Analysis of space time patterns of disease risk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis of space time patterns of disease risk

Description:

Space time models for disease risk ... smoking rates, highly industrialized and associated with Kennecott Copper Mine. Kennecott Copper Mine ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: sah64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis of space time patterns of disease risk


1
SAHSU
20 Years 1987 - 2007
Analysis of space time patterns of disease risk
Sylvia Richardson Centre for Biostatistics with
Lea Fortunato, Juanjo Abellan Linda Beale, Sam
Lefevre and Nicky Best
2
Outline
  • Context
  • Space time models for disease risk
  • Use of space time models to investigate the
    stability of patterns of disease
  • Illustration on the analysis of congenital
    malformations
  • Illustration on the analysis of bladder cancer in
    Utah
  • Discussion

3
Benefits of Space Time Analysis for chronic
diseases
  • Study the persistence of patterns over time
  • Interpreted as associated with stable risk
    factors, environmental effects, distribution of
    health care access
  • Highlight unusual patterns in time profiles via
    the inclusion of space-time interaction terms
  • Time localised excesses linked to e.g. emerging
    environmental hazards with short latency
  • Variability in recording practices
  • Increased epidemiological interpretability
  • Potential tool for surveillance

4
Case study Congenital anomalies in England
  • All cases of congenital anomalies (non
    chromosomal) recorded in England for the period
    1983 1998
  • Data from national post-coded registers (Office
    for National Statistics)
  • Annual post-coded data on total number of live
    births, still births and terminations
  • 136,000 congenital anomalies ? 84.5 per 105
    birth-years
  • Congenital anomalies are sparse
  • ? Grid of 970 grid squares with variable size,
    to equalize the number of birth and expected
    cases per square
  • Variations could be linked to socio-economic or
    environmental risk factors or heterogeneity in
    recording practises
  • ? Interest in characterising space time patterns

5
Map of grid squares used in the
Congenital Anomalies study
6
Expected number of congenital anomalies per year
in each square (per quintiles)
7
Case study Bladder cancer
Collaboration with Sam Lefevre, Utah department
of Health
  • Bladder cancer incidence in Utah (US), 1973-2004
  • Spatial resolution census tracts (496)
  • Between 0 and 11 new cases per year with mean
    around 0.4
  • Time periods 1973-76, 1977-80,, 2001-04
  • Expected counts based on sex-age incidence rates
    for the region and the total period 1973-2004

8
Case study Bladder cancer
Population density in each census tract (Census
2000)
9
Outline
  • Context
  • Space time models for disease risk
  • Use of space time models to investigate the
    stability of patterns of disease
  • Illustration on the analysis of congenital
    malformations
  • Illustration on the analysis of bladder cancer in
    Utah
  • Discussion

10
Space time models in epidemiology
  • Space time extensions of Bayesian hierarchical
    models for disease mapping have been considered
    by a number of authors, with models differing in
    their treatment of space time interactions
  • e.g. Knorr-Held and Besag (1998), Waller et al
    (1997), Bernardinelli et al (1995), Knorr-Held
    (2000), Richardson, Abellan and Best (2006),
    Abellan, Richardson and Best (2007).

11
Schematic representation
Noisy data in each area
Noise model Poisson/Binomial
Latent structure Space Time Interactions
Log scale
joint Bayesian estimation
Inference
12
Notations
  • Yit Observed of cases for area i, i 1,, N
    period t, t1, , T.
  • nit number of person at risk in area i, period
    t
  • probability of disease in area i, period t

First level binomial likelihood
Often a Poisson approximation is used
Eit expected of cases, area i, period t
relative risk, area i, period t
13
Second level modelling of the structure of the
latent (random) effects or
  • Prior structure for the random effects
  • encodes prior epidemiological knowledge
  • need to borrow strength to effect smoothing
  • has to be adapted to the analysiss aim

14
Prior structure for the random effects
  • Overall spatial pattern account for local
    dependence due to geographical continuity of
    populations and risk factors
  • use spatial autoregressive model commonly
    employed for disease mapping
  • Overall time trends time dependence might be
    expected, e.g.for long latency chronic diseases
    use time structured autoregressive model
  • Space time interactions capture the non
    predictable part from simple space time model
  • what model to use ?

15
New model for the interaction terms
  • Investigating stability of patterns Aim is to
  • -- Highlight true departures from the
    overall predictable space time model
  • the variance of nit has to be allowed to be large
  • -- Shrink idiosynchratic (non interpretable)
    interactions small variance for most nit
  • ? Mixture model to characterise stable and
    unstable risk patterns over time

Component 1 small variance t12
Component 2 allows large variance t22
16
Outline
  • Context
  • Space time models for disease risk
  • Use of space time models to investigate the
    stability of patterns of disease
  • Illustration on the analysis of congenital
    malformations
  • Illustration on the analysis of bladder cancer in
    Utah
  • Discussion

17
Analysis strategy for investigating stability of
patterns
  • Estimate a model
  • space time interactions (mixture)
  • Use the posterior probabilities of allocation pit
    into component 2 to classify areas as unstable
  • Rule area i is unstable if at least for one t,
    pit is large, i.e. pit gt pcut (threshold
    probability). Other rules possible
  • For stable areas, investigate spatial patterns,
    e.g. by using the rule Prob(exp(?i ) gt1) gt 0.8.
  • Investigate the time profile pattern of
    unstable areas

18
Statistical issues were investigated by
simulations
  • If we over-fit, (i.e. estimate a space-time model
    with interactions when the patterns are stable)
  • Do we loose power to detect pure spatial
    patterns with respect to a pure spatial model ?
    NO
  • Is the mixture model identifiable ? YES
  • What is the performance of the classification
    rules ?
  • GOOD (depends on the size of interactions and
    proportion of unstable areas)
  • Can we tease out any structured patterns in the
    interactions? YES

19
Results for the 2 data sets
  • Map of the global spatial pattern
  • Time trend
  • Classification of areas
  • Time profiles for unstable areas

20
Congenital anomalies England, 83-98
Spatial main effect 970 grid squares Post
median of exp(?i)
Evidence of spatial heterogeneity with higher
risk in the North, NW and NE and in the Greater
London area Deprivation and maternal age are
strong determinants of congenital malformations
21
Congenital anomalies England, 83-98
Time main effect exp(?t)
The downward shift picked up between pre 1990 and
post 1990 is due to the minor
anomalies exclusion policy that was implemented
in 1990 and after.
22
Mixture estimation
  • Using a cut off
  • pcut 0.5, 125 areas (13) are classified as
    unstable

23
Risk time profiles for the areas classified as
unstable
  • We performed hierarchical
  • clustering on the 125 areas
  • Four subgroups exhibit
  • smooth-like trends
  • interaction terms used to
  • adjust to general time trend
  • One small subgroup has a
  • high peak in 97
  • ? warrants investigation

thanks to Mireille Toledano
24
Bladder cancer, Utah, 1973-2004
  • Spatial main effect (496 Census Tracts)
  • Posterior median of exp(?i) spatial RR

Evidence of heterogeneity with higher risks in
central area around Salt Lake City
96 CT with Prob(exp(?i) gt 1) gt0.8
25
Bladder cancer, Utah, 1973-2004
  • Time main effects
  • Posterior median of exp(?t) Temporal RR

Slow decrease followed by steeper increase from
97 onwards
73-76 77-80 81-84 85-88 89-92 93-96 97-00
01-04
26
Bladder cancer, Utah, 1973-2004
Mixture estimation for space time interactions
Posterior distribution of pit
  • Posterior distribution of ?1 and ?2
  • Cut off pcut 0.6,
  • 13 census tracts (3) are
  • classified as unstable

27
Bladder cancer, Utah, 1973-2004
  • Census tracts classified as unstable using
  • the rule pit gt0.6

28
Bladder cancer, Utah, 1973-2004
  • Space-time interactions for the 13 areas
    classified as unstable

29
Bladder cancer, Utah, 1973-2004
exp(?it) overall RR for 96 Census Tracts with
elevated risks, including 3 (in blue) that are
classified as unstable
TRI sites which submitted a report for at least
10 years
30
Woods Cross area Cluster of oil refineries in
this area.
Hill Air Force Base
Magna and West Valley City Disadvantaged
population, much higher smoking rates, highly
industrialized and associated with Kennecott
Copper Mine
University of Utah Young mobile population from
outside Utah (less likely to live the healthy
Mormon lifestyle, than down town Salt Lake City)
Kennecott Smelter Includes number of transfer
sites between final smelter and mine, and large
waste water lagoon
Provo and Brigham Young University. Young mobile
LDS population (take the healthy Mormon
lifestyle to the extreme)
Kennecott Copper Mine
Industrialization around the Interstate (I15)
corridor.
31
Discussion
  • Bayesian space time analyses allow a richer
    interpretation of patterns than purely spatial
    ones
  • Models become more complex, with more choice of
    prior structure in particular, the prior
    structure for the space time interactions
  • Need to relate prior structure to the different
    aims of the analyses, the time scale and the
    hypotheses on the health phenomenon under
    investigation
  • To gain epidemiologic interpretability, the
    stability repeatability over time of spatial
    patterns found by a pure spatial analysis should
    be investigated
  • More work on how to explore further the patterns
    showed by the space-time interactions

32
References
  • L. Bernardinelli, D. Clayton, C. Pascutto, C.
    Montomoli, M. Ghislandi, and M. Songini.
    Bayesian. Analysis of space-time variation in
    disease risk. Statistics in Medicine,
    1424332443, 1995.
  • L. A. Waller, B. P. Carlin, H. Xia, and A. M.
    Gelfand. Hierarchical spatio-temporal mapping of
    disease rates. Journal of the American
    Statistical Association, 92607617, 1997.
  • L. Knorr-Held and J. Besag. Modelling risk from a
    disease in time and space. Statistics in
    Medicine, 1720452060, 1998.
  • L. Knorr-Held. Bayesian modelling of inseparable
    space-time variation in disease risk. Statistics
    in Medicine, 1925552567, 2000.
  • S. Richardson, A. Thomson, N Best and P Elliott.
    Interpreting posterior relative risk estimates in
    disease-mapping studies. EHP, 112, 1016-25, 2004.
  • S. Richardson, J. J. Abellan, and N. Best.
    Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis of joint
    patterns of male and female lung cancer risks in
    Yorkshire (UK). Statistical Methods in Medical
    Research, 15 385-407, 2006.
  • J. J. Abellan, S. Richardson, and N. Best. Use of
    space-time models to investigate the stability of
    patterns of disease. (2007). Under revision for
    EHP
  • L. Fortunato, J.J. Abellan, L. Beale, S Lefevre,
    S Richardson. Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis
    of bladder cancer incidence in Utah (1973-2004).
    In preparation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com