Vygotskys Sociocultural Approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Vygotskys Sociocultural Approach

Description:

Vygotsky's ... 1914 Simultaneously studied philosophy/history with literature in ... set of rules of pronunciation and grammar capable of conveying ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:428
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: edwa81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vygotskys Sociocultural Approach


1
Vygotskys Sociocultural Approach
  • Vygotsky is concerned to study how people,
    through the use of their own social activities,
    by changing their own conditions of existence,
    can change themselves
  • (Shotter,
    1993, p. 111)

2
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky 1896-1934
  • Entered medical school in Moscow (continued in
    Kharkov)
  • Changed to law at Moscow (graduated 1917)
  • 1914 Simultaneously studied philosophy/history
    with literature in private university
  • 1917 - 1924 taught literature/aesthetics/history
    of art
  • 1924 Methods of Reflexological and Psychological
    Investigations. Joined Institute of Psychology
    and founded Institute of Defectology
  • 1925 Psychology of art Moscow Institute of
    Psychology Ph.D.
  • 1924 - 34 Troika of Vygotskian school, with
    Luria and Leontev

3
  • How can I know what I think
  • until I can see what I say?
  • - attributed to E.M. Forster by W.H. Auden
    (1962)

4
A fantastic story
  • L.S. Vygotsky, Thought and Languagetrans.
    Eugenia Hanfman and Gertrude Vakar, MIT Press
    1962
  • L.S. Vygotsky, Thought and Language, revised
    edition (ed. Kozulin), MIT Press 1986
  • L.S. Vygotsky, The Collected Works of L.S.
    Vygotsky Volume 1 Problems of General
    Psychology, including the volume Thinking and
    Speech, Springer 1988

5
  • How shall the heart express itself?
  • How shall another understand? (F. Tjutchev)
  • I have forgotten the word I intended to say,
    and my thought, unembodied, returns to the realm
    of shadows. (O. Mandelstam)

6
Janet Emig
  • The Composing Process of Twelfth Graders
  • Urbana, IL National Council of Teachers of
    English , 1971
  • Writing as a Mode of Learning, College
    Composition and Communication 28.2 (May 1977)
    122 128
  • Field Composition
  • Method think-aloud protocols of eight 12th
    grade writers
  • Writing as heuristic
  • . . . writing is epigenetic, with the complex
    evolutionary development of thought steadily and
    graphically visible and available throughout as a
    record of the journey, from jottings and notes to
    full discursive formulations (Emig 1977 127)

7
William Labov
  • Language in the Inner City Studies in the Black
    English Vernacular, Univ. Pennsylvania Press,
    1972
  • Field Sociolinguistics
  • Method study of narrative syntax within a
    language community
  • "Does 'Black English' exist?"
  • BEV as a well-formed set of rules of
    pronunciation and grammar capable of conveying
    complex logic and reasoning rather than slang
  • Standard/Non-Standard Schooled literacy/other
    literacies

8
Mina Shaughnessy
  • Errors and Expectations A Guide for the Teacher
    of Basic Writing
  • (NY Oxford University Press, 1977)
  • Background Open-enrolment into HE in the US
    following Vietnam war
  • Field Composition
  • Method Analysis of 4000 placement essays by 1st
    year UGs at CUNY
  • Errors can reveal how people think and this
    revelation is useful to teachers
  • Errors can be logical (cf. miscues) and conform
    to different rules that have developed among
    different language communities
  • Learning as a constant and often troubling
    reformulation of the world rather than a steady
    flow of truth into a void

9
A Language for LifeThe Bullock Report (1975)
  • . . . man interposes a network of words between
    the world and himself, and thereby becomes the
    master of the world, Georges Gusdorf (Epigraph
    to Chapter 4 Language and Learning)
  • a. The higher processes of thinking are normally
    achieved by the interaction of a childs language
    behaviour with his sic mental and perceptual
    powers. . . .
  • b. That language behaviour represents the aspect
    of his thought processes most accessible to
    outside influences, including that of the
    teacher (p. 49)
  • language has a heuristic function that is to
    say a child can learn by talking and writing as
    certainly as he can by listening and reading (p.
    50)

10
L.S. Vygotsky, Thought and Languagetrans.
Eugenia Hanfman and Gertrude Vakar, MIT Press 1962
  • The nature of the development itself changes,
    from biological to sociohistorical. Verbal
    thought is not an innate, natural form of
    behaviour but is determined by a
    historical-cultural process and has specific
    properties and laws that cannot be found in the
    natural forms of thought and speech. (p. 51)

11
L.S. Vygotsky, Thought and Languagetrans.
Eugenia Hanfman and Gertrude Vakar, MIT Press 1962
  • In terms of learning, writing makes a unique
    demand in that the writer must engage in
    deliberate semantics . . . deliberate
    structuring of the web of meaning (p. 100)
  • LSV saw writing as an expansion of inner
    speech which he viewed as maximally compact
    writing was a mode that was maximally detailed
  • James Britton, explicating LSV, defined writing
    as speech-cum-action (Britton 1971 11)

12
L.S. Vygotsky, Thought and Languagetrans.
Eugenia Hanfman and Gertrude Vakar, MIT Press 1962
  • Word meanings evolve
  • Mastery of written language has a profound
    effect upon the achievement of abstract thinking
    (Britton 1993)
  • Learning as a sharing of the culture (Bruner
    1986)
  • Research into learning as the study of how people
    make sense of the social world

13
  • The relationship between thought and word is a
    living process thought is born through words. A
    word devoid of thought is a dead thing, and a
    thought unembodied in words remains a shadow
    (Vygotsky 1962 p. 153)

14
Vygotsky and Consciousness i.e .how we think
  • His big contribution understanding that we
    reveal how we think in how we act on the world
    he was particularly interested in language as a
    tool
  • Give a child a tool and observe how they use
    it how they interpret the problem and how they
    act on it.
  • Tools are material, conceptual, language (these
    are intertwined in use)

15
Vygotsky and tool mediated action
Mediational Means
Object
Subject
16
Elementary (natural) v. higher (cultural) mental
functions
Four distinguishing criteria 1. Shift of control
from environment to individual 2. Emergence of
conscious realisation of mental processes 3.
Social origins and social nature of higher mental
functions 4. Use of signs to mediate
higher mental functions
17
Philosophical background
  • Vygotsky appropriated ideas about how material
    tools mediate the labour activity and extended
    those ideas to include how psychological tools
    mediate thought
  • He plays with the similarity between Marxs
    notion of how the tool mediates human labour
    activity and the semiotic notion of how sign
    systems mediate human social processes and
    thinking
  • His point is that tools (conceptual and material)
    are not only used by humans to change the world
    but also they transform and regulate humans in
    this process

18
Scientific and Spontaneous Concepts
Concept
Scientific Concepts
  • Impose on child logically defined concepts
  • Scientific concepts move downwards towards
    greater concreteness
  • Evolve in highly structured and specialized
    activity of classroom instruction

Mature concepts
Spontaneous Concepts
  • Concepts emerge from the childs own
  • reflections of everyday experience
  • Spontaneous concepts move upwards towards
    greater abstractness
  • Develops in childs everyday learningenvironment

Object
19
The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)
  • Originally a way of diagnosing a childs ability
    to learn
  • Became linked with the idea of scaffolding in
    the work of Bruner
  • For Vygotsky learning was a matter of
    internalisation and externalisation our
    relationship with the social situation of
    development changes as we learn

20
What is his influence on Pedagogy?
  • Mental growth is dependant on upon growth from
    the outside in, a mastery of techniques that are
    embodied in the culture and that are passed on in
    a contingent dialogue by agents of that culture.
    (Bruner, 1966, p.21)
  • The heart of the educational process consists of
    providing aides and dialogues for translating
    experience into more powerful systems of notation
    and ordering. And it is for this reason that I
    think a theory of development must be linked to
    both a theory of knowledge and to a theory of
    instruction, or be doomed to triviality. (Bruner,
    1966, p.21)

21
The contribution of Vygotsky to pedagogy
  • tool and sign mediated action
  • everyday and scientific concepts
  • individual development from the outside in-
    internalisation and externalisation
  • the social situation of development i.e. the
    leading activity

22
Revealing Thinking in Language in Use
  • For Vygotsky consciousness (how we think) was
    revealed in our use of both material and
    conceptual tools
  • The use of language can reveal the concepts we
    employ and also our reading of the situation

23
Activity Theory Leontev and object motive
  • The main thing which distinguishes one activity
    from another, however, is the difference of their
    objects. It is exactly the object of an activity
    that gives it a determined direction. According
    to the terminology I have proposed, the object of
    the activity is its true motive.

    (Leontev, 1978, p. 62)

24
Activity Theory Leontev
  • A shift of focus from tool to object i.e. that
    which is to be worked on
  • The ideas of object motive and leading activity
  • The cultural construction of the object
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com