Title: Myths and assumptions in training young athletes
1Myths and assumptions in training young athletes
- Objectives
- Identify some common constraining beliefs
- Explore the basis of these beliefs
- Refined, more informed perspective
2Prevailing beliefs?
- Young people should be protected from stress T/F
- Certain forms of stress are unsuitable T/F
- Low impact/endurance-type training is safe T/F
- High impact/explosive-type exercise is unsafe T/F
3Common beliefs relating to strength training
- Strength training slows you down
- Strength training makes you bulky
- Strength training reduces flexibility
- Strength and endurance training dont mix
- Strength training is dangerous
4Definitions
- Strength
- The maximal amount of force a muscle or muscle
group can generate in a specific movement pattern
at a specific velocity of movement - (Knuttgen Kraemer 1987)
- The ability of a given muscle or muscle group to
generate a muscular force under specific
conditions - (Siff 2000)
- But in reality strength is a general term used
to describe a number of aspects of physical
performance
5Definitions (contd)
- Stress
- The response of the body to any demand made upon
it (Seyle 1946) - Beneficial stress gt Positive response
- Detrimental stress gt Decay, damage
- Training Process
- An exercise in stress management planning,
application, control
6Historically 2 points of debate relating to
Strength training for young people
- Potential benefits, or lack of, to general health
/or athletic performance - Potential negative effects on bone growth
long-term bone health
7Historical Basis
- Observation of stunted growth/deformity amongst
Japanese child labourers who habitually carried
heavy loads (as noted by Faigenbaum 2000) - A 1978 study in which prepubescent children
failed to gain strength from resistive training.
(Vrijens1978) - National Electronic Injury Surveillance System
(NEISS) in the United States - A limited number of case study reports of growth
plate fractures
8Accordingly in the 70s 80s
- General consensus that weight training would
compromise the bone health of growing young
people - AAP (1983) an insufficiency of androgens implies
neither girls nor prepubertal boys will increase
muscle mass with resistive training and will have
little or no gain in strength
9Bone Health Facts The Bad News
- Limited number of cases have raised concern about
epiphyseal injuries in the wrist apophyseal
injuries in the spine from weight lifting in
skeletally immature individuals - (AAP 2001)
-
- The lumbar back region has been reported as the
most common injury site in child adolescent
weight training populations - (Brady et al 1982, Brown Kimball 1983)
10Bone Health Facts The Bad News (contd)
- Damage cartilaginous cells of epiphysis may
result in premature closure of the epiphyseal
plate resulting in bone growth disturbance
subsequent deformity (Peterson Renstrom 1994,
Sports injuries in children, Conference report
2000) - Adolescent athletes may be at risk of restricted
growth delayed maturation when intense training
(of any form!) is combined with insufficient
energy intake (Lanyon et al 1992)
11Bone Health Facts The Good News
- Bone Mineral Density was higher in the spine
proximal femur in elite junior weightlifters than
age-matched controls. There were strong
relationships between BMD maximal strength,
suggesting differences were due in part to
training, not "self-selection due to genetic
factors - (Conroy et al 1993)
- Observed that intensive training will increase
the BMC to an extent that the spine can tolerate
extraordinary loads - (Granhed et al 1987)
- It has been demonstrated that high impact
activity is effective in facilitating an increase
in bone mineral acquisition thereby promoting
bone density possibly in decreasing the risks
of joint deterioration (Heinonen et al 2000,
Jakes et al 2001)
12Bone Health Facts The Good News (contd)
- Case study of World record holder in the squat
revealed - the highest bone mineral density yet measured,
redefining previously conceived upper limits of
BMD - A compressive force that doubled the previously
perceived critical compression force - Normal alignment, no evidence of disc herniation
or compressive disc disease, no frank or neural
foraminal canal stenosis - (Dickerman et al 2000)
- Observation that incidence of low back pain in
retired weightlifters was not different from that
of the population in general - Lifters that competed prior to the exclusion of
the Clean press lift, today incidence of back
pain in ex-lifters likely to be significantly
lower - (Granhed and Morelli 1988)
13General HealthMore good news
- 1RM tests can be performed safely effectively
with adolescents younger if proper technique is
used lifting is supervised by a trained SC
coach. No injuries were reported during or after
the lifts (Faigenbaum 2003). - Light to moderate weight training has been shown
to increase bone density, reduce the level of
meniscal problems, and increase red blood cell
production in children aged 8 to 14 years (Lanyon
et al 1992) - The majority of studies have concluded that
weight training programmes do not seem to
adversely effect linear growth and do not seem to
have any detrimental effects on cardiovascular
health (Ramsay et al 1990 ) - Study results indicate that strength trained
growing subjects experience significant increases
in isokinetic strength, flexibility, vertical
jump, maximum rate of oxygen consumption.
Muscoskeltal scintgraphy revealed no evidence of
damage to epiphyses, bone or muscle (Tippett
1986)
14General HealthMore good news
- ACSM reported that strength training programs can
prevent up 50 of all preadolescent sports
injuries - Skeleton is most responsive to strength training
benefits during growth. This means strength
training is most beneficial for young women
before the age of 16 and young men before the age
of 18 (Welton et al 1994)
15Current Opinion on Weight TrainingMajor
Organisations
- NSCA supports the sports of weight lifting and
power lifting as well as strength training in
both children adolescents
16Current Opinion on Weight TrainingMajor
Organisations (contd)
- "Studies have shown that strength training, when
properly structured with regard to frequency,
mode (type of lifting), intensity, and duration
of program, can increase strength in
preadolescents adolescents (AAP 2001) - Both AAP ACSM now recommend strength training
for children as young as six years old
17Current Opinion on Weight TrainingMajor
Organisations (contd)
- Current ACSM Recommendations for Physical
activity bone health - Impact activities such as gymnastics,
plyometrics, moderate resistance training - Frequency of at least 3 d.wk-1
- AAP the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports
Medicine recommend that until good data becomes
available children adolescents should avoid
extreme weight lifting, power lifting,
bodybuilding until Tanner stage 5 (near physical
maturity)
18So whats safe whats not safe
- All training modes are unsafe, IF..
- All training modes are safe, IF..
-
- Dependent on number of factors NOT JUST volume
intensity of training loadings. For example,
Nutritional status, sleep status, hormonal
cycles, circadian rhythms, mood etc etc
19Implications of Mythology..
- Avoidance of high force/high power output
training with young athletes - A bias towards excessive volumes of low load,
repetitive, cyclical activities /OR therapy
type training
20Shield or Inoculate?
- The goal is certainly not to avoid stress
stress is a part of life. But in order to
express yourself fully you must find your optimum
stress level and then use your adaptation energy
at a rate and in a direction adjusted to the
innate structure of your mind and body. - (Seyle 1946)
21 Shield or Inoculate? (contd)
- Goal of the training process is to provide
systematic exposure to controlled progressive
stressors to enable more efficient management of
future stress - Stress can start at a low level be progressed
in gradual increments, but ultimately young
athletes are preparing for future maximal
performance