Title: Family Policy from a Public Goods Perspective
1Family Policy from a Public Goods Perspective
Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis
2Choices for Family Policy Objectives
- Support the family with child-rearing.
- Encourage larger (or smaller) families.
- Promote marriage with child-rearing.
- Facilitate labor force participation of mothers.
- Facilitate at-home role for mothers discourage
working while children are young. - Protect children against abuse and neglect.
- Facilitate balancing work and family life.
- Help family cope with crises and transitions.
3Key Economic Concepts
- Public goods
- Characterized by non-rivalry and
non-excludability - Externalities
- Benefits or costs that accrue to people other
than the producer or consumer
4Families Public Goods Characteristics and
Positive Externalities
- Child-rearing role
- More engaged citizens democracy works better
- Better prepared workforce
- Less likely to commit crime or require social
assistance - Mutual support among family members
- Limits use of public safety nets
- Well-functioning families may be better able to
help others in need
5Market Forces
- More married women in the workforce
- Fewer children per family
- Immigration
- Mobility
- Job mix
6Public Policy Forces
- Explicit policies designed to achieve specific
objectives for individuals in their family roles
or the family unit as a whole. - Implicit actions in other policy domains that
have consequences for children and their
families, such as tax policy, education finance
and reform, labor regulations, consumer
protection.
7High/Scope Study of Perry Preschool
- In early 1960s, 123 children from low-income
families in Ypsilanti, Mich. - Children randomly selected to attend Perry or
control group. - High-quality program with well trained teachers,
daily classroom sessions and weekly home visits. - Tracked participants and control group through
age 40.
8Perry Educational Effects
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
9Perry Economic Effects at Age 40
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
10Perry Arrested 5 or More Times Before Age 40
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
11Perry PreschoolCosts and Benefits Over 62 Years
12 Perry Preschool Estimated Return on
Investment
- Benefit-Cost Ratio 17 to 1
- Annual Rate of Return 18
- Public Rate of Return 16
13Benefit-Cost Ratios for Other Longitudinal Studies
- Abecedarian Educational Child Care
- 4 to 1
- Chicago-Child Parent
- 7 to 1
- Elmira Prenatal/Early Infancy Project
- 5 to 1
14Private and Public BenefitsCase Study Child
Care
- Early childhood education
- Private Child is more likely to succeed in
school and earn more money in workforce. - Public Child is a better student, less likely to
require special education, commit crime, or
require social welfare. More skilled worker
higher economic growth and tax revenue.
15Private and Public BenefitsCase Study Child
Care
- Parents can participate in workforce
- Private Higher family income, businesses have
larger supply of labor from which to hire,
high-quality child care availability improves
productivity. - Public Boosts economic vitality, raises tax
revenue, produces more family-friendly place to
live.
16Private and Public BenefitsCase Study Child
Care
- Child care is a large industry
- Private Child care operations can organize,
lobby, take advantage of pooled resources, and
provide employment opportunities for laborers. - Public A large employer that spends money in
local economy. (But several industries can make a
similar argument.)
17References
- Davies, P. (December 2003). Wives at Work. The
Region, 4 (17), 12-15, 76-79. http//www.minneapol
isfed.org/pubs/region/03-12/davies.cfm - Grunewald, R., Rolnick, A. J. (December 2003).
Early childhood development Economic development
with a high public return. The Region, 4
Supplement(17), 6-12. http//www.minneapolisfed.or
g/research/studies/earlychild/abc-part2.pdf - Kammerman, Sheila B. (1999). Child and Family
Policies An International Overview. In E.F.
Zigler, S.L. Kagan, N.W. Hall (Eds.), Children,
Families Government Preparing for the
Twenty-first Century. New York Cambridge
University Press.