Relevance Feedback based on Parameter Estimation of Target Distribution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Relevance Feedback based on Parameter Estimation of Target Distribution

Description:

Department of Computer Science & Engineering. The ... Pic-Hunter ... Pic-Hunter. MARS. Relevance Feedback Based on Parameter Estimation of Target Distribution ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: richa6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Relevance Feedback based on Parameter Estimation of Target Distribution


1
Relevance Feedback based on Parameter Estimation
of Target Distribution
  • K. C. Sia and Irwin King
  • Department of Computer Science Engineering
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • 15 May
  • IJCNN 2002

2
Agenda
  • Introduction to content based image retrieval
    (CBIR) and relevance feedback (RF)
  • Former approaches
  • Tackling the problem
  • Parameter estimation of target distribution
  • Experiments
  • Future works and conclusion

3
Content Based Image Retrieval
  • How to represent an image?
  • Feature extraction
  • Colour histogram (RGB)
  • Co-occurrence matrix texture analysis
  • Shape representation
  • Feature vector
  • Map images to points in hyper-space
  • Similarity is based on distance measure

4
Feature Extraction Model
5
Relevance Feedback
  • Relevance feedback
  • Architecture to capture users target of search
  • Learning process
  • Two steps
  • Feedback how to learn from the users relevance
    feedback
  • Display how to select the next set of documents
    and present to user

6
(No Transcript)
7
Former Approaches
  • Multimedia Analysis and Retrieval System (MARS)
  • Yong Rui et al. Relevance feedback A powerful
    tool for interactive content-based image
    retrieval. - 1998
  • Using weight to capture users preference
  • Pic-Hunter
  • Ingemar J. Cox et al. The Bayesian image
    retrieval system, pichunter, theory,
    implementation, and psychophysical experiments. -
    2000
  • Images are associated with a probability being
    the users target
  • Bayesian learning

8
Comparison
9
The Model
  • Feature Extraction
  • I - raw image data
  • ? - set of feature extraction method
  • f - feature extraction operation
  • Images ? data point in hyper-space (Rd)
  • Problem scope is narrowed down to a particular
    feature

10
Feedback
11
Inconsistence in Feedback
  • User tells lies
  • Too many false positive or false negative
  • Conflict of feedback in each iteration by
    careless mistake

12
Resolving Conflicts
  • How to deal with inconsistent user feedback?
  • Maintain a relevance measure for each data points
  • Relevance measure 0 counted as relevant and use
    in estimation

13
Estimating Target Distribution
  • Users target is a cluster
  • Assume it follows a Gaussian distribution
  • Model a distribution that fits the relevant data
    points
  • Based on the parameterof distribution,
    systemlearns what user wants

14
Expectation Maximization
  • Fitting a Gaussian distribution function using
    feedback data points
  • By expectation maximization
  • Distribution represent users target
  • Expectation function match the display model

15
Updating Parameters
  • Estimated mean is the average
  • Estimated variance by differentiation
  • Iterative approach

16
Display
17
Maximum Entropy Display
  • Why maximum entropy display?
  • Reason fully utilize information contained in
    user feedback to reduce number of feedback
    iteration
  • Result near boundary images will be selected to
    fine tune parameters

18
Maximum Entropy Display
  • How to simulate maximumentropy display in
    ourmodel?
  • Data points 1.18 ? away from ? are selected
  • Why 1.18?
  • 2P(?1.18?)P(?)

19
Experiment
  • Synthetic data generated by Matlab
  • Mixture of Gaussians
  • Class label of data points shown for reference to
    give feedback
  • Dose it works and works better?

20
Convergence
  • Is the estimated parameter (mean and variance)
    converge to the actual parameter of target
    distribution?
  • Is the maximum entropy display correctly done?

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Performance
  • Compares to Ruis intra-weight updating model
  • Nearest neighbour search performed after several
    feedbacks (6-7 iterations)
  • Data points outside 2 ? are discarded in our
    algorithm
  • Precision-Recall graph

25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Future Works
  • Modification to learn from information contained
    in non-relevant set
  • To capture correlation in different features
  • Apply in CBIR system for performance measurement

32
Conclusion
  • Proposed an approach to interpret the feedback
    information from user and learn his target of
    search
  • Compares our approach with Ruis intra-weight
    updating method

33
END
  • Presentation file available at http//www.cse.cuhk
    .edu.hk/kcsia/research/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com