Realtime filtering: using the multivariate DFA to monitor the US business cycle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Realtime filtering: using the multivariate DFA to monitor the US business cycle

Description:

Real-time filtering: using the multivariate DFA to monitor the US business cycle ... Jeff Frankels Weblog : 'Who needs the NBER Committee anyway? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: marcw4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Realtime filtering: using the multivariate DFA to monitor the US business cycle


1
Real-time filtering using the multivariate DFA
to monitor the US business cycle
  • Forecasting the NBER-dating of US-recessions

M. Wildi (2009), M. Wildi and J-E Sturm (2008)
2
NBER-Datinghttp//www.nber.org/cycles.html
  • History
  • December 2007-
  • Peak announced in December 2008
  • March 2001-November 2001
  • Trough ann. in July 2003
  • July 1990-March 1991
  • July 1981-November 1982
  • January 1980-July 1980
  • November 1973-March 1975
  • December 1969-November 1970
  • April 1960-February 1961
  • NBER-dating substantially delayed (1 year)
  • Faster dating?
  • Prediction?

3
FAQ http//www.nber.org/cycles.html
  • Q Typically, how long after the beginning of a
    recession does the Business Cycle Dating
    Committee declare that a recession has started?
  • A Anywhere from 6 to 18 months. The committee
    waits long enough so that the existence of a
    recession is not at all in doubt.

4
Jeff Frankels Weblog Who needs the NBER
Committee anyway?  
  • Everyone in the real world has known that the
    economy has been in a recession for some time   
    Ivy Tower Eggheads Finally Figure Out What
    Everybody Else Has Known All Along. The implicit
    critique is that the committee takes too long
    after the event typically almost a year to
    make its declaration.  
  • One short answer is that our job is to be
    definitive, authoritative, but not fast.  We
    dont want to have to revise our dating...  We
    leave it to others  pundits, forecasters,
    consulting companies, financial newsletters, and
    so on to try to get there first.   We
    deliberately get there last.

5
http//www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/12/recess
ion_datin.html
  • The typical Econbrowser reader might not be
    surprised at the NBER decision -- but some others
    will. From a May 2008 WSJ article
  • "The data are pretty clear that we are not in a
    recession," Council of Economic Advisers Chairman
    Edward Lazear told a meeting of editors and
    reporters from the Wall Street Journal and Dow
    Jones Newswires.
  • "I would be very surprised if the NBER, looking
    back at this period, would date this as a
    recession," Mr. Lazear said. There are even
    indications that revised first-quarter estimates
    would be slightly stronger than 0.6. "The
    optimists seem to have been closer to right on
    that than the pessimists," he said.
  • Just to reiterate, that quote is from May 2008.

6
Priorities real-time setting
  • Fast and reliable recession alarms
  • Data is noisy smoothing-filter
  • Small real-time errors
  • Priorities
  • Emphasize the statistical efficiency
  • Emphasize data revision aspects

7
Established econometric tools
  • J. Piger
  • M. Chauvet
  • CFNAI (StockWatson)
  • ADS index

8
Recession dating by J. PigerData available in
September 2008
  • http//www.uoregon.edu/jpiger/us_recession_probs.
    htm
  • Historical recession probabilities
  • in the graph are smoothed (not real-time)

9
Revisions Data available in Sep. 2008, Nov.
2008, Feb.2009
10
2. Recession dating by M. Chauvet (data as to
Oct. 2008)
  • http//faculty.ucr.edu/chauvet/prob1108.pdf

11
Real-time and historical performances
  • Real-time filter filtered probabilities are
    delayed
  • Last recession is signaled first in Sep. 2008
  • There are a few missings
  • Additional revisions due to up-dating of data
  • Smoothed probabilities are very accurate
  • Recently (26.03.09), real-time estimates were no
    more available (only smoothed estimates)

12
3. CFNAI (Chicago Fed National Activity Index)
  • Stock and Watson (Journal of Monetary Economics
    1999).
  • Factor common to all of the various inflation
    indicators ... the CFNAI provides a useful gauge
    on current and future economic activity and
    inflation in the United States.
  • The 85 economic indicators production and
    income employment, unemployment, and hours
    personal consumption and housing and sales,
    orders, and inventories.
  • The two most prominent examples of monthly
    coincident business cycle indicators, to which
    policy makers and other economic agents often
    refer, are the Chicago Fed National Activity
    Index4 (CFNAI) for the US and EuroCOIN for the
    euro area (Breitung/Eickmeier 2005).

13
  • Data up to February 2008

14
  • Data up to March 2008
  • Revisions

15
  • Data up to March 2009

16
Real-time performance
  • Recession first discovered in March 2008
  • False alarms 2003
  • Threshold -0.7 possibly insufficiently tight
  • Revisions (Feb. and Mar. 2008)
  • Large data-set (85 time series)
  • Publication lag one month

17
4. Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions
Index
The ADS business conditions index is based on the
framework developed in Aruoba, S.B., Diebold,
F.X. and Scotti, C. (2009), "Real-Time
Measurement of Business Conditions," Journal
of Business and Economic Statistics
18
ADS-Index since Jan. 2000
19
ADS-Index (large) revisions
20
Data and characterization of recessions
  • Data as used by M. Chauvet
  • A simple indicator
  • Smoothing (band-pass filter)

21
Description Data
  • Lntc - total civilian employment
  • Publication lag 1 month
  • Lnip - industrial production
  • Lag 1 month
  • Lnm - manufacturing and trade sales
  • Lag 2 months (series is delayed by one month in
    our filter design)
  • Lnpa empl. on non-agric. Payroll
  • Lag 1 month
  • Lnpi pers. income less trans. paym.
  • Lag 1 month
  • The series are transformed as 100log(xt/xt-1)
  • As to 26.03.2009, they go up to 200902 (200812
    for Lnm)

22
Official NBER-characterization
http//www.nber.org/cycles.html
  • a recession is a significant decline in
    economic activity spread across the economy,
    lasting more than a few months, normally visible
    in
  • real GDP, real income, employment, industrial
    production, and wholesale-retail sales.

23
Data
24
Data as to 26.03.2009 ends in Feb09/Jan08 (after
Shift)
25
Smoothing the series bandpass 6-32
quartersDATA AS TO JAN.09
Band-Passed Series (Band-Pass 1.5-8 years) and
NBER-datings
26
Smoothing the series bandpass 6-32
quartersDATA AS TO MAR.09
Band-Passed Series (Band-Pass 1.5-8 years) and
NBER-datings
27
Summary
  • Levels of all band-passed series are low
  • All series
  • Deep troughs
  • Conclusion (characterization)
  • Compute aggregate
  • Band-pass aggregate and look for deep troughs
  • Equal-weights no revisions

28
Recession rules fixed vs. adaptive rulesData up
to Jan09
  • Historic rule anticipates recessions!!!
  • No False alarms or missings

29
Recession rules fixed vs. adaptive rulesData up
to Mar09
  • Large revisions of the (univariate) CF-filter!

30
Problems and a solution
  • Problem
  • Ideal band-pass filter is not real-time
    (symmetric filter)
  • Univariate CF-filter performs poorly
  • Data revisions
  • Solution
  • Compute an efficient real-time estimate of the
    band-passed filtered aggregate
  • Our methodological contribution MDFA

31
Real-time signalextraction
  • DFA (univariate)
  • MDFA (multivariate)

32
Filter-dimensions
  • Univariate methods Longitudinal Filtering
  • L-Filtering
  • Factor Models Transversal Filtering
  • T-Filtering (target endogeneous)
  • Multivariate Filtering
  • L- and T-Filtering Simultaneously
  • Complex Estimation Problem
  • Cointegration
  • Leads/lags
  • Filter before aggr. or aggr. before filtering?

33
Structure of the Estimation Problem
  • One- and multi-step ahead forecasts

34
Do the statistics fit the problem- structure
(intention of the user)?
  • Target good one- and multi-step ahead
    forecasts
  • Statistic
  • Estimation one-step ahead MSE
  • Identification Information criteria
  • Diagnostics
  • Traditional forecasting approaches are
    inefficient! (WS 2005, W2007, W2008)

35
Real-Time Multivariate Filter
  • Direct Filter Approach

36
Efficiency (Theorem 4.1, Wildi2008,
Wildi/Sturm2008)
  • The error term eT is smallest possible uniformly
  • Efficiency!!! ? main methodological difference to
    all other real-time estimation procedures
  • Customization match optimization criterion to
    problem-structure

37
Optimal (Efficient) Criterion under Cointegration
(Rank1)
  • Filter Restrictions are satisfied

38
Short reminder
  • If the filter error would vanish, then the
    corresponding rule would anticipate recessions
    without generating false alarms.
  • Of course, the filter error cannot vanish. But it
    can be reduced when compared to standard
    approaches (forecasting)
  • Efficiency ? methodological contribution in this
    particular (recession-dating) framework

39
Performances DFA (Forecasting)
  • TP-filters won NN3 (2007) and NN5 (2008)
    forecasting competitions (60 participants each
    time)
  • IIF and University of Lancaster
  • Monthly Macro- and Financial Data (111 time
    series) and daily financial data (111 time
    series)
  • Outperformed winner and runner-up of the
    prestigious M3 competition
  • X-12-ARIMA, Tramo
  • Forecast-Pro, Autobox
  • Exponential smoothing Simple, Holt, Damped
  • Neural nets, artificial intelligence

40
Performances DFA (Signal extraction)
  • Business Survey Data (KOF, FED, 2005)
  • X-12-ARIMA, Tramo/Seats
  • MSE-gain 30
  • Economic Sentiment Indicator (2006)
  • Dainties
  • TPs discovered 2-3 months earlier
  • Output-gap US- and Euro-GDP (2008)
  • CF
  • turning-points anticipated by 1-2 quarters

41
Empirical results
42
Error nomenclature
  • False alarm a recession is erroneously signaled
    in- between two consecutive recessions
  • Missing the end of a recession is erroneously
    signaled during an on-going connected period of
    recession
  • Delay the begin of a recession is not recognized
  • In contrast to a missing, delays are
    connected periods of false signals at the
    beginning of a recession
  • Lead the begin of a recession is anticipated
  • In contrast to a false alarm, a lead is a
    connected period of alarms closely located
    before the begin of a recession (anticipation)
  • Trade-off
  • False alarms and anticipations (loosening the
    alarm-rule)
  • missings and delays (tightening the alarm-rule)

43
BEGIN of Recessions (vintage Feb 2008)
  • Normal mean cannot be computed before Dec 1968
    (needs 10 years of data support)
  • Lnm is shifted by 1 month so that publication lag
    of real-time indicator is one month

44
BEGIN of Recessions (Mar. 2008)
  • Normal mean cannot be computed before Dec 1968
    (needs 10 years of data support)
  • Lnm is shifted by 1 month so that publication lag
    of real-time indicator is one month

45
Performance (Feb 2008 vintage vs. March 2009
vintage)
  • Better than CFNAI
  • faster
  • No false alarms nor missings

46
Summary
  • No false alarms nor missings
  • RELIABLE
  • Mean lead (publication lag included)
  • -3.5 months on whole sample
  • -7 months on most recent sample (3 recessions)
  • FAST

47
Revisions
  • Purely data driven (real-time filter)

48
Industrial Production
  • Large revisions or large errors/noise?
  • Small weight attributed by the filter (consistent
    with Wildi/Sturm2008)
  • September dip (see ADS index)

49
Manufacturing and trade sales
  • Small frequent and larger un-frequent revisions.
    Dynamics consistent.
  • Medium weight attributed by filter

50
Employment on non-agricultural payroll
  • Small revisions (last value)
  • Large weight attributed by filter

51
Personal income
  • Larger revisions (dynamics inconsistent)
  • Small weight attributed by the filter

52
Total civilian employment
  • Data affected by changes in population controls
    once per year last 5 years
  • Revisions (due to population controls) small and
    dynamics remain consistent
  • Large weight attributed by filter

53
Findings
  • Series with frequent large revisions are
    down-weighted by the filter
  • Expect that revisions due to the data are small
  • Overall revisions should be small
  • 2. priority

54
Filter revisions (Feb08, Oct08, Jan09 and Mar09
vintages)
  • Revisions are small because series with large
    revisions are
  • down-weighted by the filter
  • To be contrasted with alternative recession
    indicators

55
Revisions Feb. and Oct. vintages vs. final
(Dec.) vintage
56
Filter Diagnostics
  • Cycles, Amplitude- and Time-Shift Functions
    (Multivariate Real-Time Filter)

57
Amplitude Functions
  • Largest weight attributed to lntc, followed by
    lnm and by lnpa

58
Conclusion
  • Fast and reliable real-time indicator
  • Small(est possible) filter revisions
  • MDFA Efficiency
  • Insensitive to data revisions
  • Series with larger weights are subject to no
    revisions or only smaller revisions
  • Publication on CIRANO-website next month

59
Addresses
  • SEF web-page
  • http//www.idp.zhaw.ch/sef
  • Books, Working-book
  • Articles and Working-papers
  • Multivariate, Non-Linear, TP-Filters
  • Software
  • Projects
  • NN3 http//www.neural-forecasting-competition.com
    /NN3/results.htm
  • NN5 http//www.neural-forecasting-competition.com
    /results.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com