Political Participation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Political Participation

Description:

Campaign Finance Laws created in early 1970s, revised several times, 2002 law most recent. ... Campaign Finance Laws strictly limit donations from PACs and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ITS8153
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Political Participation


1
Political Participation
  • Americans with higher socio-economic status (SES)
    participate at higher rates. Why?
  • Participation rates are a function of resources
    and civic skills. Both come with higher SES.
  • Resources necessary?
  • Money
  • Time
  • Civic Skills necessary?
  • Knowing the system who to contact.
  • Research skills leadership skills.

2
Types of Political Participation
  • Voting Least costly, thus most common
    (Presidential elections).
  • Activity in campaigns Includes working for a
    party or a candidate and going to rallies.
  • Contributing money to campaigns Typically, only
    done by wealthy.
  • Contacting government officials, including
    writing letters, email, phoning officials.
    Requires time and civic skills.
  • Community participation Volunteering locally.
    Trending upwards.

3
Types of US Elections
  • Primaries Caucuses. Elections held to choose
    party nominee for the general election.
  • General Election. Voters choose btw candidates
    of different parties, selecting the officeholder.
    National general election in November.
  • Initiative Petitions Voters place a policy
    question on the ballot for direct approval. Ex
    Issues 2-5 on ballot (minimum wage (2), slot
    machines (3), smoking (4, 5).
  • Referendum Voters approve (or not) policy
    placed on ballot by legislature. Recall.
  • Direct Democracy only in state/local elections.

4
Voter Turnout
  • Turn-out has decreased substantially in recent
    decades. High of about 65 in 1960.

5
Voter Turnout
  • Turnout in American elections, typically low,
    even presidential. Worse in other elections.
  • Typical midterm congressional 35
  • Typical primary election 20
  • Typical local election (off-year) 20
  • Turnout in USA much lower than other democracies.
    Why?
  • Registration requirements- these differ from
    state to state.
  • Too many elections?
  • Declining political efficacy, increased cynicism.

6
Who Votes?
  • Critical question for democracy. Why?
  • Demographic indicators of vote
  • Age. The young rarely vote.
  • Wealth. Poor unlikely to vote.
  • Education. Uneducated unlikely to vote.
  • Married voters more likely to vote.
  • Race immaterial once SES is accounted for. Once
    SES is controlled, minorities vote at greater
    rates.
  • The best indicator? Registration.

7
(No Transcript)
8
Why Vote?
  • One vote rarely ever matters, especially in high
    turnout elections, so why vote?
  • Voting is costly, especially w/ registration and
    learning complex policies. So, how is it
    rational to vote?
  • More rational to vote if candidates offer
    distinct differences. They often do not.
  • Civic Duty
  • Political Efficacy leads to people voting, belief
    that participation matters.

9
Presidential Nomination Race
  • Nomination campaign decides who runs for each
    party in the general election. Occurs in the
    Winter Spring (first votes late January).
  • IA, NH first, shape the field, enormous
    influence.
  • Whats necessary to win
  • Money,
  • Media Attention,
  • Momentum. All of these relate to one another.
  • The prize pledged delegates for national
    convention.

10
Problems with the Nomination Process
  • Disproportionate attention to early primaries.
  • Late primaries irrelevant, leads to
    front-loading, as states move their primaries up,
    increasing costs.
  • High costs mean money has great impact.
  • Participation in primaries is low and is not
    representative. Party activists are ideologues.
  • Candidates cater to extremes, middle loses out.
  • To much power to the media they decide play the
    role of king makers.

11
Money and US Elections
  • Campaign Finance Laws created in early 1970s,
    revised several times, 2002 law most recent.
  • 1974 FECA led to full disclosure, donation
    limits, voluntary spending limits in presidential
    races subsidized presidential races (if
    limits).
  • Also created Federal Elections Commission (FEC).
  • Created Political Action Committees (PACs), which
    funnel regulated to campaigns.
  • 2002 reform seriously limited soft money
    donations to political parties.

12
Money and US Elections
  • Campaign Finance Laws strictly limit donations
    from PACs and individuals. Candidates can spend
    unlimited amounts of own .
  • 2000 limit for individuals per campaign.
  • 10,000 limit for PACs per campaign.
  • Early money is most significant.
  • Early money buys legitimacy (begetting more ),
    allows candidate to campaign effectively.
  • Most money spent on campaign TV Ads.
  • TV Ads tending toward negative most effective
    and informative. http//www.polisci.wisc.edu/tvadv
    ertising/Historic20Ads20Library.htm

13
Money Effects
  • While money is crucial, it is not everything.
  • In fact, congressional incumbents that spend the
    most tend to receive the least votes.
  • Money is a necessary, but insufficient factor.
  • However, is especially important for challenger
    candidates.
  • It is not true that PAC money buys members of
    Congress (their votes).
  • PACs give to their friends, so likely to vote
    with them anyway.
  • most important in presidential nomination race

14
(No Transcript)
15
Campaign Effects
  • Political campaigns (outside of the nomination
    race) are less crucial in elections than
    politicians believe. Most voters make decision
    very early.
  • Reinforcement, Activation, Conversion.
  • Campaigns mostly reinforce and activate, rarely
    do they convert.
  • Campaigns change very few votes, but they do
    stimulate turn-out.
  • Reasons for weak effect?
  • Few pay attention, most is selective perception
  • Party ID voters Incumbency advantage.

16
Explaining How People Vote
  • Policy Mandate theory The idea that the winning
    candidate has a mandate from the people to carry
    out his or her policy agenda.
  • Require convincing win based on issue voting.
  • Presidents especially like this theory, as it
    lends legitimacy to their policy agenda.
  • Political scientists do not, as rarely do voters
    vote based on issues.

17
The Voting Decision
  • Three major elements in the voting decision
  • Party Identification Provides short cut when we
    vote- a perspective to evaluate candidates and
    issues.
  • Candidate Evaluations Leadership qualities
    (integrity, reliability, and competence), as well
    as the candidates image (visual confidence).
    More important in recent elections. Why?
  • Policy voting Base vote on issue preferences,
    Difficult to do, rarely done.
  • Media unhelpful, positions often ambiguous.
  • http//www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/sta
    tes/US/P/00/epolls.0.html

18
The Electoral College
  • The process used to select the president. To
    win, candidate must receive a majority (270) of
    electoral votes, which total 538.
  • Each state gets EC votes s in Congress.
  • Biased in favor of small states, magnifying their
    voting power. Disfavors 3rd parties.
  • Votes primarily determined on a winner-take-all
    process, which can distort the final outcome.
  • Essentially, 50 different presidential races,
    with attention fixed on battleground (swing)
    states. Closeness, not size, is what is
    important here.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com