Title: Realtime filtering: using the multivariate DFA to monitor the US business cycle
1Real-time filtering using the multivariate DFA
to monitor the US business cycle
- Forecasting the NBER-dating of US-recessions
M. Wildi (2009), M. Wildi and J-E Sturm (2008)
2NBER-Datinghttp//www.nber.org/cycles.html
- History
- December 2007-
- Peak announced in December 2008
- March 2001-November 2001
- Trough ann. in July 2003
- July 1990-March 1991
- July 1981-November 1982
- January 1980-July 1980
- November 1973-March 1975
- December 1969-November 1970
- April 1960-February 1961
- NBER-dating substantially delayed (1 year)
- Faster dating?
- Prediction?
3FAQ http//www.nber.org/cycles.html
- Q Typically, how long after the beginning of a
recession does the Business Cycle Dating
Committee declare that a recession has started? - A Anywhere from 6 to 18 months. The committee
waits long enough so that the existence of a
recession is not at all in doubt.
4Jeff Frankels Weblog Who needs the NBER
Committee anyway?
- Everyone in the real world has known that the
economy has been in a recession for some time
Ivy Tower Eggheads Finally Figure Out What
Everybody Else Has Known All Along. The implicit
critique is that the committee takes too long
after the event typically almost a year to
make its declaration. - One short answer is that our job is to be
definitive, authoritative, but not fast. We
dont want to have to revise our dating... We
leave it to others pundits, forecasters,
consulting companies, financial newsletters, and
so on to try to get there first. We
deliberately get there last.
5http//www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/12/recess
ion_datin.html
- The typical Econbrowser reader might not be
surprised at the NBER decision -- but some others
will. From a May 2008 WSJ article - "The data are pretty clear that we are not in a
recession," Council of Economic Advisers Chairman
Edward Lazear told a meeting of editors and
reporters from the Wall Street Journal and Dow
Jones Newswires. - "I would be very surprised if the NBER, looking
back at this period, would date this as a
recession," Mr. Lazear said. There are even
indications that revised first-quarter estimates
would be slightly stronger than 0.6. "The
optimists seem to have been closer to right on
that than the pessimists," he said. - Just to reiterate, that quote is from May 2008.
6Priorities real-time setting
- Fast and reliable recession alarms
- Data is noisy smoothing-filter
- Small real-time errors
- Priorities
- Emphasize the statistical efficiency
- Emphasize data revision aspects
7Established econometric tools
- J. Piger
- M. Chauvet
- CFNAI (StockWatson)
- ADS index
8Recession dating by J. PigerData available in
September 2008
- http//www.uoregon.edu/jpiger/us_recession_probs.
htm
- Historical recession probabilities
- in the graph are smoothed (not real-time)
9Revisions Data available in Sep. 2008, Nov.
2008, Feb.2009
102. Recession dating by M. Chauvet (data as to
Oct. 2008)
- http//faculty.ucr.edu/chauvet/prob1108.pdf
11Real-time and historical performances
- Real-time filter filtered probabilities are
delayed - Last recession is signaled first in Sep. 2008
- There are a few missings
- Additional revisions due to up-dating of data
- Smoothed probabilities are very accurate
- Recently (26.03.09), real-time estimates were no
more available (only smoothed estimates)
123. CFNAI (Chicago Fed National Activity Index)
- Stock and Watson (Journal of Monetary Economics
1999). - Factor common to all of the various inflation
indicators ... the CFNAI provides a useful gauge
on current and future economic activity and
inflation in the United States. - The 85 economic indicators production and
income employment, unemployment, and hours
personal consumption and housing and sales,
orders, and inventories. - The two most prominent examples of monthly
coincident business cycle indicators, to which
policy makers and other economic agents often
refer, are the Chicago Fed National Activity
Index4 (CFNAI) for the US and EuroCOIN for the
euro area (Breitung/Eickmeier 2005).
13 14- Data up to March 2008
- Revisions
15 16Real-time performance
- Recession first discovered in March 2008
- False alarms 2003
- Threshold -0.7 possibly insufficiently tight
- Revisions (Feb. and Mar. 2008)
- Large data-set (85 time series)
- Publication lag one month
174. Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions
Index
The ADS business conditions index is based on the
framework developed in Aruoba, S.B., Diebold,
F.X. and Scotti, C. (2009), "Real-Time
Measurement of Business Conditions," Journal
of Business and Economic Statistics
18ADS-Index since Jan. 2000
19ADS-Index (large) revisions
20Data and characterization of recessions
- Data as used by M. Chauvet
- A simple indicator
- Smoothing (band-pass filter)
21Description Data
- Lntc - total civilian employment
- Publication lag 1 month
- Lnip - industrial production
- Lag 1 month
- Lnm - manufacturing and trade sales
- Lag 2 months (series is delayed by one month in
our filter design) - Lnpa empl. on non-agric. Payroll
- Lag 1 month
- Lnpi pers. income less trans. paym.
- Lag 1 month
- The series are transformed as 100log(xt/xt-1)
- As to 26.03.2009, they go up to 200902 (200812
for Lnm)
22Official NBER-characterization
http//www.nber.org/cycles.html
- a recession is a significant decline in
economic activity spread across the economy,
lasting more than a few months, normally visible
in - real GDP, real income, employment, industrial
production, and wholesale-retail sales.
23Data
24Data as to 26.03.2009 ends in Feb09/Jan08 (after
Shift)
25Smoothing the series bandpass 6-32
quartersDATA AS TO JAN.09
Band-Passed Series (Band-Pass 1.5-8 years) and
NBER-datings
26Smoothing the series bandpass 6-32
quartersDATA AS TO MAR.09
Band-Passed Series (Band-Pass 1.5-8 years) and
NBER-datings
27Summary
- Levels of all band-passed series are low
- All series
- Deep troughs
- Conclusion (characterization)
- Compute aggregate
- Band-pass aggregate and look for deep troughs
- Equal-weights no revisions
28Recession rules fixed vs. adaptive rulesData up
to Jan09
- Historic rule anticipates recessions!!!
- No False alarms or missings
29Recession rules fixed vs. adaptive rulesData up
to Mar09
- Large revisions of the (univariate) CF-filter!
30Problems and a solution
- Problem
- Ideal band-pass filter is not real-time
(symmetric filter) - Univariate CF-filter performs poorly
- Data revisions
- Solution
- Compute an efficient real-time estimate of the
band-passed filtered aggregate - Our methodological contribution MDFA
31Real-time signalextraction
- DFA (univariate)
- MDFA (multivariate)
32Filter-dimensions
- Univariate methods Longitudinal Filtering
- L-Filtering
- Factor Models Transversal Filtering
- T-Filtering (target endogeneous)
- Multivariate Filtering
- L- and T-Filtering Simultaneously
- Complex Estimation Problem
- Cointegration
- Leads/lags
- Filter before aggr. or aggr. before filtering?
33Structure of the Estimation Problem
- One- and multi-step ahead forecasts
34Do the statistics fit the problem- structure
(intention of the user)?
- Target good one- and multi-step ahead
forecasts
- Statistic
- Estimation one-step ahead MSE
- Identification Information criteria
- Diagnostics
- Traditional forecasting approaches are
inefficient! (WS 2005, W2007, W2008)
35Real-Time Multivariate Filter
36Efficiency (Theorem 4.1, Wildi2008,
Wildi/Sturm2008)
- The error term eT is smallest possible uniformly
- Efficiency!!! ? main methodological difference to
all other real-time estimation procedures - Customization match optimization criterion to
problem-structure
37Optimal (Efficient) Criterion under Cointegration
(Rank1)
- Filter Restrictions are satisfied
38Short reminder
- If the filter error would vanish, then the
corresponding rule would anticipate recessions
without generating false alarms. - Of course, the filter error cannot vanish. But it
can be reduced when compared to standard
approaches (forecasting) - Efficiency ? methodological contribution in this
particular (recession-dating) framework
39Performances DFA (Forecasting)
- TP-filters won NN3 (2007) and NN5 (2008)
forecasting competitions (60 participants each
time) - IIF and University of Lancaster
- Monthly Macro- and Financial Data (111 time
series) and daily financial data (111 time
series) - Outperformed winner and runner-up of the
prestigious M3 competition - X-12-ARIMA, Tramo
- Forecast-Pro, Autobox
- Exponential smoothing Simple, Holt, Damped
- Neural nets, artificial intelligence
40Performances DFA (Signal extraction)
- Business Survey Data (KOF, FED, 2005)
- X-12-ARIMA, Tramo/Seats
- MSE-gain 30
- Economic Sentiment Indicator (2006)
- Dainties
- TPs discovered 2-3 months earlier
- Output-gap US- and Euro-GDP (2008)
- CF
- turning-points anticipated by 1-2 quarters
41Empirical results
42Error nomenclature
- False alarm a recession is erroneously signaled
in- between two consecutive recessions - Missing the end of a recession is erroneously
signaled during an on-going connected period of
recession - Delay the begin of a recession is not recognized
- In contrast to a missing, delays are
connected periods of false signals at the
beginning of a recession - Lead the begin of a recession is anticipated
- In contrast to a false alarm, a lead is a
connected period of alarms closely located
before the begin of a recession (anticipation) - Trade-off
- False alarms and anticipations (loosening the
alarm-rule) - missings and delays (tightening the alarm-rule)
43BEGIN of Recessions (vintage Feb 2008)
- Normal mean cannot be computed before Dec 1968
(needs 10 years of data support) - Lnm is shifted by 1 month so that publication lag
of real-time indicator is one month
44BEGIN of Recessions (Mar. 2008)
- Normal mean cannot be computed before Dec 1968
(needs 10 years of data support) - Lnm is shifted by 1 month so that publication lag
of real-time indicator is one month
45Performance (Feb 2008 vintage vs. March 2009
vintage)
- Better than CFNAI
- faster
- No false alarms nor missings
46Summary
- No false alarms nor missings
- RELIABLE
- Mean lead (publication lag included)
- -3.5 months on whole sample
- -7 months on most recent sample (3 recessions)
- FAST
47Revisions
- Purely data driven (real-time filter)
48Industrial Production
- Large revisions or large errors/noise?
- Small weight attributed by the filter (consistent
with Wildi/Sturm2008) - September dip (see ADS index)
49Manufacturing and trade sales
- Small frequent and larger un-frequent revisions.
Dynamics consistent. - Medium weight attributed by filter
50Employment on non-agricultural payroll
- Small revisions (last value)
- Large weight attributed by filter
51Personal income
- Larger revisions (dynamics inconsistent)
- Small weight attributed by the filter
52Total civilian employment
- Data affected by changes in population controls
once per year last 5 years - Revisions (due to population controls) small and
dynamics remain consistent - Large weight attributed by filter
53Findings
- Series with frequent large revisions are
down-weighted by the filter - Expect that revisions due to the data are small
- Overall revisions should be small
- 2. priority
54Filter revisions (Feb08, Oct08, Jan09 and Mar09
vintages)
- Revisions are small because series with large
revisions are - down-weighted by the filter
- To be contrasted with alternative recession
indicators
55Revisions Feb. and Oct. vintages vs. final
(Dec.) vintage
56Filter Diagnostics
- Cycles, Amplitude- and Time-Shift Functions
(Multivariate Real-Time Filter)
57Amplitude Functions
- Largest weight attributed to lntc, followed by
lnm and by lnpa
58Conclusion
- Fast and reliable real-time indicator
- Small(est possible) filter revisions
- MDFA Efficiency
- Insensitive to data revisions
- Series with larger weights are subject to no
revisions or only smaller revisions - Publication on CIRANO-website next month
59Addresses
- SEF web-page
- http//www.idp.zhaw.ch/sef
- Books, Working-book
- Articles and Working-papers
- Multivariate, Non-Linear, TP-Filters
- Software
- Projects
- NN3 http//www.neural-forecasting-competition.com
/NN3/results.htm - NN5 http//www.neural-forecasting-competition.com
/results.htm