Trade Secrets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Trade Secrets

Description:

Some processes or inventions that are not patentable are still legally ... (directly relates to characteristics of quality of product: Pizza Hut) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ahay7
Category:
Tags: hut | pizza | secrets | trade

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trade Secrets


1
Chapter 5
  • Trade Secrets

2
Trade Secret Protection
  • May be statutory or common law
  • Importance of trade secrets (examples designs,
    special business process, customer lists, etc..)
  • Some processes or inventions that are not
    patentable are still legally protectable as
    trade secrets.

3
Legal Protection of Trade Secrets
  • Uniform Trade Secret Act gives specific
    standards for what constitutes trade secret.
  • Misappropriation (ex use of trade secret by
    former employee)
  • Economic espionage act federal criminal statute
    (originally intended for theft of trade secrets
    by foreign competitor) that covers trade
    secrets.
  • Find 2 examples of a trade secret case

4
Trade Secret Cases
  • http//inventors.about.com/od/mstartinventions/a/W
    indows_2.htm
  • http//money.cnn.com/2007/05/23/news/newsmakers/co
    ke/

5
Trademarks, service marks, and trade dress
  • Trademark word, symbol, or phrase used to
    identify a particular manufacturer or sellers
    products and distinguish them from the
    products of another.
  • Nike and the swoosh trademark
  • Coca-cola with red and white design
    distinguishing mark (trademark)
  • Business Vale of trademark importance in brand
    identification
  • Come up with 3 well known Trademarks

6
Samples of Trademarks
  • Fedex
  • DORITOS
  • LIFE SAVERS
  • Partial list of trademarks
  • http//www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/document
    s/appxi.htm

7
Trademarks, service marks, and trade dress
  • Protection under the law combination of common
    law and statutory law at both the federal and
    state level.
  • Classifications
  • Arbitrary or fanciful (no logical relationship to
    product/service Dell and Nike)
  • Suggestive (evokes characteristic of product
    /service Cisco
  • descriptive (directly relates to characteristics
    of quality of product Pizza Hut)
  • Generic (no protection computer is generic)
  • Marks can become generic over time (genericity)
    and lose protection ex. Thermos and aspirin

8
Acquiring rights to a trademark
  • Use of mark in commerce use of the mark for
    commercial purposes gives user the rights to
    protect the mark in the geographic region
    only.
  • Register mark with USPTO gives protection
    nationwide even if sales are limited to one
    geographic region

9
Preserving the Mark
  • Protection rights may be lost though abandonment,
    proper licensing, assignment, or genericity (mark
    became generic)
  • Nonuse for 3 consecutive years is evidence of
    abandoment
  • Bayer lost aspirin
  • Owner must police its protection and enforce
    the mark

10
Violation of Trademark Rights
  • Infringement
  • Using another mark or a substantially similar
    mark
  • Courts use a likelihood of confusion by the
    public standard
  • In order to infringe, marks muse be close in
    sound, appearance, or making so
    as to cause confusion
  • Trademark dilution
  • Federal trademark dilution act allows owner of
    mark to bring suit against infringer who either
    blurs or tarnishes mark
  • In order to be protected under the FTDA, the mark
    must qualify as famous
  • Example Xerox tennis shoes and IBM bicycles

11
Infringement Defense
  • Fair use (descriptive mark used in good faith for
    primary rather than secondary meanings). Ex
    windows used by a window manufacture in
    advertisement does not violate Microsoft's
    trademark
  • Parody (used as an obvious parody situation
    comedy shows etc..)
  • First amendment right

12
Remedies
  • Injunctive relief, monetary damages for
    tarnishment, profits gained by use of the mark
  • Treble damages available for bad faith cases
  • WHAT IS TREBLE?
  • Damages consisting of single damages determined
    by a jury and tripled in amount in
    certain cases as required by statute.
  • In dilution suit usually limited to injunctive
    relief

13
Trademarks in cyberspace
  • Domain names and virtual kidnapping
  • Cottage industry sprung up for registering famous
    domain names and then holding the mark owner
    hostage for large sums of money.
  • practice became known as cybersquatting
  • Abuses led Congress to pass the
    Anticybersquatting consumer
    protection act
  • Anticypbersquatting consumer protection act
  • Gives specific remedies and provides for civil
    penalties for those using domain names in
    bad faith

14
Uniform Domain Name Dispute resolution
policy
  • Useful for cyber entrepreneur because it is
    global and inexpensive
  • UDRP is an arbitration setting
  • Must prove the following
  • Domain name is identical or similar to mark
  • Party registering has no legal rights
  • Domain name was registered in bad faith

15
Emerging trends in cyberspace
  • Registering domain name with one or tow letters
    off the actual famous name with the intend of
    directing the user to a commercial website.
  • Congress passed the Truth in Domain Name Act to
    prevent typosquatting
  • Zuccarini case is a notorious typosquatter.
  • Lets look him up!

16
Cybersquatting list sample
  • Dow Jones Company
  • Nicole Kidman
  • Microsoft
  • Encyclopedia Britannica
  • Yahoo
  • Spiegel Catalog
  • Abercrombie Fitch
  • United Feature Syndicate
  • Budget Rent a Car Corporation
  • America Online. 

17
Metatags
  • Invisible code words programmed into HTML used by
    web designers to generate high rankings on a
    search engine hit list
  • Courts have tended to view metatags as fair use
  • Framing users may vies a second website within
    the frame of the first one. Can the use of
    links that contain a protected mark and a link to
    the mark owners website constitute blurring or
    tarnishment
  • Law is unsettled, but if consumer confusion
    results, mark owner may have a case for
    infringement against the framer

18
Global perspective
  • Trademark law treaty
  • Adopted in 1994
  • Adopts uniform procedure for dealing with
    trademark disputes
  • In non-TLT countries, regulations vary greatly.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com