, were the healthiest and solved problems
with less failures than those where authority was
in the pastor.
40What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Highly effective churches planting churches in
the observed CPMs implies the following - Within assessment interviews one could see the
emergence of institutionalism and the slowing,
plateauing and decline of the CPM where
congregational practices were not maintained. - In the CPMs, churches that were responsible for
housing themselves presented few failures to
house themselves effectively. The Kekchi have
been the most efficient, to a flaw.
41What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Two concerns that have been common among
traditional, institutional churches, but not
among the assessed CPMs, have been - How can we get enough pastors for our churches?
- How can we afford land and building for our
churches? - In healthy CPMs, ministry was consisted of and
was described as functions and not programs.
42What We Have Learned About CPMs
- The healthiest CPMs, meaning those with fewer
ceilings, fewer plateaus, and fewer
non-reproducing churches were those where the
basic engagement, evangelism, church planting,
initial discipleship and mentoring of leaders
were in the initial models. - When generational church planting occurs without
all the basic ministry functions, it is too late
to chase after them and add them.
43What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Within the CPMs that have been assessed,
excellent worldview-oriented witnessing and
ministry practices have been observed. - The Camel method was commonly observed in the
most productive Islamic CPM setting which
underlined the value of identifying a peoples
worldview. It was not seen in a second one. - Effective means of housing the church was
observed - Indigenous music has been absent in most
44What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Most assessed CPMs have been in relational
societies. - Media in these relational settings has been
personal rather than mass. Mass media was
adjunct in a few of the CPMs - The Jesus Film, the most famous Christian mass
media evangelism tool, was not significantly in
any of the assessed CPMs as their stated
significant source of hearing or embracing Jesus
as Lord
45What We Have Learned About CPMs
- In persecuted CPM settings, most new church
worship services were private. However, within
most, they were public within 3-5 months. - Generic, meaning copying a program, content,
methods, or curriculum, from a different
worldview, especially religious, setting was a
major barrier to growth. - The major result was syncretism
- The second issue was meaningless rituals
46What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Reversion, as learned in the interviews, to the
believers former religion was minimal. - When compared to people groups without CPMs,
their reversion and backdoor percentages were
very high - Most responded with surprise that the
interviewers would think they would want to go
back to their old religion. They said, almost in
unison, There is nothing there that we want to
go back to.
47What We Have Learned About CPMs
- Reversion, as learned in the interviews, to the
believers former religion was minimal. - In persecuted settings, which was in 7 of the 9
assessment settings, there few instances of
members going back to their old religion. - Exploring the issue of C-1 to C-5 relationships
to the former religion, none responded in the
interviews that they personally considered a C-4
or C-5 relationship, even if they had the choice.
Finding ways to stay in the old religion was a
non-issue.
48What We Have Learned From CPM Assessments!
- Prepared by Dr. Jim Slack
- IMB, SBCs Strategy Group
- Leader of On-site CPM Assessments