Modeling the US Natural Gas Network - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling the US Natural Gas Network

Description:

Transmission not completely constant, not completely seasonal. Consumption seasonal. Storage allows seasonal demand to be met ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: jimel
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling the US Natural Gas Network


1
Modeling the US Natural Gas Network
  • James Ellison
  • Sandia National Laboratories
  • Critical Infrastructures Modeling and Simulation
    Group
  • The National Infrastructure Simulation and
    Analysis Center (NISAC) is joint program at
    Sandia National Laboratories and Los Alamos
    National Laboratory, funded and managed by the
    Department of Homeland Securitys (DHS)
    Preparedness Directorate.
  • Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by
    Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company for
    the United States Department of Energys National
    Nuclear Security Administration under contract
    DE-AC04-94AL85000.

2
Natural Gas Sector
  • Importance
  • 24 of US energy consumption
  • 17 of US power generation
  • 30 of US industrial energy consumption
  • Consumption 22 Tcf (trillion cubic feet)
  • US Production 19 Tcf
  • Imports 3 Tcf (mostly from Canada)

Source EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2005. 2003
data.
3
US Natural Gas Network
4
US Natural Gas Network Flows
5
Region-to-Region Pipeline Capacity
6
Gas Network Dynamics
  • Production constant
  • Imports constant
  • Transmission not completely constant, not
    completely seasonal
  • Consumption seasonal
  • Storage allows seasonal demand to be met

7
US Consumption, Production, net Imports
Consumption
Net Imports
Production
Projection
Source EIA, Short-Term Energy Outlook, June 2004
8
(No Transcript)
9
Scenario A Base Case
10
Scenario A Base Case
11
Scenario B Gulf of Mexico Production Disruption
12
Model Caveats
  • Model does not take into account commercial
    contracts
  • May therefore give a false sense of security
    (even in an emergency, may not be able to
    override contracts in place)
  • Model does not take into account ownership of
    natural gas in storage
  • Assumption that gas could be drawn out of storage
    in an emergency may not be accurate

13
Conclusions
  • Resilience of the modeled system to transmission
    disruption scenarios suggests US natural gas
    network robust
  • Weakness of the infrastructure is that it is a
    closed system significant supply disruptions
    cannot be compensated for by increased imports
  • Large swings in natural gas pricing due to supply
    disruptions are therefore likely
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com