Energy Efficiency Policy Trends A Look Nationally - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Energy Efficiency Policy Trends A Look Nationally

Description:

... qualified new homes (both site built and manufactured) through builder networks. ... MD, WV, MI, NE, OH, SD, AK, NV, TX, UT, WA, AL, LA, MS, TN. All 5 tests ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: kathl101
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Energy Efficiency Policy Trends A Look Nationally


1
Energy Efficiency Policy TrendsA Look Nationally
David Pickles Vice President ICF
International dpickles_at_icfi.com On behalf of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Staff
Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance March 31,
2008
2
Agenda
  • Impetus and Challenges for Energy Efficiency
  • Issues Garnering Increased Interest
  • Quick start EE programs
  • Aligning utility incentives with EE
  • Incorporating EE as a resource in utility
    planning processes
  • Cost-effectiveness tests
  • State examples
  • Resources and Summary

3
Growing Impetus for Energy Efficiency
  • Shrinking reserve margins and the need for
    additional generation and transmission capacity
  • Increasing environmental concerns, especially
    around coal
  • Desire for increased local economic activity
  • Desire for improved energy security and reduced
    exposure to volatility
  • Desire for increased customer satisfaction
  • Potential increased flexibility and modularity in
    the planning of the utility system
  • Increasing political attention
  • Synergy with Advanced Metering Infrastructure

4
Challenges in Energy Efficiency
  • Potential adverse short term increases in rates
  • Equity between customers and customer classes
  • Uncertainty surrounding the persistence and
    measurement of the impacts of the programs
  • Difficulty in forecasting EE participation and
    costs
  • Diminishing economies of scale as DSM programs
    grow
  • Impact on the system if utilities rely upon DSM
    programs that ultimately do not yield the
    intended impact
  • Lack of clear legislative and regulatory
    direction, ratemaking treatments, and goal
    setting
  • Role of EE and local distribution companies in
    states with retail competition
  • Role of non-utility parties

5
Large Potential for Cost-Effective Energy
Efficiency
  • McKinsey Global Institutes Curbing Global Energy
    Demand Growth The Energy Productivity
    Opportunity (May 07) - By capturing the potential
    available from existing technologies with an
    internal rate of return of 10 or more, we could
    cut global energy demand by half or more over the
    next 15 years.
  • ACEEEs Energy Efficiencys Role in a Carbon
    Cap-and-Trade System (May 06) - Doubling
    efficiency would cut load growth by about
    two-thirds in 2024, from about 20 to about 6
    above 2006 levels.
  • Report of the Clean and Diversified Energy
    Advisory Committee to the Western Governors
    Association (WGA) (June 06) - By adopting the
    WGA's best practices scenario in the 18 WGA
    states, load growth could be reduced by as much
    as 75 over the next 15 years.

6
Utility Sector Energy Efficiency Had Declined,
But Is Now On An Upswing
Source ACEEE, ICF
7
Programs Help Overcome Key Barriers Limiting
Efficiency
  • ENERGY STAR
  • Helps homeowners reduce energy use by 10, 20, or
    30 while purchasing products, home improvements,
    or buying a new home
  • Helps businesses, public sector, schools reduce
    energy use by 10 or more
  • Overcomes lack of information, competing vendor
    claims, split incentives
  • Broad-based platform with government-backed
    credibility and network of retailers and
    manufacturers to leverage
  • Important utility barriers remain
  • Existing electricity and gas regulations / market
    rules provide additional financial incentives for
    supply-side resources
  • View that EE is not a reliable, measurable, cost
    effective resource
  • Concern that EE will raise rates
  • Lack of good documentation and guidance on
    demand-side programs

Barriers important to address do not go away
with carbon regulation
8
Quick start EE programs
  • Quick Start programs are a basic set of
    programs that
  • Are quick to get off the ground
  • Offer measurable benefits in the near-term
  • Can be expanded to a broader and more
    comprehensive set of programs over a few years
  • AR PSC completed a successful collaborative in
    2006 which resulted in EE rulemaking in June 07.
  • Quick Start EE programs filed by 4 electric 3
    gas utilities
  • Approved statewide EE education program and
    weatherization program for Severely
    Energy-Inefficient Houses
  • Allows for cost recovery via rate rider.

9
Quick start EE programs (2)
  • Residential Sector
  • Promoting the purchase of ENERGY STAR qualifying
    lighting and appliances through existing supply
    channels with financial incentives for some
    products, coupled with education and outreach
  • Promoting retirement and recycling of old and
    inefficient appliances such as refrigerators,
    freezers, and room air conditioners through
    turn-in incentive programs.
  • Promoting proper functioning of existing
    residential HVAC equipment, as well as proper
    sizing and installation of new equipment.
  • Developing pilot-scale initiatives to promote
    comprehensive home energy improvements for
    existing homes through Home Performance with
    ENERGY STAR.
  • Developing pilot-scale initiatives to promote the
    construction of ENERGY STAR qualified new homes
    (both site built and manufactured) through
    builder networks.

10
Quick start EE programs (3)
  • Commercial Sector
  • Offering prescriptive incentives for lighting and
    HVAC measures to a broad range of commercial
    facilities along with education and/or technical
    assistance to promote increased efficiency in
    lighting and HVAC system design.
  • Offering prescriptive incentives to promote the
    purchase of ENERGY STAR qualifying commercial
    food service equipment for use in restaurants,
    hotels/hospitality venues, schools, and other
    applicable commercial or institutional
    facilities.
  • Developing pilot-scale initiatives to facilitate
    whole-building energy performance using the
    ENERGY STAR building performance rating system,
    coupled with incentives for energy efficient
    lighting and HVAC systems, and general education
    about building tune-ups and/or retrocommissioning
    to improve building operation and maintenance.
  • Promoting power management of computer monitors
    through direct outreach to large end users and
    online tools for smaller end users, along with
    education about additional opportunities for
    saving energy through purchase and proper use of
    ENERGY STAR qualifying office products.

11
Aligning Utility Incentives with EE
Expense Rate Case Rider
Lost Revenue Recovery Mechanism (LRAM)
Decoupling
Program Cost Recovery
Lost Margin Recovery
Capitalize Rate Case Deferral
Earnings/Net Operating Margin
Performance Incentives
Shared Savings
Performance Payment
ROR Adder
12
Support from National Organizations
  • 1989 NARUC resolution urging its member state
    commissions to
  • consider the loss of earnings potential connected
    with the use of demand-side resources and
  • adopt appropriate ratemaking mechanisms to
    encourage utilities to help their customers
    improve end-use efficiency cost-effectively and
  • otherwise ensure that the successful
    implementation of a utilitys least-cost plan is
    its most profitable course of action
  • National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency offers
    the following recommendations as ways to overcome
    barriers that have limited greater investment in
    energy efficiency
  • .Promote sufficient, timely, and stable program
    funding to deliver energy efficiency where
    cost-effective, and
  • Modify policies to align utility incentives with
    the delivery of cost-effective energy efficiency
    and modify ratemaking practices to promote energy
    efficiency investments.

13
Significant State Regulatory Activity
  • Shareholder incentives are very common with 18 of
    the 36 states with significant DSM funding
    offering utility incentives of some kind
  • Six states provide a separate mechanism for the
    recovery of lost electricity margins
  • 14 states have either approved or have pending
    electric decoupling mechanisms to insulate
    utility earnings from DSM program performance
  • Ten states have either an approved or pending
    mechanism treating both lost margins and
    shareholder incentives

14
Status of Regulatory Treatments of EE
15
Trends in Utility Incentives
  • Increased interest in broad topic by many
    stakeholders (Commissions, utilities,
    legislators, non-profits, etc)
  • Renewed interest in exploring decoupling
  • Idaho Power pilot in ID
  • Legislation in CT, NY, MN
  • Filing by Pepco in MD and DC
  • Docket in IA
  • LRAM less prevalent but still being explored
  • Large variety of approaches for performance
    incentives
  • CA Rewards and penalties based on a) how well
    the utility met CPUC established energy savings
    targets b) the economic benefits generated from
    the utilitys EE portfolio
  • NV Enhanced ROR
  • TX Shared Savings

16
Incorporating EE as a Resource in Utility
Planning Processes
  • Renewed interest in treating EE as a resource in
    planning
  • CA loading order
  • WA ballot initiative 937 conservation is
    resource of first choice
  • NC IRP comparison of demand and supply side
    options to determine the least-cost, long-term
    set of resources needed
  • ISO New England Forward Capacity Market EE can
    bid in as a resource to provide capacity
  • TVA Board approved goal of 1200 MW demand
    reduction through EE and DR in 5 years.

17
Incorporating EE as a Resource in Utility
Planning Processes (2)
  • WI legislation requires the PSC to conduct EE
    planning every four years results incorporated
    into Strategic Energy Assessment by PSC.
  • AR PSC decision in June 2007 -- Resource Planning
    Guidelines, directs utilities to give comparable
    consideration to demand and supply resources and
    to assess all reasonably useful and economic
    supply and demand resources that may be available
    to a utility or its customers, and to identify
    and investigate resources including energy
    efficiency, conservation, demand-side management,
    interruptible load, and price responsive demand.

18
Issues in Incorporating EE in the Utility
Planning Processes
  • Fragmented regulatory authority (siting,
    emissions, transmission, reliability, etc.)
  • Timing of CPCN and related dockets and the
    timeliness of EE. Integrate EE early in the
    resource planning process to capture the full
    value
  • Inconsistent planning and evaluation criteria for
    supply and EE investments
  • Data necessary to integrate EE into resource
    planning are now readily available
  • Cost and savings data
  • Potential studies for what is achievable through
    EE measures
  • Energy, capacity and non-energy benefits can
    often justify significant EE programs
  • Clear path to funding is needed to establish a
    budget for EE resources
  • Update resource plan as information changes

19
Importance of Cost-Effectiveness Tests
  • Several tests for evaluating EE
    cost-effectiveness, each reflect a different
    stakeholder perspective on the impact of EE.
  • Common misperception that there is a single best
    perspective for evaluation of cost-effectiveness.
    Each test is useful and accurate, but the results
    of each test are intended to answer a different
    set of questions.
  • Amount of cost-effective EE is different
    depending on perspective. Also impact on shared
    savings and related MV requirements
  • Criteria for defining cost-effectiveness - the
    California Standard Practice Manual is
    authoritative source, and is referred to by many
    states

20
Source Guide to Resource Planning with Energy
Efficiency - a Product of the National Action
Plan for Energy Efficiency. 2007.
21
Snapshot of State Use of Tests
Doesnt include info. from MD, WV, MI, NE, OH,
SD, AK, NV, TX, UT, WA, AL, LA, MS, TN
  • All 5 tests required
  • VA, IN, MN, CA, HI, GA
  • No specific test/s required
  • KY, PA, ME, IL, ND, OK, ID, WY, NC, SC

22
Resources
  • National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Guides
    and Papers
  • www.epa.gov/eeactionplan
  • National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Report
  • Aligning Utility Incentives with Energy
    Efficiency Investment
  • Resource Planning with Energy Efficiency
  • Conducting Potential Studies for Cost-Effective
    Energy Efficiency
  • Model Energy Efficiency Program Evaluation
  • National Action Plan Vision for 2025
  • EPA Clean Energy-Environment Guide to Action
  • www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/stateandlocal
  • Sections on Energy Efficiency Portfolio
    Standards, Public Benefits Funds for Energy
    Efficiency, Portfolio Management Strategies and
    Utility Incentives for Demand-Side Resources.

23
Summary
  • Growing momentum across the country
  • Interest in learning how to increase use of EE
  • Recognition that EE is a valuable part of energy
    mix and is one key as the nation addresses
    climate change solutions

24
For More Information
  • David Pickles
  • ICF International
  • 7160 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 340
  • Plano, TX 75024
  • (972) 841-2567
  • dpickles_at_icfi.com
  • www.icfi.com
  • Katrina Pielli
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Clean Energy Program Manager
  • (202) 343-9610
  • Pielli.Katrina_at_epa.gov
  • www.epa.gov/cleanenergy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com