Title: Inclusion, Changing Preferences, and Public Policy
1Inclusion, Changing Preferences, and Public Policy
- Nicholas Stern
- 2nd Permanent Secretary to HM Treasury and Head
of the Government Economic Service
2Overview
- Development as a process of change
- A strategy for development two pillars
- Spotlight on the second pillar promoting
empowerment, participation, and inclusion - The dynamics of preferences
- Concluding comments on expanding theory of public
policy
3Part I Development as a Process of Change
- Progress on living standards beneficial change
in the developing world - Meanings what poor people say conceptual
frameworks. - Dramatic changes in education and health over the
last 30 years - Perspective over two centuries
4Development as a Process of Change
First fall in absolute numbers in 2 centuries
dominated by East Asia
5Development as a Process of Change
- What does change not consist of?
- Progress has not resulted from steady
accumulation of capital (physical or human or
social) within a static or dynamically simplistic
single-good framework - Formal models of growth and development are
usually superficial or silent on the most
important features of the development process
6Development as a Process of Change
- Instead, development characterized by
- Fits and starts in growth
- Massive structural changes in economy and society
- Global integration
- Striking changes in preferences and behaviour
(focus of todays discussion) and ways of living
7Part II A Strategy for Development
- Lessons of 50 years of development on spurring
the right type of changes - Two-pillar strategy for development
- Pillar 1 Improving the investment climate
- Pillar 2 Empowering poor people and promoting
participation in development
8A Strategy for Development
- Governance, institutions, and behaviour central
to both pillars - Each of governance, institutions, and behaviour
has a conceptually distinct role, although they
overlap and interact - Behaviour is often missing from story
9A Strategy for Development
- Pillar 1 Improving investment climate
- Purpose
- Build a climate promoting growth, employment, and
innovation in private sector - Emphasises farms and small enterprises
- Elements of that climate
- Stable macro and openness
- Infrastructure
- Governance and institutions
10Part III Empowerment and Participation
- What does empowerment mean?
- Gaining control over ones own life
- Essential to development effectiveness
- In management of schools and water projects
- In security of property rights
- In improvements in health status
- In monitoring government performance
- And it is central to poor peoples definition of
their poverty (Voices of the Poor)
11Empowerment and Participation
- Empowerment having the ability to shape ones
life, or to participate effectively (ingredients) - Determinants of /constraints on empowerment
- Poor individual endowments HD
- External constraints created by family, social,
cultural, and political context - Internal constraints the lack of a capacity to
aspire
12Empowerment and Participation
Determinants of Empowerment
- Individual Endowments
- Assets
- Human Capital
- External Constraints
- Family
- Community (Caste, Religion)
- Society
- Governance
Empowerment
- Internal Constraints
- Perceptions of own role
- Preferences
- Capacity to aspire
13Empowerment and Participation
- Empowerment and inclusion similar but not
identical concepts - Empowerment is relevant even when we look at
individual in isolation - Inclusion focuses on
- social interactions within a community
- action by agents who may force exclusion
- factors that go across generations
- In practice, both often identify key policy
issues and challenges and imply similar policies
14Empowerment and Participation
- Can we measure empowerment?
- Household surveys
- Focus on outcomes, including HD outcomes
- Need to disaggregate by social status, gender
- Surveys of governance
- Surveys of attitudes and aspirations
- Surveys measuring shocks, such as natural
disasters and crime - Surveys of public service delivery (QSDS/PETS)
15Part IV The Dynamics of Preferences
- Empowerment will often be associated with
changing preferences - Indeed, policies to enhance empowerment are often
focused on changing preferences/behaviour - Distinguish preferences and behaviour
- Development is accompanied by momentous changes
in preferences (with rural-urban migration,
education of women, etc.) - This makes increasingly untenable the
comprehensive assumption of constant preferences
16The Dynamics of Preferences
- Why preference change matters five examples
- Shift in attitudes with industrialisation or
urbanisation (Tawney) - Promoting the education of girls
- Attitudes toward women in the workforce
- Race relations
- Changing standards in economic transitions
17The Dynamics of Preferences
- Assessing reforms or optimising policy with fixed
preferences - Very fruitful approach for much of modelling and
policy (e.g., theory of taxation and economic
regulation) - Behaviours in terms of actions change if
incentives or information change in a manner
modelled via fixed preferences - If a state of affairs is preferred by one
individual and not ranked lower by any other, it
is socially preferred (SWF is based- positively-
on individual preferences) - Provides clear answers
18The Dynamics of Preferences
- Without the constant-preference assumption, we
have 2 options for understanding behaviour - Retain formal preferences and model how
preferences change over time - Abandon preferences, and focus on understanding
how opportunities capabilities change over time - Different approaches to policy are associated
with these approaches - For the former, we have to decide how to treat
(e.g., weight) conflicting preferences - For the latter, we have to be able to identify
expansions of ability to shape own life - Both approaches will leave important ambiguities
19The Dynamics of Preferences
- First approach attempt to integrate into
neoclassical public economics - Retains preference orderings, and struggles to
make comparisons - Examples
- Meta-utility function
- Utility function with preferences over
fundamental goods or wants - Experience effects
20The Dynamics of Preferences
- The challenge of assessing well-being when
preferences change - To judge the welfare effects of a policy, should
we use todays preferences, or tomorrows or
something else?
21The Dynamics of Preferences
- To assess policy change in this type of approach
often requires something akin to paternalism - State acts in support of higher self against
wishes of lower self, when preferences are
expected to evolve - State overrides preferences where it believes
they should be changed - May be some mileage in partial orderings where
rankings relative to two preference orderings are
consistent, but strong interest in cases where
there is conflict in rankings
22The Dynamics of Preferences
- Alternative approach focuses on processes e.g.
Austrian school/ Sen approach - Looks beyond preference orderings
- Works in terms of freedoms and capabilities,
rather than utilities - Provides a new basis for policy advice assess
development effects in terms of expanding freedoms
23The Dynamics of Preferences
- Expansion of freedoms as a criterion for policy
choice has a basis in some strands of political
philosophy - Nozicks view asserts inviolable freedoms
- Berlins assessments of states, governments and
policies but insistence on pluralism and
warnings on simplistic, single-criterion,
formulations of decision-making
24The Dynamics of Preferences
- Implication of the Austrian/Sen approach
- Focus of policymaking should be less on comparing
outcomes - And more on processes for decisionmaking
- Examples
- Ait Iktel in Morocco
- Sonagachi anti-AIDS efforts in Kolkata
25The Dynamics of Preferences
- Validity or legitimacy of action to change
preferences again processes - Examples show the importance of building mutual
trust through co-operation and mutual commitment - Connects to literature of Tocqueville, Mill,
Dewey on political interaction and changing
preferences - Market itself is an arena for these social
processes
26The Dynamics of Preferences
- Viewing social actions this way has profound
implications for preference change and policy
choice - Not top-down preference change, but processes of
social decision making - There are many challenges in implementation,
particularly where inequalities and exclusion are
severe
27Part V Concluding Comments
- Evidence of development as fundamental change
plus objectives in terms of empowerment
inclusion point to strategy focusing on
processes, as exemplified by two pillars here - Together the evidence, objectives, and strategy
lead us to re-examine basics of theory of public
policy - Much of development policy is, or should be,
focused on changing institutions preferences
28Part V Concluding Comments
- Have focused here on changing preferences
- Changing institutions/governance is another
lecture - But we have learned something on changing
governance - transparency
- economic structure avoiding discretion
- civil service reform
- leadership
29Concluding Comments
- If we follow this analysis and direction through,
we will create a new approach to the theory
practice of public policy which builds on but
goes far beyond standard public economics - At same time will bring different social sciences
together in understanding policy and the role of
the state