On the Shoulders of Giants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

On the Shoulders of Giants

Description:

It combines classical mechanics with statistics and statistical mechanics. ... Richard Feynman thought that Lagrangian mechanics was too powerful a tool to ignore. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: phillip62
Category:
Tags: giants | shoulders

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: On the Shoulders of Giants


1
On the Shoulders of Giants
  • An Introduction to Classical Mechanics

2
  • If I have seen further it is by standing on the
    shoulders of giants.
  • Isaac Newton, Letter to Robert Hooke, February 5,
    1675English mathematician physicist (1642 -
    1727)

3
  • Quantum Mechanics (QM) is based on classical
    mechanics. It combines classical mechanics with
    statistics and statistical mechanics.
  • For native English-speakers, it is somewhat
    unfortunate that it uses the word quantum. A
    better English word which describes the thrust of
    this approach would be pixel.

4
Lights! Camera! Action!
  • 2nd Century BC
  • Hero of Alexandria found that light, traveling
    from one point to another by a reflection from a
    plane mirror, always takes the shortest possible
    path.
  • 1657
  • Pierre de Fermat reformulates the principle by
    postulating that the light travels in a path that
    takes the least time!
  • In hindsight, if c is constant then Hero and
    Fermat are in complete agreement.
  • Based on his reasoning, he is able to deduce both
    the law of reflection and Snells law (nsinQ n
    sinQ)

5
An Aside
  • Fermat is most famous for his last theorem
  • Xn Yn Zn where n2 and
  • On his deathbed, he wrote
  • And n arrgh! Im having a heartattack!
  • His last theorem was only solved by computer in
    the last 10 years

6
Now we wait for the Math
  • 1686
  • The calculus of variations is begun by Isaac
    Newton
  • 1696
  • Johann and Jakob Bernoulli extend Newtons ideas

7
Now we can get back
  • 1747
  • Pierre-Louise-Moreau de Maupertuis asserts a
    Principle of Least Action
  • More Theological than Scientific
  • Action is minimized through the Wisdom of God
  • His idea of action is also kind of vague
  • Action (todays definition)
  • Has dimensions of length x momentum or energy x
    time
  • Hmm p x or Et seems familiar

8
To the Physics
  • 1760
  • Joseph Lagrange reformulates the principle of
    least action
  • The Lagrangian, L, is defined as LT-V where T
    kinetic energy of a system and Vpotential energy
    of a system

9
Hamiltons Principle
  • 1834-1835
  • William Rowan Hamiltons publishes two papers on
    which it is possible to base all of mechanics and
    most of classical physics.
  • Hamiltons Principle is that a particle follows a
    path that minimizes L over a specific time
    interval (and consistent with any constraints).
  • A constraint, for example, may be that the
    particle is moving along a surface.

10
Lagranges Equations
11
Lagranges Equations
And I can add zero to anything and not change the
result
12
Expanding to 3 Dimensions
  • Since x, y, and z are orthogonal and linearly
    independent, I can write a Lagranges EOM for
    each. In order to conserve space, I call x, y,
    and z to be dimensions 1, 2, and 3.
  • So
  • Amusingly enough, 1, 2, 3, could represent r, q,
    f (spherical coordinates) or r, q, z
    (cylindrical) or any other 3-dimensional
    coordinate system.

13
Example Simple Harmonic Oscillator
  • Recall for SHO V(x) ½ kx2 and let T1/2 mv2
  • Hookes Law F-kx

14
Tip
  • The trick in the Lagrangian Formalism of
    mechanics is not the math but the proper choice
    of coordinate system.
  • The strength of this approach is that
  • Energy is a scalar and so is the Lagrangian
  • The Lagrangian is invariant with respect to
    coordinate transformations

15
Two Conditions Required for Lagranges Equations
  • The forces acting on the system (apart from the
    forces of constraint) must be derivable from a
    potential i.e. F-dU/dx or some similar type of
    function
  • The equations of constraint must be relations
    that connect the coordinates of the particles and
    may be functions of time.

16
Your Turn
  • Projectile
  • Go to the board and work a simple projectile
    problem in cartesian coordinates. Dont worry
    about initial conditions yet.
  • Now do the same in polar coordinates.
  • Hint

17
Introducing the Hamiltonian
  • First, any Lagrangian which describes a uniform
    force field is independent of time i.e. dL/dt0.

18
Introducing the Hamiltonian
  • Hmmm H for Hornblower or Hamilton?

19
Introducing the Hamiltonian
20
H is only E when
  • It is important to note that H is equal to E only
    if the following conditions are met
  • The kinetic energy must be a homogeneous
    quadratic function of velocity
  • The potential energy must be velocity independent
  • While it is important to note that there is an
    association of H with E, it is equally important
    to note that these two are not necessarily the
    same value or even the same type of quantity!

21
Making Simple Problems Difficult with the
Hamiltonian
  • Most students find that the Lagrangian formalism
    is much easier than the Hamiltonian formalism
  • So why bother?

22
Making Simple Problems Difficult with the
Hamiltonian
  • First, we need to define one more quantity
    generalized momenta, pj

23
SHO with the Hamiltonian
  • Big deal, right?
  • But look what we did
  • Lf(q,dq/dt,t)
  • Hf(q,p,t)
  • So our mechanics all depend on momentum but not
    velocity
  • Recall light has constant velocity, c, but a
    momentum which is phc/l !

24
The Big Deal
  • So if we are going to define mechanics for light,
    it does not make any sense to use the Lagrangian
    formulation, only the Hamiltonian!

25
That Feynman Guy!
  • Richard Feynman thought that Lagrangian mechanics
    was too powerful a tool to ignore.
  • Feynman developed the path integral formalism of
    quantum mechanics which is equivalent to the
    picture of Schroedinger and Dirac.
  • So which is better? Both and Neither
  • There seems to be no undergraduate treatment of
    path integral formalism.

26
Hamiltons Equations of Motion
  • Just like Lagrangian formalism, the Hamiltonian
    formalism has equations of motion. There are
    two equations for every degree of freedom
  • They are

27
Finishing the SHO
Hookes Law again!
28
Symmetry
  • Note that Hamiltons EOM are symmetric in
    appearance i.e. that q and p can almost be
    interchanged!
  • Because of this symmetry, q and p are said to be
    conjugate

29
Definition of Cyclic
  • Consider a Hamiltonian of a free particle i.e.
    Hf(p) then dp/dt0 i.e. momentum is a
    constant of the motion
  • Now in the projectile problem, U-mgy and for
    x-component, Hf(px) only!
  • Thus, px constant and the horizontal variable, x
    is said to cyclic!
  • A more practical definition of cyclic is
    ignorable and modern texts sometimes use this
    term.

30
Definition of canonical
  • Canonical is used to describe a simple, general
    set of something such as equations or
    variables.
  • It was first introduced by Jacobi and rapidly
    gained common usuage but the reason for its
    introduction remained obscured even to
    contemporaries
  • Lord Kelvin was quoted as saying Why it has been
    so called would be hard to say

31
Poisson Brackets
32
Kronecker Delta
  • di,k1 if ik
  • di,k0 if i?k

33
Back to Fish
  • Consider two continuous functions g(q,p) and
    h(q,p)
  • If g,h0 then h and g are said to commute In
    other words, the order of operations does not
    matter
  • If g,h1 then quantities are canonically
    conjugate
  • A look ahead we will find that canonically
    conjugate quantities obey the Uncertainty
    principle

34
Properties of Fish
35
Levi-Civita Notation
36
Levi-Civita Notation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com