Geen diatitel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Geen diatitel

Description:

T(def:Frank,gd:son,def:Guido). Definitions. A rule generates a triple. A query is a graph ... son(X1,Y), son(X2,Y) - brother(X1,X2). Proof of 'brother(Frank,Wim) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: naudts
Category:
Tags: diatitel | geen

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Geen diatitel


1
(No Transcript)
2
Problems
  • Title
  • cfr.Prolog database of facts, rules, query and
    solutions

3
Example 1
  • Database
  • son(Frank, Guido).
  • son(Wim, Guido).
  • son(X1,Y), son(X2,Y) -gt brother(X1,X2). Query
  • brother(Frank,X).

4
RDF Graph
  • URI
  • T(defFrank,gdson,defGuido).

5
Definitions
  • A rule generates a triple
  • A query is a graph
  • Closure graph
  • A solution is a subgraph of a graph

6
Graph theory of resolution
  • not based on logic
  • proof of
  • 1) completeness
  • 2) monotonicity
  • deduction of proof based on forwards reasoning

7
Proof format
  • son(Frank, Guido).
  • son(Wim, Guido).
  • son(X1,Y), son(X2,Y) -gt brother(X1,X2).
  • Proof of brother(Frank,Wim).
  • (son(Frank, Guido), son(Wim, Guido)),
  • son(Frank,Guido), son(Frank,Wim) -gt
    brother(Frank,Wim).

8
Constructive logic
  • BHK-interpretation(Brouwer, Heyting, Kolmogorov)
  • A proof of A and B is given by presenting a proof
    of A and a proof of B.
  • A proof of A or B is given by presenting either a
    proof of A or a proof of B or both.
  • A proof of A ? B is a procedure which permits us
    to transform a proof of A into a proof of B.
  • The constant false has no proof.

9
Open World Consequences
  • No complement of set
  • No general negation
  • No universal quantifier
  • a or b if no proof of a and no proof of b gt no
    proof of a or b

10
Open versus closed
  • Set of all large internet sites?
  • Complement of this set?
  • x in complement if x is small
  • Only members that can be constructed are in the
    set

11
Negation and disjunction
  • RDF has no negation and disjunction
  • Nevertheless needed
  • Introduction by ontology
  • Proposal for constructive negation and
    disjunction
  • capable, not_capable/not(capable)

12
Conclusions 1
  • Graph theory of RDF resolution inferencing
    permits
  • 1) clear definition of rules, queries, solutions
    and proofs
  • 2) proof of completeness and monotonicity
  • 3) simple proof format based on forwards
    reasoning
  • 4) constructive logic avoids problems with
    closed /open world.

13
Conclusions 2
  • RDFEngine is a constructive resolution engine in
    Haskell
  • Proposal for constructive negation and disjunction
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com