SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEMING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEMING

Description:

Juran et al. (1974) as fitness for use', Crosby (1979) as conformance to requirements' ... India and has ISO 9002, ISO 14001, ISO/TS 16949:1999 certifications. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:870
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: bsiedu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEMING


1
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL QUALITY
MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEMINGS PDSA CYCLE
  • Author Dr. G. Karuppusami

2
Abbreviations
2
3
What is Quality?
  • Quality is the totality of features and
    characteristics of a product or service that bear
    on its ability to satisfy implied or stated
    needs.
  • ANSI/ASQC STD A3-1987.

4
What is Quality?
  • Feigenbaum (1951) and Abbott (1955) defined
    quality as value,
  • Levitt (1972) as conformance to specifications,
  • Juran et al. (1974) as fitness for use,
  • Crosby (1979) as conformance to requirements,
  • Taguchi (1981) as the losses a product imparts
    to the society from the time the product is
    shipped,
  • Reeves and Bednar, (1994) as the extent to which
    a product or service meets and/or exceeds a
    customers expectations which reflects a shift
    in focus to customer satisfaction.

5
Total quality management
  • Ho (1997) defines the term TQM as
  • Total everyone associated with the company is
    involved in continuous improvement (including
    its customers and suppliers if feasible)
  • Quality customers expressed and implied
    requirements are met fully
  • Management executives are fully committed.

6
Motivation for the study
  • The business units are ever increasingly
    forced to achieve world-class manufacturing
    capabilities in order to compete and, in many
    cases, to achieve in the market. One of the means
    to achieve the world-class manufacturing
    capability is through the practices of Total
    Quality Management (Joseph, et al., 1999)

7
Full TQM (OR) Partial TQM?
  • The problem with TQM is not whether companies
    have been converted to the philosophy many
    surveys have shown the philosophy being embraced
    by organizations (Yong Wilkinson, 1999). The
    issue relates more acutely to whether these
    supposedly TQM companies are actually practicing
    total or partial TQM (Wilkinson et al., 1998).

8
Some obstacles to achieving TQM
  • Lack of top management support
  • Lack of customer focus
  • Lack of employee empowerment
  • Lack of training

9
Criteria for the study
  • Quality is one of the twentieth centurys most
    important management ideas
  • (Feigenbaum, 1999)
  • You cant manage what you dont measure
  • (Wert, 2003)

10
Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of TQM
  • CSFs are the critical areas of managerial
    planning and action that must be practiced to
    achieve effective quality management in a
    business unit (Saraph et al., (1989)
  • CSFs are critical and absolutely essential for
    the success of TQM. The process stands a good
    chance of ending in failure if these factors are
    not part of the management process.

11
CSFs reported by Saraph et al., (1989)
  • The role of management leadership and quality
    policy
  • Role of quality department
  • Training
  • Product / service design
  • Supplier quality management
  • Process management
  • Quality data and reporting
  • Employee relations

12
Quality Related Action Programs (QAPs)
  • Critical success factors of TQM are latent
    variables, which means they cannot be measured
    directly. Hence Quality-related Action Programs
    (QAPs) are generated that represent
    manifestations of these CSFs. QAPs are the
    quality management prescriptions.

13
QAPs of CSF The role of top management
leadership and quality policy
  • Top management responsibility for quality
    performance
  • Performance evaluation based on quality
  • Acceptance of responsibility for quality by major
    dept heads
  • Degree of participation by dept heads in quality
    improvement process
  • Consideration of quality as first priority
  • Discussion of quality related issues in meetings
  • Extent to which quality goals and policies are
    understood
  • Degree of comprehensiveness of quality plan

14
CSFs and QAPs of TQM
TQM
15
Sustainable development of TQM
  • Quinn (2000) describes sustainability as the
    development that meets present needs without
    compromising the ability of future generations to
    meet their own needs.
  • Without sustainability, there is little benefit
    to be gained from TQM (Curry et al., 2002).
  • The focus of maintaining competitive advantage
    and performance does not simply emphasize the
    present time, but also the future (Zairi, 2002).

16
Sustainable development of TQM
  • Sustainability is defined as the ability of an
    organization to adapt to change in the business
    environment to capture contemporary best practice
    methods and to achieve and maintain superior
    competitive performance (Zairi Liburd 2001).

17
PDSA Cycle for sustainable development of TQM
Step 1 Plan for TQM
ACT
PLAN
Step 4 Take necessary actions to improve the
less developed programs of TQM
Step 2 Implement TQM
DO
STUDY
Step 3 Study and measure the level of TQM
implementation
18
TQM Implementation Index (TQMII)
  • TQM Implementation Index (TQMII) can be
    interpreted as the level of TQM implementation
    of a company on a unit scale. Input is the
    companys total quality effort. Output is the
    level of the performance of the plant. TQMII
    measures how well a company has implemented its
    TQM.

19
Framework for TQMII calculation
  • The set of CSFs and QAPs implemented by the
    company.
  • The list of departments involved in the quality
    programs.
  • The level of quality consciousness of the
    departments.
  • The degree to which critical quality factors and
    quality action programs applied.

20
TQM Implementation space
  • Department, m

TQMIIimk
  • Quality Consciousness, k
  • Critical success factor, QAP i

21
Notations
  • i Index of QAPs
  • Dm Departments
  • m Index of departments
  • Zm Ideal weight factor assigned department
  • Wm Revised normalized weight of department
  • Vim Actual performance of quality-related
    action programme i in department m

22
TQMII Algorithm
  • Algorithm developed by Kumar et.al.(2004) is
    adopted. TQMII algorithm for the firm (or) CSF is
    as follows.
  • i 1, 2, 3..I m 1, 2, 3 . M,
  • I Total number of QAPs of the firm or CSF

23
  • Presentation of a Case Study to illustrate TQMII

24
Case Study
  • The suggested PDSA model for TQM implementation
    was applied to an automotive ancillary company
    located in South India.
  • The company is the largest manufacturer of
    automotive horns in India and has ISO 9002, ISO
    14001, ISO/TS 169491999 certifications.
  • Thirteen CSFs and 85 QAPs were selected by the
    expert committee.

25
Case Study CSFs selected
  • Role of top management and quality policy
  • Supplier quality management
  • Customer focus
  • Process management
  • Product / service design
  • Quality data and reporting
  • Training
  • Employee relations
  • Role of quality department
  • Benchmarking
  • Information technology analysis
  • Lean manufacturing
  • Continuous improvement

26
TQMII Calculation Step 1 (Table 1)
  • 1. Compute each departments normalized quality
    consciousness weight
  • The calculation for the first the department
    D1 is as follows
  • W1 10(0.52 14 2.56 38 310) 7.4
  • 1010

27
TQMII Calculation Step 2 (Table 1)
  • 2. Compute each departments quality
    consciousness state efficiency.
  • The calculation for the first the department
    D1 is as follows
  • QCSE1 (0.52 14 2.56 38 310) 0.74
  • 1010

28
TQMII Calculation Step 3 (Table 2)
  • 3. Compute TQMII of QAPs
  • i 1, 2, 3..I m 1, 2, 3 . M

TQMII of QAP 1 is as follows (97.4 106
75.81 105.46 107.92 107.7 85.22
94.74 56.86) 10(10
10 7 7 9 10 9 6 7) 0.65
29
TQMII Calculation Step 4 (Table 2)
  • 4. Calculate TQMII of the CSF or firm as a whole.

I Total number of QAPs of the firm or CSF, i
1, 2, 3..I m 1, 2, 3 . M,
30
Table 1 Department consciousness matrix
31
Table 2. TQMII Calculation
32
Table 2. TQMII Calculation contd
33
TQMII of the selected organization
The combined level of TQM implementation index in
the selected organization was assessed as 0.460
on a unit scale
34
  • Recommendations as a result of the Study
  • Link the department quality consciousness state
    efficiency of TQM implementation program to
    annual incentive scheme.
  • Arrange training program for all the least
    developed QAPs.
  • Encourage exchange of information and data among
    departments regarding TQMII.
  • Obtain expert advice about the list of CSFs and
    QAPs selected for the TQMII analysis.
  • Integrate the TQM programs with the procedures of
    ISO 9002, ISO 14001, ISO/TS 169491999
    certifications.

35
Conclusions
  • The problem areas of TQM implementation correctly
    identified by the proposed PDSA method.
  • The model allows tracking of TQM programs and
    departments that are substantially impacting the
    TQM implementation in the company.
  • Specific recommendations were proposed to bring
    about improvements in those least developed TQM
    programs.

36
References
37
References contd
38
Quality is a Journey, not a Destination
39
  • Thanks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com