Best Practices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Best Practices

Description:

Each of the items included in this presentation came from on-site, ... expectation is the use of the heart language (See Acts 2 and the Pentecost event) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: RVAU
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Best Practices


1
Best Practices CPM Discussion Session
  • Stateside Assignment Sessions
  • November 2006 at ILC
  • Prepared by Dr. Jim Slack of GRD

2
What We Have Learned FromPeople Group Growth
through On-Site CPM Assessments
  • Common Characteristics
  • Seen within 12 On-Site
  • CPM Assessments
  • International Learning Center Edition
  • November 2006 Edition

3
Where Did This Summary of CPM Characteristics
Come From?
  • Each of the items included in this presentation
    came from on-site, professionally researched, CPM
    assessments.
  • A number of likely CPMs have been assessed
    through on-site interviews observations by a
    team of biblically and missiologically aware
    interviewers.
  • In most cases, interviews were chosen through a
    use of random sampling methodology of members and
    pastors within the likely CPM. The interviewing
    of two members to one pastoral type leader was
    the usual interview selection approach.

4
Where Did This Summary of CPM Characteristics
Come From?
  • 12 of the on-site assessments were found to match
    the definition of a Church Planting Movement.
    (Interview results were evaluated in light of the
    IMBs published booklet on Church Planting
    Movements.)
  • This approach provides the reader of this
    information with the criteria used which should
    provide a base for understanding and discussing
    the evaluative statements made about the various
    CPMs.
  • CPM Assessment interviews typically reach 7,000
    Excel pages of notes.
  • The characteristics, to make this list, had to be
    evident in a significant majority (beyond 75) of
    the 12.

5
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • A CPM is the work of God. Each CPM had its own
    footprint.
  • None of the assessed CPMs were found to be the
    result of human efforts that resulted from
    mechanically copying other strategies.
  • Also, it was seen in the studies that a CPM can
    be thwarted, blocked, or the victim of ceilings
    placed on the movement due to poor practices,
    ill-timed good practices, or by not meeting that
    CPMs needs.
  • Evidence exists that CPMs can be missed or
    short-circuited, or frozen in time due to poor
    practices even after it emerged as a full-blown
    CPM.

6
Consistency in CPM Assessments
  • Research of different CPMs over a period of
    years and in varied settings to be compared with
    each other, should follow the same research
    technology and process as much as possible.
  • Research results from each CPM assessment, in
    order to be accurate and valid, should be
    evaluated and measured against the same basic
    principles or criteria.
  • Thus, it is necessary for viewers of this
    module to include the definition of a CPM that
    was used in each assessment. A Church Planting
    Movement is a rapid and multiplicative increase
    of indigenous churches planting churches within a
    given people group or population segment.

7
Consistency in CPM Assessments
  • This presentation is designed as an overview of
    the common, positive characteristics seen within
    the 12 on-site assessed CPMs.
  • Therefore, the evaluation principles, or
    criteria, will not be provided. However, it is
    necessary to mention the churches planting
    churches item. For the teams, this meant that
    the churches started could be traced to the
    awareness, intent and involvement of someone, or
    someone's, from another local church. The
    someone could have been a pastor, a member, or
    members, who went out and was key in the
    emergence of a new church. At least 51 of the
    churches, old and new, should meet that criteria
    for the team to recognize it as being a CPM. The
    12 CPMs that led to the characteristics in this
    document qualified at a much higher percentage
    than 51.

8
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • The church planting model or strategy that was
    used which resulted in the first generation of an
    emerging CPM was found in the interviews to be a
    major issue in relation to the emergence of a
    CPM.
  • Of greater concern it seems are the negative
    items that can easily block, put a ceiling on, or
    bring certain plateauing and decline to an
    emerging or existing CPM.
  • Beyond these, when looking at all 12
    assessments there are common characteristics that
    appear in a majority of the CPMs. In this
    document, only 19 common and positive ones will
    be included.

9
Nineteen (19) Common Characteristics within the
12 CPMs
  • On-site prayers, coming from within the churches,
    which often was directed toward specific people
    in need, spiritually or physically, were common.
  • Almost only within Islamic settings, but within
    every Islamic assessment, there were testimonies
    of pre-conversion dreams of Muslims that spoke
    to that person of Isa (Jesus Christ) as Messiah.
    Some dreams pointed the person to a way of
    hearing of Isa.
  • The habitual care, and often sacrificial
    benevolent help, provided by believers within
    churches met the needs of fellow church members
    and the lost around them. This was a major
    characteristic in every Hindu CPM assessment and
    was common in the other CPMs. The testimony of
    healings were common.

10
Common Characteristics within the CPMs
  • Believing, and even some not-yet converted church
    attendees, who, due to Gospel presentations they
    heard, were able and regularly did successfully
    answer persistent ethnic, cultural worldview
    questions of lost neighbors, family members,
    critics and persecutors that the Holy Spirit used
    to draw them to Christ and their church
    fellowship.
  • Minimal outside presence and dependence on an
    outside presence was characteristic of third,
    fourth and successive generations of churches.
    (Where it was observed in successive generations,
    the movement tended to be slowing and hindered in
    its free flow and continuation.)

11
Common Characteristics within the CPMs
  • Pastoral leaders in each assessed CPM were lay
    leaders who came from the locales where the
    churches were started. In none of the
    assessments were those conducting the interviews
    asked Where are we going to get leaders for our
    emerging churches?
  • Most pastoral leaders fed and cared for their
    families through bi-vocational means with only a
    small percentage being full-time, paid pastors.
    Members in churches within the CPMs were found to
    be giving sacrificially and regularly to their
    pastors care. In none were the majority
    supported by their churches.

12
Common Characteristics within CPMs
  • Believers testified of exciting and very
    meaningful worship sessions. Some were private
    while others were public. Believers in them
    commonly felt they belonged and that they were
    among friends, while at the same time speaking
    with concern of their own personal weaknesses and
    imperfections.
  • Emerging and existing churches found their own
    pastor from their fellowship of believers, and
    personally testified that they recognized that
    person as their pastoral leader. Many churches
    recognized two or three persons as their group of
    pastors. Pastors tended to define themselves as
    a pastor-evangelist.

13
Common Characteristics within CPMs
  • Churches emerged primarily from a believer who
    came seeking the Man of Peace, also from lay
    pastors from the church that started them, and
    from members of close churches whose burden for
    lost neighbors, lost family members, and even for
    their lost detractors, pushed them into authentic
    witnessing experiences. Only in a few cases was
    there common conversions and churches started as
    a result of canned personal or mass media
    presentations.

14
Common Characteristics within CPMs
  • Witness and church planting, with rare
    exceptions, was conducted in the heart language
    of the people group that experienced the Church
    Planting Movement. (In fact, in some cases, the
    movement was not able to move beyond the people
    group because believers did not understand the
    other groups language or dialect of their own
    language.)
  • Local, on-site training was more effective,
    pervasive and reproduced more in the succeeding
    generation/s than was training held outside the
    local setting. In persecuted settings, non-local
    training provided at more distant sites, brought
    its own types of dangers.

15
Common Characteristics within CPMs
  • Indigenous church planting practices were a major
    contribution to the ability of churches within
    the CPM to multiply. This was especially true
    where initially non-indigenous practices
    transitioned to become indigenous soon after
    coming into being. Those tended to reproduce
    more often and sooner. (Indigeniety within the
    CPMs included financing themselves securing
    their own leaders from within their emerging
    church housing themselves according to the local
    style and at the level of the local economy
    extending themselves as a witness and as a church
    among the lost as a result of their own resources
    and spiritual awareness's.)
  • Most pastoral leaders interviewed were either 1)
    the original Man of Peace, or 2) the lay person
    who came from a nearby church to start their
    church, or 3) persons chosen from within the
    emerging church group as they matured to be a
    church.

16
Common Characteristics within CPMs
  • Throughout the interviews, members were aware
    that their group was a church and spoke of their
    group as being a church.
  • Among the twelve CPMs, except for two of them,
    the church members recognized their pastor as the
    handler of the ordinances who did administer
    the ordinances. (Within the two who didnt,
    churches in that CPM was moving in that direction
    while in the other CPM the CPM churches wanted to
    do so but deferred to a long-existing
    institutional church pattern. Most of these said
    they could not wait long for the Convention to
    recognize their rights as churches.)

17
Common Characteristics within CPMs
  • Within each of the CPMs, emerging churches
    housed their church, meeting in homes, offices,
    warehouses, barns, factories, schools, hospitals,
    health clinics, grain sheds, and other places.
    Some groups, mainly the Kekchi as they became
    churches, provided for themselves separate
    buildings for their churches. By contrast, a
    majority of the churches in the other CPMs tended
    to stay in the facilities they were in as they
    emerged to be a church. Very few of the CPMs
    used resources from outside the people group to
    provide housing for their worship events.

18
Common Characteristics within CPMs
  • In persecuted settings, which included Islamic
    settings, most of the churches emerged with
    private (underground) worship sessions which
    tended to become public within four to six months
    of their recognizing themselves as a church. In
    most cases, it was their burden for the lost that
    brought them out and into public worship
    sessions.
  • Throughout the 12 CPM assessments, the
    interviewers did not find continuing C-5
    situations. Most believers said they could not
    remain in their previous religion more than four
    to six months. Most could not understand why we
    would ask why they came out of their former
    religion. Their common answer was There is
    nothing there that I want to go back to. (This
    is the last of these characteristics.)

19
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Among all of the characteristics observed
    within CPMs, the issue of the model used, or that
    exists, when planting churches is very
    significant.
  • The church planting model, healthy or unhealthy,
    biblically sound or not biblically sound, using
    best practices or poor practices, that exists
    when a CPM emerges tends to become the permanent
    model of that CPM. If the model is good, the CPM
    tends to survive.

20
End of the CPM Characteristics
  • Prepared by Dr. Jim Slack
  • IMB Field Assessments Consultations
  • November 17, 2006 Edition

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
CPM Stoppers or Ceiling Setters
  • Securing pastors from outside the CPM, and for
    sure from outside the ethnic group
  • Working in a language other than the colloquial
    language of the ethnic group.
  • Using outside resources to provide land for
    churches provide buildings for the churches
    provide support for pastors meaning, providing
    resources that are not at an indigenous level of
    the ethne.

24
CPM Stoppers or Ceiling Setters
  • Requiring local church baptisms to be conducted
    by official baptizers who live beyond the
    churches and who represent an institutional
    validating structure.
  • Regularly taking pastoral leaders outside the
    geographic setting of his local church to be
    trained and validated. (This means reversing
    the on-site training characteristic.)

25
(No Transcript)
26
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Definition of church. The model defines church.
  • Just any ole model wont do, and what results in
    a CPM in one setting among people groups wont
    necessarily result in the emergence of a CPM in
    other people groups.
  • Indigeniety is a major concern?
  • Minimize subsidy and move to an indigenous
    approach as soon as possible.
  • Subsidy, if continued, will put a ceiling on
    growth that tends to become dependent on the
    subsidy.

27
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Indigeniety concerns continued
  • Subsidy shapes the churches in its image
  • Indigeniety includes outside finances
  • Indigeniety includes the issue of outside
    personnel
  • Indigeniety includes methods that are not natural
    or reproducible within the people group
  • Indigeniety means natural or compatible with the
    local surroundings

28
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Infinitively reproducible. If a model is
    indigenous, it should be infinitively
    reproducible in all of its parts by (lay)
    believers in local churches. Again, in this case
    indigenous means in and of each local church.
  • Seeks the resources from within the Harvest.
    Indigenous means that the resources are found and
    secured from within the harvest. This is even
    true when resources are available from outside
    the harvest. The model of reducibility is the
    issue.

29
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Close to indigeniety are language issues
    choices.
  • The New Testament example and expectation is the
    use of the heart language (See Acts 2 and the
    Pentecost event)
  • A critical missions discussion is between heart
    language or classical language. Gods language
    choice of giving us the New Testament was
    Koine, a street version of Greek. God did not
    choose Classical Greek.
  • God chose the idiom of the heart language for His
    Gospel.
  • Added to Scriptural examples is the fact that
    each persons worldview resides in their heart
    language idiom. Heart language use was in every
    CPM.

30
There Is Now The Need For A Brief Interlude
Concerning Language
  • In Old and New Testament Scripture laos and ta
    ethne are referenced at least 2000 times.
  • A Ta ethne, defined also in Acts 2 as heart
    language is our norm. An illustration today is
  • Asian is a Category, not a Ta Ethne
  • Filipino is a Category, not a Ta Ethne
  • Tagalog, Ilocano, Cebuano and 187 other groups
    are ta ethne people groups

31
A Brief Interlude Concerning Language Continued
  • West African is a Category Not A ta ethne
  • Nigerian is a Category Not A ta ethne
  • Yoruba is a ta ethne, as is
  • Ibo, Hausa and 428 other Nigerian ta ethnes
  • Hispanic is a Category Not A ta ethne
  • Guatemalan is a Category Not A ta ethne
  • Kekchi is a ta ethne

32
Now, Back To What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • CPM churches are praying churches.
  • The prayer habits of churches within the CPMs we
    have assessed are phenomenal
  • Most of the churches in every CPM we assessed had
    multiple prayer sessions each week. In every
    assessment, we were told of all-night prayer
    meetings
  • CPMs exhibit a multiplication mindset. This
    workshop has already covered this topic.
  • Churches planting new churches is the norm
  • Church planting has become generational

33
Now, Back To What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Close to use of the people groups heart language
    idiom is the provision of Scripture for use in
    engagement, evangelism, church planting,
    discipleship and leader mentoring.
  • Lack of Scripture due to illiteracy is a major
    issue in all but one of the assessed CPMs.
  • In many of the Islamic CPM settings, many of the
    Islamic converts had a memorized Quran, while
    immediately after becoming a believer, had no
    Christian Bible, mainly due to illiteracy.

34
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • For those in the USA who are praying for a CPM in
    their people group, Scripture heart language
    evangelization will also be an issue.
  • Today, some of the CPMs face back-tracking in
    order to solve the orality-literacy problems by
    giving the believers an oral Bible until they
    have or can handle written Scripture.
  • A lot of syncretism results from moving one
    language upthe Great Compromiseon the language
    tree. Leader accommodation, social correctness
    economics lurks here.

35
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • A Lay leadership model should be foundational.
  • Lay leader models, styles, should follow New
    Testament and not historic, traditional patterns
    or models
  • Church planting should move to churches planting
    churches as soon as possible

36
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Training and mentoring is a major issue in most
    of the CPMs.
  • Those interviewed, members and pastors, in each
    of the CPMs said they needed more training.
  • Assessors concluded in all but 2 of the CPMs,
    training of leaders was a serious need that could
    lead to weaknesses or plateauing if not provided.
  • Training in most CPMs was seen to be very
    academic and not functional at lay understanding
    levels. Training in most was very literate when
    more oral methods were needed.

37
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Highly effective churches planting churches in
    the observed CPMs implies the following
  • Finding and keying on the Man of Peace is the
    most common engagement practice seen within the 9
    assessed CPMs.
  • Staying with the Man of Peace to the point of the
    gathering of a group the conversion of the Man
    of Peace and many in the group and the Man of
    Peace becoming the pastor of the group is common
    among most but not in every one.

38
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Highly effective churches planting churches in
    the observed CPMs implies the following
  • If the Man of Peace does not convert and mature
    to be the pastor, the pastor is secured from
    within each emerging church
  • Resistant to importing pastors from the outside,
    even from other sectors of the people group
  • SC, Church Planter, does not pastor any of the
    churches, and especially any of the first ones.
    The only model is a local model.

39
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Highly effective churches planting churches in
    the observed CPMs implies the following
  • Churches planting churches follow New Testament
    patterns, especially the four self items. We
    saw self-correcting where Scripture was
    available, possessed, understood used.
  • The churches that operated according to
    congregational polity replicated themselves more
    easily, were the healthiest and solved problems
    with less failures than those where authority was
    in the pastor.

40
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Highly effective churches planting churches in
    the observed CPMs implies the following
  • Within assessment interviews one could see the
    emergence of institutionalism and the slowing,
    plateauing and decline of the CPM where
    congregational practices were not maintained.
  • In the CPMs, churches that were responsible for
    housing themselves presented few failures to
    house themselves effectively. The Kekchi have
    been the most efficient, to a flaw.

41
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Two concerns that have been common among
    traditional, institutional churches, but not
    among the assessed CPMs, have been
  • How can we get enough pastors for our churches?
  • How can we afford land and building for our
    churches?
  • In healthy CPMs, ministry was consisted of and
    was described as functions and not programs.

42
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • The healthiest CPMs, meaning those with fewer
    ceilings, fewer plateaus, and fewer
    non-reproducing churches were those where the
    basic engagement, evangelism, church planting,
    initial discipleship and mentoring of leaders
    were in the initial models.
  • When generational church planting occurs without
    all the basic ministry functions, it is too late
    to chase after them and add them.

43
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Within the CPMs that have been assessed,
    excellent worldview-oriented witnessing and
    ministry practices have been observed.
  • The Camel method was commonly observed in the
    most productive Islamic CPM setting which
    underlined the value of identifying a peoples
    worldview. It was not seen in a second one.
  • Effective means of housing the church was
    observed
  • Indigenous music has been absent in most

44
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Most assessed CPMs have been in relational
    societies.
  • Media in these relational settings has been
    personal rather than mass. Mass media was
    adjunct in a few of the CPMs
  • The Jesus Film, the most famous Christian mass
    media evangelism tool, was not significantly in
    any of the assessed CPMs as their stated
    significant source of hearing or embracing Jesus
    as Lord

45
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • In persecuted CPM settings, most new church
    worship services were private. However, within
    most, they were public within 3-5 months.
  • Generic, meaning copying a program, content,
    methods, or curriculum, from a different
    worldview, especially religious, setting was a
    major barrier to growth.
  • The major result was syncretism
  • The second issue was meaningless rituals

46
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Reversion, as learned in the interviews, to the
    believers former religion was minimal.
  • When compared to people groups without CPMs,
    their reversion and backdoor percentages were
    very high
  • Most responded with surprise that the
    interviewers would think they would want to go
    back to their old religion. They said, almost in
    unison, There is nothing there that we want to
    go back to.

47
What We Have Learned About CPMs
  • Reversion, as learned in the interviews, to the
    believers former religion was minimal.
  • In persecuted settings, which was in 7 of the 9
    assessment settings, there few instances of
    members going back to their old religion.
  • Exploring the issue of C-1 to C-5 relationships
    to the former religion, none responded in the
    interviews that they personally considered a C-4
    or C-5 relationship, even if they had the choice.
    Finding ways to stay in the old religion was a
    non-issue.

48
What We Have Learned From CPM Assessments!
  • Prepared by Dr. Jim Slack
  • IMB, SBCs Strategy Group
  • Leader of On-site CPM Assessments
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com