Self Regulation Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Self Regulation Study

Description:

Self regulation is the attempt to control or alter one's own responses. ... The team has won a series of competitions this year and is preparing for the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: MDM2
Category:
Tags: regulation | self | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Self Regulation Study


1
Self Regulation Study
  • Meng Li
  • Department of Psychology,
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

2
Self-regulation
Self regulation is the attempt to control or
alter ones own responses.
3
Strength Model of Self-regulation
  • Self regulation capacity is limited at any moment
  • Controlling attention to ignore irrelevant
    stimuli leads to worse performance on concurrent
    task, compared to naturally ignoring the same
    stimuli (Gilbert, Krull Pelham 1988).
  • Self regulation capacity can be depleted over
    time
  • Initial act of self-regulation impairs ability to
    regulate the self immediately afterwards
    (Muraven, Tice Baumeister 1998).
  • All forms of self-regulation draws on the same
    resource
  • Single dimension of self-regulatory resource,
    including traditional measures like delay of
    gratification and endurance of physical
    discomfort (Eysenck 1960)

4
How does self-regulation relate to other
constructs?
5
Executive Function
  • (Norman, D.A. Shallice, T. 1980)
  • Those that involve planning or decision making.
  • Situations which require the overcoming of a
    strong habitual response or resisting temptation.
    ---How long did you wait for the second cookie
    when you were 4? (Mitchell 1988)
  • Situations where responses are not well-learned
    or contain novel sequences of actions. ----Are
    you good at analytical thinking? (Schmeichel,
    Vohs Baumeister 2003)?
  • Those that involve error correction or
    troubleshooting.
  • Dangerous or technically difficult situations.

6
Self-regulation --- system 2 ?
  • System 1 are typically fast, automatic,
    effortless, associative, implicit (not available
    to introspection), and often emotionally charged
    they are also governed by habit and are therefore
    difficult to control or modify.
  • System 2 are slower, serial, effortful, more
    likely to be consciously monitored and
    deliberately controlled they are also relatively
    flexible and potentially rule governed.

7
Research question
  • Do other system 2- processes draw on
    self-regulatory resource?
  • If so, depletion of the self-regulatory resource
    should lead to Failure of the conscious,
    cognitive system 2 processes (executive
    functioning), the default operation of system 1
    would thus result in biases.
  • Decision making bias derived from intuitive
    responses honoring sunken cost, status quo bias
  • Social perception bias due to cognitive
    short-cuts correspondence bias
  • Behavior dominated by physical drive choice of
    caloric food

8
Research question
  • What construct captures individual differences in
    self regulation?
  • Impulse control ability?
  • Cognitive capacity?

9
Experiment Design
  • Design 2x2x2 between subjects.
  • Experimental Manipulation
  • Self-regulation task vs. control
  • Dependent measures
  • Performance in decision making task
  • Performance in social judgment task
  • Choice of food
  • Moderators
  • Trait self-controlhigh vs. low in Self-Control
    scale
  • Cognitive capacityhigh vs. low in Need For
    Cognition scale

10
Methods
  • 88 Rutgers Undergraduate students taking General
    Psychology.
  • Conducted in classroom after last class before
    final exam.

11
Procedures
  • Depletion of self-regulatory resource
  • Subjects in experimental group will be asked to
    write about their activity in the past day for 7
    minutes, without using neither letter a nor
    letter n
  • Subjects in control group will simply be asked to
    write about their activity in the past day for 7
    minutes. Without further instructions.
  • Then, subjects completed questionnaire consisting
    series decision making and person perception
    tasks.

12
Results sunk cost effect
  • Please imagine the following two scenarios
  • Situation X You are staying alone in a hotel
    room. You have paid 6.95 to see a movie on pay
    TV. After 15 minutes you are bored, the movie
    seems pretty bad, and there are other things on
    regular TV to watch that might be more enjoyable.
  • Would you continue to watch the movie or not?
  • a. I would continue to watch the movie
  • b. I would switch to another channel
  • Situation Y You are staying alone in a hotel
    room. You turn on the TV and there is a movie on.
    After 15 minutes you are bored, the movie seems
    pretty bad, and there are other things on regular
    TV to watch that might be more enjoyable.
  • Would you continue to watch the movie or not?
  • a. I would continue to watch the movie
  • b. I would switch to another channel

13
(No Transcript)
14
Results status quo bias
  • Imagine the following scenario
  • You are currently an assistant professor at
    College A in the mid-west. Recently, you have
    been approached by colleagues at other
    universities with job opportunities.
  • Your choices are
  • a) Remain at College A low prestige school,
    moderate salary, very good chance of tenure.
  • b) College B west coast, low prestige school,
    high salary, good chance of tenure.
  • c) College C east coast, very prestigious
    school, high salary, fair chance of tenure.
  • d) College D west coast, prestigious school,
    moderate salary, good chance of tenure.
  • What would you choose _____

15
Results status quo bias
16
Results Correspondence Bias
  • Sam is a member of the college debate team. The
    team has won a series of competitions this year
    and is preparing for the final national college
    debate contest. The topic for the final debate is
    How practical is Nuclear Power now and for the
    future? and the side Sam team has been assigned
    to is ANTI-NUCLEAR POWER. The debate coach
    assigned Sam the job of writing an anti-nuclear
    essay, and emphasized on making it as eloquent as
    possible.
  • Below is an excerpt from Sams essay.

17
Correspondence Bias
18
Food choice
OR
Chi square test p0.184
19
Individual Differences
  • Trait self-control
  • Cognitive capacity
  • No significant effect on sunk-cost effect, status
    quo bias or correspondence bias.
  • Correlation of the two scores r .279, Plt.01

20
Why study 1 failed
  • Manipulation
  • Not strong enough/too strong that no one
    followed---changed to crossing out letter e
  • Measures
  • Bad question for Status quo bias.
  • Person perception questions confusing to
    subjects.
  • Too many tasks after depletion.

21
Suggestions
  • Better design
  • Better decision questions
  • Better hypothesis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com