Title: Ethical aspects and Patents in Lifescience
1Ethical aspects and Patents in Lifescience
- Peter R. Thomsen
- Manager Global IP Litigation, Corporate
Intellectual Property, Novartis - WIPO symposium on IP and Bioethics
- Geneva, 4. Sep 2007
2Overview
- Role of Patents and boundaries to ethics
- Example Human Stem Cells
- Other Ethical considerations in connection with
patents
3Role of PatentsWhat is a patent?
- A right to exclude others from doing or using
what is claimed in the patent - For a certain Country, for which patent was
applied in kept in force - For a limited time period (at least 20 years from
Filing Date, TRIPs Art. 33)
4Role of PatentsWhat is a patent not?
- A patent is not a positive right
- By having a patent the patentee is not
automatically entitled to use the patented
invention - Provisions of other laws may make it impossible
for patentee to use patented invention, e.g. - Health safety Law
- Environmental Law
- Restrictions of activities by Embryonic
Protection Law - Earlier dominating Patent
5Role of PatentsWhat are patents good for?
- Patent system gives incentive to invest in
Research and Development to promote - that more new inventions are made
- that those new inventions are not kept secret but
published - Reward for providing and publishing inventions
- Technical progress, e.g. huge investments to
bring a medicament with a new active ingredient
to the market
6Role of PatentsPatentability Criteria (see Art.
27.1 Art. 29 TRIPS)
- For Technical inventions
- Mere scientific discoveries, findings in nature,
are not patentable - Novelty
- Different from what is known
- Inventive/Non-obvious
- Not easily conceivable by a trained person
- Industrial applicable/Useful
- Enablement/ Sufficient Disclosure
- Disclosed in a way that a trained person can
repeat invention
7Patents and boundaries to EthicsRole of Ethics
in Patents
- Ethics are about what is regarded right or wrong
by a society - Ethical norms and values may vary from culture
group to culture group, or even from country to
country - Ethical norms and values may change over time
- Technology may progress over time
8Patents and boundaries to EthicsRole of Ethics
in Patents
- Implications for Patents?
- Differentiation between activities for which
patent protection will be sought and the act of
patenting those activities - Activities claimed in a patent may be ethically
problematic - However, patenting it does not add anything,
because the patent does not include the right to
perform the problematic activities
9Role of Patents and boundaries to ethics
Proposals/Conclusions
- Patent system cannot be the primary tool to deal
with ethical considerations for research and
commercial activities - Other institutions necessary to solve ethical
problems or to enforce ethical norms - Since ethical standards may vary, only those
inventions should be excluded from patentability
for ordre public or morality reasons, for which
there is a clear consensus in overwhelming parts
of society that the underlying activities are
contrary to ethical standards
10Ethics in Patent LawInternational Standards
- According to TRIPs, WTO-members may exclude from
patentability inventions in order to protect
ordre public or morality, provided that such
exclusion is not made merely because the
exploitation is prohibited by their law (see
TRIPS, Art. 27.2) - Illegality of an activity is not sufficient to
exclude it from patentability for ordre public or
morality reasons
11Ethics in Patent LawExample Biotechnological
Inventions
- EU-Directive on legal protection of
biotechnological inventions (Dir 98/44) - Parallel provisions in the European Patent
Convention (R. 23b-f, EPC1973) - Patents shall not be granted for
- Processes for cloning of human beings
- Processes for modifying the germ cell line
genetic identity of human beings - Uses of human embryos for industrial or
commercial purposes - Processes for modifying the genetic identity of
animals which are likely to cause them suffering
without anysubstantial medical benefitand
animals resulting from such processes
12Example Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hEC)
Patents on human stem cells?
Patents on human stem cells?
Patents on processes to cultivate cells?
13Example Human Embryonic stem Cells (hEC)
- Patents shall not be granted for uses of human
embryos for industrial or commercial purposes
(EU-Biotech Dir 98/44) - Patents on methods to cultivate or differentiate
hEC - Patents are NOT directed to uses of human embryos
- Patent Offices have taken different positions
- European Patent Office excluded from
patentability, because it was contended that hEC
are necessarily consumed in order to provide the
starting material for the claimed process
question is pending before the Enlarged Board of
Appeal (G2/06) - Patent Offices in Sweden, Great Britain and
Germany allowed patents, because carrying out
the process as claimed does not make use of human
embryos for industrial or commercial purposes
14Example Human Embryonic stem Cells
- Federal Patent Court in Germany revoked part of a
patent which was directed to a process to prepare
purified cells with certain properties wherein
the first step was cultivating human embryonic
stemcells - reasoning patents that do not claim but require
as a precondition to be carried out with human
embryonic stem cells which were derived by
consuming an embryo fall under the exclusion due
to uses of human embryos for industrial or
commercial purposes - Court did not address that human embryonic stem
cells may be legally derived from other sources,
e.g. existing embryonic cell lines and that such
research is substantially funded and promoted by
public institutions (e.g. EU-commission or DFG) - patentee appealed and case is pending before
German Federal Supreme Court
15Other ethical considerations in connection to
patents
- Patenting in Least Developed Countries (LDC)
- Swiss Pharmaceutical Industry has decided to
voluntarily abstain from filing patent
applications in LDCs
- Enforcing patents against a product of a third
party - If a third party sells the only effective product
that infringes a patent and neither the patentee
nor somebody else could provide a substitute
product - Serious ethical considerations how to enforce the
patent - Injunction may not be appropriate as this would
prevent access of patients to the product in need
16ConclusionsEthical aspects and Patents in
Lifesciences
- A functioning patent system is essential for
development of new pharmaceuticals and treatments - The Patent System is not suited to enforce
ethical norms - Ethical problems should be solved by other legal
instruments or institutions, e.g. Research
regulations, ethical advisory committees etc. - Since ethical standards and technology may
develop over time exclusions from patentability
for ethical reasons should be limited to clear
cases with society-consensus (e.g. reproductive
cloning of human beings)