Teaching Special Students in General Education Classrooms 7th edition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Teaching Special Students in General Education Classrooms 7th edition

Description:

... special needs in the general education program for any part of the school day ... In these days it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:613
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: janna1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teaching Special Students in General Education Classrooms 7th edition


1
Chapter 1
  • Success for All Students in the General Education
    Classroom

1.1
2
Inclusion is Operationalized over time
  • Mainstreaming is the inclusion of students with
    special needs in the general education program
    for any part of the school day
  • Full Inclusion is where students do not leave the
    general classroom to receive services
  • Inclusion is the meaningful participation of
    students with special needs in general education
    classrooms and programs

1.2
3
Recall Student Groups you as a teacher will
need to Accommodate
  • Gifted and talented students
  • Culturally and linguistically diverse students
  • Students at-risk for school failure
  • Students with disabilities (14 categor- ies in
    WA)

EDF 302 focus
1.3A
4
Areas in which a disability can appear
  • Physical (HI, OI)
  • Sensory (VI, HI, Deaf, Deaf-Blind)
  • Language (CD, SLD)
  • Cognitive (MR, SLD, MD, Autism, TBI)
  • Emotional (E/B D)

1.3A
5
Current Sp. Ed. Services are a function of
Litigation and Legislation
6
Case 1 - Landmark Education Litigation
Segregated Schools?
  • Brown v. Board of Education (See Linda)
  • Supreme Court ruled segregation is inherently
    unequal because it has the effect of causing the
    minority group members to feel inferior, perhaps
    for the rest of their lives. In these days it
    is doubtful that any child may reasonably be
    expected to succeed in life if he is denied an
    opportunity of an education. LEAs may be
    assigning students based on color to substandard
    preparation to be a citizen?
  • This Supreme Court decision is based on the XIVth
    Amendment to the U.S. Constitution..

1.4A
7
Landmark Education Litigation
  • Brown v. Board of Education is based on the XIVth
    Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

I wonderWhat is the 14th Amendment to our
Constitution? I also wonder what the Bill of
Rights is? hmmany help from the class? Tell
your neighbor.
1.4A
8
XIVth Amendment
  • All persons born or naturalized in the United
    Statesare citizens of theState wherein they
    reside. No state shall make or enforce any law
    which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
    of citizens
  • nor shall any state deprive any person of life,
    liberty, or property, without due process of law.

1.4B
9
I think this is what Big 14 means. A state
cannot serendipitously take away our house (a
property) if taking it away makes us
disadvantaged.
10
Interpreting XIVth Amendment
You got it Harry!
  • education was classified as a property, which a
    person was entitled not to lose without due
    process.
  • The basic meaning of the final sentence is that
    fair procedures must be followed before a state
    can deny certain important interests of
    individuals. A denial of an opportunity to
    succeed in life is such an important interest.

1.4C
11
Tracking - Hobson v. Hansen 67
Tracking students (smarter students attend
more challenging courses and slower students
are placed in a less rigorous course of studies)
also affected the area of special education.
Next.
  • Standardized tests were used to place children in
    different academic tracks.
  • Black children tended to be placed in the lower
    tracks while white children were often placed in
    higher tracks.
  • A mechanism of de facto segregation seemed to
    be in place.
  • See implications of Hobson v. Hansen on next
    slide.

1.4D
12
Tracking - Hobson v. Hansen 67
  • Standardized tests were used to place children in
    different academic tracks.
  • Black children tended to be placed in the lower
    tracks while white children were often placed in
    higher tracks.
  • A mechanism of de facto segregation seemed to
    be in place.
  • See implications of Hobson v. Hansen on next
    slide.

1.4D
13
Another issue - Fairness in Evaluation Hobson v.
Hansen
  • It was found that the tests used to track
    students were not measuring their ability but the
    economic and social background (SES).
  • Subsequent legislation insisted on multi-factored
    and nondiscriminatory testing for any special
    placement.

1.4E
14
Issue- LRE PARC v. Pennsylvania Contributes to
Sp. Ed.
  • Children with mental retardation were excluded
    from public schools in PA.
  • Parents (Assoc. for Retarded Citizens) sued.
  • Court ruled that their children were entitled to
    a due process hearing before placement in special
    education or denying a child admission to school.
  • The concept of least restrictive environment
    (LRE) was advanced.

1.4F
15
Placement based on LRE Fig. 1-4
1.7
16
Current Issues and Trends
  • A Nation at Risk (1983)
  • America 2000 (1990), Goals 2000 (1994)
  • Standards Movement
  • No Child Left Behind (2001)
  • Increase accountability
  • Focus on what works
  • Reduce bureaucracy and increase flexibility
  • Empower parents

1.8
17
Landmark Legislation Stick and Carrot approaches
  • Civil Rights
  • Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act
    of 1973
  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Applied
    all legislation to private entities).
  • Education
  • The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of
    1975 (EHA).
  • The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
    (IDEA) Amendments of 1997.
  • The Individuals with Disabilities Education
    Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA).

1.4G g
18
Section 504 - Recipients of Federal
Assistance may not
  • 1. Deny qualified handicapped persons equal
    opportunities to participate or benefit from any
    program or activity solely based on their
    handicap.
  • 2. Provide benefits or services unequal to those
    provided for non-handicapped persons.
  • 3. Deny handicapped individuals the right to
    participate in regular programs just because of
    special programs that are available to them.
  • (Note similarities with Civil Right Act and Title
    IX.)

1.4H
19
Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Applied principles of 504 to non-federally
    assisted programs
  • Private colleges
  • Businesses
  • Transportation
  • No teeth.

1.4I
20
EHA through IDEIA Elements to receive funding
(carrots).
  • FAPE - Including Related Services
  • Due Process
  • Fair Assessments
  • LRE
  • IEP
  • 5-21 (3-21)

1.4J
21
EHA through IDEIA Elements
  • Transition plan in place _at_ 16
  • Rehabilitation counseling added as a related
    service
  • General education teachers required to
    participate in IEP process unless excused
  • Functional behavior assessment

1.4K
22
  • Where will a new teacher encounter students with
    disabilities?

23
Educational Environments for Students with
Disabilities Ages 6-21 1999-2000 Fig. 1-1
Heres how disabilities appear in classrooms
according to the text.
1.5
24
The Role of Special Education
  • Instruction
  • Related Services
  • Supplementary Aids and Services
  • Based on Individualized Education Program (IEP)
  • Provided in the Least Restrictive Environment

1.6
25
Current Issues and Trends
  • A Nation at Risk (1983)
  • America 2000 (1990), Goals 2000 (1994)
  • Standards Movement
  • No Child Left Behind (2001)
  • Increase accountability
  • Focus on what works
  • Reduce bureaucracy and increase flexibility
  • Empower parents

1.8
26
People-First Language
  • Do not use generic labels
  • Not the retarded
  • Instead individuals with mental retardation
  • Put people first, not their disability
  • a person with a disability
  • Emphasize abilities, not limitations
  • uses a wheelchair rather than confined to a
    wheelchair

1.9
27
General Education Teachers and Special Students
  • First to identify needs of the special student,
    and initiate the referral
  • Implementation of the special students general
    education program
  • Help to evaluate the students progress in the
    general education program, and those areas served
    by the specialists

1.10
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com