Laboratory test method for the prediction of the evolution of road skidresistance with traffic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Laboratory test method for the prediction of the evolution of road skidresistance with traffic

Description:

Cone contact pressure: 0.4 N.mm-2. Rotation speed: 500 rpm 'Friction measurement' function ... Mosaic discs (fraction 7.2/10 mm) 22,5 cm. 22,5 cm. Portoro , Slovenia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:210
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: WATTE
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Laboratory test method for the prediction of the evolution of road skidresistance with traffic


1
Laboratory test method for the predictionof the
evolution of road skid-resistance with traffic
  • Minh-Tan Do
  • LCPC
  • Research engineer
  • E-mail minh-tan.do_at_lcpc.fr

2
Scope
  • Need to predict skid-resistance evolution
  • Existing empirical tools
  • LCPC polishing tests
  • From laboratory simulation to road prediction
  • Conclusions

3
Need to predict skid-resistance evolution
  • Road skid-resistance evolves with time
  • due to mechanical actions (traffic)
  • due to climate effects
  • Prediction of skid-resistance evolution is
    needed
  • to forecast road maintenance
  • to ensure long-term performance
  • to optimize material choice

4
Existing empirical tools
  • Experimental sites tracked over time
  • drawbacks costs ?, time ?

5
LCPC polishing tests Objectives
  • Quick laboratory tests
  • Able to test concrete-asphalt mixes and
    aggregates
  • Comparable results with road data
  • Means to predict skid-resistance evolution

6
LCPC polishing tests Test machine
7
LCPC polishing tests Wehner/Schulze machine
8
LCPC polishing tests Specimens
  • Concrete asphalt
  • Cores taken from pavements or laboratory-made
    slabs
  • Aggregates
  • Mosaic discs (fraction 7.2/10 mm)

9
LCPC polishing tests Test procedure
  • Friction-time plot
  • Friction measurement every 1000 passes ? µmax is
    reached
  • Next stops 3-5-9.104 passes
  • End 180,000 passes

10
LCPC polishing tests Laboratory results (1/2)
  • Aggregates vs asphalt mixes

11
LCPC polishing tests Laboratory results (2/2)
  • Wehner/Schulze vs PSV

µWS 1.06(PSV/100) 0.20
12
From laboratory to road
  • Core sampling on new roads tracked over time

Wheel paths
13
From laboratory to road
  • Core sampling on circulated roads

Wheel paths
14
From laboratory to road
  • Relationship polishing duration traffic

15
From laboratory to road
  • Simulation vs actual evolution

16
From laboratory to road
  • Towards a prediction of skid-resistance
    evolution
  • Problem statement

17
From laboratory to road
  • Towards a prediction of skid-resistance
    evolution
  • Approach

18
From laboratory to road
  • Towards a prediction of skid-resistance
    evolution
  • Relationship µWS LFC/SFC (source from Huschek,
    2004)

19
From laboratory to road
  • Towards a prediction of skid-resistance
    evolution
  • Comparison prediction/measurement

actual LFC-T plot
µWS-N plot converted into equivalent LFC-T plot
20
Conclusions Where are we / objectives?
  • Quick laboratory tests
  • ½ day to plot a full friction-time curve, could
    be ? depending (N 0.024T) on anticipated
    traffic
  • Able to test concrete-asphalt mixes and
    aggregates
  • Yes, except very aggressive surfaces
  • Comparable results with road data
  • Yes, first tendencies to be supported by other
    experiments
  • Means to predict skid-resistance evolution
  • Promising first results

21
Conclusions Next step
  • Investigate the relationship polishing duration
    ? traffic
  • k (N kT) should be constant ?
  • Relationship µWS ? LFC/SFC
  • Relative influences light vehicles/trucks
  • Prediction model, taking into account other
    mechanisms (seasonal variations, ageing)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com