Aerodynamic Study of Gokart Nose Cones - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Aerodynamic Study of Gokart Nose Cones

Description:

Comparison of two nose cone shapes to determine which is more aerodynamic ... Results are only as good as the mesh that they arise from. I AM DONE! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:283
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: engrI
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aerodynamic Study of Gokart Nose Cones


1
Aerodynamic Study ofGo-kart Nose Cones
  • ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering
  • Becker, Joe
  • Professor H. U. Akay
  • May 1, 2000

2
Example of Enduro Type Go-kart
  • Driver lays on his\her back
  • Race on road courses such as Mid-Ohio
  • Speeds are in excess of 80 mph (35.76 m/s)

3
Project Objective
  • Use Finite Element Code (ANSYS CFD component
    FLOTRAN) for the following
  • Comparison of two nose cone shapes to determine
    which is more aerodynamic
  • Comparison of two meshing techniques
  • Mapped Mesh (Structured Mesh)
  • Free Mesh

4
Theory Assumptions
  • Steady State
  • Newtonian Fluid
  • No-slip at Fluid\Solid Interface
  • Turbulent
  • Incompressible
  • Isothermal

5
Model Setup Basic Geometry
Figure 1 Shape 1 in Flow Field
Figure 2 Shape 2 in Flow Field
6
Basic Geometry Comparison
7
ANSYS Procedure
  • Define Keypoints and Create Lines
  • Make Areas from Line Loops
  • Mesh Areas
  • Set Boundary Conditions
  • Set Solver Parameters
  • Solve FLOTRAN

8
Shape 1 Areas
9
Shape 2 Areas
10
Mapped Meshes
Shape 1 Mapped Mesh
Shape 2 Mapped Mesh
11
Free Meshes
Shape 1 Free Mesh
Shape 2 Free Mesh
12
Boundary Conditions
  • All Boundary Conditions were applied to lines
  • Velocity of 0 m/s applied to ground and all
    surfaces of kart
  • Velocity of 35.76 m/s in x-direction applied to
    the upper free stream surface
  • Relative Pressure of 0 Pa applied to outlet

13
FLOTRAN Parameters
  • Steady-state with turbulent solver
  • Fluid properties set to air in standard SI
  • Solver set to perform 250 iterations

14
Results
15
Shape 1 Velocity (m/s)
16
Shape 2 Velocity (m/s)
17
Shape 1 Pressure (Pa)
18
Shape 2 Pressure (Pa)
19
Shape 1 Turbulent KE (J)
20
Shape 2 Turbulent KE (J)
21
Shape 1 Free Mesh Results
Shape 1 Velocity (m/s)
Shape 1 Pressure (Pa)
Shape 1 Turbulent KE (J)
22
Shape 2 Free Mesh Results
Shape 2 Velocity (m/s)
Shape 2 Pressure (Pa)
Shape 2 Turbulent KE (J)
23
Conclusion
  • Shape 1 is better than Shape 2
  • A mapped mesh is slightly better than a free mesh
  • Results are only as good as the mesh that they
    arise from

24
I AM DONE!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com