Title: Special Economic Zones and Local Governance
1Special Economic Zones and Local Governance
Presented by John C.T. Ko May 17, 2005
2Outline of the Presentation
- 1. Background
- 2. Ecozone Concessions Autonomy
- 3. Zone Autonomy vs. Local Autonomy
3Part I Background
- Philippine development policy considers the need
to disperse industries from the metropolitan
capital to the different regions throughout the
country. - Investment priority areas outside Metro Manila
have been identified to decongest the heavily
populated cities. - Special Economic Zone Act of 1995 passed by
Congress.
4Economic Purpose Objectives
- Establishing the requisite legal framework and
mechanisms for planning the special economic
zones, industrial estates and export processing
zones. - Transforming selected areas into highly developed
industrial and commercial centers. - Promoting local and foreign investors to invest
in those economic zones to generate employment
and establish industrial cluster. - Stimulating the return of Filipino capital by
providing sufficient incentives for business. - Promoting international cooperation through the
use of technology-intensive industries in order
to improve production levels. - Vesting in the special economic zones the status
of separate customs territory within the
constitutional framework.
5Comparison of Ecozones between RP Taiwan
The Philippines
Taiwan
6Part II Ecozone Concessions Autonomy
Definition of Terms
- Special Economic Zones (SEZ) or Ecozones are
selected areas with highly developed
agro-industrial, industrial, tourist,
recreational, business, banking and financial
investment centers or having the potential to be
developed into either of them. - An ecozone may be either an industrial estate or
an EPZ or a free trade zone. - Industrial estates are large tracts of land,
subdivided and developed based upon a
comprehensive plan with provisions for
infrastructure facilities for the use of the
industrial community. - The EPZ is a specialized industrial estate
primarily oriented to export production and is
physically and administratively outside of the
customs territory. Capital equipment and raw
materials can be imported with free of duty. - The Free Trade Zone is an area adjacent to a
seaport or airport of entry. In this area
imported goods could be free from duties for
transshipment or storage or repacking. But goods
are subject to duties if moved to a non-free
trade area.
7Unfair Game?
- EPZs Free Trade Zones with import duty
exemption gt Other local geographic areas - EPZs FTZs Administration with one-stop shopping
service. - Grant of permanent resident status to foreign
investors spouse and dependent children within
Ecozone for an investment of US150,000. - More autonomy is vested the Ecozones with PEZA
management as a separate customs authority.
8PEZA - Managing the Ecozones
PEZA, attached to DTI, is a government
corporation tasked with the establishment,
operation management of economic zones. It is
mandated to grant incentives to developers
operators of privately-owned ecozones. The main
responsibility of PEZA is to encourage private
investment to develop ecozones of international
standing and help create employment opportunities
and accelerate export growth.
9Organization Chart of PEZA
10Board Members of PEZA
- Chairman Secretary of Department of Trade and
Industry - Vice Chairman Director General and CEO of PEZA
- Undersecretaries of
- Department of Finance
- Department of Labor and Employment
- Department of Interior and Local Government
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources
- Department of Agriculture
- Department of Public Works and Highways
- Department of Science and Technology
- Department of Energy
- Deputy Director General of the NEDA
- One (1) representative from the labor sector
- One (1) representative from the investors in the
economic zone
11Advisory body of PEZA
- The president of the association of investors in
the ecozone - The governor of the province where the ecozone is
located - Mayors of towns/cities where the ecozone is
located - President of the accredited labor union
- Representative of the business sector in the zone
- The PEZA representative
12Part III Zone Autonomy vs. Local Autonomy
Background
- The setting up of special economic zones was
primarily designed to accelerate a balanced
economic development, but the initiative taken
depends on the support of local government whose
territory is included in the zone. - However from the perspective of governance, there
is an apparent overlap of jurisdiction between
the zone administration and local governments.
13Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
1. Legal status
- The local municipals are overshadowed by PEZA and
the national entities in policy-making. More so
because the criteria for the creation of zones
are already set by law without participation of
the inhabitants of the areas concerned. (The
setting up of ecozones therefore ignores the
direct participative mechanism.) - The Local Government Code of 1991 stipulates that
the creation, division, merger, or substantial
alteration of boundaries of local government
units require the majority plebiscitary decision
of the inhabitants.
14Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
2. Smuggling prevention
- The national government does not have a hand in
the development of zones on the BOT arrangement,
yet the national government must secure the area
against smuggling activities, a responsibility
vested to the law enforcement agencies of the
national government. - Securing the zones against smuggling has not been
effectively implemented. Ex. SubicClark
ecozones backdoors for smuggling Undervalued
misdeclared goods were seized. Transshipment-inten
ded duty-free diverted to local market. - These could ruin the economy decrease tax
revenue.
15Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
3. Peace order
- Defense security is the joint responsibilities
of the national government and PEZA, but the
expenses for maintaining the military forces are
borne by the national government. - There is no clear-cut responsibilities of the
local police forces and the national military
forces which could result in conflict of
jurisdiction.
16Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
4. Local government power deprivation
- The law permits decentralized development with
minimum government intervention, so the ecozones
can establish directly economic relations with
foreign enterprises. Besides, the general
policies are formulated by PEZA leaving local
government no choice but to approve what PEZA has
decided on, especially regarding infrastructure,
water system, etc. - Local governments are deprived of the power to
decide on policy issues vis-Ã -vis development
even only on a consultative basis, since they can
not effectively participate in policy-making.
17Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
5. Discriminatory interest
- PEZA manages these zones as separate customs
territory and therefore empowered to issue C/O.
But Filipino entrepreneurs do not have the
competitive advantage over foreign investors who
have the needed capital resources, investment
advantage and preferential treatment. - Critics contend that this is discriminatory to
the Filipino interest. Therefore, it is
disadvantageous to traders outside the zone.
18Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
6. Conflict of powers administrative functions
- PEZA can conduct investigations, issue the
subpoena, compel the production of papers and
other evidences, and even grant immunity to
persons with vital information about a case under
investigation. - This can be a potential ground for conflict
between PEZA and local government in the exercise
of policy powers and other relevant
administrative functions.
19Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
7. Tax exemption
- The grant of exemption from national and local
taxes on business entities operating within the
zones is disadvantageous to businesses located
outside the zone, so this explains the
mushrooming of ecozones in order to take
advantage of tax free incentives. - Outsiders lose their competitiveness vis-Ã -vis
the locators in the zones. Maybe this could be
one of the causes why the government revenue
collection falls short of as expected.
20Contradictory Issues between Zone and Local
Autonomy
8. Disaccord of the governances
- No explicit mention of pro-environmental and
pro-sustainable development. Because ecozones are
protected from local government intervention,
implementation of environmental protection
measures could be an administrative issue between
local governance and ecozone governance. - Uncontrolled conversion of agricultural lands for
non-agricultural purposes like construction of
golf courses within or outside of the ecozone. - The extent of concessions granted by law could
provide grounds for administrative and
jurisdictional problems and conflicts between the
local government units and the economic zones.
21Conclusion
The ecozone law needs to be re-studied to
incorporate more specific and more clearly
defined rules and guidelines regarding national
government, LGU and ecozone relationships, so
that role conflicts and overlapping jurisdictions
in the governance of these areas can be avoided.
22National Palace Museum, Taipei, Taiwan
Thank you!