Title: Controlling Airborne Hazards
1Controlling Airborne Hazards
- Industrial Hygiene
- IENG 341
- Carter J. Kerk
- Industrial Engineering Program
- SD Tech
- Spring 2006
2Reading Assignment
- Nims, Chapter 7
- Critical Thinking Questions, p. 186-7
3Outline Controlling Airborne Hazards
- Hazard Control Options
- Local Exhaust Ventilation Systems (LEVS)
- Dilution Ventilation for Contaminant Control
4Hazard Control Options
- Remember
- Identify (Chapters 4 5)
- Evaluate (Chapters 4 5)
- Control (This Chapter!)
- Engineering Controls
- Administrative Controls
- Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
5Engineering Controls
- Equipment design changes
- Automation, enclosures, etc
- Reduce or prevent release of contaminants
- Substitution
- Use a less hazardous material
- Work practice changes
- Fundamentals of work methods engineering
- Including personal hygiene
- Improved housekeeping and maintenance
- Constant vigilance!
6Administrative Controls
- Use only after engineering controls!
- Control or limit access
- Worker rotation
- This is a great tool, but remember it now exposes
even more workers - Worker training
7Worker Training
- Can be effective if consistent and appropriate
- Specialized
- Special work practices/procedures
- Emergency situations (spills, uncontrolled
releases of contaminants, etc.) - Training effect can be noticeable immediately
following training, but these results decrease
over time without further training (Hawthorne
Effect?)
8Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
- Last resort!
- We will cover this in Chapter 12
9Local Exhaust Ventilation Systems
- Designed to capture contaminants at the point of
release - Compared to Dilution Ventilation, LEVS is
- more effective at removing point source releases
- is more energy efficient
- Has less impact on the overall HVAC
10LEVS Basic Components
- Intake, or hood captures or draws contaminant
into the system - Ducts
- Air cleaner
- Fan
- Outlet, or exhaust
11(No Transcript)
12Three Main Types of Hoods
13Hood Entry Loss
- When air enters the hood
- Some turbulence is created
- Loss of kinetic energy of the air
- A flange around the opening
- Reduces the entry loss
- Causes more air to enter
- Vent Manual
- ACGIH Industrial Ventilation, A Manual of
Recommended Practice - Tables of data concerning ventilation systems and
components
14Hood Capture Velocity
- Q A V
- Q volumetric flow rate, cfm
- A cross-sectional area of air flow, ft2
- V velocity of air, fpm
- Flow rate must be high enough to capture the
contaminants - Gases / Vapors 1000 fpm
- Wood, cotton dust 2000-2500 fpm
- Lead, cement dust - gt4500 fpm
15Hood Placement Tips
- Enclose the process as much as possible without
interfering with the worker - Draw contaminants away from the breathing zone
- Take advantage of natural inertia from the
process, e.g., heat, grinding spray - Locate as close as possible to release point
- More than two feet from source will likely be
ineffective
16Ducts
- Friction losses between air and sides of duct
- Other loss sources
- Duct length
- Turns, tapers, multiple duct joints
- Smaller diameter ducts have higher losses than
larger diameters - Calculate losses or look up estimates in tables
in the Vent Manual
17Duct Air Pressure
- TP SP VP
- TP Total Pressure, inches of water gage
- SP Static Pressure
- Air moving inside ducts exerts pressure in all
directions, this is static pressure - VP Velocity Pressure
- V 4005 (VP)1/2
- Bernoullis theorem
- V air velocity, fpm
- Adequate pressure and velocity must be maintained
through duct system to keep airborne particles
airborne!
18(No Transcript)
19Air Cleaners
- Filters, collectors, settling chambers,
precipitators - Remove dusts, fumes, fibers, radioactive
particles, gases, vapors
20(No Transcript)
21Selection of the Filter
- Consider the properties of the contaminant
- Size, density, toxicity, solubility,
concentration - How clean must the exiting air be?
- May be regulated by federal, state, or local
limits - Costs
- First cost, operating and maintenance costs,
energy costs, space considerations, disposal of
collected contaminants
22Fans
- Placed near the end of the system
- Their selection and performance is critical to
the system - Two types of fans
- Centrifugal (or squirrel-cage)
- Wheel type, blades (straight, forward-curved,
backward-curved - Axial-Flow fans
- Like aircraft propeller
- Can move large volumes of air, but not a
pressures generally required in LEVS
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25Exhaust
- Allow release of air with minimal added pressure
- Straight-path is most efficient
- Rain cover over top impedes airflow
- Dont let aesthetic designs over-rule efficient
designs
26Evaluating LEV Performance
- Is it designed, installed, and operating
properly?? - Face Velocity
- Get an average face velocity
- Q VA
- Pitot Tube
- Measure pressure in a duct
- U-shaped liquid-filled tube comprising a
manometer (see Figure 7-6) - Look for discoloration at duct seams indicating
leaks or accumulations
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Example Duct Flow
- Designed velocity is 2000 fpm. Using a pitot
traverse, the average pressure is 0.11 in w.g. - Actual duct velocity 4005 (0.11)1/2 1328 fpm
- Measure velocity is much lower than designed
velocity. - Potential solutions?
30OSHA Standards
- OSHA has minimum ventilation rates for many
processes - Abrasive blasting, welding in confined spaces,
grinding, polishing, buffing, open surface tanks,
sawmills, spray finishing - 29 CFR 1910.94 Ventilation
- 29 CFR 1926.57 Ventilation
31Dilution Ventilation
- Uses
- Non-toxics (or very low toxics)
- Nuisance contaminants
- Combustible vapors (keep below LEL)
- LEVS not feasible
- Move contaminated air away from breathing zone
(see Fig 7-7)
32Figure 7-7. If relying on dilution ventilation
to control contaminants, placement of the inlet
and patterns of air movement relative to the
location of the worker are critical so that
contaminated air is drawn away from the breathing
zone of the worker.
33Dilution Flow Rate for Low Toxics
- Qdil (387)(pounds)(106)(Kmix) /
(MW)(t)(Ca)(d) - Qdil flow rate of dilution air, cfm
- 387 volume occupied by one pound of air at STP,
ft3 - STP 70F, sea level
- Pounds amount of contaminant evaporated, lbs
- Kmix mixing factor, accounts for air movement
and mixing - 1.0, perfect and rare 1.5 optimum, 1.5 2.0
good 2.5 3.0 conservative - MW molecular weight of contaminant
- t time for known amount of contaminant to
evaporate, minutes - Ca acceptable concentration, ppm
- d air density correction factor 1 _at_ STP
(conservative), 0.66 at extreme altitude and high
temperature